It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 4:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38101
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hussra wrote:
McAfee's all over ESPN doing College Game Day etc, so I imagine he's more likely to stick it out.

I dont know about that Tonto. Naming one of your bosses and calling him a rat and saying he's out to sabotage your show doesnt scream " Ima be here a long time"


_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
badrogue17 wrote:
doesnt scream " Ima be here a long time"


McAfee or Norby?


Last edited by Hussra on Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77139
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
A lot of former ESPN "talent" agrees with McAfee regarding the target of his rant.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 15977
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Image

Image

Image





Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37159
Location: ...
nancy armour just proved rodgers' point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:49 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7217
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.

the good old days.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489
W_Z wrote:
nancy armour just proved rodgers' point.

It really was a terrible article.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
Hawg Ass wrote:
W_Z wrote:
nancy armour just proved rodgers' point.

It really was a terrible article.

my favorite line:
Rodgers is a terrific quarterback and an utter fool, and it’s impossible to separate one from the other.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.



If Rodgers had actually accused Kimmel of something, then Kimmel would be suing him now, instead of just posturing.

Try and remember the massive L you took on the Covington students incident. The same lesson you learned there, (we hope). applies here.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:25 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.


According to Nancy Armour, Rodgers says he didn't accuse Kimmel of being a pedophile. Are you saying that Rodgers' statement is inaccurate?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
If Rodgers had actually accused Kimmel of something, then Kimmel would be suing him now, instead of just posturing.
I mean of course Kimmel has nothing to sue on. Rodgers made it clear he wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So what is the posturing?

Seacrest wrote:
Try and remember the massive L you took on the Covington students incident. The same lesson you learned there, (we hope). applies here.
What was that L again? I'm going to guess this is another example of you not remembering what I actually said about it.

Keep in mind the Covington kid lost every lawsuit he took to court. He did get some big paydays though in early settlements but settling a lawsuit without admitting fault is only a win for your bank account.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
RFDC wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
W_Z wrote:
nancy armour just proved rodgers' point.

It really was a terrible article.

my favorite line:
Rodgers is a terrific quarterback and an utter fool, and it’s impossible to separate one from the other.

:lol:

Unless you’re an insane person it’s very easy to separate those two things.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.


According to Nancy Armour, Rodgers says he didn't accuse Kimmel of being a pedophile. Are you saying that Rodgers' statement is inaccurate?

Rodgers didn't include Kimmel of anything. So the question becomes what was even the point of bringing up Kimmel randomly like that?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
W_Z wrote:
nancy armour just proved rodgers' point.

It really was a terrible article.

my favorite line:
Rodgers is a terrific quarterback and an utter fool, and it’s impossible to separate one from the other.

:lol:

Unless you’re an insane person it’s very easy to separate those two things.

Exactly. It reads like something Dicaro would have done with more grammatical errors of course.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20496
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.


According to Nancy Armour, Rodgers says he didn't accuse Kimmel of being a pedophile. Are you saying that Rodgers' statement is inaccurate?

Rodgers didn't include Kimmel of anything. So the question becomes what was even the point of bringing up Kimmel randomly like that?

Kimmel called him crazy (rightfully) years ago for suggesting the government was leaking UFO info to distract from the Epstein story.

Rodgers never forgets. His capacity to hold grudges rivals only his immediate family, who all hate him, which people forget & nobody talks about.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 28489
Kimmel has long gone after Rodgers and apparently doesn’t like when someone gives it back.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77041
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Rodgers's sin is that he refused a worthless and often dangerous vaccine.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
If Rodgers had actually accused Kimmel of something, then Kimmel would be suing him now, instead of just posturing.
I mean of course Kimmel has nothing to sue on. Rodgers made it clear he wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So what is the posturing?

Seacrest wrote:
Try and remember the massive L you took on the Covington students incident. The same lesson you learned there, (we hope). applies here.
What was that L again? I'm going to guess this is another example of you not remembering what I actually said about it.

Keep in mind the Covington kid lost every lawsuit he took to court. He did get some big paydays though in early settlements but settling a lawsuit without admitting fault is only a win for your bank account.



That's how winners and losers are decided in civil lawsuits. :lol: :lol:

Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So any tough talk from Kimmel is just posturing.

And the Covington kid was libeled, Kimmel was not.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Kimmel has long gone after Rodgers and apparently doesn’t like when someone gives it back.


Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Rodgers's sin is that he refused a worthless and often dangerous vaccine.


THIS AND THIS.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Seacrest wrote:
That's how winners and losers are decided in civil lawsuits. :lol: :lol:
No it isn't. Settlements happen for many different reasons. Just ask Trump. A settlement that doesn't involve any admittance of fault is a win only for the persons bank account.

Seacrest wrote:
Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So any tough talk from Kimmel is just posturing.
Yes, Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So what was the point of randomly mentioning his name with the Epstein list?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:39 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
Rodgers backpedaled so fast it was like he was playing the Giants in the playoffs at Lambeau.


How so?
By saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything.


According to Nancy Armour, Rodgers says he didn't accuse Kimmel of being a pedophile. Are you saying that Rodgers' statement is inaccurate?

Rodgers didn't include Kimmel of anything. So the question becomes what was even the point of bringing up Kimmel randomly like that?


If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

I guess I don't understand the point of linking Kimmel and the Epstein list last week then. Was it just some random celebrity he chose?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77041
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

I guess I don't understand the point of linking Kimmel and the Epstein list last week then. Was it just some random celebrity he chose?



You do know that Kimmel cavorts with Epstein's personal chef, right?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:44 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27795
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
That's how winners and losers are decided in civil lawsuits. :lol: :lol:
No it isn't. Settlements happen for many different reasons. Just ask Trump. A settlement that doesn't involve any admittance of fault is a win only for the persons bank account.

Seacrest wrote:
Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So any tough talk from Kimmel is just posturing.
Yes, Rodgers wasn't accusing Kimmel of anything. So what was the point of randomly mentioning his name with the Epstein list?


It wasn't random. As Antioch mentioned, Kimmel mocked Rodgers for linking the UFO story and the expected release of the Epstein list. Rodgers may have taken this mockery as an attempt by Kimmel to provide cover for those named in the Epstein Conspiracy.

Another possibility is that Rodgers is aware that Kimmel is good friends and business partners with Epstein's former personal chef, who may have witnessed and/or facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Kimmel therefore may have a personal and financial interest in squelching discussion of the Epstein Conspiracy.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

I guess I don't understand the point of linking Kimmel and the Epstein list last week then. Was it just some random celebrity he chose?



You do know that Kimmel cavorts with Epstein's personal chef, right?

But again, if he isn't accusing Kimmel of anything then what is the point?

Most celebrities are going to know people on the Epstein list. Trump is likely on the Epstein list. Bill Clinton is likely on the Epstein list.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
It wasn't random. As Antioch mentioned, Kimmel mocked Rodgers for linking the UFO story and the expected release of the Epstein list. Rodgers may have taken this mockery as an attempt by Kimmel to provide cover for those named in the Epstein Conspiracy.
I don't think that is a win for Rodgers though if that is the explanation.

Tall Midget wrote:
Another possibility is that Rodgers is aware that Kimmel is good friends and business partners with Epstein's former personal chef, who may have witnessed and/or facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Kimmel therefore may have a personal and financial interest in squelching discussion of the Epstein Conspiracy.
Rodgers had a chance to make an argument like that though and chose not to.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2024 9:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77041
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
If Rodgers didn't accuse Kimmel of anything, how is he backpedaling by saying that he wasn't actually accusing Kimmel of anything? :?:

I guess I don't understand the point of linking Kimmel and the Epstein list last week then. Was it just some random celebrity he chose?



You do know that Kimmel cavorts with Epstein's personal chef, right?

But again, if he isn't accusing Kimmel of anything then what is the point?

Most celebrities are going to know people on the Epstein list. Trump is likely on the Epstein list. Bill Clinton is likely on the Epstein list.


Doesn't it seem odd to you that Kimmel is so wound up over this? If someone accused me of knowing Epstein, I'd laugh it off. How about you? He's seems very sensitive about the subject and he has suggested that the names should remain hidden from the public.

https://soundcloud.com/atsssioj/jimmy-k ... ein-island

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group