long time guy wrote:
And so are you
you hate my guts
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Fred Hoiberg http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=106116 |
Page 4 of 4 |
| Author: | long time guy [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win Rondo's contract isn't up. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win Rondo's contract isn't up. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win Rondo's contract isn't up. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win Why is there a need to resign him? Rondo's contract isn't up |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: long time guy wrote: I didn't see much of the game and didn't check for the stat line. I'm sure he ran the team better than anyone else on it. He was a huge factor in gm 2. When it is all said and done they avg 108 points with him and about 92 without him. That is really all you need in terms of impact. The other guys on the team do not get the same looks without him. Its obvious.. Didn't reach a 100 in any of the games that he didn't play and look brutal during each of the 4 4th quarters. http://stats.nba.com/game/#!/0041600101/?RangeType=2&StartRange=21600&EndRange=28800 Why couldn't the Bulls get to a 100 points in any of the games that he missed? Rondo they better resign him or they will never win Why is there a need to resign him? Rondo's contract isn't up Then the Bulls are champions |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
And so are you |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
long time guy wrote: And so are you you hate my guts
|
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun May 07, 2017 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
Mike Brown is up 3-0 on the Jazz. Mike Brown |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun May 07, 2017 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
If Mike brown is up 3-0 on the Jazz then why didn't Fred Hoiberg sub in Lopez when the.Bulls were down 96-95 to the Kings during the forth quarter in November? Cannot with him. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Sun May 07, 2017 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
veganfan21 wrote: If Mike brown is up 3-0 on the Jazz then why didn't Fred Hoiberg sub in Lopez when the.Bulls were down 96-95 to the Kings during the forth quarter in November? Cannot with him. Thanks for the oh so familiar contribution. https://youtu.be/Mh3Kk5tZSmo |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon May 08, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Fred Hoiberg |
https://twitter.com/ChicagoSports/statu ... 2714147843 How wrong is this! |
|
| Page 4 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|