It is currently Thu May 09, 2024 2:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
SHARK wrote:
By the way, memo to Chris Rongey...

The Bears' kicker's name is Olindo Mare (Ma-rey). Please get it right. Thank you.

It's actually pronounced Orlando Mahay

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Phil McCracken wrote:
SHARK wrote:
By the way, memo to Chris Rongey...

The Bears' kicker's name is Olindo Mare (Ma-rey). Please get it right. Thank you.

It's actually pronounced Orlando Mahay

Rongey's been calling him Olindo MAHER in his "Scoreboards". He did it again moments ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:44 pm
Posts: 1146
Location: The home
pizza_Place: Gino's - Sausage
SHARK wrote:
Rongey's been calling him Olindo MAHER in his "Scoreboards". He did it again moments ago.


Must be Bill's cousin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18471
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
So tired of Bernies saying they fired that guy that was responsible for those bad drafts :twisted: Asshat they hired a guy that was a scout for 3 of the Angelo's bad drafts.I just want to bitch slap Dan :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Is it irrational to be thinking more and more that it's not unlikely that, in 3-4 years or so, the Bears will be playing a 3-4 set on defense? If so, why exactly?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Don Tiny wrote:
Is it irrational to be thinking more and more that it's not unlikely that, in 3-4 years or so, the Bears will be playing a 3-4 set on defense? If so, why exactly?

The white dude from Boise they drafted seems to fit a 3-4 scheme. They will certainly never do it with Lovie still here. And I think he finds away to crash this Bears ship into the playoffs by beating the awful Cards and the less awful but still bad Lions. Then they might actually sneak out a win in the Wild Card round before getting completely ass waxed by the Giants, Packers or 49ers. Then next year we get to lather rinse repeat this whole cycle.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:09 pm
Posts: 480
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Not sure which is more ridiculous: people referring to the Bears as "we" or Dan getting so incredibly irritated with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Phil McCracken wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Is it irrational to be thinking more and more that it's not unlikely that, in 3-4 years or so, the Bears will be playing a 3-4 set on defense? If so, why exactly?

The white dude from Boise they drafted seems to fit a 3-4 scheme. They will certainly never do it with Lovie still here. And I think he finds away to crash this Bears ship into the playoffs by beating the awful Cards and the less awful but still bad Lions. Then they might actually sneak out a win in the Wild Card round before getting completely ass waxed by the Giants, Packers or 49ers. Then next year we get to lather rinse repeat this whole cycle.


But I assume Lovie is gone .... just appearing in the playoffs twice in six years doesn't mean shit to me, and I doubt as much to Emery, who I think it's reasonable to think wants Lovie gone yesterday so that he can get around to making this his team (not saying it's better or worse, just saying what I think he's thinking).

I don't know everyone's ages and injuries and whatnot, and I'm not about to research it because I'm not getting paid to do so. What I get the impression of, however ignorant it admittedly may be, is that it'll be much easier in a couple-three years to let the old go and fill in as we go along but in a 3-4 model to maximize current assets and minimize personnel losses (Urlacher, Peppers, Tillman, even Briggs) possible/probable in the next 4 years.

Plus, for every purple jesus, there's a dozen ham-and-eggers running the ball that aren't anything special ... on top of which it's obvious to all that passing is the direction the league is heading. I think the 3-4 is a far more eloquent and appropriate scheme to consider fielding because of that - and I'm a 4-3 stalwart meatball.

So, I think it makes sense to just plug and play who you can on defense, and promise Jay (and then quickly prove) that you're going to seriously concentrate picks, signings, money, and Virginia's remaining prayers to making the offense effective, not to mention "safer" for him.

Then again, maybe not ... what the hell do I know.

uofiguy - two things:

1) I only now, just as I typed your name, realize it wasn't ufoguy :oops: :lol: :oops:
2) It's clearly far more ridiculous for Dan to shit his pants over a fairly common convention of the language

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
uofiguy wrote:
Not sure which is more ridiculous: people referring to the Bears as "we" or Dan getting so incredibly irritated with it.

At first it was annoying. Now it's become hilarious. What a stupid thing to be mad about. :lol:


Last edited by Kirkwood on Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Don Tiny wrote:
But I assume Lovie is gone .... just appearing in the playoffs twice in six years doesn't mean shit to me, and I doubt as much to Emery, who I think it's reasonable to think wants Lovie gone yesterday so that he can get around to making this his team (not saying it's better or worse, just saying what I think he's thinking).

I don't know everyone's ages and injuries and whatnot, and I'm not about to research it because I'm not getting paid to do so. What I get the impression of, however ignorant it admittedly may be, is that it'll be much easier in a couple-three years to let the old go and fill in as we go along but in a 3-4 model to maximize current assets and minimize personnel losses (Urlacher, Peppers, Tillman, even Briggs) possible/probable in the next 4 years.

Plus, for every purple jesus, there's a dozen ham-and-eggers running the ball that aren't anything special ... on top of which it's obvious to all that passing is the direction the league is heading. I think the 3-4 is a far more eloquent and appropriate scheme to consider fielding because of that - and I'm a 4-3 stalwart meatball.

So, I think it makes sense to just plug and play who you can on defense, and promise Jay (and then quickly prove) that you're going to seriously concentrate picks, signings, money, and Virginia's remaining prayers to making the offense effective, not to mention "safer" for him.

Then again, maybe not ... what the hell do I know.

Logically I think you are pretty much spot on. But when have the Bears ever done anything logically. Bring back the 46 Zone! Hampton!!! Knees!!!!

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Last edited by Phil McCracken on Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:09 pm
Posts: 480
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Ha. UFOguy could be Mac's alter ego on here. And I think it's funny that Dan only scolds a certain Score caller demographic when they drop the "we". When that old cat from Racine calls, it's cool. Because Dan is down with bbq and Rakim.

Don Tiny wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Is it irrational to be thinking more and more that it's not unlikely that, in 3-4 years or so, the Bears will be playing a 3-4 set on defense? If so, why exactly?

The white dude from Boise they drafted seems to fit a 3-4 scheme. They will certainly never do it with Lovie still here. And I think he finds away to crash this Bears ship into the playoffs by beating the awful Cards and the less awful but still bad Lions. Then they might actually sneak out a win in the Wild Card round before getting completely ass waxed by the Giants, Packers or 49ers. Then next year we get to lather rinse repeat this whole cycle.


But I assume Lovie is gone .... just appearing in the playoffs twice in six years doesn't mean shit to me, and I doubt as much to Emery, who I think it's reasonable to think wants Lovie gone yesterday so that he can get around to making this his team (not saying it's better or worse, just saying what I think he's thinking).

I don't know everyone's ages and injuries and whatnot, and I'm not about to research it because I'm not getting paid to do so. What I get the impression of, however ignorant it admittedly may be, is that it'll be much easier in a couple-three years to let the old go and fill in as we go along but in a 3-4 model to maximize current assets and minimize personnel losses (Urlacher, Peppers, Tillman, even Briggs) possible/probable in the next 4 years.

Plus, for every purple jesus, there's a dozen ham-and-eggers running the ball that aren't anything special ... on top of which it's obvious to all that passing is the direction the league is heading. I think the 3-4 is a far more eloquent and appropriate scheme to consider fielding because of that - and I'm a 4-3 stalwart meatball.

So, I think it makes sense to just plug and play who you can on defense, and promise Jay (and then quickly prove) that you're going to seriously concentrate picks, signings, money, and Virginia's remaining prayers to making the offense effective, not to mention "safer" for him.

Then again, maybe not ... what the hell do I know.

uofiguy - two things:

1) I only now, just as I typed your name, realize it wasn't ufoguy :oops: :lol: :oops:
2) It's clearly far more ridiculous for Dan to shit his pants over a fairly common convention of the language


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 18973
I listened to the last twenty minutes of the show on the way home. There is not one thing a caller could of said in that time frame that would not have led to them being belittled.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
conns7901 wrote:
I listened to the last twenty minutes of the show on the way home. There is not one thing a caller could of said in that time frame that would not have led to them being belittled.

Yes. This was my problem with the show today and yesterday. Then it goes back to the fundamental question of, "Why take calls then?" They should just go guest-intensive and leave it at that.

I also have to put part of the onus on the callers as well. Not for the content of the calls, but for willingly calling in to get abused. Why call? Your point won't be important to them.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
So tired of Bernies saying they fired that guy that was responsible for those bad drafts :twisted:


He was.

Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Asshat they hired a guy that was a scout for 3 of the Angelo's bad drafts.


That shouldn't disqualify him from the job. Now if you had brought up his crappy record with the Chiefs, you'd have a better case.

Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I just want to bitch slap Dan :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I'm with you on this endeavor.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 3715
Location: The Kingdom of Gene Siegel
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I listened to the last twenty minutes of the show on the way home. There is not one thing a caller could of said in that time frame that would not have led to them being belittled.

Yes. This was my problem with the show today and yesterday. Then it goes back to the fundamental question of, "Why take calls then?" They should just go guest-intensive and leave it at that.

I also have to put part of the onus on the callers as well. Not for the content of the calls, but for willingly calling in to get abused. Why call? Your point won't be important to them.


You know you bring up a good point here. I would imagine a guy calling into their show would be a semi-regular listener. So, they must be familiar with the format of the show and how Dan speaks to callers on Bears post-mortem shows. The callers never win, are often belittled and hung up on, and Dan talks/screams over them for most of the call. Is that an enjoyable experience for some people? Is it the abuse that they crave? The brief moment of being on a radio station? Or is Edward A. Meatball sitting in traffic on the Kennedy thinking to himself: "I'm going to call in and show that whiny little bitch Bernstein what's what." They think they're going to be that one guy who finally one ups Dan and leaves him flabbergasted.

_________________
Back off, Warchild. Seriously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 12771
Location: Lake of the Ozarks (whenever I can)
pizza_Place: Mauries Table
SHARK wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
SHARK wrote:
redskingreg wrote:
SHARK, were a fan of Mama's Family? Personally, I loved that show.

No. It was stupid.


Good man. Once you saw 5 minutes of the first episode, it was all rerun after that.

I know that Vicki Lawrence occasionally donned the wig when "Mama's Family" was originally a skit on the old "Carol Burnett Show" in the '70s. I didn't care for the sitcom when NBC originally aired it from 1982-84 & syndicated from 1986-89. I don't care for reruns now.

Surprised you left out her original claim to fame - singing "The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia".

_________________
If we nominate Trump we will get destroyed & we'll deserve it.- L Graham
I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. No one will be above the law.- DJT 2016
MAY THEY ROT IN HELL. AGAIN, MERRY CHRISTMAS!- DJT 12/25/23


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Picked a great day to listen for the first time in a month or so... :?

Leaving a horrible caller on there just so you can refute the people who say "we never let people talk" is bad...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
Zizou wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I listened to the last twenty minutes of the show on the way home. There is not one thing a caller could of said in that time frame that would not have led to them being belittled.

Yes. This was my problem with the show today and yesterday. Then it goes back to the fundamental question of, "Why take calls then?" They should just go guest-intensive and leave it at that.

I also have to put part of the onus on the callers as well. Not for the content of the calls, but for willingly calling in to get abused. Why call? Your point won't be important to them.


You know you bring up a good point here. I would imagine a guy calling into their show would be a semi-regular listener. So, they must be familiar with the format of the show and how Dan speaks to callers on Bears post-mortem shows. The callers never win, are often belittled and hung up on, and Dan talks/screams over them for most of the call. Is that an enjoyable experience for some people? Is it the abuse that they crave? The brief moment of being on a radio station? Or is Edward A. Meatball sitting in traffic on the Kennedy thinking to himself: "I'm going to call in and show that whiny little bitch Bernstein what's what." They think they're going to be that one guy who finally one ups Dan and leaves him flabbergasted.




I'm beginning to think that the phone lines aren't full, that can be verified. I'm also beginning to derive minor amusement at how Dan can be worked into a predictable type of intellectual meatball.

I may have to see how easy it is to call in and how far I can go with stringing Dan along, I think 12 minutes will be a mark of note.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 18864
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
"Intellectual meatball" I like it.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
When exactly did the Boers and Bernstein show turn into five hours straight of chastising callers? It has gotten completely out of hand, they're even promoting the bad callers on their website now. Everything in moderation is better, B & B is an example of this. It has completely taken away the lighthearted spirit of the show.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:01 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12133
Powerhouse233 wrote:
When exactly did the Boers and Bernstein show turn into five hours straight of chastising callers? It has gotten completely out of hand, they're even promoting the bad callers on their website now. Everything in moderation is better, B & B is an example of this. It has completely taken away the lighthearted spirit of the show.


I think Bernstein, who drives the show, is sick of talking about topics that are beneath him on a given day. He'd much rather talk about Penn St or concussions. Rather than have a conversation, he'd rather pick fights, and I think, as you mentioned, completely out of control.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
BD wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
When exactly did the Boers and Bernstein show turn into five hours straight of chastising callers? It has gotten completely out of hand, they're even promoting the bad callers on their website now. Everything in moderation is better, B & B is an example of this. It has completely taken away the lighthearted spirit of the show.


I think Bernstein, who drives the show, is sick of talking about topics that are beneath him on a given day. He'd much rather talk about Penn St or concussions. Rather than have a conversation, he'd rather pick fights, and I think, as you mentioned, completely out of control.

Bernstein has driven that show, I think from the getgo. I think when callers like a guy from Phoenix (?) wanted the Bears to bench Jay Cutler in favor of Jason Campbell vs. the Packers in the final half hour yesterday, it turned into quite a bizarre argument between the caller & Bernstein.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group