It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:19 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 22606
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
That one game Jordan played in and got 2 hits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:07 pm
Posts: 7913
Location: A large oak tree.
pizza_Place: Nowhere
1906.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77040
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
juschill wrote:
312player wrote:
It hasn't peaked IMO, in 3 years Reinsdorph will be DEAD! The team will have a new majority owner and young talent blossoming. The Cubs will have won 2 rings in in the last 5 years and been a juggernaut the last 5...then things get interesting.


There is no rivalry to peak in the future.

It's adorable that you think the guys who haven't developed a single minor leaguer outside of Sale for the past 15 years will have young talent blossoming in three years. They're basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

Interesting... Like comparing horse flies with the actual horse. Nothing interesting. White Sox best bet as a franchise is to leave this city. No serious free agent will ever sign with the team that will be perpetually ignored.



You a big Cub fan? I have some tickets available for you. You can have any Cardinals game for 3X the Diamond Level face. :lol: :lol: :lol: Go Cubs!

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
juschill wrote:
312player wrote:
It hasn't peaked IMO, in 3 years Reinsdorph will be DEAD! The team will have a new majority owner and young talent blossoming. The Cubs will have won 2 rings in in the last 5 years and been a juggernaut the last 5...then things get interesting.


There is no rivalry to peak in the future.

It's adorable that you think the guys who haven't developed a single minor leaguer outside of Sale for the past 15 years will have young talent blossoming in three years. They're basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

Interesting... Like comparing horse flies with the actual horse. Nothing interesting. White Sox best bet as a franchise is to leave this city. No serious free agent will ever sign with the team that will be perpetually ignored.



You a big Cub fan? I have some tickets available for you. You can have any Cardinals game for 3X the Diamond Level face. :lol: :lol: :lol: Go Cubs!


Nope. You won't find a bigger Cub or Cub-fan hater than me. Ambivalent about the White Sox. Just an unbiased outsider viewing the obvious that this city is only big enough for one team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101885
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
juschill wrote:
You won't find a bigger Cub or Cub-fan hater than me.
Try us.
juschill wrote:
Just an unbiased outsider...
No, you're not.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Frank Coztansa wrote:
juschill wrote:
Just an unbiased outsider...
No, you're not.


That's true enough. I stand corrected. I do loathe everything about the Cubs organization and it's fans and for the good of competitive baseball in general I've come to the conclusion that the White Sox should leave Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101885
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You hate the Cubs so much that you want the other team to move to FARGO ???

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38546
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Frank Coztansa wrote:
You hate the Cubs so much that you want the other team to move to FARGO ???

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Frank Coztansa wrote:
You hate the Cubs so much that you want the other team to move to FARGO ???


Indianapolis would do fine. Although I suspect the White Sox would have just as good a chance of attracting a serious free agent in Fargo as they would as the afterthought step children in Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77040
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.
:lol: The problem is they've gotten too many free agents.

The funny thing is a lot of free agents have chosen to go elsewhere than the Cubs too and they had to overpay for others.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38100
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.

Pernicious myths.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.


If that's all it takes then it shouldn't matter if they were in Fargo since all it takes is the most money and being an attractive franchise has nothing to do with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.
:lol: The problem is they've gotten too many free agents.

The funny thing is a lot of free agents have chosen to go elsewhere than the Cubs too and they had to overpay for others.


Too many awful free agents and trades by an in-over-it's-head front office.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77040
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
juschill wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.


If that's all it takes then it shouldn't matter if they were in Fargo since all it takes is the most money and being an attractive franchise has nothing to do with it.



Except they're pretty frugal right now and they wouldn't have as much money if they were in Fargo.

The idea that baseball players regularly take less to play for "attractive franchises" is pure fantasy. MLB is not the capped NBA.

The White Sox are not losing money. They have a sweet stadium deal.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
juschill wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.


If that's all it takes then it shouldn't matter if they were in Fargo since all it takes is the most money and being an attractive franchise has nothing to do with it.



Except they're pretty frugal right now and they wouldn't have as much money if they were in Fargo.

The idea that baseball players regularly take less to play for "attractive franchises" is pure fantasy. MLB is not the capped NBA.

The White Sox are not losing money. They have a sweet stadium deal.


I know they're making money thanks to Reinsdorf blackmailing the state 30 years ago when the state should have told him good bye.

They haven't been frugal since the late eighties and in all that time the only serious free agent they signed was one of the biggest jerks to ever live.

I'm not sure that they wouldn't have as much money elsewhere. They'd be more likely to develop a fan base and get some attention. They would have an equal or greater chance of increasing attendance. They can develop a rivalry with a team on par with them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Just 3-4 years ago, when both teams were awful, it was a good rivalry. The games they had against each other were perhaps the most meaningful of the season, since neither team was going anywhere soon. But 2004, when both teams were going pretty well it was good too. The key, is having both teams at similar levels. Ideally, both teams doing well. But this season, the games will probably be more important to the Sox, as they will probably be a last place team, with their only possible saving grace being whatever victories they might get against their crosstown rivals. For the Cubs they will just be like playing the Reds, Padres or Braves. Just another team they should beat up on.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just 3-4 years ago, when both teams were awful, it was a good rivalry. The games they had against each other were perhaps the most meaningful of the season, since neither team was going anywhere soon. But 2004, when both teams were going pretty well it was good too. The key, is having both teams at similar levels. Ideally, both teams doing well. But this season, the games will probably be more important to the Sox, as they will probably be a last place team, with their only possible saving grace being whatever victories they might get against their crosstown rivals. For the Cubs they will just be like playing the Reds, Padres or Braves. Just another team they should beat up on.


They never, ever will be on similar levels in terms of fan or media interest. The White Sox will perpetually be the Western Michigan to the Cubs Michigan. An insignificant footnote.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24201
pizza_Place: It's gone
Can someone detail the fall of the White Sox as the team of Chicago.

Was there a void in the early 80s? I remember when the Sox won in 83 it wasn't nearly as popular as the Cubs 84 season.

Was the media just full of more Cubs fans than Sox fans sometime in the late 70s or early 80s?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
juschill wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The White Sox can sign almost any free agent they want. All they have to do is pay the most money.


If that's all it takes then it shouldn't matter if they were in Fargo since all it takes is the most money and being an attractive franchise has nothing to do with it.



Except they're pretty frugal right now and they wouldn't have as much money if they were in Fargo.

The idea that baseball players regularly take less to play for "attractive franchises" is pure fantasy. MLB is not the capped NBA.

The White Sox are not losing money. They have a sweet stadium deal.

That will get you to a championship. Keep on believing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
juschill wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just 3-4 years ago, when both teams were awful, it was a good rivalry. The games they had against each other were perhaps the most meaningful of the season, since neither team was going anywhere soon. But 2004, when both teams were going pretty well it was good too. The key, is having both teams at similar levels. Ideally, both teams doing well. But this season, the games will probably be more important to the Sox, as they will probably be a last place team, with their only possible saving grace being whatever victories they might get against their crosstown rivals. For the Cubs they will just be like playing the Reds, Padres or Braves. Just another team they should beat up on.


They never, ever will be on similar levels in terms of fan or media interest. The White Sox will perpetually be the Western Michigan to the Cubs Michigan. An insignificant footnote.


I agree and believe that the division between the two will likely grow, as the Cubs continue to dominate and the Sox likely struggle in the short term.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101885
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Congrats on the Headline Championship!!

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77040
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
juschill wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just 3-4 years ago, when both teams were awful, it was a good rivalry. The games they had against each other were perhaps the most meaningful of the season, since neither team was going anywhere soon. But 2004, when both teams were going pretty well it was good too. The key, is having both teams at similar levels. Ideally, both teams doing well. But this season, the games will probably be more important to the Sox, as they will probably be a last place team, with their only possible saving grace being whatever victories they might get against their crosstown rivals. For the Cubs they will just be like playing the Reds, Padres or Braves. Just another team they should beat up on.


They never, ever will be on similar levels in terms of fan or media interest. The White Sox will perpetually be the Western Michigan to the Cubs Michigan. An insignificant footnote.


I agree and believe that the division between the two will likely grow, as the Cubs continue to dominate and the Sox likely struggle in the short term.



That's fantasyland though. The game isn't set up for the Cubs- or anyone else- to "dominate". You might not notice it right now in the post-coital afterglow of the first Cub championship in 108 seasons, but everything that made the Cubs special is GONE. They will be judged more and more like a normal team. Even Wrigley Field is gone. Buried in a canyon of giant buildings and resurfaced so that it looks like a cheap replica of the original.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
juschill wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just 3-4 years ago, when both teams were awful, it was a good rivalry. The games they had against each other were perhaps the most meaningful of the season, since neither team was going anywhere soon. But 2004, when both teams were going pretty well it was good too. The key, is having both teams at similar levels. Ideally, both teams doing well. But this season, the games will probably be more important to the Sox, as they will probably be a last place team, with their only possible saving grace being whatever victories they might get against their crosstown rivals. For the Cubs they will just be like playing the Reds, Padres or Braves. Just another team they should beat up on.


They never, ever will be on similar levels in terms of fan or media interest. The White Sox will perpetually be the Western Michigan to the Cubs Michigan. An insignificant footnote.


I agree and believe that the division between the two will likely grow, as the Cubs continue to dominate and the Sox likely struggle in the short term.



That's fantasyland though. The game isn't set up for the Cubs- or anyone else- to "dominate". You might not notice it right now in the post-coital afterglow of the first Cub championship in 108 seasons, but everything that made the Cubs special is GONE. They will be judged more and more like a normal team. Even Wrigley Field is gone. Buried in a canyon of giant buildings and resurfaced so that it looks like a cheap replica of the original.


I think that's fantasyland to think that since they won and aren't losers anymore that they're just a regular team. The bars aren't going to close down. The fans won't sober up. And the fans won't care that their ugly stadium is now a permanent billboard. The media won't stop covering them. It'll still be the cool thing to do in the summer. And the Sox will still play in a ghetto that couldn't be a more unattractive venue for a game. (I hate Jerry Reinsdorf more every day.). Until the White Sox move the gap between them will continue to grow. Even when the White Sox have successful years on the field. Which should be a while because what they are doing now is not a rebuild, it's unloading malcontents. Nothing more.


Last edited by juschill on Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
juschill wrote:
basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

What?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89030
Location: To the left of my post
If the Mets and Clippers can still exist and do fairly well with the Yankees and Lakers in the same town the Sox can do just fine with the Cubs.

The Cubs would need about 20 years of championship success to even be in the same discussion as the Yankees and Lakers.

Some smart owner is going to buy the Sox on the cheap compared to most other franchises and make a ton of money with some very simple moves that leverage Chicago rather than leaving Chicago.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
IMU wrote:
juschill wrote:
basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

What?


Basing their hopes on a guy dropped from the second best prospect to the seventeenth because he struck out 12 times in 19 plate appearances. And this is the hope for the future. I think they may have made the worst trade in all of human history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 495
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If the Mets and Clippers can still exist and do fairly well with the Yankees and Lakers in the same town the Sox can do just fine with the Cubs.

The Cubs would need about 20 years of championship success to even be in the same discussion as the Yankees and Lakers.

Some smart owner is going to buy the Sox on the cheap compared to most other franchises and make a ton of money with some very simple moves that leverage Chicago rather than leaving Chicago.


I don't think the Cubs need 20 years of championships to be like the Yankees or Lakers in terms of fan interest or media interest. They are right there if not superior to those two in terms of fan base and interest and always have been.

I don't know how a new owner would be better for the White Sox while they still play in the ghetto. Unless they closed that stadium down and moved downtown (which would be less likely than the team moving to Indianapolis).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:04 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77040
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
juschill wrote:
IMU wrote:
juschill wrote:
basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

What?


Basing their hopes on a guy dropped from the second best prospect to the seventeenth because he struck out 12 times in 19 plate appearances. And this is the hope for the future. I think they may have made the worst trade in all of human history.



He'll strike out slightly less than Kris Bryant.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38546
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
juschill wrote:
IMU wrote:
juschill wrote:
basing their hopes on a guy who has already proven he can't hit in the major leagues.

What?


Basing their hopes on a guy dropped from the second best prospect to the seventeenth because he struck out 12 times in 19 plate appearances. And this is the hope for the future. I think they may have made the worst trade in all of human history.


19 plate appearances does not a career make.

You are an idiot.

Please do us all a favor and go drown yourself in Lake Michigan.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group