It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
I'm going Rodgers.

Is that advisable? Foster, Rice or McCoy will probably be picked with the 1st 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89034
Location: To the left of my post
RGIII

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RGIII


Oh I'm sure someone in this league will draft him way too early. Can't wait.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Cam Newton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34796
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
I wouldn't be against taking Rodgers with the first pick. RBs get hurt way too much.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27450
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Tebow

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
Chus wrote:
I wouldn't be against taking Rodgers with the first pick. RBs get hurt way too much.


Thanks, Chus. If he's there, I'm doing it. Or taking Tebow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34796
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
I would take Tebow first. Then you have the lord on your side.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:33 pm 
Standard means Foster will go first. Take Rodgers or Brady. Whoever isn't taken at 2.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19926
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Chus wrote:
I would take Tebow first. Then you have the lord on your side.


One GM in my league took Tebow in the final round (16) as a joke....methinks he took Tebow way too early.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22706
pizza_Place: A few...
Baby McNown wrote:
Standard means Foster will go first. Take Rodgers or Brady. Whoever isn't taken at 2.


But is QB deeper than RB? I could draft rice or foster or Mccoy at 3 and grab best available QB or WR with the next 2 picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12555
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Peoria Matt wrote:
I'm going Rodgers.

Is that advisable? Foster, Rice or McCoy will probably be picked with the 1st 2.

In my league Rodgers went #2 in the same scenario. I had 3rd pick and gladly took Rice. I think going Rodgers isn't a terrible idea at all. You'll probably need to get a RB and WR in rounds two and three (or if Gronk or Graham is available, by all means take them), and then I'd top off with RBs and maybe go with several speculative RB options late. There are so many RBBC these days that I think if you hit three of the speculative ones, you'll likely at least get one serviceable RB out of it. QBs and TEs are the most consistent scoring positions year to year that I wouldn't call Rodgers a stretch at all with the third pick.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group