Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

This show is objectively bad
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=105532		 Page 12 of 13
Author:  Beardown [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Goff is the most sensitive radio host ever. Any dig or slight to him and he goes nuts. Be it Spiegel or Bernstein. Bernstein has taken a few shots.

Even Bernstein is tired of the constant laughter. The other day he asked him "what are giggling about?"
Author:  hnd [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
yeah doing away with all the old bits i think is a mistake if they aren't replaced with something. FF/WYC/TOB while at times were bad, they were fun at times. These guys attempt to joke enough that it seems odd they wanted to get rid of it. You can't be real. smart. radio when you are giggling like idiots all day long.
Author:  Brick [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Friday Fung was perfect radio at the perfect time of the week. I don't know how you can even explain not doing that besides "We want to be a new show so let's get rid of something".
Author:  Douchebag [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Friday Fung was perfect radio at the perfect time of the week. I don't know how you can even explain not doing that besides "We want to be a new show so let's get rid of something".

Are they going to do "Who's your guy?" this year before the draft? I always enjoyed those segments. It was pretty much just an excuse to play drops.
Author:  pittmike [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Dan said last week or so Who's Your Guy should happen.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Friday Fung was perfect radio at the perfect time of the week. I don't know how you can even explain not doing that besides "We want to be a new show so let's get rid of something".

Back when I did listen to B&B, that was some of the best radio I would ever here. It was fun, lighthearted, and everything that I was tuning in for.

It's what sports radio should be when it gets away from sports.
Author:  hnd [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
i think their omission of these sketches are goff. he seems like the type to think he's beyond "gimmick" radio. He does'nt seem to try the "whats on" segment which is understandable though as it may be the stupidest thing ever.

but you have to believe that show's best ratings were on thursdays at 5 and fridays at 4.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
hnd wrote:
i think their omission of these sketches are goff. he seems like the type to think he's beyond "gimmick" radio. He does'nt seem to try the "whats on" segment which is understandable though as it may be the stupidest thing ever.

but you have to believe that show's best ratings were on thursdays at 5 and fridays at 4.

Those two segments were once appointment radio
Author:  Caller Bob [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Kap in company is going to wreck Mully and Hanley in the ratings.

Mac, Jurco & Harry was phenomenal when Mac wasn't off the reservation, I even liked Carmen, Jurko and Harry. I really think the ESPN afternoon drive should go back to a trio with Waddell and Silvy.
Author:  ChiefWampum [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Caller Bob wrote:
Kap in company is going to wreck Mully and Hanley in the ratings.

Mac, Jurco & Harry was phenomenal when Mac wasn't off the reservation, I even liked Carmen, Jurko and Harry. I really think the ESPN afternoon drive should go back to a trio with Waddell and Silvy.

Kap will be 9-12.
Author:  Curious Hair [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Caller Bob wrote:
Kap in company is going to wreck Mully and Hanley in the ratings.

They won't run against each other, but the 9 a.m. hour should help 1000's morning drive ratings.
Author:  Caller Bob [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
ugh, not a fan of the 9-12 slot. The two-three hours of actual work I do everyday, usually is done starting at 9.
Author:  Killer V [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Did they drop the old bits because it's a "new" show?

Maybe Terry owns the rights to those bits and took them with him? ;)
Author:  Beardown [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
I think drinky stopped the stupid 83 thing. Which is good.
Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It will be interesting to see if they start to try and get a little more focused on ratings though now. I still really want to listen to this show and like it at times but even I sometimes switch to Pandora simply because topics don't interest me.


They should be fine by April. My useless advice for that month would be to concentrate on, in descending order, Cubs/Sox, the NFL draft, the Blackhawks in the playoffs (bring on Rozner and/or Rosenbloom for the hour to prop them up), and any fallout from the Bulls season if there finally is any. I'd stfu about LeBron James and the rest of the NBA. No one really cares that much.


Watch it before FF gets here with his empirical data. :lol:


MasturNBAting: (verb) the act of indulging oneself with pseudo-intellectual analysis of out-of-town basketball

Except nobody does this. We've been over this ad nauseam by now. Your stereotype applies to like 12 people in the entire world.
Author:  leashyourkids [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I had forgotten about the Tournament of Bad. I would have thought that would have survived.


It did: viewforum.php?f=164
Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Beardown wrote:
I think drinky stopped the stupid 83 thing. Which is good.


I for one miss this and other drops.

Can someone explain what exactly I'm supposed to enjoy about the What's On but?
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Beardown wrote:
I think drinky stopped the stupid 83 thing. Which is good.


I for one miss this and other drops.

Can someone explain what exactly I'm supposed to enjoy about the What's On but?


That it's a segment they can eventually monetize. "What's On, brought to you by Xfinity..."
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Quote:
Say Bruh Metrics‏ @Jason1Goff
Now that we've solved the national mystery of Tom Brady's jersey, you think we can figure out who's kidnapping black/brown girls in D.C.?


Goff was willing to plagiarize D. L. Hughley to take the brave stance that missing girls is bad.
Author:  badrogue17 [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
Say Bruh Metrics‏ @Jason1Goff
Now that we've solved the national mystery of Tom Brady's jersey, you think we can figure out who's kidnapping black/brown girls in D.C.?


Goff was willing to plagiarize D. L. Hughley to take the brave stance that missing girls is bad.

Lemme guess, his implication that police aren't looking for who's doing this because its minorities being kidnapped?
Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
In Goff's defense, what the fuck is the FBI doing investigating a stolen athletic jersey?

Also, kidnapping is supposed to be, or was, the FBI's specialty, right? I don't think he's wrong in mocking that, get to work helping real people with real problems.
Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
In Goff's defense, what the fuck is the FBI doing investigating a stolen athletic jersey?

Also, kidnapping is supposed to be, or was, the FBI's specialty, right? I don't think he's wrong in mocking that, get to work helping real people with real problems.

The FBI is investigating it (as are the local police). He is just upset about the lack of coverage.
Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
In Goff's defense, what the fuck is the FBI doing investigating a stolen athletic jersey?

Also, kidnapping is supposed to be, or was, the FBI's specialty, right? I don't think he's wrong in mocking that, get to work helping real people with real problems.


Probably because there are different divisions of the FBI looking into different crimes.

Beyond that Goff literally just restated a DL Hughley's point and presented it as his own. It ties into his and the show's general laziness and lack of imagination.
Author:  pittmike [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
I read the FBI was only involved because the jersey was out of the country.
Author:  W_Z [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
In Goff's defense, what the fuck is the FBI doing investigating a stolen athletic jersey?

Also, kidnapping is supposed to be, or was, the FBI's specialty, right? I don't think he's wrong in mocking that, get to work helping real people with real problems.


well now they have their hands full with that tad cummins case.
Author:  MartyD47 [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Quote:
Say Bruh Metrics‏ @Jason1Goff
Now that we've solved the national mystery of Tom Brady's jersey, you think we can figure out who's kidnapping black/brown girls in D.C.?


Yih, yih, yih.
Author:  ChiefWampum [ Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
MartyD47 wrote:
Quote:
Say Bruh Metrics‏ @Jason1Goff
Now that we've solved the national mystery of Tom Brady's jersey, you think we can figure out who's kidnapping black/brown girls in D.C.?


Yih, yih, yih.

Yes, because they had every FBI employee dedicated to Brady's jersey and nothing else this entire time. It's unfathomable to some that if the FBI is investigating X, they can also investigate Y AND Z.
Author:  the ghost of t-dub [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
I have ever listened to another radio program in which the host read an entire news article to his audience. It felt like it took close to 5 minutes. Great radio boys.
Author:  Curious Hair [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
the ghost of t-dub wrote:
I have ever listened to another radio program in which the host read an entire news article to his audience. It felt like it took close to 5 minutes. Great radio boys.

Dan's been doing this for years.
Author:  312player [ Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: This show is objectively bad
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
In Goff's defense, what the fuck is the FBI doing investigating a stolen athletic jersey?

Also, kidnapping is supposed to be, or was, the FBI's specialty, right? I don't think he's wrong in mocking that, get to work helping real people with real problems.

The FBI is investigating it (as are the local police). He is just upset about the lack of coverage.




I thought I read that nearly all of the missing women have turned back up, most were runaways that fell in with gangs.
Page 12 of 13 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/