Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=128&t=106585
Page 1 of 2

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue May 16, 2017 6:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?



6h
M@ Spiegel @MattSpiegel670
1) Consider having the nuts to @ us.
2) If you're implying we protect him & don't challenge him, you listen poorly
Mark Potash @MarkPotash
Enjoying Joe Maddon's weekly appearance on the Spicer & Huckabee-Sanders Show on The Score. Entertaining!

Author:  Hatchetman [ Tue May 16, 2017 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

it was pretty sickening the softballs they give him. or it was the liverwurst. not sure 100%

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue May 16, 2017 6:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

FavreFan wrote:


6h
M@ Spiegel @MattSpiegel670
1) Consider having the nuts to @ us.
2) If you're implying we protect him & don't challenge him, you listen poorly
Mark Potash @MarkPotash
Enjoying Joe Maddon's weekly appearance on the Spicer & Huckabee-Sanders Show on The Score. Entertaining!


:roll: They both giggle like little schoolgirls when Maddon asked "why wouldn't he be?" to Kyle Schwarber leading off tonight. There was zero challenging going on.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue May 16, 2017 6:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

FavreFan wrote:


6h
M@ Spiegel @MattSpiegel670
1) Consider having the nuts to @ us.
2) If you're implying we protect him & don't challenge him, you listen poorly
Mark Potash @MarkPotash
Enjoying Joe Maddon's weekly appearance on the Spicer & Huckabee-Sanders Show on The Score. Entertaining!

:lol: :lol: owned by Mark Potash . And Meat can gtfo with that have the nuts to @ us bullshit. How many fucking people has he blocked on Twitter. Thin skinned bitch

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue May 16, 2017 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Yeah, that part is funny. Spiegel has to be the most insecure radio host ever in this city and he's trying to take that shot?

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue May 16, 2017 7:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

False alarm. Potash backed down and said it was a joke. Spiegel continued to be a little passive aggressive:
Image

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue May 16, 2017 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

And then there's this guy:
Image

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue May 16, 2017 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Potash's self-@-correction was kind of funny.

Author:  Beardown [ Tue May 16, 2017 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Local media wars are good for everybody.

Author:  Beardown [ Tue May 16, 2017 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Local media wars are good for everybody.

Author:  Beardown [ Tue May 16, 2017 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Local media wars are good for everybody.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue May 16, 2017 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Pooh, pooh, pooh...

Author:  billypootons [ Tue May 16, 2017 10:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

speigal is inching ever so close to the mike murphy spectrum of sensitive biotches

Author:  Curious Hair [ Tue May 16, 2017 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

billypootons wrote:
speigal is inching ever so close to the mike murphy spectrum of sensitive biotches

"have the nuts to @ us" is basically "face to face, over Twitter"

Author:  newper [ Tue May 16, 2017 11:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Local media wars are good for nobody.

Author:  redskingreg [ Wed May 17, 2017 11:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Can't Do It starting shortly.

Author:  Harvard Dan [ Wed May 17, 2017 11:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Potash was on Mully and Hanley this morning in the 7 o'clock hour and took some swipes at people sensitive to his comments...especially people in the media.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

I think that was David Haugh.

Author:  spmack [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Peoria Matt wrote:
I think that was David Haugh.

If that was David Haugh, he should be the last one to talk about sensitivity. He blocked me years ago for mentioning to him that Urlacher was giving him crap in a Waddle/Silvy interview.

Author:  spmack [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Peoria Matt wrote:
I think that was David Haugh.

If that was David Haugh, he should be the last one to talk about sensitivity. He blocked me years ago for mentioning to him that Urlacher was giving him crap in a Waddle/Silvy interview.

Author:  Harvard Dan [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

spmack wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
I think that was David Haugh.

If that was David Haugh, he should be the last one to talk about sensitivity. He blocked me years ago for mentioning to him that Urlacher was giving him crap in a Waddle/Silvy interview.



Whoops, yes it was. Still funny that all these hosts and writers are snarky about sensitivity.

Author:  Godfella [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed May 17, 2017 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Godfella wrote:
Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?


Mac.

I don't think it's close.

Author:  Hatchetman [ Wed May 17, 2017 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Godfella wrote:
Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?


I don't think Waddle gives a shit about anything.

Author:  Tad Queasy [ Wed May 17, 2017 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Godfella wrote:
Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?


Silvy.

Author:  312player [ Wed May 17, 2017 5:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Godfella wrote:
Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?




Parkins or Mac

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed May 17, 2017 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

312player wrote:
Godfella wrote:
Who do you think has the thickest skin in Chicago media when it comes to brushing off the criticism stuff?




Parkins or Mac


Parkins spends segments talking about the negative things people say to him about his show or his talent. I don't think that's thick skin.

Author:  good dolphin [ Thu May 18, 2017 8:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Beef...now I get it.

I'm amused.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 18, 2017 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

Curious Hair wrote:
billypootons wrote:
speigal is inching ever so close to the mike murphy spectrum of sensitive biotches

"have the nuts to @ us" is basically "face to face, over Twitter"

Potash should have replied with "Im always in the hallway"

Author:  torch! [ Thu May 18, 2017 9:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Spiegel/Mark Potash beef?

spmack wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
I think that was David Haugh.

If that was David Haugh, he should be the last one to talk about sensitivity. He blocked me years ago for mentioning to him that Urlacher was giving him crap in a Waddle/Silvy interview.


Spiegel actually has done this to me, he's one to talk. I've had 2 twitter accounts and he's had me blocked on both. The first time he made some comment about Yu Darvish throwing harder compared to what we expect from Japanese pitchers and as a joke I told him to stop stereotyping; he not only blocked me, he reported me to twitter (i got a notification from twitter about the report) and he replied to me after blocking so I couldn't see it, lame move. The 2nd time it was for disagreeing with him on Hendricks being removed too early in the World Series. This is the guy who says "@ me next time?"

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/