It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 12:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Congrats on a well earned Nobel Prize for your work on mrna vaccines!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:49 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?



Too make people who took the vaccines feel better about themselves.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32293
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?


You’ve been trolled. The master retains his Nobel Prize in advancing the science of manipulating the weak minded.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?

The only person I ever know of that claimed the mrna vaccine I took was invented in 1989 was Dr. Robert Malone.

There are very few things in medicine or technology that haven't changed since 1989 so I don't really understand your point. Are you only willing to accept medical care that was unchanged since the 80s?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31473
pizza_Place: Milano's
Dr. Robert Moses Malone could be a good mult


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32293
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Bagels wrote:
Dr. Robert Moses Malone could be a good mult


Yes, for LTG to engage in NBA threads and to debate the politics of Covid.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?
Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?

The only person I ever know of that claimed the mrna vaccine I took was invented in 1989 was Dr. Robert Malone.

There are very few things in medicine or technology that haven't changed since 1989 so I don't really understand your point. Are you only willing to accept medical care that was unchanged since the 80s?

I distinctly remember you fending off concerns raised about the side effects of the COVID mRNA vaccine with cries of "this technology has been around since the 80's!" But now new iterations you admit are detached from the 1989 version of it are worthy of official praise and esteem from the scientific community? It just seems to me that you cannot appeal to the age of the tech to cast doubt on concerns about side effects, then marvel at the new iterations of it winning the Nobel, without at least admitting first that some new side effects may have cropped up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I distinctly remember you fending off concerns raised about the side effects of the COVID mRNA vaccine with cries of "this technology has been around since the 80's!"
It was done sarcastically to prove the point that Dr Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took as was claimed by others when convenient. I believe I claimed the vaccine that I took was more like 10 years old as that was when the initial trials began.


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
But now new iterations you admit are detached from the 1989 version of it are worthy of official praise and esteem from the scientific community? It just seems to me that you cannot appeal to the age of the tech to cast doubt on concerns about side effects, then marvel at the new iterations of it winning the Nobel, without at least admitting first that some new side effects may have cropped up.
You started from a failed premise so I won't hold this one against you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I distinctly remember you fending off concerns raised about the side effects of the COVID mRNA vaccine with cries of "this technology has been around since the 80's!"
It was done sarcastically to prove the point that Dr Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took as was claimed by others when convenient. I believe I claimed the vaccine that I took was more like 10 years old as that was when the initial trials began.


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
But now new iterations you admit are detached from the 1989 version of it are worthy of official praise and esteem from the scientific community? It just seems to me that you cannot appeal to the age of the tech to cast doubt on concerns about side effects, then marvel at the new iterations of it winning the Nobel, without at least admitting first that some new side effects may have cropped up.
You started from a failed premise so I won't hold this one against you.

That's really, really convenient for you, Rick. "I was being sarcastic when I said that wrong thing, what I REALLY said was..." :lol:


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
It is convenient that the things I actually said are the things I actually said.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
It is convenient that the things I actually said are the things I actually said.

But you actually said the thing I said you did about the vaccine tech being solid because it's been around since the 80's. Only now are you claiming that you were just being sarcastic, and that your REAL claim was that it was from 10 years ago and that's why it's safe.

That's just convenient, that's all. Good for you!


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=175&t=124625&p=3790079&hilit=mrna+years#p3790079

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Brick wrote:
It is convenient that the things I actually said are the things I actually said.

But you actually said the thing I said you did about the vaccine tech being solid because it's been around since the 80's. Only now are you claiming that you were just being sarcastic, and that your REAL claim was that it was from 10 years ago and that's why it's safe.

That's just convenient, that's all. Good for you!

It's ok to just admit you were wrong and don't have a photographic memory of every one of my posts. I made it easy for you to do so now by providing a post that proves that it was not a mystery.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
I'll also provide me saying it was tested for about 10 years.

https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=175&t=125875&p=3676339&hilit=10+mrna+trials#p3676339

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 42984
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

Dr. Robert Malone should be given the Nobel prize. He invented the vaccine.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:

:lol: You walked back from "more like 10 years old" to "about" 10 years old because you found your quote where you said the technology has been tested on humans "for over 10 years now".

But yes, you are correct that I misremembered your position as genuine when it was a troll, you actually believe the mRNA COVID vaccine is safe because it's been tested for over 10 years now, despite that chronologically being impossible. Are you going to send these Nobel recipients a bottle of something?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Douchebag wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

Dr. Robert Malone should be given the Nobel prize. He invented the vaccine.

AND I heard he hates Fauci! Someone should interview him!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
:lol: You walked back from "more like 10 years old" to "about" 10 years old because you found your quote where you said the technology has been tested on humans "for over 10 years now".
I don't see much of a difference there.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
But yes, you are correct that I misremembered your position as genuine when it was a troll, you actually believe the mRNA COVID vaccine is safe because it's been tested for over 10 years now, despite that chronologically being impossible. Are you going to send these Nobel recipients a bottle of something?
I made it clear many times that I didn't actually think the vaccine was invented in 1989. Seacrest even stopped calling Dr. Robert Malone the inventor since you know, he wasn't the inventor though his contribution was valuable.

I'll put you down in the camp that thinks the COVID vaccine was invented during a 2 week stretch in 2020. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
I'll put you down in the camp that thinks the COVID vaccine was invented during a 2 week stretch in 2020. :lol:


When was the vaccine you took tested on humans, again?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Bagels wrote:
Dr. Robert Moses Malone could be a good mult
Dr, how many vaccines should we get?

Fo Fo Fo

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 6:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-new-evidence-confirms-covid-19-vaccines-are-overwhelmingly-safe/
I look forward to taking more mrna vaccines in the future. Lots of potential and obviously very safe. If COVID wasn't over I'd even get a booster!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 10:01 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?


He still doesn't understand the difference between the technology, and the contents of the vaccine.

The board's most prolific troller is trolling himself at this point. Just enjoy it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?


He still doesn't understand the difference between the technology, and the contents of the vaccine.

The board's most prolific troller is trolling himself at this point. Just enjoy it.

We all now agree with me that Dr. Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28619
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?


He still doesn't understand the difference between the technology, and the contents of the vaccine.

The board's most prolific troller is trolling himself at this point. Just enjoy it.

We all now agree with me that Dr. Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took.

Disingenuous PRick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2023 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?


He still doesn't understand the difference between the technology, and the contents of the vaccine.

The board's most prolific troller is trolling himself at this point. Just enjoy it.

We all now agree with me that Dr. Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took.

Disingenuous PRick.

Huh?

Dr. Robert Malone today claims to be the inventor of mRna vaccines. Seacrest has also claimed he invented the technology.

I'm just happy the safe and effective(enough) vaccine I took is actually safer than I even expected.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group