Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner

Seacrest wrote:

Regular Reader wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Regular Reader wrote:

Seacrest wrote:

Which is why I'm confused by your response.

What's to be confused about? I have problems with federal money going to private schools of any stripe, and absent places like the U of C that regularly subsidize tuition based on need or family relationship, private schools' tuition is ridiculous

Millions of dollars a year go to loans for private colleges and universities.

MANY don't take that into consideration when they state that public money should never go to private education.

But Brick and others (yourself included) have correctly brought that up for years. And I agree.

The larger question is, who would subsidize that level of borrowing on a private scale in order to help others pay for college?

And we all know the answer is no one. So, short of public funds being made available, there would not be any college for MANY.

think you're trying to create an argument that doesn't exist. Yes the government backs student loans, but like people have said, that is paid back with interest. If there is free money from the public for this, then could you let me know how to get some of that thrown my way when my check to the Dioscese is due next month?

Author:	Seacrest [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:25 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
Baby McNown wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Which is why I'm confused by your response. What's to be confused about? I have problems with federal money going to private schools of any stripe, and absent places like the U of C that regularly subsidize tuition based on need or family relationship, private schools' tuition is ridiculous Millions of dollars a year go to loans for private colleges and universities. MANY don't take that into consideration when they state that public money should never go to private education. But Brick and others (yourself included) have correctly brought that up for years. And I agree. The larger question is, who would subsidize that level of borrowing on a private scale in order to help others pay for college? And we all know the answer is no one. So, short of public funds being made available, there would not be any college for MANY. think you're trying to create an argument that doesn't exist. Yes the government backs student loans, but like people have said, that is paid back with interest. If there is free money from the public for this, then could you let me know how to get some of that thrown my way when my check to the Dioscese is due next month? SuperMario wrote: First off, nothing is free. But there are Pell Grants and subsidized non-interest loans as well. Grants don't have to be paid back at all. And they are given to people going to private colleges all of the time.

Author:	Baby McNown [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
We aren't talking about colleges.

Author:	Brick [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:00 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
I also would be fine if Pell Grants were only for public colleges.

Author:	denisdman [ Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:13 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
I doubt Rauner has any shot in the November general election. As such, I have been trying to figure out which of the Dems may be decent. It can't be JB. He just has slime written all over him. I think I would lean Biss, but the papers seem to love Kennedy. I look at JB, and I just see a fatter version of Blago. It's the hair.

Author:	Don Tiny [ Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=110685	Page 5 of 5

Author:	IMU [ Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:20 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
I've got Rauner in the primary, but I've also been looking at some of the Democrats. Biss would probably be the guy.

Author:	Caller Bob [ Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:22 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Jeanne Ives v. Benedict Rauner
STICK TO THE GAMEPLAN BRUCE!

Page 5 of 5	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/