It is currently Wed Jun 05, 2024 10:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1010 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 34  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6541
RFDC wrote:
It is funny how the sentiment regarding Jake has changed. Not too long ago the consensus was let Jake go. Now it seems to be swinging to bring Jake back.


Jake needs to go. He is going to breakdown very soon with his delivery style. Rebuild the bullpen and trade for a young SP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27464
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I would be interested in trading Russell for a starting pitcher and then signing Cozart to replace him rather than using Baez and Happ in the infield.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
No thanks to Jake or Darvish. Jake is on the decline, Darvish is a loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
If I really have to I'm trading Baez or Happ before Russell. Russell has the injury problems but he has proven to be a big bat in the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
If Jake will take 4/108 for example (a 27M AVV) I say re-sign him but chances are someone will go 5/6 years at 25M+ and then it's bye bye. I don't think there is a ton of risk with him arm wise either. Would like to see him back. Maybe they could structure a deal tied to starts/IP to extend him beyond 4 years...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4466
pizza_Place: Rosati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I think everyone will sign with the Cubs for less money

Heyward may renegotiate to help the club.


If they don't trade him, I hope this happens. I keep telling myself he seems like a dude that would do it but why would any human being say let's rework my contract so I get less money. He did sign for less to come here though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I read that vesting options are likely for Arrieta with any team, but there could be 5 years guaranteed out there for him.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4466
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
I would be interested in trading Russell for a starting pitcher and then signing Cozart to replace him rather than using Baez and Happ in the infield.


Russell is clutch. No thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
I would be interested in trading Russell for a starting pitcher and then signing Cozart to replace him rather than using Baez and Happ in the infield.


Happ seems like the guy mostly likely traded. He is sub par defensively but has the switch hitting power bat and 6 years of team control plus the defensive versatility. There is a lot to like there.

As for as trading Russell, gotta get back someone with top of the rotation stuff. Not sure your going to find that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Schwarber and a thing for Michael Fulmer.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Ron Wolfley wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
I would be interested in trading Russell for a starting pitcher and then signing Cozart to replace him rather than using Baez and Happ in the infield.


Russell is clutch. No thank you.



Im not interested in trading Russell either.. Guy will bounce back and have a huge year next year.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26640
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Keep everybody and sign about 3 FA SP that could fit in the 4 and 5 spots.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55967
jimmypasta wrote:
Keep everybody and sign about 3 FA SP that could fit in the 4 and 5 spots.

They gotta do some work on the bullpen. Cannot stand pat there.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12164
RFDC wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Keep everybody and sign about 3 FA SP that could fit in the 4 and 5 spots.

They gotta do some work on the bullpen. Cannot stand pat there.


I'd almost prefer they don't trade any of their position players, and add 1 starter/reliever through free agency, not even upper end talent. They aren't going to get an aces in free agency, and they're likely to have to have to overpay. Why not lay somewhat low and re-evaluate the market come July?

Currently, if they do nothing, they have Lester, Hendricks and Quintana. They probably do need to add a #4 starter, but can get buy without a #5 if the top of the rotation does their job.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55967
BD wrote:
RFDC wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
Keep everybody and sign about 3 FA SP that could fit in the 4 and 5 spots.

They gotta do some work on the bullpen. Cannot stand pat there.


I'd almost prefer they don't trade any of their position players, and add 1 starter/reliever through free agency, not even upper end talent. They aren't going to get an aces in free agency, and they're likely to have to have to overpay. Why not lay somewhat low and re-evaluate the market come July?

Currently, if they do nothing, they have Lester, Hendricks and Quintana. They probably do need to add a #4 starter, but can get buy without a #5 if the top of the rotation does their job.

I would not be surprised at all to see them go this route.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 3886
Location: Tinley Park
pizza_Place: zzzzzz
Sell high on Happ for pitching. He's a player you do not have a position for. I am not opposed to trading Schwarber but I doubt he will bring back the return the Cubs want. Better to let him build up his value.

Sign Cobb to be a #3/#4 and let Montgomery take the #5. If Davis doesn't get a stupid offer, resign him.

_________________
Lay off that whiskey and let that cocaine be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
DAC wrote:
Sell high on Happ for pitching. He's a player you do not have a position for. I am not opposed to trading Schwarber but I doubt he will bring back the return the Cubs want. Better to let him build up his value.

Sign Cobb to be a #3/#4 and let Montgomery take the #5. If Davis doesn't get a stupid offer, resign him.



Id rather have Lynn over Cobb, if Schwarber sucks this year his value drops more..if he hits better than Theo won't trade him...just dump him now, get what ya can and move on.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Obviously we need a closer but I wouldn't worry about the rest of the bullpen until the trade deadline. We had a good regular season bullpen last year (eventhough it declined in the 2nd half but who saw Justin Wilson being that bad?).

Do what the Dodgers, Yankees and I think even the Astros did and trade for closers from bad teams near or at the deadline. It seems like that will be the model going forward. 3-4 closers in your bullpen for the stretch run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10618
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
'77Cubs wrote:
If Jake will take 4/108 for example (a 27M AVV) I say re-sign him but chances are someone will go 5/6 years at 25M+ and then it's bye bye. I don't think there is a ton of risk with him arm wise either. Would like to see him back. Maybe they could structure a deal tied to starts/IP to extend him beyond 4 years...


Jake is going to get at least 5 years for a shit ton of money. If the Cubs wanto be the Yankees or Giants and understand / accept that in 2 years, the contract will be throwing money out the window...fine. I've yet to see the Cubs operate that way.

Jake is going elsewhere.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Jon Lester signed a 6/$155M contract in his age 31 season. Arrieta will be 32 and not as good as Lester, in my opinion, at the time of the contract. I think he is looking at 4-5 years at between $22M-$25M per.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80496
7 years and $155

The GM who wins this lottery will be fired.

Jake was a good five inning pitcher.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
good dolphin wrote:
7 years and $155

The GM who wins this lottery will be fired.

Jake was a good five inning pitcher.

That's about all it takes nowadays.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80496
wdelaney72 wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
If Jake will take 4/108 for example (a 27M AVV) I say re-sign him but chances are someone will go 5/6 years at 25M+ and then it's bye bye. I don't think there is a ton of risk with him arm wise either. Would like to see him back. Maybe they could structure a deal tied to starts/IP to extend him beyond 4 years...


Jake is going to get at least 5 years for a shit ton of money. If the Cubs wanto be the Yankees or Giants and understand / accept that in 2 years, the contract will be throwing money out the window...fine. I've yet to see the Cubs operate that way.

Jake is going elsewhere.


The Cubs are already that team with Lester underperforming and showing signs of age in year 3 of a 6 year contract.

Everyone seems to be penciling him in for 2016 numbers when he is most likely not going to be good as 2017.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80496
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
7 years and $155

The GM who wins this lottery will be fired.

Jake was a good five inning pitcher.

That's about all it takes nowadays.


Then sign him. He will be awesome.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77504
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
good dolphin wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
If Jake will take 4/108 for example (a 27M AVV) I say re-sign him but chances are someone will go 5/6 years at 25M+ and then it's bye bye. I don't think there is a ton of risk with him arm wise either. Would like to see him back. Maybe they could structure a deal tied to starts/IP to extend him beyond 4 years...


Jake is going to get at least 5 years for a shit ton of money. If the Cubs wanto be the Yankees or Giants and understand / accept that in 2 years, the contract will be throwing money out the window...fine. I've yet to see the Cubs operate that way.

Jake is going elsewhere.


The Cubs are already that team with Lester underperforming and showing signs of age in year 3 of a 6 year contract.

Everyone seems to be penciling him in for 2016 numbers when he is most likely not going to be good as 2017.



Lester almost certainly won't be at his best as he finishes up that contract. Still, it was a good signing that has already worked out well for the Cubs. Also, he's lefthanded and doesn't rely on overwhelming stuff to get outs. That's a big difference between him and Arrieta.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
good dolphin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
7 years and $155

The GM who wins this lottery will be fired.

Jake was a good five inning pitcher.

That's about all it takes nowadays.


Then sign him. He will be awesome.

Dont be bitchy.

I would offer him 4 years at the most. I might overpay a bit but no more than 4 years.

I understand that wont get it done, so he's gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
good dolphin wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
'77Cubs wrote:
If Jake will take 4/108 for example (a 27M AVV) I say re-sign him but chances are someone will go 5/6 years at 25M+ and then it's bye bye. I don't think there is a ton of risk with him arm wise either. Would like to see him back. Maybe they could structure a deal tied to starts/IP to extend him beyond 4 years...


Jake is going to get at least 5 years for a shit ton of money. If the Cubs wanto be the Yankees or Giants and understand / accept that in 2 years, the contract will be throwing money out the window...fine. I've yet to see the Cubs operate that way.

Jake is going elsewhere.


The Cubs are already that team with Lester underperforming and showing signs of age in year 3 of a 6 year contract.

Everyone seems to be penciling him in for 2016 numbers when he is most likely not going to be good as 2017.

Havent seen that at all. He was a Cy Young finalist in 2016.

I see people calling him a 2/3 which is what he was last year.

He'll go like 13-11 with a high 3's ERA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3880
Wouldn't mind if Theo called KC to see what they want for Danny Duffy. He's signed to a pretty team friendly deal through 2021 or something.

KC has to know they are facing a massive rebuild, maybe they want to jumpstart it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12164
312player wrote:
DAC wrote:
Sell high on Happ for pitching. He's a player you do not have a position for. I am not opposed to trading Schwarber but I doubt he will bring back the return the Cubs want. Better to let him build up his value.

Sign Cobb to be a #3/#4 and let Montgomery take the #5. If Davis doesn't get a stupid offer, resign him.



Id rather have Lynn over Cobb, if Schwarber sucks this year his value drops more..if he hits better than Theo won't trade him...just dump him now, get what ya can and move on.


Aren't they going to end up giving Lynn (or Cobb) at least $17-18 million a season on a multi-year deal? Not sure I'd be up for giving any of these guys huge deals when there's probably better value to be found on the market.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Heard on the radio Dodgers trying to make room for Stanton.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1010 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group