Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

Isn't that most Nobel Prizes in the sciences? It's not just the initial invention. It's often about advancing technology or understanding.

Are you saying modern MRNA therapeutics are a new iteration of an older tech spec?

Of course the technology has advanced since 1989.

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?

Hm. Seems to me then if we're going to commend scientists for their contributions to new iterations of this older tech and release it to the masses, we should be prepared to admit these new iterations might have some quirks about them that weren't in the 1989 version of it? Is that fair?

Dr. Robert Moses Malone could be a good mult

The only person I ever know of that claimed the mrna vaccine I took was invented in 1989 was Dr. Robert Malone.

There are very few things in medicine or technology that haven't changed since 1989 so I don't really understand your point. Are you only willing to accept medical care that was unchanged since the 80s?

I distinctly remember you fending off concerns raised about the side effects of the COVID mRNA vaccine with cries of "this technology has been around since the 80's!"

But now new iterations you admit are detached from the 1989 version of it are worthy of official praise and esteem from the scientific community? It just seems to me that you cannot appeal to the age of the tech to cast doubt on concerns about side effects, then marvel at the new iterations of it winning the Nobel, without at least admitting first that some new side effects may have cropped up.

It was done sarcastically to prove the point that Dr Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took as was claimed by others when convenient. I believe I claimed the vaccine that I took was more like 10 years old as that was when the initial trials began.


You started from a failed premise so I won't hold this one against you.

It is convenient that the things I actually said are the things I actually said.

But you actually said the thing I said you did about the vaccine tech being solid because it's been around since the 80's. Only now are you claiming that you were just being sarcastic, and that your REAL claim was that it was from 10 years ago and that's why it's safe.

That's just convenient, that's all. Good for you!

Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

I'll also provide me saying it was tested for about 10 years.

https://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=175&t=125875&p=3676339&hilit=10+mrna+trials#p3676339

Dr. Robert Malone should be given the Nobel prize. He invented the vaccine.

You walked back from "more like 10 years old" to "about" 10 years old because you found your quote where you said the technology has been tested on humans "for over 10 years now".

But yes, you are correct that I misremembered your position as genuine when it was a troll, you actually believe the mRNA COVID vaccine is safe because it's been tested for over 10 years now, despite that chronologically being impossible. Are you going to send these Nobel recipients a bottle of something?

I'll put you down in the camp that thinks the COVID vaccine was invented during a 2 week stretch in 2020.

Dr. Robert Moses Malone could be a good mult

Why are we giving awards in 2023 for therapeutics technology that has been around for decades?

He still doesn't understand the difference between the technology, and the contents of the vaccine.

The board's most prolific troller is trolling himself at this point. Just enjoy it.

We all now agree with me that Dr. Robert Malone did not in fact invent the vaccine I took.

Disingenuous PRick.