It is currently Fri May 03, 2024 8:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Another dumb statement
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 12751
Location: Lake of the Ozarks (whenever I can)
pizza_Place: Mauries Table
Although it would be difficult to pick the single dumbest comment uttered on the MNMS, his thoughts on the Mattel toy recall this morning would have to rank up there. Essentially Mike jag-bagged them for issuing a recall because the toys were found to contain lead paint. Why did North object to this you might ask? Because lots of stuff had lead paint in the past and people survived that just fine. Fred then chimed in with "maybe the parents shouldn't let their kids chew on the toys". The amazing thing is they think these are good points. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Posts: 5275
Location: In the hospital....
You have got to be kidding me. Glad I missed it....

_________________
SideshowBob311: "Sadly enough, I think we're the "intelligent" portion of the sports radio fanbase".
"I make fun of whoever sucks, including me"- Harry 11/30/07


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
You have to wonder if his stance would have been different if the lead had been in dog products. Remember, it seems that in his world dogs>people, especially children

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Phoenix, AZ
pizza_Place: grimaldis
Regular Reader wrote:
You have to wonder if his stance would have been different if the lead had been in dog products. Remember, it seems that in his world dogs>people, especially children


if mike north had the choice to send either oj simpson or mike vick to jail for life, he would pick a dog fighter over a person who killed 2 humans


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Posts: 5275
Location: In the hospital....
That is a sad state of affairs....

_________________
SideshowBob311: "Sadly enough, I think we're the "intelligent" portion of the sports radio fanbase".
"I make fun of whoever sucks, including me"- Harry 11/30/07


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:14 pm
Posts: 2255
And here we were complaining that Fred and Mike comment on children's issues when not being parents. I for one am glad that neither are parents, after reading this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:57 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Frontman wrote:
And here we were complaining that Fred and Mike comment on children's issues when not being parents. I for one am glad that neither are parents, after reading this.


I think both Mike and Fred chewed on a LOT of lead based paint when they were kids. That might explain a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33841
Pappy - When we'ze was kids we had led in everything. Dat never stopped us. I used to eat da led pencils as a kid. Look how I turned out.

Fred - You're right Pappy. Plus now the big thing is kids should eat healthy now. My Mom and Dad told me to eat whatever the hell I wanted. Sure I'm a fat ass today because of it. But I'll tell you what. I'm happy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 3021
Mike is just being a asswipe to draw atttention to himself, his 15 minutes is about up and he is deperate to do or say anything to fool someone into giving him a job.

Fred prove who he was when he teamed up with a sponser to lose weight and failed, that says it all about Fred a pthetic loser who has settled in to kissing the ass of a dope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27834
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
RodeoVann wrote:
Mike is just being a asswipe to draw atttention to himself, his 15 minutes is about up and he is deperate to do or say anything to fool someone into giving him a job.

Fred prove who he was when he teamed up with a sponser to lose weight and failed, that says it all about Fred a pthetic loser who has settled in to kissing the ass of a dope.


Yeah, probably because he was also a Dunkin' Donuts spokesman at the same time! That was a priceless crap on WYC several years ago...

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:29 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:33 am
Posts: 5039
RodeoVann wrote:
Mike is just being a asswipe to draw atttention to himself, his 15 minutes is about up and he is deperate to do or say anything to fool someone into giving him a job.


I respectfully disagree. I've heard Mike say a lot of stuff that made me do a double take...on and off the air. My observation is that he does not say stuff like this to draw attention to himself. He truly believes this stuff. These comments are consistent with a lot of stuff he has said in the past comparing kids today to his day and the "pussification" of kids today. I've seen crowds of people at Mike's remotes nod their heads in agreement at stuff like this. You can question his opinions, but I wouldn't question his conviction in believing what he says.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 3021
C2C, I agree that he believes most of what he says, but sometimes it just seems to me, that he just blurts stuff out for reaction and thats my issue. If he sounded like he did some research or had some first hand knowledge of some of his topics, then I wouldnt have a issue.

EVeryone can have a opinion, I dont have a problem with that either, but to just say some of the stupid stuff he does and to just say and not go into detail why he feels that way, its weak and comes off as a reason to cause a stir, but since he doesnt take calls on his comments and has a lap dog for a co-host, thats why I feel the way I do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Keeping Score wrote:
I created a new section / thread for all of Mike's dum statements.

Enjoy!!


That's more like it, KS. You may bet my vote yet.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Keeping Score wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Keeping Score wrote:
I created a new section / thread for all of Mike's dum statements.

Enjoy!!


That's more like it, KS. You may bet my vote yet.


I'm not a betting man Reason :wink:


I've had a couple cocktails.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 209
Location: Montreal, PQ
Deacon Blues wrote:
if mike north had the choice to send either oj simpson or mike vick to jail for life, he would pick a dog fighter over a person who killed 2 humans


Well, at least they're both black, so that would make it easier for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31519
pizza_Place: Milano's
RodeoVann wrote:
Fred prove who he was when he teamed up with a sponser to lose weight and failed, that says it all about Fred a pthetic loser who has settled in to kissing the ass of a dope.


I've noticed lately Mike is making fun of Fred being fat a lot more, both personally and by reading emails mocking Fred's weight, much like he would slip in emails mocking Annie. I guess since Annie's gone he has to direct his insults and put downs toward Fred now. Of course Fred offers no resistance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
SkippyTim37 wrote:
Deacon Blues wrote:
if mike north had the choice to send either oj simpson or mike vick to jail for life, he would pick a dog fighter over a person who killed 2 humans


Well, at least they're both black, so that would make it easier for him.

Dat's exaccly rite.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34796
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
What if it wuz a couple two tree whites involved with da dog fightin ?

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<ยบ)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:14 pm
Posts: 2255
Baku wrote:
RodeoVann wrote:
Fred prove who he was when he teamed up with a sponser to lose weight and failed, that says it all about Fred a pthetic loser who has settled in to kissing the ass of a dope.


I've noticed lately Mike is making fun of Fred being fat a lot more, both personally and by reading emails mocking Fred's weight, much like he would slip in emails mocking Annie. I guess since Annie's gone he has to direct his insults and put downs toward Fred now. Of course Fred offers no resistance.


Like North is a physical specimen of greek godlike build. :roll:

Mike and Mike might a ton of Yanks/Sawks/Bonds crap, but at least I can't get pissed over stupid commentary on how I'm a bad parent for not letting my kid chew on a lead toy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:42 am
Posts: 327
Location: Eufaula
SkippyTim37 wrote:
Deacon Blues wrote:
if mike north had the choice to send either oj simpson or mike vick to jail for life, he would pick a dog fighter over a person who killed 2 humans


Well, at least they're both black, so that would make it easier for him.


OJ hasn't been Black since King died! LOL Actually I think all animal lovers feel the same way Mike does. They feel animals deserve the same rights as humans because they can't speak for themselves! Okey Dokey!

_________________
Winning covers a multitude of sins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31519
pizza_Place: Milano's
Mike's comparison this morning of dog killing to deer hunting is a little flawed...He said there are too many deer, so it's OK to kill them. I agree deer are overpopulated. But, by the same token there are too many dogs too. Shelters have to kill them all the time. That's why Bob Barker always says help control the pet population, because if your dog has 10 puppies no one is going to be able to care for all of them. The difference is the dogs are killed in humane manner, not tortured by hanging, electrocution and drowning.

At least he conceded that the people defending Vick, like marbury and roy jones, if they want to participate in dog fights do it somewhere where it isn't a felony. At the crux of the matter there is no argument there- if it's illegal and you do it you deserve to be punished, no matter what the moral stance is. As a weed smoker, I understand this. I don't think it should be illegal, but at the same time I understand the risk I'm taking by doing it and if I'm punished I can't cry foul.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:26 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27834
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Did I hear Mike say that dog fighting is worse than rape or spousal abuse because "a lot of times women come back for more"? I know I heard him say that a lot of women "like to be urinated on". This is your guy, KS?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:59 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12123
Baku wrote:
Mike's comparison this morning of dog killing to deer hunting is a little flawed...He said there are too many deer, so it's OK to kill them. I agree deer are overpopulated. But, by the same token there are too many dogs too. Shelters have to kill them all the time. That's why Bob Barker always says help control the pet population, because if your dog has 10 puppies no one is going to be able to care for all of them. The difference is the dogs are killed in humane manner, not tortured by hanging, electrocution and drowning.

At least he conceded that the people defending Vick, like marbury and roy jones, if they want to participate in dog fights do it somewhere where it isn't a felony. At the crux of the matter there is no argument there- if it's illegal and you do it you deserve to be punished, no matter what the moral stance is. As a weed smoker, I understand this. I don't think it should be illegal, but at the same time I understand the risk I'm taking by doing it and if I'm punished I can't cry foul.


Yes, I've heard the deer hunting comparison, and it's doesn't fly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48777
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
BD wrote:
Yes, I've heard the deer hunting comparison, and it's doesn't fly.


I agree. That dog don't hunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group