Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

LaVar Ball
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=106624
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Franky T [ Fri May 19, 2017 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  LaVar Ball

Put Kristine Leahy in her place for saying she doesn't like the word "baller" and wondering how he will market his brand to women. He basically told her to STFU and get back in the kitchen. Maybe she can find a safe space on Julie's podcast. Big Baller indeed.

Author:  Jbi11s [ Fri May 19, 2017 8:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

I thought it was funny. Leahy can find sports bras to fit her a-cups in a variety of different brands. The lack of women's apparel argument is kind of silly for a bottom of the barrel venture like BBB.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Fri May 19, 2017 8:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

She understands his last name is Ball right?

Author:  sjboyd0137 [ Fri May 19, 2017 8:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Denied

This guy is a cockstain to the Nth degree. Fucking stage parents. It's too bad his dad didn't pull out.

Author:  good dolphin [ Fri May 19, 2017 9:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Why do national shows give him a forum? There are many raving lunatic parents out there, why do they choose him?

Author:  likemarsen [ Fri May 19, 2017 9:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

good dolphin wrote:
Why do national shows give him a forum? There are many raving lunatic parents out there, why do they choose him?


Per Herd, LaVar Ball brings in high ratings...

Author:  Douchebag [ Fri May 19, 2017 9:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

likemarsen wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Why do national shows give him a forum? There are many raving lunatic parents out there, why do they choose him?


Per Herd, LaVar Ball brings in high ratings...

It's Fox Sports.

Did 7 people watch instead of the usual 5?

Author:  America [ Fri May 19, 2017 9:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

I really am beginning to like this guy. First he takes on the big sportswear brands head on and now he's throwing haymakers at outraged women.

Author:  Nas [ Fri May 19, 2017 10:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

good dolphin wrote:
Why do national shows give him a forum? There are many raving lunatic parents out there, why do they choose him?


Because he's entertaining

Author:  good dolphin [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Why do national shows give him a forum? There are many raving lunatic parents out there, why do they choose him?


Because he's entertaining


all of them are, if you can see it as entertainment. Walk over to a little league field this weekend and you can have a good laugh

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

I'll be shocked if this guy doesn't end up in Trump's cabinet.

Author:  spmack [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

America wrote:
I really am beginning to like this guy. First he takes on the big sportswear brands head on and now he's throwing haymakers at outraged women.

One of few times I agree with you.

Author:  Nas [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'll be shocked if this guy doesn't end up in Trump's cabinet.


He's doing a version of Trump.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Another woman who needs to be marketed to.

Author:  Nas [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'll be shocked if this guy doesn't end up in Trump's cabinet.


If not, he can do a Crossfire-style show on Fox with that insane Sheriff from Wisconsin. They can call it "urban brawl."

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Nas wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.


If it makes money, fine. But there's no obligation for private companies to do it out of "fairness."

Author:  Curious Hair [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Nas wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.

That's different than demanding that a business try to get you to spend money on them. People should want less marketing in their lives, not more.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Fri May 19, 2017 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

lol, she pulled a Senor at the end. "Oh, are you threatening me? Is that a threat?"

Author:  Nas [ Fri May 19, 2017 12:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.


If it makes money, fine. But there's no obligation for private companies to do it out of "fairness."


I agree. In most cases it will make money.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri May 19, 2017 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.


If it makes money, fine. But there's no obligation for private companies to do it out of "fairness."


I agree. In most cases it will make money.


Maybe in some industries, but I have a hard time believing that, in the vast majority of industries, the market would not have already responded if there was some "hidden" money to be made by marketing more to females.

Throwing out a softball for "the market"...

Author:  badrogue17 [ Fri May 19, 2017 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Nas wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Another woman who needs to be marketed to.


Women are buyers so it would be smart to market to them. Especially for athletic gear.


If it makes money, fine. But there's no obligation for private companies to do it out of "fairness."


I agree. In most cases it will make money.


Maybe in some industries, but I have a hard time believing that, in the vast majority of industries, the market would not have already responded if there was some "hidden" money to be made by marketing more to females.

Throwing out a softball for "the market"...
I don't see a lot of women wearing Air Jordan's or whatever the hot sneaker is these days.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri May 19, 2017 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Wait, is Kristine Leahy the chick Bernstein basically accused of only being employed because of her looks live during Super Bowl week?

Author:  Jbi11s [ Fri May 19, 2017 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

leashyourkids wrote:
Wait, is Kristine Leahy the chick Bernstein basically accused of only being employed because of her looks live during Super Bowl week?

Yes, but do further "research". She's not all that. Cute face and all, but there are a couple things missing. I feel betrayed.

Author:  Furious Styles [ Fri May 19, 2017 1:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

America wrote:
throwing haymakers at outraged women.

I would buy a 312player hoodie.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Fri May 19, 2017 1:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

leashyourkids wrote:
Wait, is Kristine Leahy the chick Bernstein basically accused of only being employed because of her looks live during Super Bowl week?

Yeah she didn't do her work in the trenches of the blogosphere first to earn her job.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Fri May 19, 2017 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

I thought that his remark that Jason Whitlock should only be engaged to "report on snacks" was priceless. And boy did the vacuous Leahy get SJW pissy. And look foolish trying to engage him.

I occasionally watch that network, but I turn it off each and every time the know nothing Chris Broussard or that asswipe Cris Carter come on.

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Fri May 19, 2017 1:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

Regular Reader wrote:
I thought that his remark that Jason Whitlock should only be engaged to "report on snacks" was priceless. And boy did the vacuous Leahy get SJW pissy. And look foolish trying to engage him.

I occasionally watch that network, but I turn it off each and every time the know nothing Chris Broussard or that asswipe Cris Carter come on.

My favorite part of this brouhaha is how despite the outrage from people inclined to hate on Ball or defend Leahy, no one is even trying to stand up for Whitlock.

Author:  Panther pislA [ Fri May 19, 2017 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

I am so glad now that Trump is President its ok to splay out and let one's balls get some air.

Finally.

Fuck that malcontent bitch. Toughen-up.

Author:  312player [ Fri May 19, 2017 6:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: LaVar Ball

America wrote:
I really am beginning to like this guy. First he takes on the big sportswear brands head on and now he's throwing haymakers at outraged women.




How did he take on the big sportswear brands? His stupid ass pitched everything to all of them and they wisely passed on this chump. So he found a chinaman to make his ugly apparel that won't sell.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/