It is currently Thu Oct 31, 2024 7:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
would be a more apt name.


Ive been listening for about 45 minutes instead of 15 recently. Its pretty much all Mulligan til he asks Hanley to agree with him and Hanley does.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

Yeah, I never realized how much Mully dominates everything. I think he likes to get Hanley involved early (a la the Bulls with Cartwright) in the first segment, before he takes over.



Theyre both bad, but I like listening just to see how dumb they will get.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

Yeah, I never realized how much Mully dominates everything. I think he likes to get Hanley involved early (a la the Bulls with Cartwright) in the first segment, before he takes over.



Theyre both bad, but I like listening just to see how dumb they will get.

It's actually more fun to talk about how bad they are, than listening to them.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

Yeah, I never realized how much Mully dominates everything. I think he likes to get Hanley involved early (a la the Bulls with Cartwright) in the first segment, before he takes over.



Theyre both bad, but I like listening just to see how dumb they will get.


Yeah, go ahead, play with that hot fire some more, pal....pretty soon YOU will be the one that becomes dumb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
mully is a huge gas bag. hanley can't get in a word edgewise.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
spmack wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

Yeah, I never realized how much Mully dominates everything. I think he likes to get Hanley involved early (a la the Bulls with Cartwright) in the first segment, before he takes over.



Theyre both bad, but I like listening just to see how dumb they will get.

It's actually more fun to talk about how bad they are, than listening to them.

Absolutely. I always wonder if one of the other early birds will beat me to posting their idiocy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I can't even get down with Mully. They are both bad. Hanley much worse, but both bad none the less.

I do agree that Mully is pretty much runnin shit. Which makes Hanley look even worse. You sit their, not concerned with having to fill dead air. Getting plenty of time to come up with a good thought. Maybe crafting a funny joke or two and then boom......you Hanleys yourself...

Yeah, I never realized how much Mully dominates everything. I think he likes to get Hanley involved early (a la the Bulls with Cartwright) in the first segment, before he takes over.



Theyre both bad, but I like listening just to see how dumb they will get.



I listened a little this morning for the first time in a long time while shoveling snow. It's a tough listen. They ruin almost every interview they do. They bring someone on and continue to do their schtick the entire time.

Stuff like Hub Arkush a year or so ago telling Hanley that his "Manumaleuseless" joke wasn't funny or the reporter from Buffalo shitting on Mully for his "Ryan Fitzmagic" stuff would usually be a clue to normal radio hosts that maybe they should cool it with the lame shit. Not these guys...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:

Stuff like Hub Arkush a year or so ago telling Hanley that his "Manumaleuseless" joke wasn't funny or the reporter from Buffalo shitting on Mully for his "Ryan Fitzmagic" stuff would usually be a clue to normal radio hosts that maybe they should cool it with the lame shit. Not these guys...

Didnt know either of those stories.

They are kinda like Laurence in that way. They are gonna do their show, their way and fuck anyone else who thinks they should change.


Personally, I dont care for MOST interviews on any show. Occassionally you'll get some good stuff like Billick on B and B. And the sportsbetting guy on M and H is ok but for the most part the interviews are terrible and filled with say nothing cliches.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
rogers park bryan wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:

Stuff like Hub Arkush a year or so ago telling Hanley that his "Manumaleuseless" joke wasn't funny or the reporter from Buffalo shitting on Mully for his "Ryan Fitzmagic" stuff would usually be a clue to normal radio hosts that maybe they should cool it with the lame shit. Not these guys...

Didnt know either of those stories.

They are kinda like Laurence in that way. They are gonna do their show, their way and fuck anyone else who thinks they should change.


Personally, I dont care for MOST interviews on any show. Occassionally you'll get some good stuff like Billick on B and B. And the sportsbetting guy on M and H is ok but for the most part the interviews are terrible and filled with say nothing cliches.



I wish they were taped somewhere. Both cringeworthy radio.

The interview thing is annoying as hell. It's the same with their callers. They will do a 3 minute routine while the person is sitting their waiting to speak. It's ridiculous. First because it's not nearly as funny as they both think it is secondly becasue the guy on the phone has to pretend to laugh at the shit...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Yeah, Hub's crotchety nature, like Bruce LeVine, sometimes comes in handy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
It was great because he totally caght Hanley off guard. It sounded like Hub was somehow offended by Hanley's joke. Hanly just fumbled out a few incoherent words and Hub moved on with his thoughts...

I don't see any way that this show ever gets better. Like you said, they're going to do their thing no matter what. And they'll probably get decent numbers going up against a national show...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79196
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Personally, I dont care for MOST interviews on any show. Occassionally you'll get some good stuff like Billick on B and B. And the sportsbetting guy on M and H is ok but for the most part the interviews are terrible and filled with say nothing cliches.



bernstein knows how to ask a question. Guys like North and Mully think they know the answer before they ask it so the question becomes a rambling jumble that includes what they perceive to be the answer. The interviewee often doesn't know what to say.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Personally, I dont care for MOST interviews on any show. Occassionally you'll get some good stuff like Billick on B and B. And the sportsbetting guy on M and H is ok but for the most part the interviews are terrible and filled with say nothing cliches.



bernstein knows how to ask a question. Guys like North and Mully think they know the answer before they ask it so the question becomes a rambling jumble that includes what they perceive to be the answer. The interviewee often doesn't know what to say.

True. And Silvy is a good interviewer.

But for the most part, the people interviewed on sports radio just have nothing to say.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79196
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
But for the most part, the people interviewed on sports radio just have nothing to say.


True, that's why the media loved Guillen and Ditka so much. Even when he was angry at them, Ditka gave the reporters something to write about or an interview that the radio station could replay a few times.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
But for the most part, the people interviewed on sports radio just have nothing to say.


True, that's why the media loved Guillen and Ditka so much. Even when he was angry at them, Ditka gave the reporters something to write about or an interview that the radio station could replay a few times.

You are forgetting the King of the Soundbite....Mike Quade.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Phil McCracken wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
But for the most part, the people interviewed on sports radio just have nothing to say.


True, that's why the media loved Guillen and Ditka so much. Even when he was angry at them, Ditka gave the reporters something to write about or an interview that the radio station could replay a few times.

You are forgetting the King of the Soundbite....Mike Quade.

We've been lucky in chicago in general.

Some of those lunatics that managed the Cubs in the Tribune era were very interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group