It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:02 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
Don't forget that it was also another major victory for corporations over individuals!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Not Trolling

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: ...
what a frustrating game. ghosts and goblins is the unholy fuckness of NES Capcom gaming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32292
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
BR, this was quite a bit different than Citizens United and the corporation is an individual decision. In this case, it was only for very closely held family companies with established religious beliefs (companies and owners are one in the same). This decision does not apply to public companies.

In any case, we have such an expansive and intrusive government, and folks are pretty sick of it. This is simply a consequence of forcing private enterprises to pay for health care. The entire system is broken beyond belief. Ironically, the private employer health care system developed out of WWII government price controls. So sick. "Solve" one problem and create another.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32292
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
W_Z wrote:
what a frustrating game. ghosts and goblins is the unholy fuckness of NES Capcom gaming.


You are right. I have it on my Arcade Legends Machine. Very tough.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
BR, this was quite a bit different than Citizens United and the corporation is an individual decision. In this case, it was only for very closely held family companies with established religious beliefs (companies and owners are one in the same). This decision does not apply to public companies.
Why would it only apply to some companies? What is to stop Comcast or IBM from declaring they are God warriors too?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32292
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
BR, this was quite a bit different than Citizens United and the corporation is an individual decision. In this case, it was only for very closely held family companies with established religious beliefs (companies and owners are one in the same). This decision does not apply to public companies.
Why would it only apply to some companies? What is to stop Comcast or IBM from declaring they are God warriors too?


The decision would stop them. It said it only applied to very closely held family companies where the beliefs of the owners can be attributable to the company. In your example, Comcast, it has thousands of shareholders with divergent views.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
The decision would stop them. It said it only applied to very closely held family companies where the beliefs of the owners can be attributable to the company. In your example, Comcast, it has thousands of shareholders with divergent views.
If a large majority of the owners voted to call themselves a "Christian company" wouldn't it be the same thing?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Not Trolling


Actually it isn't. Just some levity.

Thanks for playing. You definitely have prooved the justice of dog shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: ...
SomeGuy wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Not Trolling


Actually it isn't. Just some levity.

Thanks for playing. You definitely have prooved the justice of dog shit.


return to starting point. challenge again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SomeGuy wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Not Trolling


Actually it isn't. Just some levity.

Thanks for playing. You definitely have prooved the justice of dog shit.


Thanks, pal!

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32292
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The decision would stop them. It said it only applied to very closely held family companies where the beliefs of the owners can be attributable to the company. In your example, Comcast, it has thousands of shareholders with divergent views.
If a large majority of the owners voted to call themselves a "Christian company" wouldn't it be the same thing?



It is the way they wrote the decision. It's not my opinion, it is the Court's.

"Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the majority, emphasized the ruling’s limited scope. For starters, he said, the court ruled only that a federal religious-freedom law applied to “closely held” for-profit corporations run on religious principles. Even those corporations, he said, were unlikely to prevail if they objected to complying with other laws on religious grounds."

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
W_Z wrote:
what a frustrating game. ghosts and goblins is the unholy fuckness of NES Capcom gaming.


One of the hardest and cheapest games ever made. Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
The decision would stop them. It said it only applied to very closely held family companies where the beliefs of the owners can be attributable to the company. In your example, Comcast, it has thousands of shareholders with divergent views.
If a large majority of the owners voted to call themselves a "Christian company" wouldn't it be the same thing?



It is the way they wrote the decision. It's not my opinion, it is the Court's.

"Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the majority, emphasized the ruling’s limited scope. For starters, he said, the court ruled only that a federal religious-freedom law applied to “closely held” for-profit corporations run on religious principles. Even those corporations, he said, were unlikely to prevail if they objected to complying with other laws on religious grounds."
That doesn't mean it will be interpreted that way going forward though. The door has been opened. The majority and minority opinions can say what they want but ultimately the precedent is set by the actual ruling more than that.

It's still amazing to me that he could write something like that. It's the most mind boggling thing about it. Even he seems to think the decision is pretty illogical since he's basically saying "This wouldn't make sense in any other application".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32292
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I agree. It's a tangled web. See in my world, the Federal Government would not force a private corporation to pay for employee healthcare. Thus, I would never have to decide between forcing a Mormon run company to pay for one of its employee's morning after pills. It is a total conundrum, and the more we let government dictate stuff, the more it will intrude on someone's "rights".

I don't know the answer anymore. The immigration thing has me baffled too. Syria and Iraq. How to deal with China. Climate change. I am struggling with it all.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SomeGuy wrote:
Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


Can I use this as my mantra?

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Krazy Ivan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


Can I use this as my mantra?


For you?

Anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SomeGuy wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


Can I use this as my mantra?


For you?

Anything.


Image

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: ...
SomeGuy wrote:
W_Z wrote:
what a frustrating game. ghosts and goblins is the unholy fuckness of NES Capcom gaming.


One of the hardest and cheapest games ever made. Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


never ever get the flame. get the knife. always.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
I agree. It's a tangled web. See in my world, the Federal Government would not force a private corporation to pay for employee healthcare. Thus, I would never have to decide between forcing a Mormon run company to pay for one of its employee's morning after pills. It is a total conundrum, and the more we let government dictate stuff, the more it will intrude on someone's "rights".
It's even tougher when you realize that the Democrats want total control of healthcare by the government, and the Republicans want none. Both of those options really suck.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
W_Z wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
W_Z wrote:
what a frustrating game. ghosts and goblins is the unholy fuckness of NES Capcom gaming.


One of the hardest and cheapest games ever made. Get the wrong weapon and it's game over.


never ever get the flame. get the knife. always.


I'm getting mad talking about it.

Sometimes it's just unavoidable and you're forced to switch.

Death soon follows.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: ...
and those fucking red devils...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
W_Z wrote:
and those fucking red devils...


Yes, swoop down when walk over just the right pixel or the last step on the latter.

No Gouda.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16485
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
denisdman wrote:
BR, this was quite a bit different than Citizens United and the corporation is an individual decision. In this case, it was only for very closely held family companies with established religious beliefs (companies and owners are one in the same). This decision does not apply to public companies.

In any case, we have such an expansive and intrusive government, and folks are pretty sick of it. This is simply a consequence of forcing private enterprises to pay for health care. The entire system is broken beyond belief. Ironically, the private employer health care system developed out of WWII government price controls. So sick. "Solve" one problem and create another.


Change you can believe in...

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
BR, this was quite a bit different than Citizens United and the corporation is an individual decision. In this case, it was only for very closely held family companies with established religious beliefs (companies and owners are one in the same). This decision does not apply to public companies.

In any case, we have such an expansive and intrusive government, and folks are pretty sick of it. This is simply a consequence of forcing private enterprises to pay for health care. The entire system is broken beyond belief. Ironically, the private employer health care system developed out of WWII government price controls. So sick. "Solve" one problem and create another.



Golf clap.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39753
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I agree. It's a tangled web. See in my world, the Federal Government would not force a private corporation to pay for employee healthcare. Thus, I would never have to decide between forcing a Mormon run company to pay for one of its employee's morning after pills. It is a total conundrum, and the more we let government dictate stuff, the more it will intrude on someone's "rights".
It's even tougher when you realize that the Democrats want total control of healthcare by the government, and the Republicans want none. Both of those options really suck.



Yes Brick. But in order to avoid the problem you have been discussing with this case you have to have one or the other. Government healthcare as a right or None. Everyone decided the status quo was no good anymore. An Denis is absolutely right. There was no employer healthcare before WW2. Due to wage/price controls employers invented it to entice the best workers over fixed wages. So then we have the insurance monster born (then the lawyers). Imagine that even in our lifetimes when you had a kid in a hospital she stayed 5 days and the dad went and paid a $600 bill cash before she left the hospital. I am going to guess an aspirin (before Tylenol) was not $125 either.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Yes Brick. But in order to avoid the problem you have been discussing with this case you have to have one or the other. Government healthcare as a right or None. Everyone decided the status quo was no good anymore. An Denis is absolutely right. There was no employer healthcare before WW2. Due to wage/price controls employers invented it to entice the best workers over fixed wages. So then we have the insurance monster born (then the lawyers). Imagine that even in our lifetimes when you had a kid in a hospital she stayed 5 days and the dad went and paid a $600 bill cash before she left the hospital. I am going to guess an aspirin (before Tylenol) was not $125 either.
You most certainly don't have to have one or the other.

Government regulation, and some filling in of the holes by the government for catastrophic care, while keeping the private insurance industry is perfect.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group