Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=132&t=106855
Page 14 of 17

Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

My NFL pre draft analysis show would have produced more than 13 pages, just sayin.

Author:  IMU [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

But would it have produced 14?

Author:  Nas [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Looks like Leash was wrong about 80 pages.

Author:  Matches Malone [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Nas wrote:
That color you see at night when you close your eyes is perfection.

Ice-T wrote:
We all black when the lights go out.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Well, this got interesting.

Full disclosure, I received a PM from Chus...which is not something that is completely rare. Mult or not, I thought it was in poor taste to post it on the board though I was not surprised the link made it to the board.

Whatever though. Its all done and over with, and we can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. I think there are some lessons to be learned by everybody involved.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

IMU wrote:
Bigfan deleted my posts. You three delete my posts.

tbh, I cannot even see where the similarities start and where they end.

Racist.

Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Yeah, kept wondering why the podcast thread just got longer and longer. Sorry that I checked why.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

KDdidit wrote:
Yeah, kept wondering why the podcast thread just got longer and longer. Sorry that I checked why.


_________ sympathizer!

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Okay, I'll ask: No official punishment for Chus and FF now that they have both admitted to doxxing another member? Has there been any official word from the triumvirate letting both know that doing so wasn't acceptable? Which I guess begs the question: Is doxxing other members acceptable behavior?

Or are we just going to hope nobody learns that doxxing is an effective tool to deal with board vendettas? And furthermore that said doxxing won't result in any substantive punishment?

Author:  Chus [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

You are definitely an uninterested third party.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Okay, I'll ask: No official punishment for Chus and FF now that they have both admitted to doxxing another member? Has there been any official word from the triumvirate letting both know that doing so wasn't acceptable? Which I guess begs the question: Is doxxing other members acceptable behavior?

Or are we just going to hope nobody learns that doxxing is an effective tool to deal with board vendettas? And furthermore that said doxxing won't result in any substantive punishment?

:lol:

Author:  Brick [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Okay, I'll ask: No official punishment for Chus and FF now that they have both admitted to doxxing another member? Has there been any official word from the triumvirate letting both know that doing so wasn't acceptable? Which I guess begs the question: Is doxxing other members acceptable behavior?

Or are we just going to hope nobody learns that doxxing is an effective tool to deal with board vendettas? And furthermore that said doxxing won't result in any substantive punishment?

They are banned with credit for time served.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

Author:  Chus [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.


Maybe nobody cares about it as much as you do. Have you thought about that? Let us know when you make a decision. We are waiting with bated breath.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

It's not really complicated. I'm not an admin but it doesn't take a lot of brain power to surmise their stance. It was deleted for a reason. I'm sure if there were repeated attempts to post the link then banning would be an option. Not sure what you're looking for beyond that

Author:  Chus [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Hopefully this thread dies down soon, so JLN can get back to his regularly scheduled stalking of Julie.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

Not sure what you're looking for beyond that


INTERNET. JUSTICE.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

It's not really complicated. I'm not an admin but it doesn't take a lot of brain power to surmise their stance. It was deleted for a reason. I'm sure if there were repeated attempts to post the link then banning would be an option. Not sure what you're looking for beyond that


An official stance from one of or all of the board's three capos on a practice that is rather unique to our type of community would be nice, especially considering MANY board members appeared concerned at its commission. I mean, shit, anything that brings SpiralStairs and I together should be cause for alarm.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

It's not really complicated. I'm not an admin but it doesn't take a lot of brain power to surmise their stance. It was deleted for a reason. I'm sure if there were repeated attempts to post the link then banning would be an option. Not sure what you're looking for beyond that


An official stance from one of or all of the board's three capos on a practice that is rather unique to our type of community would be nice, especially considering MANY board members appeared concerned at its commission.

Deleting the post and then the entire thread that contained the link is a pretty clear statement on where they stand on it.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.

It's not really complicated. I'm not an admin but it doesn't take a lot of brain power to surmise their stance. It was deleted for a reason. I'm sure if there were repeated attempts to post the link then banning would be an option. Not sure what you're looking for beyond that


An official stance from one of or all of the board's three capos on a practice that is rather unique to our type of community would be nice, especially considering MANY board members appeared concerned at its commission. I mean, shit, anything that brings SpiralStairs and I together should be cause for alarm.

:lol:

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Chus wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.


Maybe nobody cares about it as much as you do. Have you thought about that?


Yes, I have. Then I see the amount of posts on the subject that aren't from me or in response to me. I then disregard the notion.

Author:  Chus [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

I was dragged through the streets like Mussolini, and that's not enough for JLN. But, it's definitely not personal.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Their silence speaks VOLUMES.

Author:  Chus [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.


Maybe nobody cares about it as much as you do. Have you thought about that?


Yes, I have. Then I see the amount of posts on the subject that aren't from me or in response to me. I then disregard the notion.


You are the only person asking for more "justice".

You seem to have this weird thing where you think that just because you think something, everybody else does, too.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Chus wrote:
I was dragged through the streets like Mussolini, and that's not enough for JLN. But, it's definitely not personal.


If only Mussolini had Darkside to blindly support him :P

Author:  Furious Styles [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Chus wrote:
I was dragged through the streets like Mussolini


Il Chuce

Author:  Beerdown [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

It's like this. No one likes chas. No one. Then someone finds a link on chas. That link is sent around. Everyone knows the admins are close with everyone. Real close. It must have been Seacrest who first axed it. Cuz he likes chas. But Nas stepped in. He hates chas. So Nas protected Favrefan. Then JORR pushed Favrefan to confess. Pushed him nicely. Cuz he likes him. JORR thought this would appease the masses. But it didn't. This shit lives on. And on.

That's how it went down.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Beerdown wrote:
It's like this. No one likes chas. No one. Then someone finds a link on chas. That link is sent around. Everyone knows the admins are close with everyone. Real close. It must have been Seacrest who first axed it. Cuz he likes chas. But Nas stepped in. He hates chas. So Nas protected Favrefan. Then JORR pushed Favrefan to confess. Pushed him nicely. Cuz he likes him. JORR thought this would appease the masses. But it didn't. This shit lives on. And on.

That's how it went down.


Not one reference to Drink or Goff.

SAD!

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

Chus wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Chus wrote:
You are definitely an uninterested third party.


As I said, I became interested once I learned all of the facts, and made a decision. An arbitrator is uninterested right up until the point they make a decision, follow?

And I personally would find it helpful to know what the powers-that-be have to say about two members of the board doxxing another, albeit shittier, member of the board.

I mean, besides Nas cracking jokes.


Maybe nobody cares about it as much as you do. Have you thought about that?


Yes, I have. Then I see the amount of posts on the subject that aren't from me or in response to me. I then disregard the notion.


You are the only person asking for more "justice".

You seem to have this weird thing where you think that just because you think something, everybody else does, too.


It may seem that way, but I'm actually not, I just wanted to know if it was on the table/considered, purely as a means to see how the triumvirate felt about members doxxing one another, as this is really my first time seeing it happen on the board.

I'm not going to be butthurt if you're not punished, but I would like to know what is and is not acceptable to The Suits. And frankly would appreciate a definitive "Yeah, don't do that again, anyone" from them.

Author:  badrogue17 [ Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 018 - Dude, Where's My Car Keys

JORR and Seacrest would be against doxxing . Nas would be against it only if it were someone he likes .

Page 14 of 17 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/