It is currently Sat May 18, 2024 10:02 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2024 1:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 5972
pizza_Place: Frozen
White Sox up to 75 wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 5972
pizza_Place: Frozen
Great Bruce Levine Sunday with Grote.

Grote brought up Bellinger's low hard contact rate in '23. "It proves he's a great hitter how he adjusted his game to go to the opposite field more reducing his hard contact rate". Actually his oppo% rate went up only 1.2%. Still well below MLB average.

Levine said Michael Soroka could be up to a 15 game winner. Only eight 15 or more game winners in '23. That would be in Cy Young award talk class. A tall order for a guy whose only pitched 46 MLB innings total the last 4 years.


Last edited by vitoscotti on Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 12:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 691
pizza_Place: Marie's
vitoscotti wrote:
White Sox up to 75 wins



I'll be banging the under like I bang your mom.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 12:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32351
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Phil Leotardo wrote:
vitoscotti wrote:
White Sox up to 75 wins



I'll be banging the under like I bang your mom.


Is this like a $2 hooker joke?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:53 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Chicago
David Haugh stands up to Bruce like none of his "Inside the Clubhouse" co hosts have done. They got into a nice verbal tussle today and Haugh wouldn't back down or show deference to the old scribe. Bruce seems to think he's Abner Doubleday and is all knowing. Levine made his bones by butt kissing and Haugh seems to have little patience for that .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43057
orioleboy wrote:
David Haugh stands up to Bruce like none of his "Inside the Clubhouse" co hosts have done. They got into a nice verbal tussle today and Haugh wouldn't back down or show deference to the old scribe. Bruce seems to think he's Abner Doubleday and is all knowing. Levine made his bones by butt kissing and Haugh seems to have little patience for that .

These guys should shoot each other in the face at the same time.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 1:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37380
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
orioleboy wrote:
David Haugh stands up to Bruce like none of his "Inside the Clubhouse" co hosts have done. They got into a nice verbal tussle today and Haugh wouldn't back down or show deference to the old scribe. Bruce seems to think he's Abner Doubleday and is all knowing. Levine made his bones by butt kissing and Haugh seems to have little patience for that .

These guys should shoot each other in the face at the same time.


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2024 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 691
pizza_Place: Marie's
Phil Leotardo wrote:
vitoscotti wrote:
White Sox up to 75 wins



I'll be banging the under like I bang your mom.



I'll be cashing that one with zero sweat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2024 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3885
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
orioleboy wrote:
David Haugh stands up to Bruce like none of his "Inside the Clubhouse" co hosts have done. They got into a nice verbal tussle today and Haugh wouldn't back down or show deference to the old scribe. Bruce seems to think he's Abner Doubleday and is all knowing. Levine made his bones by butt kissing and Haugh seems to have little patience for that .


Good. Levine is unnecessarily abrasive and too often a team apologist. Definitely not a fan of his.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2024 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2921
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
DAC wrote:
orioleboy wrote:
David Haugh stands up to Bruce like none of his "Inside the Clubhouse" co hosts have done. They got into a nice verbal tussle today and Haugh wouldn't back down or show deference to the old scribe. Bruce seems to think he's Abner Doubleday and is all knowing. Levine made his bones by butt kissing and Haugh seems to have little patience for that .


Good. Levine is unnecessarily abrasive and too often a team apologist. Definitely not a fan of his.


during Cubs postgame interviews, I guess theres some arrangement where Bruce gets dibs on first question. They're rarely anything of importance and are either a softball, or some bullshit about feelings.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 11, 2024 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2253
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
I was listening to Inside The Clubhouse this morning and heard that they had a new segment called "High and Tight," which is supposed to serve as a response to "somebody who needs responding to," or something to that effect. That piqued my interest, and I was wondering if they would actually come up with some sort of hot take or call someone out. So, I keep listening to the segment.

At the top, they play some anodyne sound byte from Dylan Cease where he says "you know? It just didn't work out last year" and then proceed to talk about how Dylan Cease is a good guy.

Just the hard hitting journalism I've come to expect from Levine & Co.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Sat May 11, 2024 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28808
pizza_Place: What??
Warren Newson wrote:
I was listening to Inside The Clubhouse this morning and heard that they had a new segment called "High and Tight," which is supposed to serve as a response to "somebody who needs responding to," or something to that effect. That piqued my interest, and I was wondering if they would actually come up with some sort of hot take or call someone out. So, I keep listening to the segment.

At the top, they play some anodyne sound byte from Dylan Cease where he says "you know? It just didn't work out last year" and then proceed to talk about how Dylan Cease is a good guy.

Just the hard hitting journalism I've come to expect from Levine & Co.

Damn! That's some big time chin music. Keep honing that edge, Bruce & Haugh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2024 8:43 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12140
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
I was listening to Inside The Clubhouse this morning and heard that they had a new segment called "High and Tight," which is supposed to serve as a response to "somebody who needs responding to," or something to that effect. That piqued my interest, and I was wondering if they would actually come up with some sort of hot take or call someone out. So, I keep listening to the segment.

At the top, they play some anodyne sound byte from Dylan Cease where he says "you know? It just didn't work out last year" and then proceed to talk about how Dylan Cease is a good guy.

Just the hard hitting journalism I've come to expect from Levine & Co.

Damn! That's some big time chin music. Keep honing that edge, Bruce & Haugh.


I'm more understanding of Levine (and Zaidman when covering the Bears). These guys would go on with hosts who had very strong opinions on the teams, and then the reporters (Zaidman/Levine) wouldn't take the bait and would give more generic/safe responses. Reporters aren't supposed to be providing their opinions, just the news. Commentators/hosts are supposed to react to the news, give their opinion.

The lines have been blurred. I heard Leila lecturing the listeners a few weeks back saying that on NBC she only gives the news, but on the Score, she gives her opinions. I don't think she understands that makes her "news" coverage very questionable when she's spouting out about rich billionaires on the Score everyday (when talking about the Bears/White Sox stadium issues). Someone like her wants it both ways - to be a serious news journalist, but also give opinions, but doesn't understand why listeners may think she may have an agenda she's pushing.

I don't think Levine has an agenda other than he's probably protecting what relationships he has with the team by not being overly critical. As long as he is able to provide news, I'm ok with him not providing hot takes. Haugh is still very vanilla as a commentator, less edgy and tries to be reasonable vs. some of the other hosts. That's not for everyone though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2024 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
BD wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
I was listening to Inside The Clubhouse this morning and heard that they had a new segment called "High and Tight," which is supposed to serve as a response to "somebody who needs responding to," or something to that effect. That piqued my interest, and I was wondering if they would actually come up with some sort of hot take or call someone out. So, I keep listening to the segment.

At the top, they play some anodyne sound byte from Dylan Cease where he says "you know? It just didn't work out last year" and then proceed to talk about how Dylan Cease is a good guy.

Just the hard hitting journalism I've come to expect from Levine & Co.

Damn! That's some big time chin music. Keep honing that edge, Bruce & Haugh.


I'm more understanding of Levine (and Zaidman when covering the Bears). These guys would go on with hosts who had very strong opinions on the teams, and then the reporters (Zaidman/Levine) wouldn't take the bait and would give more generic/safe responses. Reporters aren't supposed to be providing their opinions, just the news. Commentators/hosts are supposed to react to the news, give their opinion.

The lines have been blurred. I heard Leila lecturing the listeners a few weeks back saying that on NBC she only gives the news, but on the Score, she gives her opinions. I don't think she understands that makes her "news" coverage very questionable when she's spouting out about rich billionaires on the Score everyday (when talking about the Bears/White Sox stadium issues). Someone like her wants it both ways - to be a serious news journalist, but also give opinions, but doesn't understand why listeners may think she may have an agenda she's pushing.

I don't think Levine has an agenda other than he's probably protecting what relationships he has with the team by not being overly critical. As long as he is able to provide news, I'm ok with him not providing hot takes. Haugh is still very vanilla as a commentator, less edgy and tries to be reasonable vs. some of the other hosts. That's not for everyone though.

ZZ was an update / fill-in host long before he became a team schill. He had plenty of opportunity to express his God-awful sports thoughts on the air. I heard plenty of them. Awful.

Levine's ass-licking goes well beyond protecting his sources.

Mark Grote seems to have no problem being a team mouthpiece and not coming off as a total ass-wipe. Jeff Dickerson was perfectly fine at it. Jesse Rogers has issues articulating sentences, but as a reporter he's fine.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2024 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 5972
pizza_Place: Frozen
Levine is a shill who's under the Score mandate of avoiding the truth. He's just not quick witted and a skilled speaker to sound believable. Makes for great sports radio hearing him sound foolish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2024 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 12:17 am
Posts: 667
Location: LaGrange
Zaidman worst fault is the fact he thinks he has to kiss Hughes a$$ and laugh hysterically at every Pat Hughes stupid joke.

Ron : "Boy Pat, Morel took a big swing and a miss at that curve ball"

Hughes : "Yea Ronnie, I bet the fans in the bleachers appreciated the breeze on this hot, humid evening"

Zaidman (Heard in the background) : "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"


:lol:

_________________
Blackhawk goal, scored by number 20, Al Secord.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2024 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 20709
pizza_Place: Pizanos

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Thu May 16, 2024 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54359
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BigW72 wrote:
ZZ was an update / fill-in host long before he became a team schill. He had plenty of opportunity to express his God-awful sports thoughts on the air. I heard plenty of them. Awful.


Mitch once tried to make a Saturday morning show out of Zach, Drinky, and I want to say Brian Paruch. The "young guns" of the Score, except by 2008 Drinky was probably like 40. I think it was supposed to be a soft launch for a new morning show if Mully and Hanley didn't work, but they did, and the experiment was never spoken of again, at least by anyone but me.

Even with the reliable Brian Paruch, it was really, really bad.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
ZZ was an update / fill-in host long before he became a team schill. He had plenty of opportunity to express his God-awful sports thoughts on the air. I heard plenty of them. Awful.


Mitch once tried to make a Saturday morning show out of Zach, Drinky, and I want to say Brian Paruch. The "young guns" of the Score, except by 2008 Drinky was probably like 40. I think it was supposed to be a soft launch for a new morning show if Mully and Hanley didn't work, but they did, and the experiment was never spoken of again, at least by anyone but me.

Even with the reliable Brian Paruch, it was really, really bad.

LOL...I remember that.
I've said this in other threads....you can be technically skilled at radio or you could be a skilled journalist / writer. Neither of those translate to entertaining / engaging radio host.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 2:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 27890
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brian Paruch was exclusively reliable as a soporific, nothing more.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Tall Midget wrote:
Brian Paruch was exclusively reliable as a soporific, nothing more.

One of many that are technically good at radio, but about as interesting as a 2x4.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 12790
Location: Lake of the Ozarks (whenever I can)
pizza_Place: Mauries Table
BigW72 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Brian Paruch was exclusively reliable as a soporific, nothing more.

One of many that are technically good at radio, but about as interesting as a 2x4.

The modern-day dimensions of a 2×4 are smaller due to historical practices and practical considerations. Thinner pieces of wood were favored over time to reduce shipping costs and increase efficiency in transportation. These dimensions eventually became standardized to strike a balance between cost-efficiency and structural integrity.

_________________
If we nominate Trump we will get destroyed & we'll deserve it.- L Graham
I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. No one will be above the law.- DJT 2016
MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!- DJT 12/25/23


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10778
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Tall Midget wrote:
Brian Paruch was exclusively reliable as a soporific, nothing more.


Someone has the drop of the lady Jane's haircut guy commercial saying in a weird voice "Brian pah rook"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16008
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
This Ends in Antioch wrote:


Ridiculous.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9978
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
ZZ was an update / fill-in host long before he became a team schill. He had plenty of opportunity to express his God-awful sports thoughts on the air. I heard plenty of them. Awful.


Mitch once tried to make a Saturday morning show out of Zach, Drinky, and I want to say Brian Paruch. The "young guns" of the Score, except by 2008 Drinky was probably like 40. I think it was supposed to be a soft launch for a new morning show if Mully and Hanley didn't work, but they did, and the experiment was never spoken of again, at least by anyone but me.

Even with the reliable Brian Paruch, it was really, really bad.

Wasn't that the predecessor of Paruch going on with Steve Rosenbloom before Grote took the spot over?

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruce Levine
PostPosted: Fri May 17, 2024 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54359
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
ZZ was an update / fill-in host long before he became a team schill. He had plenty of opportunity to express his God-awful sports thoughts on the air. I heard plenty of them. Awful.


Mitch once tried to make a Saturday morning show out of Zach, Drinky, and I want to say Brian Paruch. The "young guns" of the Score, except by 2008 Drinky was probably like 40. I think it was supposed to be a soft launch for a new morning show if Mully and Hanley didn't work, but they did, and the experiment was never spoken of again, at least by anyone but me.

Even with the reliable Brian Paruch, it was really, really bad.

Wasn't that the predecessor of Paruch going on with Steve Rosenbloom before Grote took the spot over?

Yeah. That was when Drew Hayes came in and took all the weekend and fill-in shifts away from the board-ops and gave them all to sportswriters. That gave us some really solid years of Rozner and Rosenbloom sitting in for Terry. I also remember a time when Teddy Greenstein was on the Mac show and Terry wouldn't do transition that day because his lofty principles wouldn't allow it.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group