It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
badrogue17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Kershaw: 64.9

Koufax: 49

Post season

Koufax 4-3 0.95 ERA

Kershaw 7-7 4.6 ERA

Koufax never had to face the mid-2000s Cubs though.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10465
pizza_Place: Investigating
Kershaw has not pitched 7 times in World Series. Not sure if NLDS justifies the comparison. That's a tough one. The pressure in a season ending series would seem more meaningful.

Another pitcher on par or better than Koufax in that era? RR nailed the only one I could think of in Gibson. There has to be someone else that even for a year or two was as good as those two but I cannot think of any. Drysdale maybe, but same team and that might be on name recognition alone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3842
beni hanna wrote:
Kershaw has not pitched 7 times in World Series. Not sure if NLDS justifies the comparison. That's a tough one. The pressure in a season ending series would seem more meaningful.

Another pitcher on par or better than Koufax in that era? RR nailed the only one I could think of in Gibson. There has to be someone else that even for a year or two was as good as those two but I cannot think of any. Drysdale maybe, but same team and that might be on name recognition alone.


Juan Marichal might want to have some speaks with you also especially about years 1965 and 1966.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Pedro was the best I've seen..those guys were before my time.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10565
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
312player wrote:
Pedro was the best I've seen..those guys were before my time.

You can have Pedro....I'm taking Randy Johnson.

Koufax > Kershaw....nothing to debate here.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
wdelaney72 wrote:
312player wrote:
Pedro was the best I've seen..those guys were before my time.

You can have Pedro....I'm taking Randy Johnson.

Koufax > Kershaw....nothing to debate here.


There's no planet that Kershaw is better at baseball.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 2270
Location: Wheaton, IL
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.

_________________
Host of the weekly "We Fish ASA" podcast
Weekly columnist for the Northwest Herald
Bi-monthly columnist for Illinois Outdoor News magazine
Former host of The Outdoors Experience on WIND and The Great Outdoors on CLTV
http://www.wefishasa.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
badrogue17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Kershaw: 64.9

Koufax: 49

Post season

Koufax 4-3 0.95 ERA

Kershaw 7-7 4.6 ERA

Very flawed Stat Sandy's post season was THE WORLD SERIES plus he couldn't pitch on Yom Kipper also a quality start was more than 6 innings, Plus 90% of you never saw Koufax pitch

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
wdelaney72 wrote:
312player wrote:
Pedro was the best I've seen..those guys were before my time.

You can have Pedro....I'm taking Randy Johnson.

Koufax > Kershaw....nothing to debate here.


Agree x 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
57 years ago on tis date https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN196109200.shtml

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 5:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77140
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Kershaw: 64.9

Koufax: 49

Post season

Koufax 4-3 0.95 ERA

Kershaw 7-7 4.6 ERA

Very flawed Stat Sandy's post season was THE WORLD SERIES plus he couldn't pitch on Yom Kipper also a quality start was more than 6 innings, Plus 90% of you never saw Koufax pitch


Only you saw Babe Ruth play :wink: but I still know that he was the greatest of all time.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Nas wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Kershaw: 64.9

Koufax: 49

Post season

Koufax 4-3 0.95 ERA

Kershaw 7-7 4.6 ERA

Very flawed Stat Sandy's post season was THE WORLD SERIES plus he couldn't pitch on Yom Kipper also a quality start was more than 6 innings, Plus 90% of you never saw Koufax pitch


Only you saw Babe Ruth play :wink: but I still know that he was the greatest of all time.

My Dad saw Ruth play and played against Buck Weaver....and he told me Mays was better all round better player than Ruth only saw him against the Cubs,,,,All Star games (There used to be 2 ! )

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 15991
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 15991
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Yes, but they still benefitted from it. Gibson’s ERA was a full run higher the following year and way higher after that (though he was past his prime). Koufax retired before they lowered it so we don’t have a comparison.

I’d like to see a comparison adjusting for park factors, average league ERA, etc.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77044
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

I think Koufax was gone by then? Anyway, it sure helped Gibson. (The lack of offense, that is.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
tommy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

I think Koufax was gone by then? Anyway, it sure helped Gibson. (The lack of offense, that is.)


He still was a run lower than everyone else in 67.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13320
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Amazing thing about Koufax is that he struggled for his first 6 seasons ('55-60) and then absolutely dominated the next six seasons. The last two of those seasons he pitched with a lot of pain and still dominated.

Only seen Kershaw pitch but from reading and hearing about Koufax from my dad, I take Koufax.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Regular Reader wrote:
tommy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

I think Koufax was gone by then? Anyway, it sure helped Gibson. (The lack of offense, that is.)


He still was a run lower than everyone else in 67.

Wow.....just amazing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

there were quite a few reasons why it was lowered

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Nas wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Kershaw: 64.9

Koufax: 49

Post season

Koufax 4-3 0.95 ERA

Kershaw 7-7 4.6 ERA

Very flawed Stat Sandy's post season was THE WORLD SERIES plus he couldn't pitch on Yom Kipper also a quality start was more than 6 innings, Plus 90% of you never saw Koufax pitch


Only you saw Babe Ruth play :wink: but I still know that he was the greatest of all time.

My Dad saw Ruth play and played against Buck Weaver....and he told me Mays was better all round better player than Ruth only saw him against the Cubs,,,,All Star games (There used to be 2 ! )


That's a very tough call. What year did your dad see Ruth and how old was he?

I'm guessing your dad was born in the 20s. Ruth retired in 35 at the age of 40.

There's really no footage of prime Ruth.

If you want to use doubles and triples to help indicate speed and athleticism,

Ruth: 506 doubles 136 triples
162 game average 33 and 9

Mays: 523 doubles 140 triples
162 game average 28 and 8

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77044
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Regular Reader wrote:
tommy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
SteveSarley wrote:
Just look at Koufax's last six seasons.
Absolutely incredible! Once he settled down he was the best.


But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

I think Koufax was gone by then? Anyway, it sure helped Gibson. (The lack of offense, that is.)


He still was a run lower than everyone else in 67.



Well, that's not right. I'm not sure Gibson was in the top 20 in ERA in '67. His big year was 1968. And he wasn't a run better than everyone else. Tiant had a 1.60 ERA in '68. I would compare Gibson's 1968 season to Greinke or Arrieta in 2015.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kershaw vs. Koufax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
tommy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
But if you adjust for the mound being lowered after Koufax retired and the offensive era Kershaw has had to face, it helps Kershaw's case. What hurts him now is his obvious decline vs Koufax retiring at his peak.

Koufax and Gibson were the reason they lowered the mound


Not really correct. It was the overall dearth of offense which also resulted in the DH. .301 lead the AL and it had nothing to do with Gibson or Koufax.

I think Koufax was gone by then? Anyway, it sure helped Gibson. (The lack of offense, that is.)


He still was a run lower than everyone else in 67.



Well, that's not right. I'm not sure Gibson was in the top 20 in ERA in '67. His big year was 1968. And he wasn't a run better than everyone else. Tiant had a 1.60 ERA in '68. I would compare Gibson's 1968 season to Greinke or Arrieta in 2015.


Mea culpa.

Sorry, I always mistake the glorious year they won for 68. And you're certainly right about the actual gap, for some reason I've always mistakenly had the one run vs the actual half run difference.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group