It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: End of the Score Is Near
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12706
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
So far the list includes:

David Schuster
Julie DiCaro
Connor McKnight
Rick Camp

Anyone else?

As if that wasn't bad enough:

"Field also announced salary reductions of between 10% and 20% for those earning more than $50,000 annually, elimination of 401(k) matches, first quarter and second quarter bonuses and a suspension of its dividend."

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
This iteration largely won't be missed.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
AM radio has been on life support for a little bit.

The corporatization of sports radio is why MANY don't listen any more, especially here.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12706
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Terry's Peeps wrote:
AM radio has been on life support for a little bit.

The corporatization of sports radio is why MANY don't listen any more, especially here.


This.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3839
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
One Post wrote:
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


you do realize the internet was available in 2000 :lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
People would listen if it were entertaining.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9950
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Eh, they are going to cut mostly fat and a little muscle. They need better interviewers and nicer people, and shows better geared for a podcast version and YouTube cuts on social media.

And find the media savvy players. Or example, I'm listening to Trevor Bauer being interviewed on an ESPN podcast right now. He has an hour long weekly show on MLB Radio, and his own media company, Bears All Access? Fuck that.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3839
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


you do realize the internet was available in 2000 :lol:


Dude, in the year 2000 it took about 25 minutes to download one webpage of 18 lines of text on a dial up connection.

You do realize the internet was different in it's 5th year of existence compared to it's 25 years?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33838
Actually, in these times, more people are listening to the radio cuz we're all stuck at home. So ratings should be higher.

Problem is on the advertising side. Nobody is buying anything except groceries. So most of the advertisers are gonna pull their spots cuz it doesn't matter to them now.

And it's not like Costco, Sam's, Jewel or any other grocery store needs to advertise on the radio. They never have. Cuz everybody knows about them when they need food.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
One Post wrote:
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


you do realize the internet was available in 2000 :lol:


Dude, in the year 2000 it took about 25 minutes to download one webpage of 18 lines of text on a dial up connection.

You do realize the internet was different in it's 5th year of existence compared to it's 25 years?


I understand the internet in 2000. I was around then. There were even message boards in 2000, and many other places for sports fans to interact. I do get your point, but it was not the dark ages or anything.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48768
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
They need better interviewers and nicer people, and shows better geared for a podcast version and YouTube cuts on social media.



OK.

I'll do it.

_________________
https://twitter.com/DrKenCast


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12555
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Beardown wrote:
Actually, in these times, more people are listening to the radio cuz we're all stuck at home. So ratings should be higher.

I only listen to radio in the car. And since I'm not commuting to work anymore, I would guesstimate I hear about 10 minutes of radio a week these days.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9950
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
They need better interviewers and nicer people, and shows better geared for a podcast version and YouTube cuts on social media.



OK.

I'll do it.

You are a gentleman and a scholar. You get to interview Lovie Smith.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3839
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


you do realize the internet was available in 2000 :lol:


Dude, in the year 2000 it took about 25 minutes to download one webpage of 18 lines of text on a dial up connection.

You do realize the internet was different in it's 5th year of existence compared to it's 25 years?


I understand the internet in 2000. I was around then. There were even message boards in 2000, and many other places for sports fans to interact. I do get your point, but it was not the dark ages or anything.


Also, the demo shifted in like with the above. I agree there were outlets on the internet similar to today. THat said, 20 years ago, the radio listener was probably between 38-58, not a demo that would be on the cutting edge of technology. You and I were both younger then, and not in that demo, so we grew up with the internet/message boards and didn't have to rely on radio.

So now that 38-58 demo is either dead or not interested in radio, and the demo you and i are in gets our sports fix on the internet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 42982
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Eh, they are going to cut mostly fat and a little muscle. They need better interviewers and nicer people, and shows better geared for a podcast version and YouTube cuts on social media.

Sorry Grandpa, radio is dead. Its had coronavirus for at least 15 years now.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Douchebag wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Eh, they are going to cut mostly fat and a little muscle. They need better interviewers and nicer people, and shows better geared for a podcast version and YouTube cuts on social media.

Sorry Grandpa, radio is dead. Its had coronavirus for at least 15 years now.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 8:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37241
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Out early this morning for work.

The prize for winning the WBBM quiz question this morning was exactly...NOTHING.

Except a hearty congratulations from Pat Cassidy himself.

Tough times indeed for radio.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
RFDC wrote:
One Post wrote:
I think I've mentioned it before, but I think the internet - specifically message boards and team specific sites - have really hurt sports radio.

In 2000 if you wanted to do any of the following:

1. ask about/traffic in a rumor;
2. propose a hypothetical trade;
3. rant about how crappy team or player is;
4. talk about how you think backup X should be playing;
5. learn about a prospect; and
6. many other things

your outlets were (a) sports radio, or (b) no outlet. Now if you want to do any of those things, you can pop onto the internet and go to a team specific website that will traffic in any and all inside info or dirt. You want to do any of those things which generally required feedback from the host or other callers (i.e. rant about QB X) well now you can go onto a site like this and post your opinion and get immediate feedback.

Why would you wait on hold for 15 minutes to say that Mitch sucks, when you can pop open your laptop and within 30 seconds have a bunch of views or even a response? I mean if you listened to sports radio in 2001, it's nothing like it is today. Back then it was caller driven, sure the talent was important, but they had countless hours of free content from callers. That's where the "notable" or "name" callers came from. Guys calling in every day, it became part of the show.

That isn't the case now, and it's hard to entertain people for a bunch of hours in the day with a half dozen hosts that are driving, engaging in, and dominating the conversation.


you do realize the internet was available in 2000 :lol:


Dude, in the year 2000 it took about 25 minutes to download one webpage of 18 lines of text on a dial up connection.

You do realize the internet was different in it's 5th year of existence compared to it's 25 years?


I understand the internet in 2000. I was around then. There were even message boards in 2000, and many other places for sports fans to interact. I do get your point, but it was not the dark ages or anything.

Yep, White Sox Interactive was around then and wasn't yet a complete cesspool of miserable mods.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80164
I'd have to check but I think I joined WSI around 2000

I've been here since 2003 or 04 (joined dates were reissued after some board change) and this place existed before me in a few iterations. My guess is this place is pushing 20 years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10565
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
good dolphin wrote:
I'd have to check but I think I joined WSI around 2000

I've been here since 2003 or 04 (joined dates were reissued after some board change) and this place existed before me in a few iterations. My guess is this place is pushing 20 years.

I remember your handle on WSI. (at least I think I do).
It's funny how there's at least 5 of us there were at WSI before this site and got fed up with the same BS over there. Those ass clowns might be more self-absorbed and miserable as Fels....and that's a lot.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
You know it's bad when you're listening to the streaming of the broadcast and it's just dead sound during what should be a paid spot.

They can't sell anything right now.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 42982
I'm really shocked they didn't just shut the whole station down right now. Why is a sports talk station even functioning right now? Send everyone home and just simulcast WBBM.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
The difference between today and 5-10 years ago isn't that there are places to post about your team. Those places have existed for 20+ years.

The difference is there are now places to *listen* about your team. Each team has probably a dozen or more dedicated podcasts dedicated to them. You listened to 670 because you wanted to hear about your local team, otherwise you would just watch or listen to a national show. Well now there are hyper-focused audio products centered around your team. You don't need 670 anymore.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
BigW72 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I'd have to check but I think I joined WSI around 2000

I've been here since 2003 or 04 (joined dates were reissued after some board change) and this place existed before me in a few iterations. My guess is this place is pushing 20 years.

I remember your handle on WSI. (at least I think I do).
It's funny how there's at least 5 of us there were at WSI before this site and got fed up with the same BS over there. Those ass clowns might be more self-absorbed and miserable as Fels....and that's a lot.

Between WSI and Soxtalk the White Sox fan presence online is massive yet ruined by terrible admins.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The difference between today and 5-10 years ago isn't that there are places to post about your team. Those places have existed for 20+ years.

The difference is there are now places to *listen* about your team. Each team has probably a dozen or more dedicated podcasts dedicated to them. You listened to 670 because you wanted to hear about your local team, otherwise you would just watch or listen to a national show. Well now there are hyper-focused audio products centered around your team. You don't need 670 anymore.

That is true and good way of putting it.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10565
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
RFDC wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The difference between today and 5-10 years ago isn't that there are places to post about your team. Those places have existed for 20+ years.

The difference is there are now places to *listen* about your team. Each team has probably a dozen or more dedicated podcasts dedicated to them. You listened to 670 because you wanted to hear about your local team, otherwise you would just watch or listen to a national show. Well now there are hyper-focused audio products centered around your team. You don't need 670 anymore.

That is true and good way of putting it.

I still think there's a demand for talk radio. Whether it's driving or working outside / around the house and having it on in the background. The interactive / call-in portion was still stuff you don't get from Podcasts. They destroyed that and became local team mouthpieces. That does matter.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55800
BigW72 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The difference between today and 5-10 years ago isn't that there are places to post about your team. Those places have existed for 20+ years.

The difference is there are now places to *listen* about your team. Each team has probably a dozen or more dedicated podcasts dedicated to them. You listened to 670 because you wanted to hear about your local team, otherwise you would just watch or listen to a national show. Well now there are hyper-focused audio products centered around your team. You don't need 670 anymore.

That is true and good way of putting it.

I still think there's a demand for talk radio. Whether it's driving or working outside / around the house and having it on in the background. The interactive / call-in portion was still stuff you don't get from Podcasts. They destroyed that and became local team mouthpieces. That does matter.

yeah I think it will survive I some form as it provides a dynamic that others do not, but Ogie and others are right it is not needed as it was back in the day.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 16901
pizza_Place: Pequods
BigW72 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The difference between today and 5-10 years ago isn't that there are places to post about your team. Those places have existed for 20+ years.

The difference is there are now places to *listen* about your team. Each team has probably a dozen or more dedicated podcasts dedicated to them. You listened to 670 because you wanted to hear about your local team, otherwise you would just watch or listen to a national show. Well now there are hyper-focused audio products centered around your team. You don't need 670 anymore.

That is true and good way of putting it.

I still think there's a demand for talk radio. Whether it's driving or working outside / around the house and having it on in the background. The interactive / call-in portion was still stuff you don't get from Podcasts. They destroyed that and became local team mouthpieces. That does matter.

The call in portion was a draw with B&B as they'd shit on callers and it was entertaining. However, what Score shows have compelling calls today? I'd say none of them do.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Oogie right on the money.

Everything is heading to on demand listening.

Sports radio is good for breaking news and instant reaction.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group