A 59.2 completion percentage is not the same as 60.8 completions percentage. Go back and take a math class.

I said basically the same. Go back and take a reading comprehension class.

Ok, so you think 59.2% is prohibitively bad and 60.8 isn't. That's fine. Do you expect Cam Newton to be in the NFL next year? Do you think he should be? Is 52.9% prohibitively bad?

At any point you can just admit you were talking out of your ass and just don't like Kaepernick and we can stop.

Yes, clearly I am the only person in the world that thinks Colin Kaepernick is a bad QB. The only one, except oh every other single GM in the NFL that does not want him either. You are quite a savant here. Your posts = Forest Whitaker eye

Yes this past year, it was prohibitively bad for Cam Newton. In other years it wasn't.

Joe Flacco makes how much?

Joe Flacco makes how much?

The Jaguars will once again trot Blake fucking Bortles out there as starter this year. But yeah, Kaep isn't good enough to even be a backup.

Come on you have to know all back up spots don't get filled until they are sure they can't get even a slight starter possibility. He will latch on somewhere. Some here would rather have him back up Ben than the crap they have now.

Come on you have to know all back up spots don't get filled until they are sure they can't get even a slight starter possibility. He will latch on somewhere. Some here would rather have him back up Ben than the crap they have now.

Alot of teams also seek backup QB's that are content in their role and don't want to cause friction in the locker room. I know FavreFan likes to think this is fantasy football, like the fantasy land he lives in, but his knowledge of how actual teams are built, is well, prohibitive.

Alot of teams also seek backup QB's that are content in their role and don't want to cause friction in the locker room. I know FavreFan likes to think this is fantasy football, like the fantasy land he lives in, but his knowledge of how actual teams are built, is well, prohibitive.

It's not a fact. It's an opinion, and a baseless one. He played well on arguably the least talented team in football last year. He would almost certainly be on a team right now if not for the stupid Anthem controversy. I don't feel bad for him because he had to know this was a possible consequence, but yeah there's no evidence from last season that he's bad at football, and he's not unemployed right now because of football reasons.

Do you know what the word prohibitively means? Clearly not.

But let's give you the benefit of the doubt and say you do know what it means. Is Jameis Winston's completion % prohibitively bad? What's the major difference between him and Kaep's completion %?


You're pretty bad at this.

I dig her voice, very raspy. They purposely make her look ragged in the mini series (single poor mom), but then there are scenes where she is dressed up.

Have to admit that I look forward to the post-rape running on the beach flashback every episode.

The difference is that one player is in his second season and one was in his sixth. If it was Jameis' sixth season, he would have been benched for Glennon.

None?

You sure you want to step out that far?

I'll give you some stats that say he compares favorably to Brock Osweiler and Trevor Simien.

That's fine. Use Cam Newton then. Or Fitzpatrick.

Give them. Matt Moore is better. Yes or no. Stats not an option. Answer the Question. Fuck Cutler sideways on a stick.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/jets/jets-mailbag-no-love-kaepernick-benefit-0-16-article-1.3006484?utm_content=buffer77876&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=mmehta+twitter

Why sign Josh McCown over Colin Kaepernick? -- @greenflash78

As expected, Kaepernick's ongoing unemployment has been a hot-button topic. Some folks believe that the quarterback's political stances have precluded him from finding a job. Although it's naïve to think that these factors haven't played some sort of role, the football reality is that he's not a scheme fit for the majority of teams in the league. He also hasn't been a very good quarterback in the past three seasons. It's not shocking that teams aren't clamoring for a 29-year-old zone-read signal caller with an 11-24 record as a starter (and litany of injuries/surgeries) since 2014.

From an X's and O's standpoint, a coaching staff would have to tailor its system to Kaepernick's strengths. How many teams are willing to go all-in with a read-option system?

So, forget about starting. That's not going to happen. The next piece to this story centers on whether it makes sense for a team to have a backup quarterback who never evolved into a conventional pocket passer, on the roster. Why would you sign a backup quarterback who doesn't fit your scheme? (Coaches don't radically alter their offenses for a backup unless it's an emergency).

Geno Smith, for all his faults, is much better suited to be a drop-back quarterback in a conventional pro-style offense than Kaepernick. The Seahawks seem to be scheme fit. If Russell Wilson were to go down, I could think of worse backup options that Kaepernick. But Seattle isn't interested.

From a purely football perspective, Kaepernick, frankly, has nobody to blame but himself for the lack of interest in his services. He never developed into a pocket passer after catching the league off guard in his first couple seasons. He never evolved as a pocket passer like Wilson did. If you watched Kaepernick play the past few years, you'd know that he just isn't very good.

.