Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=132&t=107012
Page 4 of 6

Author:  Don Tiny [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I think I should get hazard pay for convincing Parkins that we aren't all crazy.

Not sure it's a great idea to lie to him on the first date.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:


You made the big time.

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:



You're the front runner for Score Search IV!

Author:  denisdman [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:


Paraphasing Parkins, "Dr Ken, I don't even know if you're a doctor."

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:



You're the front runner for Score Search IV!


I'm sure. I broadcast for free.

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:



You're the front runner for Score Search IV!


I'm sure. I broadcast for free.



HE'S ON THE TEAM FOR NEXT YEAR!

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:



You're the front runner for Score Search IV!


I'm sure. I broadcast for free.



HE'S ON THE TEAM FOR NEXT YEAR!


:lol:

That's a great drop.

Author:  Beerdown [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:


This confirms it. I'm right again. The light will not shine on Drinky, Larry and Goff on this podcast. The light cannot shine on them. Can't do it.

I'll go it alone.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:
Don't forget about us when you get famous.

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:
Don't forget about us when you get famous.


He will.

Author:  RFDC [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Parkins & Dr. Ken show....drive time on the SCORE.

Can't wait

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Mitch Rosen is now following me on Twitter. :lol:
Don't forget about us when you get famous.


I forgot about you a long time ago.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Good and interesting episode. I agree Parkins was pretty aggressive but I don't think that is surprising given his job. Dr. Ken did hold his own.

The SJW answer was a little bit strong I think but in general Parkins seems like a good guy and I hope he does well at the Score.

Author:  TurdFerguson [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.


Doc did a good job getting that across. That subject could have been the entire podcast. In between Boyd questions.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.


Agreed. Parkins came off as smug on the SJW issue. Sandy Hook was terrible, but do I really want Danny's take on gun violence? There are mass shootings nearly every day in the US, and plenty here in Chicago. Is he supposed to switch over to gun violence guests every time one happens? Killing people is bad is about the depth of his analysis on that issue I am certain. Riveting.

He also sounded out of town stupid (to borrow a phase from the old B and B show) on Penn St. The ratings were "gang busters" for those shows? Why does a Chicago radio show need to cover Penn State for years, including brining on a trustee so Bernstein can play gotcha- I've been talking about you with your ex-wife. It was beyond embarrassing for him and the station.

I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.


Agreed. Parkins came off as smug on the SJW issue. Sandy Hook was terrible, but do I really want Danny's take on gun violence? There are mass shootings nearly every day in the US, and plenty here in Chicago. Is he supposed to switch over to gun violence guests every time one happens? Killing people is bad is about the depth of his analysis on that issue I am certain. Riveting.

He also sounded out of town stupid (to borrow a phase from the old B and B show) on Penn St. The ratings were "gang busters" for those shows? Why does a Chicago radio show need to cover Penn State for years, including brining on a trustee so Bernstein can play gotcha- I've been talking about you with your ex-wife. It was beyond embarrassing for him and the station.

I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.
I believe he said the ratings in KC were huge for the Penn State stuff.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

I don't know if he was smug, but I think his definition of what he considers "SJW radio" differs from what the main gripe on the board is.

Talking about social issues in sports when something happens is fine. It's the day-in/day-out analysis of "what does team x saying y mean about how they feel about me" and the optics and narratives that become tiresome and turn away listeners.

That hasn't really been something on the show since Parkins came on board so it's not fair to lump him in that camp.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.


Thanks, but why do you say that? He had ample opportunity to opt out prior to doing it.

If anything, I felt like he thought I was going to ask him what color Dan Bernstein's underwear is and at some point he realized that question wasn't coming until the next time I interview him and he just settled in.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.


Agreed. Parkins came off as smug on the SJW issue. Sandy Hook was terrible, but do I really want Danny's take on gun violence? There are mass shootings nearly every day in the US, and plenty here in Chicago. Is he supposed to switch over to gun violence guests every time one happens? Killing people is bad is about the depth of his analysis on that issue I am certain. Riveting.

He also sounded out of town stupid (to borrow a phase from the old B and B show) on Penn St. The ratings were "gang busters" for those shows? Why does a Chicago radio show need to cover Penn State for years, including brining on a trustee so Bernstein can play gotcha- I've been talking about you with your ex-wife. It was beyond embarrassing for him and the station.

I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.
I believe he said the ratings in KC were huge for the Penn State stuff.


I thought he was talking about B&B ratings in regards to the Penn State stuff.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

What Parkins was referring to wasn't "SJW." Talking about Sandy Hook wasn't any sort of SJW stuff, unless you were arguing for stricture gun control, which to me isn't an "SJW" topic.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.


Agreed. Parkins came off as smug on the SJW issue. Sandy Hook was terrible, but do I really want Danny's take on gun violence? There are mass shootings nearly every day in the US, and plenty here in Chicago. Is he supposed to switch over to gun violence guests every time one happens? Killing people is bad is about the depth of his analysis on that issue I am certain. Riveting.

He also sounded out of town stupid (to borrow a phase from the old B and B show) on Penn St. The ratings were "gang busters" for those shows? Why does a Chicago radio show need to cover Penn State for years, including brining on a trustee so Bernstein can play gotcha- I've been talking about you with your ex-wife. It was beyond embarrassing for him and the station.

I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.
I believe he said the ratings in KC were huge for the Penn State stuff.


I thought he was talking about B&B ratings in regards to the Penn State stuff.


He was. Rick is dumb.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

leashyourkids wrote:
What Parkins was referring to wasn't "SJW." Talking about Sandy Hook wasn't any sort of SJW stuff, unless you were arguing for stricture gun control, which to me isn't an "SJW" topic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIPan-rEQJA

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Image

Hmmmm...does Danny know to whom they are referring, you think?

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Fuzzy Kitten Club has a new owner I think.

Saw "she" was playing crosswords with BERNSTEIN this morning.

Author:  Cashman [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Fuzzy Kitten Club has a new owner I think.




I am pretty sure that is incorrect.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
TurdFerguson wrote:
I applaud Parking's for doing it. Enjoyed it a lot.

Felt like Dr Ken was in a bad spot trying to argue the spirit of the boards anti-SJW tilt but Danny was distorting it to a hyperbolic response of "why are you anti-gay, Jew, islam, woman, and for child rape." I think most are OK with the major events that cross over between the real world and societal problems. Its the everyday hypocritical grandstanding from 2-6 that should go away.



There's definitely some shit on the board- particularly in the DiCaro thread- that is indefensible, but the idea that what we might call "SJW orthodoxy" has some kind of moral high ground is just wrong.


Agreed. Parkins came off as smug on the SJW issue. Sandy Hook was terrible, but do I really want Danny's take on gun violence? There are mass shootings nearly every day in the US, and plenty here in Chicago. Is he supposed to switch over to gun violence guests every time one happens? Killing people is bad is about the depth of his analysis on that issue I am certain. Riveting.

He also sounded out of town stupid (to borrow a phase from the old B and B show) on Penn St. The ratings were "gang busters" for those shows? Why does a Chicago radio show need to cover Penn State for years, including brining on a trustee so Bernstein can play gotcha- I've been talking about you with your ex-wife. It was beyond embarrassing for him and the station.

I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.
I believe he said the ratings in KC were huge for the Penn State stuff.


I thought he was talking about B&B ratings in regards to the Penn State stuff.


He was. Rick is dumb.
He said "The afternoon show" so I assumed it was his but you may be right.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CFR 020 - The Danny Parkins Project

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
I applaud Parkins for going on, but I don't think he would have had he know what he was agreeing to do at the time.

Good work Dr. Ken.


Thanks, but why do you say that? He had ample opportunity to opt out prior to doing it.

If anything, I felt like he thought I was going to ask him what color Dan Bernstein's underwear is and at some point he realized that question wasn't coming until the next time I interview him and he just settled in.


I think he agreed to it, and then realized what it was. He was polite and had the guts to go through with it, but it sounded like he was apprehensive about it being associated with the board when he realized. Makes me think he would not have accepted if he knew ahead of time.

Page 4 of 6 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/