Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

1/11 thread
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=110346		 Page 2 of 3
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

You don't think there's a difference between weed and meth?


I don't care about their effects, I care about their categorization as controlled substances, and whether speaking of consumption or desire to consume such substances should be allowed or otherwise rewarded on publicly-owned airwaves.

BAN WEED TALK!

God, you would be an awful legislator.


:lol: So defensive of a plant. Cannabis is not your friend.
Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
It's sad that JLN doesn't want Danny Mac to ever work in radio again.
Author:  Brick [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.
Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.


I would think Danny B reading testimony about underage shower anal rape in his low thoughtful voice is the more damaging of the two
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Curious Hair wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

You don't think there's a difference between weed and meth?

Seriously, I have a friend from high school who is suffering end stage liver failure from alcohol use. I don't know anyone dying of organ failure or OD's from weed.

I'm pretty sure Budweiser sponsors the station as well.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

It'd weed, not crystal meth. Lighten up, Francis.


Why would you see speaking fondly of one controlled substance different than speaking fondly of the other?

One's deadly, one's pretty fun to use and not more unhealthy than alcohol or fast food. Shirley you see the difference.


Except alcohol and fast food aren't controlled substances.

So? What's your point? I answered your question sufficiently, and this isn't a rebuttal to it.


You weed degenerates get so defensive. SO?! IT'S NOT AS BAD AS MAINLINING ETHANOL!

I know it's not as bad, and it's probably healthier than booze, but the fact remains that it's a controlled substance, and it is probably better that hosts on a broadcast radio program on a medium licensed from the public and purportedly performed in the public interest, shouldn't be so gleefully talking about consuming controlled substances unlawfully.

It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.
Author:  Brick [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I can't listen to The Score around my kid now.


I would think Danny B reading testimony about underage shower anal rape in his low thoughtful voice is the more damaging of the two

That was an important lesson to learn.

My kid looks up to Bernstein. Can't have him hear things like that.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Hoenstly, if weed bothers you so much, then I rally hope you're also fighting for the return of the 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I know it's not as bad, and it's probably healthier than booze,


You sure do love to misquote me. Gonna accuse me again of defending the Philando Castille shooting? Is that before or after you worship a cop killer?
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.

shhh... he thinks Reefer Madness is scientifically accurate. :lol:

It’s his first bad thread in awhile. He was due.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

No question.
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.

Mac and Parkins have both made it clear their bookies lived nearby.
Author:  Seacrest [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.


Good chat.
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It’s not getting defensive. It’s just smacking down lame ass puritanical arguments from the 1950’s.

People talk about sports gambling constantly and that’s illegal in IL.

You do need to lighten up.


As has been explained to you before: Making book is illegal in Illinois, placing a wager is not proscribed.

I trust this is the last time I see that false equivalency from you.

Placing a wager through a bookie is absolutely illegal, and it’s discussed often on the airwaves and has been for decades.

I trust you will learn what a false equivalency is next time you try to apply it.


Not when that bookie isn't in the State. There is no law proscribing online sports betting.

Mac and Parkins have both made it clear their bookies lived nearby.


I've only heard Parkins talk about online betting.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.

well you are supporting the prohibition of what is really a harmless plant so...
Author:  Jbi11s [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
So we went from fake outrage to real outrage here from JLN.
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
If JLN lived in the 1920s, he'd be the jerk ratting out the speakeasy's and the neighbors who were enjoying a nice glass of beer on a weekend.

Heck, in the 1850s he'd probably be looking for fugitive slaves because we must make sure we obey every awful law in the book and have no critical thinking as to whether something should be a law or not.

Edit: JLN, I'm not saying you would be pro-slavery, just that you are pro-bad laws and believe every law should be enforced without thought as to whether or not it is a just law or not.


From "maybe hosts on public airwaves shouldn't talk about their weed consumption" to "you loved prohibition" and, ultimately, slavery.

Go fuck yourselves.

well you are supporting the prohibition of what is really a harmless plant so...


No, I'm not. Saying it shouldn't be discussed in glowing terms on the radio is not supporting the legal classification as a controlled substance.

I'm all for legalization, and guess what I won't complain about after legalization...?
Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Square
Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
FavreFan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Square


NARC!!! This guy is a narc!
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?
Author:  Brick [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

I feel unsafe.
Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?



I would tell my 7 year old that Bud Light is trash and then hand him a Shiner Bock
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 1/11 thread
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I don’t care about weed. I think it should be legal but I don’t really want to have to talk to my 7yr son about edibles and mushrooms. I had to flip the channel until they moved on.

Do you also talk to your son when they introduce their tavern tour and tell him not to touch Bud Light?



I would tell my 7 year old that Bud Light is trash and then hand him a Shiner Bock

Well you're raising him right IMO
Page 2 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/