It is currently Tue Apr 30, 2024 8:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.
My opinion would be that if someone wants to give someone $1 million dollars to show up at their birthday party and they just so happen to be a big Alabama fan than Alabama deserves that player.

If it is money coming from the school then it needs to have some sort of limit on it to keep things equal between teams. It's not like a bunch of Bulls fans got together to give LeBron James $10 million to eat some tacos with him if he came to the Bulls. I think it's not going to be a huge amount of money to anyone but maybe the Johnny Football types.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40139
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77060
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If it is money coming from the school then it needs to have some sort of limit on it to keep things equal between teams.


But what does "from the school" mean? Obviously Alabama is always going to have more boosters than Illinois or Purdue. It's not equal right now when it's illegal. The worst it could be by legalizing it is still unequal. But like I said in my previous post, there could be some limits with the enforcement just more strict than it is now. For example, you get $10 million to pay your players. You get caught giving guys more and you get a five year death penalty- no football. That ought to take care of that.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.
My opinion would be that if someone wants to give someone $1 million dollars to show up at their birthday party and they just so happen to be a big Alabama fan than Alabama deserves that player.

If it is money coming from the school then it needs to have some sort of limit on it to keep things equal between teams. It's not like a bunch of Bulls fans got together to give LeBron James $10 million to eat some tacos with him if he came to the Bulls. I think it's not going to be a huge amount of money to anyone but maybe the Johnny Football types.


Okay I follow. I was more wondering how the schools paying out themselves might cause a mess where a large majority of it simply goes away. You said you are okay with that and I probably don't care that much really. There are sports players that are not johnny football types that know they have no chance at the pros and really need a scholarship. Some of them even at bog schools really take that seriously and care a lot.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


See my response to Brick. There are a lot more things involved when you start changing the system.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9955
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
shakes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Last week the NCAA suspended the likely top picks in next year's NBA and NFL drafts. The idiots are overtly trying to kill big time college sports themselves. And over relatively minor amounts to boot.



Don't follow football, but Wiseman deserved to be suspended for violating what is essentially the numero uno rule of college sports.

I do like the idea that Memphis knows that they're going to end up getting everything vacated on them, but they're going to play the kid anyway and just take their chances and make their fans happy.

Penny Hardaway doesn't give two fucks about the NCAA, and he has a university president who agrees with him. They're going for Curt Flood / Spencer Heywood status.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40139
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
pittmike wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


See my response to Brick. There are a lot more things involved when you start changing the system.


Under this mentality, slavery would have never been abolished. It stinks but "can't upset the apple cart".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


See my response to Brick. There are a lot more things involved when you start changing the system.


Under this mentality, slavery would have never been abolished. It stinks but "can't upset the apple cart".


That is pretty ridiculous for you to infer that from anything I have written. If you think changing the NCAA system is as simple and push button A and B and will have the certain result of C I can't help you.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16372
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
shakes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Last week the NCAA suspended the likely top picks in next year's NBA and NFL drafts. The idiots are overtly trying to kill big time college sports themselves. And over relatively minor amounts to boot.



Don't follow football, but Wiseman deserved to be suspended for violating what is essentially the numero uno rule of college sports.

I do like the idea that Memphis knows that they're going to end up getting everything vacated on them, but they're going to play the kid anyway and just take their chances and make their fans happy.

Penny Hardaway doesn't give two fucks about the NCAA, and he has a university president who agrees with him. They're going for Curt Flood / Spencer Heywood status.


Of course the University supports the coach who donates over a million dollars to the program.

But I do agree that they might as well play him as long as they can. If you did the crime and are gonna get nailed the wall for it anyway, you might as well try and enjoy some fruits from it while you can.

Memphis plays at Oregon tonight, that could be Wiseman's only game all season vs a good team. I'm definitely gonna be watching.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40139
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
pittmike wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


See my response to Brick. There are a lot more things involved when you start changing the system.


Under this mentality, slavery would have never been abolished. It stinks but "can't upset the apple cart".


That is pretty ridiculous for you to infer that from anything I have written. If you think changing the NCAA system is as simple and push button A and B and will have the certain result of C I can't help you.


It's revenue distribution to the underserved. I'm not sure why this makes you uncomfortable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16372
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
My opinion would be that if someone wants to give someone $1 million dollars to show up at their birthday party and they just so happen to be a big Alabama fan than Alabama deserves that player.

.



you're trolling, right Brick? You're too smart to think something this blatantly stupid.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If it is money coming from the school then it needs to have some sort of limit on it to keep things equal between teams.


But what does "from the school" mean? Obviously Alabama is always going to have more boosters than Illinois or Purdue. It's not equal right now when it's illegal. The worst it could be by legalizing it is still unequal. But like I said in my previous post, there could be some limits with the enforcement just more strict than it is now. For example, you get $10 million to pay your players. You get caught giving guys more and you get a five year death penalty- no football. That ought to take care of that.
It's two separate discussions. There is the money that comes from the school which basically means whatever checks they write to the players and how they pay it. It comes from ticket sales, tv contracts, merchandise sales, and it could be from donors. That should be uniform across the board at least for the big conferences.

However, you can't really stop, and probably shouldn't stop, a big time booster from paying someone $1 million to come to their birthday party if they really want to. It does put in a fair amount of imbalance if we assume that places like Alabama and OSU have boosters who are far more invested in the program than places like Illinois or Purdue but those players are already choosing Alabama and OSU in huge numbers and it is unlikely that boosters are going to be contributing huge money to all 25 recruits in every class.

Also, if the schools do provide some money from the contracts, it makes it less likely that a booster giving $10k will make a big difference to a recruit. They'll go to the place with the best chance to succeed like they do now. It may be Alabama still. It may be being an immediate starter at Illinois rather than sitting the bench and playing special teams at Alabama for 2 years.

College sports are basically built on inequality between schools. OSU and Alabama operate under a different structure than Illinois and Purdue and it creates a gap in terms of recruiting that is virtually impossible to make up. Illinois and Purdue do the same to NIU and Ball State. NIU and Ball State do it to whoever is below them. It's not an even playing field now and this probably just keeps that going.

If the cable bubble fully knocks out the big tv contracts then we have a different discussion but that's probably true regardless.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39754
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Caller Bob wrote:
It's revenue distribution to the underserved. I'm not sure why this makes you uncomfortable.


:lol:
pittmike wrote:
I probably don't care that much really.

_________________
Brick wrote:
Biden is doing a GOOD job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
shakes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
My opinion would be that if someone wants to give someone $1 million dollars to show up at their birthday party and they just so happen to be a big Alabama fan than Alabama deserves that player.

.



you're trolling, right Brick? You're too smart to think something this blatantly stupid.
Why does Alabama get players now? It's because they spend more money than most on coaches, facilities, and other things. What is the difference about some booster doing the same but direct assuming it was done legally?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 40139
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
For some here, this is clearly about keeping the "black man" in his place and poor throughout his college years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If it is money coming from the school then it needs to have some sort of limit on it to keep things equal between teams.


But what does "from the school" mean? Obviously Alabama is always going to have more boosters than Illinois or Purdue. It's not equal right now when it's illegal. The worst it could be by legalizing it is still unequal. But like I said in my previous post, there could be some limits with the enforcement just more strict than it is now. For example, you get $10 million to pay your players. You get caught giving guys more and you get a five year death penalty- no football. That ought to take care of that.
It's two separate discussions. There is the money that comes from the school which basically means whatever checks they write to the players and how they pay it. It comes from ticket sales, tv contracts, merchandise sales, and it could be from donors. That should be uniform across the board at least for the big conferences.

However, you can't really stop, and probably shouldn't stop, a big time booster from paying someone $1 million to come to their birthday party if they really want to. It does put in a fair amount of imbalance if we assume that places like Alabama and OSU have boosters who are far more invested in the program than places like Illinois or Purdue but those players are already choosing Alabama and OSU in huge numbers and it is unlikely that boosters are going to be contributing huge money to all 25 recruits in every class.

Also, if the schools do provide some money from the contracts, it makes it less likely that a booster giving $10k will make a big difference to a recruit. They'll go to the place with the best chance to succeed like they do now. It may be Alabama still. It may be being an immediate starter at Illinois rather than sitting the bench and playing special teams at Alabama for 2 years.

College sports are basically built on inequality between schools. OSU and Alabama operate under a different structure than Illinois and Purdue and it creates a gap in terms of recruiting that is virtually impossible to make up. Illinois and Purdue do the same to NIU and Ball State. NIU and Ball State do it to whoever is below them. It's not an even playing field now and this probably just keeps that going.

If the cable bubble fully knocks out the big tv contracts then we have a different discussion but that's probably true regardless.


Not true. Illinois and even Purdue have boosters willing to pay dollar in order to bring in recruits. The NCAA will not look the other way when they get caught doing it however.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9955
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Deon Thomas wrote:
Bruce Pearl can go fuck himself. That was a sweet Blazer for the era.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Not true. Illinois and even Purdue have boosters willing to pay dollar in order to bring in recruits. The NCAA will not look the other way when they get caught doing it however.
What point are you making here?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10572
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
While I completely agree the current model is unacceptable....I cannot imagine any way the NCAA can manage this without creating a mess.


This is really where I side if I had to choose. I can't see how they can possibly cover the wide array of players that are the NCAA with any sort of fairness etc. And without that you just inserted another level from which the same dirty stuff can be launched.

What is your guy's definition of "mess"


See my response to Brick. There are a lot more things involved when you start changing the system.


Under this mentality, slavery would have never been abolished. It stinks but "can't upset the apple cart".

That's not what I'm saying at all. The only thing they can do is just let the market pay the player and stay the fuck out of it. There isn't a chance in hell the NCAA is going to do that. They will meddle....they will find a way to make this an overcomplicated disaster.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 18960
I'm excited for the first time a booster pays a player more than their lottery slot to stay in school.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16003
pizza_Place: Salerno's
shakes wrote:

But I do agree that they might as well play him as long as they can. If you did the crime and are gonna get nailed the wall for it anyway, you might as well try and enjoy some fruits from it while you can.


It's Memphis, having wins vacated due to recruiting violations is a tradition, like any other:

Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Not true. Illinois and even Purdue have boosters willing to pay dollar in order to bring in recruits. The NCAA will not look the other way when they get caught doing it however.
What point are you making here?


Illinois' problem isn't that they lack the money to pay for top recruits. Their problem is that once they begin to do it at the level which allows them to be a national power the NCAA investigators will come a sniffing. Immediate red flags will be raised the second they bring in a top recruiting class. When it happens at Alabama and Ohio State it is expected. When it happens at Illinois someone will automatically assume that the recruit was paid off. At the Ohio States and Alabamas of the world everyone knows that this sort of thing is happening but it is rationalized as accepted practice. Saban will be hailed as a recruiting genius (even though all he is doing is paying a tad more than the other coaches) while the guy at Illinois will be ridiculed as a scumbag.

I hope that I explained it in language that you can comprehend and understand.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Not true. Illinois and even Purdue have boosters willing to pay dollar in order to bring in recruits. The NCAA will not look the other way when they get caught doing it however.
What point are you making here?


Illinois' problem isn't that they lack the money to pay for top recruits. Their problem is that once they begin to do it at the level which allows them to be a national power the NCAA investigators will come a sniffing. Immediate red flags will be raised the second they bring in a top recruiting class. When it happens at Alabama and Ohio State it is expected. When it happens at Illinois someone will automatically assume that the recruit was paid off. At the Ohio States and Alabamas of the world everyone knows that this sort of thing is happening but it is rationalized as accepted practice. Saban will be hailed as a recruiting genius (even though all he is doing is paying a tad more than the other coaches) while the guy at Illinois will be ridiculed as a scumbag.

I hope that I explained it in language that you can comprehend and understand.

So it had nothing to do with my post. Thanks.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Not true. Illinois and even Purdue have boosters willing to pay dollar in order to bring in recruits. The NCAA will not look the other way when they get caught doing it however.
What point are you making here?


Illinois' problem isn't that they lack the money to pay for top recruits. Their problem is that once they begin to do it at the level which allows them to be a national power the NCAA investigators will come a sniffing. Immediate red flags will be raised the second they bring in a top recruiting class. When it happens at Alabama and Ohio State it is expected. When it happens at Illinois someone will automatically assume that the recruit was paid off. At the Ohio States and Alabamas of the world everyone knows that this sort of thing is happening but it is rationalized as accepted practice. Saban will be hailed as a recruiting genius (even though all he is doing is paying a tad more than the other coaches) while the guy at Illinois will be ridiculed as a scumbag.

I hope that I explained it in language that you can comprehend and understand.

So it had nothing to do with my post. Thanks.


It actually did. Hopefully you are able to comprehend your own words.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
But what does "from the school" mean? Obviously Alabama is always going to have more boosters than Illinois or Purdue.
However, you can't really stop, and probably shouldn't stop, a big time booster from paying someone $1 million to come to their birthday party if they really want to. It does put in a fair amount of imbalance if we assume that places like Alabama and OSU have boosters who are far more invested in the program than places like Illinois or Purdue but those players are already choosing Alabama and OSU in huge numbers and it is unlikely that boosters are going to be contributing huge money to all 25 recruits in every class.
Also, if the schools do provide some money from the contracts, it makes it less likely that a booster giving $10k will make a big difference to a recruit. They'll go to the place with the best chance to succeed like they do now. It may be Alabama still. It may be being an immediate starter at Illinois rather than sitting the bench and playing special teams at Alabama for 2 years.
College sports are basically built on inequality between schools. OSU and Alabama operate under a different structure than Illinois and Purdue and it creates a gap in terms of recruiting that is virtually impossible to make up. Illinois and Purdue do the same to NIU and Ball State. NIU and Ball State do it to whoever is below them. It's not an even playing field now and this probably just keeps that going.


Illinois's problem isn't that they lack people willing to "invest" in the program. Illinois' problem is that increased investment brings increased scrutiny from the NCAA.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
So your point is what? Purdue and Illinois are going to pay as much as Alabama and OSU?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So your point is what? Purdue and Illinois are going to pay as much as Alabama and OSU?


Yeah. They have wealthy alums that are willing to contribute to their sports programs too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89067
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So your point is what? Purdue and Illinois are going to pay as much as Alabama and OSU?


Yeah. They have wealthy alums that are willing to contribute to their sports programs too.

They have some for sure. OSU and Alabama have a lot more.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
shakes wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Last week the NCAA suspended the likely top picks in next year's NBA and NFL drafts. The idiots are overtly trying to kill big time college sports themselves. And over relatively minor amounts to boot.



Don't follow football, but Wiseman deserved to be suspended for violating what is essentially the numero uno rule of college sports.


I'm not really in depth on this, but the NCAA cleared him in May and none of this was exactly uncommon knowledge.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group