It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Hatchetman wrote:
Ventura was a much better player. any oaf can play 1B.

Aggravated Sox fan Bob would like a word with you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3831
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
?


One Post wrote:
Well you can argue about anything because if you are obstinate.

Dawson, even as a borderline HOF player, has 2x the WAR of Baines.

Stop, it's silly at this point.


They're very close as players. It's very easy to make the case that Baines was a better offensive player. Of course, Dawson is going to have a higher WAR because WAR vastly overvalues defense, particularly on the outfield corners. The only thing that's silly is WAR zombies.


OWAR, Dawson 54+, Baines 40+.

Dawson had 4 seasons with an OWAR of 5+, Baines had none. It isn't close really.

Like I said, you can argue anything that you want.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
?


One Post wrote:
Well you can argue about anything because if you are obstinate.

Dawson, even as a borderline HOF player, has 2x the WAR of Baines.

Stop, it's silly at this point.


They're very close as players. It's very easy to make the case that Baines was a better offensive player. Of course, Dawson is going to have a higher WAR because WAR vastly overvalues defense, particularly on the outfield corners. The only thing that's silly is WAR zombies.


OWAR, Dawson 54+, Baines 40+.

Dawson had 4 seasons with an OWAR of 5+, Baines had none. It isn't close really.

Like I said, you can argue anything that you want.



Unless you're a WAR zombie. Baines played the first ten years of his career in a park that was notoriously tough for hitters. It's clear that's not adequately accounted for in your favorite aggregate stat. And even so, over long careers Baines has a better OPS.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Dawson hung around after he was done while Baines stayed productive into his 40s

Dawson still better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Dawson hung around after he was done while Baines stayed productive into his 40s


:lol: Baines played 22 seasons. That's not really a great argument in favor of Dawson.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Dawson hung around after he was done while Baines stayed productive into his 40s


:lol: Baines played 22 seasons. That's not really a great argument in favor of Dawson.

Thats my point. It wouldn't be as close but Baines closed the gap by finishing so much better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3831
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
?


One Post wrote:
Well you can argue about anything because if you are obstinate.

Dawson, even as a borderline HOF player, has 2x the WAR of Baines.

Stop, it's silly at this point.


They're very close as players. It's very easy to make the case that Baines was a better offensive player. Of course, Dawson is going to have a higher WAR because WAR vastly overvalues defense, particularly on the outfield corners. The only thing that's silly is WAR zombies.


OWAR, Dawson 54+, Baines 40+.

Dawson had 4 seasons with an OWAR of 5+, Baines had none. It isn't close really.

Like I said, you can argue anything that you want.



Unless you're a WAR zombie. Baines played the first ten years of his career in a park that was notoriously tough for hitters. It's clear that's not adequately accounted for in your favorite aggregate stat. And even so, over long careers Baines has a better OPS.


Dawson played a decade in Olympic Stadium, a pretty shitty place for hitters.

Like I said before, you can argue anything that you want really.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55768
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He was the most effective base stealer in history.


Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:15 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He was the most effective base stealer in history.


Image


Not close to Raines on percentage.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55768
Thats great. Raines was a really good player.

But I do not see how anyone who actually watched them play could say that Raines was a more effective base stealer than Henderson.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3831
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


One Post wrote:
Not sure what you are driving at here.

Pick the Hall of Famer

Guy A: 600+ Homers, 1600+ RBI, 2400+ hits, slash line of .273/.344/.534

Guy B: 600+ Homers, 1600+ RBI, 2300+ hits, slash line of .276/.402/.554

It's not even close really.


I'll take the guy who played four seasons less and hit 60 or more homers three times. Is there anyone else who ever did that?



We aren't asking who hit 60 homers three times, that isn't the question, it's who is HOF worthy, or in this case, who has the better case Thome or Sosa. I think we are in agreement here.

WAR: Thome 72.9 and Sosa 58.4. Also we know that WAR for Sosa is WAAAAAY overrated because:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR vastly overvalues defense, particularly on the outfield corners.


So it is nice that we can put this one to bed. Thome has a vastly superior WAR, and Sosa's WAR is waaaaaay over valued.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Henderson would've never been caught if he only had to steal 40/year.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
http://baseball-players.pointafter.com/ ... Tim-Raines

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
He was the most effective base stealer in history.


Image


Easily the best leadoff hitter of my lifetime. Best base stealer too. His numbers were much more prodigious because he made far more attempts. He put the opposing pitcher and his defense under great pressure whenever he got on base. if you don't think Ricky was the best, just ask him.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
RFDC wrote:
Thats great. Raines was a really good player.

But I do not see how anyone who actually watched them play could say that Raines was a more effective base stealer than Henderson.


:lol: Because his results speak for themselves. The numbers don't lie. Every time you get caught you diminish the return.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Hatchetman wrote:
Henderson would've never been caught if he only had to steal 40/year.



What kind of claptrap is this? First of all, nobody has to steal a base. Henderson often ran when it was pointless, even foolish to do so.

We can't be selectively SABRmetric. Of course Henderson was successful enough that his stealing was a net positive. It just wasn't as positive as Raines' results.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


One Post wrote:
Not sure what you are driving at here.

Pick the Hall of Famer

Guy A: 600+ Homers, 1600+ RBI, 2400+ hits, slash line of .273/.344/.534

Guy B: 600+ Homers, 1600+ RBI, 2300+ hits, slash line of .276/.402/.554

It's not even close really.


I'll take the guy who played four seasons less and hit 60 or more homers three times. Is there anyone else who ever did that?



We aren't asking who hit 60 homers three times, that isn't the question, it's who is HOF worthy, or in this case, who has the better case Thome or Sosa. I think we are in agreement here.

WAR: Thome 72.9 and Sosa 58.4. Also we know that WAR for Sosa is WAAAAAY overrated because:

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
WAR vastly overvalues defense, particularly on the outfield corners.


So it is nice that we can put this one to bed. Thome has a vastly superior WAR, and Sosa's WAR is waaaaaay over valued.


Are you saying that the only man to hit 60+ homers in a season three times achieved something insignificant?

Image

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55768
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Thats great. Raines was a really good player.

But I do not see how anyone who actually watched them play could say that Raines was a more effective base stealer than Henderson.


:lol: Because his results speak for themselves. The numbers don't lie. Every time you get caught you diminish the return.


Game 7 of WS and you need a stolen base. Do you want Henderson or Raines on 1st base?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:44 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101786
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
That depends on who did more lines in the clubhouse before the game started.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
What kind of claptrap is this? First of all, nobody has to steal a base. Henderson often ran when it was pointless, even foolish to do so.
.


Ultimately the manager, not the player, has control over base stealing decisions. You're saying he would have gone renegade and ignored the manager? Back then baseball management never had anyone with the most rudimentary concept of statistical probability to figure things we take for granted now.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 3831
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Are you saying that the only man to hit 60+ homers in a season three times achieved something insignificant?

Image


Feel free to use the quote function to highlight where I said that Sosa's accomplishments are insignificant.

Let me help you out here and tell you not to look to long for it because I never said that.

The conversation is who has a better HOF case, and thereby a better career. I don't see how we aren't in agreement here. Thome has a far superior WAR to Sosa, and you yourself acknowledge that Sosa's WAR is veeeeeery overrated, further giving the advantage to Thome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 22587
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
What kind of claptrap is this? First of all, nobody has to steal a base. Henderson often ran when it was pointless, even foolish to do so.
.


Ultimately the manager, not the player, has control over base stealing decisions. You're saying he would have gone renegade and ignored the manager? Back then baseball management never had anyone with the most rudimentary concept of statistical probability to figure things we take for granted now.


Quote:
Billy told Rick that he would give Rickey the first seven innings of the game to do whatever he wanted. "Green light" is not really the phrase here. "Running bejesus amok" is more like it. Then Billy told Rick to give him, Billy, the last two innings.


Rickey could run whenever he wanted the first 7 innings.

https://espn.go.com/page2/s/wiley/011005.html

Great article by the way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The numbers don't lie.

Well, except for every time you say they do.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The numbers don't lie.

Well, except for every time you say they do.


Example? And please don't cite some "magic" aggregate loaded with noise as an actual number.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Are you saying that the only man to hit 60+ homers in a season three times achieved something insignificant?

Image


Feel free to use the quote function to highlight where I said that Sosa's accomplishments are insignificant.

Let me help you out here and tell you not to look to long for it because I never said that.

The conversation is who has a better HOF case, and thereby a better career. I don't see how we aren't in agreement here. Thome has a far superior WAR to Sosa, and you yourself acknowledge that Sosa's WAR is veeeeeery overrated, further giving the advantage to Thome.


One Post wrote:
We aren't asking who hit 60 homers three times, that isn't the question


That seems to be a suggestion that it's not very significant. Juicing aside, very few guys who ever played have a career peak as strong as Sosa. I'm not sure Thome was ever the best hitter on his own team. [Edit: I just checked. He clearly was in 2002.]

And here's the real issue with the steroids era. We're arguing about guys and we aren't really sure how good they were. Obviously his numbers are inflated, but I can't be sure Thome was really better than a guy like Richie Zisk.

If that's what IMU means by me suggesting that numbers can lie, I'll agree.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The numbers don't lie.

Well, except for every time you say they do.


Example? And please don't cite some "magic" aggregate loaded with noise as an actual number.

Sale versus Arrieta. Their last three seasons, since I've been claiming Arrieta as the better pitcher.

Arrieta is 50-19 with a 2.42 ERA and 0.973 WHIP.

Sale is 42-25 with a 3.03 ERA and a 1.034 WHIP.

There isn't a 0.6 earned run difference between the NL and AL.

Those are some old school numbers for you. No metrics involved. Arrieta wins more games (your idea of a better pitcher) and gives up less runs, even when weighted for league (my idea of a better pitcher)

But you have Sale as the better ace. You think the numbers lie.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The numbers don't lie.

Well, except for every time you say they do.


Example? And please don't cite some "magic" aggregate loaded with noise as an actual number.

Sale versus Arrieta. Their last three seasons, since I've been claiming Arrieta as the better pitcher.

Arrieta is 50-19 with a 2.42 ERA and 0.973 WHIP.

Sale is 42-25 with a 3.03 ERA and a 1.034 WHIP.

There isn't a 0.6 earned run difference between the NL and AL.

Those are some old school numbers for you. No metrics involved. Arrieta wins more games (your idea of a better pitcher) and gives up less runs, even when weighted for league (my idea of a better pitcher)

But you have Sale as the better ace. You think the numbers lie.


That's not quite as straight forward as comparing stolen base percentages between two guys in over 1000 attempts. There is much more "noise" involved in a relatively small sample of 80 or so starts apiece. They're facing different batters in different parks etc.

But I have no issue with you claiming Arrieta to be the better pitcher. It's a fair argument.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55768
RFDC wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Thats great. Raines was a really good player.

But I do not see how anyone who actually watched them play could say that Raines was a more effective base stealer than Henderson.


:lol: Because his results speak for themselves. The numbers don't lie. Every time you get caught you diminish the return.


Game 7 of WS and you need a stolen base. Do you want Henderson or Raines on 1st base?


I will put you down for Henderson as well :D

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Last edited by RFDC on Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
They're facing different batters in different parks etc.

IF ONLY WE HAD SOME WAY OF ANALYZING THAT

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76950
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
They're facing different batters in different parks etc.

IF ONLY WE HAD SOME WAY OF ANALYZING THAT



There's not a good way. Every park doesn't play the same way everyday. And when we're talking about 30 starts in a season and 180-200 innings, that really isn't much of a sample.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group