It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
They may be shitty people, but damn they do have a just cause. There is a real problem in this country when 50+% of the land in most Western states (85% in Nevada) is controlled entirely by the Federal government with no local input.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/artic ... heir-case/

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39749
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Yes. The government does lie and does bad things to its citizens.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Fuck Cliven and his brood.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Beat them charges like Rocky

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
GoldenJet wrote:
Fuck Cliven and his brood.


Possibly the most uninformed thing ever posted here.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Fuck Cliven and his brood.


Possibly the most uninformed thing ever posted here.

Worse than deep breathing cures cancer?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?

because with the exception of small pockets such as National Parks, that land should belong to the local governments and states. It's a real problem when a state has 85% of its land owned and sealed off by the Federal Government.

As I've said before, the Sagebrush Rebellion is a noble cause

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Feds should have just opened up the place to a cow shoot and BBQ.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?

because with the exception of small pockets such as National Parks, that land should belong to the local governments and states. It's a real problem when a state has 85% of its land owned and sealed off by the Federal Government.

As I've said before, the Sagebrush Rebellion is a noble cause

Why though?

Federal government = bad doesn't convince me.

With how you mock certain states for mismanagement why do you want them to have it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?

because with the exception of small pockets such as National Parks, that land should belong to the local governments and states. It's a real problem when a state has 85% of its land owned and sealed off by the Federal Government.

As I've said before, the Sagebrush Rebellion is a noble cause

Why though?

Federal government = bad doesn't convince me.

With how you mock certain states for mismanagement why do you want them to have it?

The states and local jurisdictions will at least manage/utilize the land in a manner which benefits their constituents where the current situation is to have it controlled by a bureaucrat in DC who probably never visited the state in the 1st place. Local governments are more receptive to the needs and desires of their citizens than a giant DC bureaucracy.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Aren't these people alt-right Mormons who basically laid down their arms and surrendered when one of their own was killed by the FBI?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?

because with the exception of small pockets such as National Parks, that land should belong to the local governments and states. It's a real problem when a state has 85% of its land owned and sealed off by the Federal Government.

As I've said before, the Sagebrush Rebellion is a noble cause

Why though?

Federal government = bad doesn't convince me.

With how you mock certain states for mismanagement why do you want them to have it?

The states and local jurisdictions will at least manage/utilize the land in a manner which benefits their constituents where the current situation is to have it controlled by a bureaucrat in DC who probably never visited the state in the 1st place. Local governments are more receptive to the needs and desires of their citizens than a giant DC bureaucracy.

From what I've read the federal government does a pretty good job in general with grazing rights. The state would likely do no better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:39 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.


The feds could have brought in additional firepower if so desired. I think the potential negative publicity for escalating the confrontation likely outweighed tactical considerations. The overall strategy seemed to rely on surreptitiously manipulating legal mechanisms to punish the Bundys rather than doing so by overwhelming force--and thereby validating the Bundys anti-government rhetoric.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.


The feds could have brought in additional firepower if so desired. I think the potential negative publicity for escalating the confrontation likely outweighed tactical considerations. The overall strategy seemed to surreptitiously manipulate legal mechanisms to punish the Bundys rather than doing so by overwhelming force--and thereby validating the Bundys anti-government rhetoric.


Plan A is always better than Plan B.

The level of manipulation by the feds is over top here. Even for them.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Does this ruling mean I can cut firewood in Thatcher Woods?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:50 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
Does this ruling mean I can cut firewood in Thatcher Woods?


There is plenty laying on the forest floor due to the Democratic party allowing MANY of the Forest Preserve properties to go to shit over the last 50 years.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:56 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
N/A

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Last edited by Tall Midget on Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 4216
pizza_Place: pizza and subs
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.


The feds could have brought in additional firepower if so desired. I think the potential negative publicity for escalating the confrontation likely outweighed tactical considerations. The overall strategy seemed to surreptitiously manipulate legal mechanisms to punish the Bundys rather than doing so by overwhelming force--and thereby validating the Bundys anti-government rhetoric.



this is the biggest reason for an armed citizenry. they wouldn't have the firepower of a gvt, but it would be such an absolute mess on the world stage, a power will theoretically think twice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
hnd wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.


The feds could have brought in additional firepower if so desired. I think the potential negative publicity for escalating the confrontation likely outweighed tactical considerations. The overall strategy seemed to surreptitiously manipulate legal mechanisms to punish the Bundys rather than doing so by overwhelming force--and thereby validating the Bundys anti-government rhetoric.



this is the biggest reason for an armed citizenry. they wouldn't have the firepower of a gvt, but it would be such an absolute mess on the world stage, a power will theoretically think twice.

Don't we have more of an armed citizenry than the rest of the developed world?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
hnd wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

I'd also point to the 2014 stand-off as proof that well armed citizens can hold tyrants at bay.



How so? The "tyrants" in this instnace simply decided they didn't want to eviscerate the Bundys.

It seemed the Bundys and their supporters had enough fire power to make them think twice. Without them being there in force we would've had Ruby Ridge Part II. I welcome an armed citizenry using its 2nd Amendment rights as Madison envisioned to repel tyrants.


This, and the fact that the government had grossly under estimated the resistance that they would be meeting up with.


The feds could have brought in additional firepower if so desired. I think the potential negative publicity for escalating the confrontation likely outweighed tactical considerations. The overall strategy seemed to surreptitiously manipulate legal mechanisms to punish the Bundys rather than doing so by overwhelming force--and thereby validating the Bundys anti-government rhetoric.



this is the biggest reason for an armed citizenry. they wouldn't have the firepower of a gvt, but it would be such an absolute mess on the world stage, a power will theoretically think twice.

Whereas if there was government violence against an unarmed citizenry the world would instead just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
ZephMarshack wrote:
Whereas if there was government violence against an unarmed citizenry the world would instead just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

Pretty much yes, see Catalonia.

The government tramples on their rights, but escapes criticism on the world stage because they can contain the violence when they are the only party with the guns. If the protesters have guns, a stand-off can ensue and the government is faced with the prospect an armed conflict (which makes them look bad) or backing off and taking the loss. They took the loss here because the Bundys and their supporters were armed.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
Jbi11s wrote:
Don't we have more of an armed citizenry than the rest of the developed world?
Yes, and that's a good thing. It's exactly as Madison intended.

That 2nd Amendment preserves the 1st and all others.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:09 pm
Posts: 28
pizza_Place: Booby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Why is it bad for the government to own a lot of land?



Not only should the Federal Government own more land (and all the money), the Electoral College should be eliminated ensuring President Oprah. It's too late for me. I have been forced to suffer, a martyr to the tyranny of meaningless states like Utah and Nebraska and their deplorable residents.

_________________
I'm With Me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Whereas if there was government violence against an unarmed citizenry the world would instead just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

Pretty much yes, see Catalonia.

The government tramples on their rights, but escapes criticism on the world stage because they can contain the violence when they are the only party with the guns. If the protesters have guns, a stand-off can ensue and the government is faced with the prospect an armed conflict (which makes them look bad) or backing off and taking the loss. They took the loss here because the Bundys and their supporters were armed.

No we and much of the rest of the world wouldn't have cared about Catalonia regardless of how armed or unarmed they were unless it was relevant to our strategic interests. This isn't close to a parallel with the US or some kind of knockout argument in favor of guns that you keep trying to pretend it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bundy Family
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
ZephMarshack wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Whereas if there was government violence against an unarmed citizenry the world would instead just ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ?

Pretty much yes, see Catalonia.

The government tramples on their rights, but escapes criticism on the world stage because they can contain the violence when they are the only party with the guns. If the protesters have guns, a stand-off can ensue and the government is faced with the prospect an armed conflict (which makes them look bad) or backing off and taking the loss. They took the loss here because the Bundys and their supporters were armed.

No we and much of the rest of the world wouldn't have cared about Catalonia regardless of how armed or unarmed they were unless it was relevant to our strategic interests. This isn't close to a parallel with the US or some kind of knockout argument in favor of guns that you keep trying to pretend it is.

People would care about Catalonia if the protesters had arms to defend themselves. Then they would've been able to assert their rights. Let's see how easily the police would've closed polling stations if people had arms. I bet they would've held back. It's easy to trample on rights when the trampled have no means to exert force.

If the Bundys were unarmed, the Federal forces would've just moved in, beat them down, and hauled them away. That didn't happen though. The arms forced the government to stand down.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group