It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 3:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101886
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Here's another problem with baseball.

Brewers @ Cubs, 1-0 game, 7 total hits in the bottom of the 5th inning.

Neither starting pitcher was still in the game.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 4:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101886
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
12 pitchers used. Its still 1-0 in the 8th. This will likely be at least a three and a half hour game.

Managers are fucking clowns with these bullpens.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 01, 2019 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
12 pitchers used. Its still 1-0 in the 8th. This will likely be at least a three and a half hour game.

Managers are fucking clowns with these bullpens.

It's flat out abuse of players. Wick was up and warming in the 4th. Brought in in the 8th.

I'm telling ya, these relievers need to form their own union.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 12:56 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Here's another problem with baseball.

Brewers @ Cubs, 1-0 game, 7 total hits in the bottom of the 5th inning.

Neither starting pitcher was still in the game.


Any thought to a limit on pitchers available through 9 innings? 5 pitchers total, you don't have to declare who is available before the game. If the game goes extra's, a manager can use the other 7 or 8 pitchers they have on the 25 man roster OR they can actually limit the number of pitchers they have to 11 and then more flexibility with late in a game.

I haven't thought through this enough and am still allowing for 10-12 pitching changes in a 9 inning game, but the game has become a bullpen game. Maybe this idea doesn't go far enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 15990
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
12 pitchers used. Its still 1-0 in the 8th. This will likely be at least a three and a half hour game.

Managers are fucking clowns with these bullpens.

It's flat out abuse of players. Wick was up and warming in the 4th. Brought in in the 8th.

I'm telling ya, these relievers need to form their own union.


I think that abuse is why relievers are often unpredictable from year to year.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 6:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Frank Coztansa wrote:
12 pitchers used. Its still 1-0 in the 8th. This will likely be at least a three and a half hour game.

Managers are fucking clowns with these bullpens.

If I've said it once, I’ve said it thousand times. I fucking hate bullpens.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 6:51 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The thought process is that the way to beat the shift is to hit over it, not completely change your batting style.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of something. It’s not good baseball.


It seems to be working to some degree though.

It only appears to be working because everyone is doing it.

You watch the same horseshit approach as I do. It’s not good baseball, despite what the propeller heads say.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77042
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The thought process is that the way to beat the shift is to hit over it, not completely change your batting style.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of something. It’s not good baseball.


It seems to be working to some degree though.

It only appears to be working because everyone is doing it.

You watch the same horseshit approach as I do. It’s not good baseball, despite what the propeller heads say.



I think Jaw Breaker's point stands. It is winning baseball.

But I agree with you that it isn't "good" baseball if by good you mean interesting, exciting, and entertaining. The powers that be need to worry less about shaving minutes off the game and do something that lines up winning strategy with entertaining baseball.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The thought process is that the way to beat the shift is to hit over it, not completely change your batting style.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of something. It’s not good baseball.


It seems to be working to some degree though.

It only appears to be working because everyone is doing it.

You watch the same horseshit approach as I do. It’s not good baseball, despite what the propeller heads say.



I think Jaw Breaker's point stands. It is winning baseball.

But I agree with you that it isn't "good" baseball if by good you mean interesting, exciting, and entertaining. The powers that be need to worry less about shaving minutes off the game and do something that lines up winning strategy with entertaining baseball.

I know I’m a dinosaur, but I could give two shits about shaving minutes. I like baseball. I just don’t like the modern incarnation of the game. I’m not entertained by walks, strikeouts and home runs.

I’ve always been in your corner about starting pitcher W/L’s. As a starter, your job is to out pitch your opponent. Much of that relies on your teammates ability to hit in the situation. That’s been lost the last 15+ years, for better or worse, I know it’s very frustrating to old fucks like us. Close games are won and lost on approach. There is no approach anymore.

Is there a metric that measures approach?

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 28601
pizza_Place: What??
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The thought process is that the way to beat the shift is to hit over it, not completely change your batting style.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of something. It’s not good baseball.


It seems to be working to some degree though.

It only appears to be working because everyone is doing it.

You watch the same horseshit approach as I do. It’s not good baseball, despite what the propeller heads say.



I think Jaw Breaker's point stands. It is winning baseball.

But I agree with you that it isn't "good" baseball if by good you mean interesting, exciting, and entertaining. The powers that be need to worry less about shaving minutes off the game and do something that lines up winning strategy with entertaining baseball.

I know I’m a dinosaur, but I could give two shits about shaving minutes. I like baseball. I just don’t like the modern incarnation of the game. I’m not entertained by walks, strikeouts and home runs.

I’ve always been in your corner about starting pitcher W/L’s. As a starter, your job is to out pitch your opponent. Much of that relies on your teammates ability to hit in the situation. That’s been lost the last 15+ years, for better or worse, I know it’s very frustrating to old fucks like us. Close games are won and lost on approach. There is no approach anymore.

Is there a metric that measures approach?

Earl Weaver begat Dave Duncan who begat LaRussa. I imagine in some respect Duncan & LaRussa begat Bill James who begat Billy Beane. I guess my point is this didn't happen overnight. The curve started long ago but accelerated only recently. Pitching, defense, and the 3 run homer won games for Weaver and they win games today. It's just today that they know exactly why. I only see one way out of the malaise. Can't move the fences back so you have to deaden the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group