It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.

I applaud you for being correct that he will not be a top 100 at the end of the year but it will be because he will be playing for an MLB team by then.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Last edited by good dolphin on Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.


And I qualified in my original statement that he might be still in some, but will quickly fall out. Sad the"The Subdivsion" is too fucking ignorant to read and process full sentences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars


Image

Poor Bob. Frank's having a particularly strong day against him today

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.


And I qualified in my original statement that he might be still in some, but will quickly fall out. Sad the"The Subdivsion" is too fucking ignorant to read and process full sentences.


He will fall out because he will be an MLB player for Detroit and no longer a prospect.

Another tough day for Bob.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.


And I qualified in my original statement that he might be still in some, but will quickly fall out. Sad the"The Subdivsion" is too fucking ignorant to read and process full sentences.


He will fall out because he will be an MLB player for Detroit and no longer a prospect.

Another tough day for Bob.



You realize he's already played stints in MLB, for the Cubs? Dumbass.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Candalerio is not a top 100 prospect.

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2017?list=prospects

I'm too stupid to analyze an intellectual analysis so here is my "from the hip" analysis, now excuse me while I put some farts in jars


Image

Poor Bob. Frank's having a particularly strong day against him today


Tough day for Flapjacks, who relapsed, again. His Cubs vs Sox posts ratio continues to plummet out of control.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.


And I qualified in my original statement that he might be still in some, but will quickly fall out. Sad the"The Subdivsion" is too fucking ignorant to read and process full sentences.


He will fall out because he will be an MLB player for Detroit and no longer a prospect.

Another tough day for Bob.



You realize he's already played stints in MLB, for the Cubs? Dumbass.


Not enough to remove him from prospect status, Robert.

Are my explanations starting to help you to finally understand how this works?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101528
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Your made up "Cubs Sox Post Ratio" stat means nothing in regards to you continuing to get simple facts wrong.

Also, Carson Fulmer has nothing to do with this trade. Why do you even bring up a Sox guy in this discussion?

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He was last ranked 92nd. He's about to be very old for AAA, where he's putting up OK numbers. There is your analysis. Of course you are the dumb asses that get excited because AAA Fulmer is still a "Top 100 prospect"


So, what you really mean, is that yes he is a top 100 as of just a couple of weeks ago.


And I qualified in my original statement that he might be still in some, but will quickly fall out. Sad the"The Subdivsion" is too fucking ignorant to read and process full sentences.


He will fall out because he will be an MLB player for Detroit and no longer a prospect.

Another tough day for Bob.



You realize he's already played stints in MLB, for the Cubs? Dumbass.


Not enough to remove him from prospect status, Robert.

Are my explanations starting to help you to finally understand how this works?


Your explanations are based on a portion of my post that was quoted, not the full statement. See two can play at this Dolphin...
posting.php?mode=quote&f=47&p=2765363

good dolphin wrote:
I'm useless


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
[
Not enough to remove him from prospect status, Robert.

Are my explanations starting to help you to finally understand how this works?


Your explanations are based on a portion of my post that was quoted, not the full statement. See two can play at this Dolphin...
http://www.chicagofanatics.com/posting. ... &p=2765363

good dolphin wrote:
I'm useless
[/quote]

But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it. The second part is either going to be factually incorrect in two months or not applicable due to him no longer being defined as a prospect.

Bob, you should just hide from this thread like you did the Eloy thread.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101528
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Caller Bob wrote:
Your explanations are based on a portion of my post that was quoted, not the full statement. See two can play at this Dolphin...
posting.php?mode=quote&f=47&p=2765363

good dolphin wrote:
I'm useless
:lol: This doesn't even link to a thread.

Log off and grab a cold one, Bobby. You could use the break.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Chill out Bob, I just amended my assessment from "Fleeced" to "good trade"
Eh like anyone cares what some random person on the internet thinks about a trade

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it.


No, it's not. And I qualified that. Baseball America I know for a fact didn't have him as a top 100 prospect. You do realize MLB is not the only publication that ranks farm systems? I know you are new at this baseball/prospect thing.. And I purposely qualified my statement, because yes, it's not black and white, there are many different ranking systems.

What happened here was that you were trying to get a burn on the Cubs, looked up the name Jeimer Candelario, saw MLB had him ranked 92, and then went on about some nonsense about the Cubs traded their top 100 prospect for a rental catcher.

I felt I needed to qualify that "top 100" prospect with the metadata that depending you ask/trust/follow, he really isn't anymore.


Keep spiking the football acting like you accomplished something though, it's been a tough year for the Subdivision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Apologist wrote:
Chill out Bob, I just amended my assessment from "Fleeced" to "good trade"
Eh like anyone cares what some random person on the internet thinks about a trade


No worries. I know what you meant. I just had to put Dolphin back in his lane.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
Apologist wrote:
Chill out Bob, I just amended my assessment from "Fleeced" to "good trade"
Eh like anyone cares what some random person on the internet thinks about a trade


No worries. I know what you meant. I just had to put Dolphin back in his lane.


When are you going to do that?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it.


No, it's not. And I qualified that. Baseball America I know for a fact didn't have him as a top 100 prospect. You do realize MLB is not the only publication that ranks farm systems? I know you are new at this baseball/prospect thing.. And I purposely qualified my statement, because yes, it's not black and white, there are many different ranking systems.

What happened here was that you were trying to get a burn on the Cubs, looked up the name Jeimer Candelario, saw MLB had him ranked 92, and then went on about some nonsense about the Cubs traded their top 100 prospect for a rental catcher.

I felt I needed to qualify that "top 100" prospect with the metadata that depending you ask/trust/follow, he really isn't anymore.


Keep spiking the football acting like you accomplished something though, it's been a tough year for the Subdivision.


If you meant Baseball America, you would have limited it by saying Baseball America. Instead, you generalized, were immediately proven incorrect and are now backtracking.

Bob, this isn't even fun for me any more. It's like punching a boxer while he lays on the mat.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it.


No, it's not. And I qualified that. Baseball America I know for a fact didn't have him as a top 100 prospect. You do realize MLB is not the only publication that ranks farm systems? I know you are new at this baseball/prospect thing.. And I purposely qualified my statement, because yes, it's not black and white, there are many different ranking systems.

What happened here was that you were trying to get a burn on the Cubs, looked up the name Jeimer Candelario, saw MLB had him ranked 92, and then went on about some nonsense about the Cubs traded their top 100 prospect for a rental catcher.

I felt I needed to qualify that "top 100" prospect with the metadata that depending you ask/trust/follow, he really isn't anymore.


Keep spiking the football acting like you accomplished something though, it's been a tough year for the Subdivision.


If you meant Baseball America, you would have limited it by saying Baseball America. Instead, you generalized, were immediately proven incorrect and are now backtracking.

Bob, this isn't even fun for me any more. It's like punching a boxer while he lays on the mat.


Only if you are under the assumption that mlb.com is the be all to end all for all prospect rankings. Which was never specified. Keep fishing, maybe ask Sarley for some advice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 9900
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
They don't need Avila under control. In fact, after hearing Hoyer the other day, I'm certain they feel Caratini is better than any catcher they were going to trade for. The point is, at this point in his development they want Caratini getting consistent at-bats and Contreras is going to be doing the lion's share of the catching.

And Avila is good enough against righties that they can stick Contreras in LF and give him a break and still have an hitting upgrade over Zobrist or Schwarber.

_________________
“Build a man a fire and he’s warm for a day. But set a man on fire and he’s warm for the rest of his life."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79868
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it.


No, it's not. And I qualified that. Baseball America I know for a fact didn't have him as a top 100 prospect. You do realize MLB is not the only publication that ranks farm systems? I know you are new at this baseball/prospect thing.. And I purposely qualified my statement, because yes, it's not black and white, there are many different ranking systems.

What happened here was that you were trying to get a burn on the Cubs, looked up the name Jeimer Candelario, saw MLB had him ranked 92, and then went on about some nonsense about the Cubs traded their top 100 prospect for a rental catcher.

I felt I needed to qualify that "top 100" prospect with the metadata that depending you ask/trust/follow, he really isn't anymore.


Keep spiking the football acting like you accomplished something though, it's been a tough year for the Subdivision.


If you meant Baseball America, you would have limited it by saying Baseball America. Instead, you generalized, were immediately proven incorrect and are now backtracking.

Bob, this isn't even fun for me any more. It's like punching a boxer while he lays on the mat.


Only if you are under the assumption that mlb.com is the be all to end all for all prospect rankings. Which was never specified. Keep fishing, maybe ask Sarley for some advice.


Your words opened it up to all publications.

Now double down again on this

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Why does the whole White Sox housing project jump in on Bob Frank fights?

Let these two settle it. Its a perfect matchup


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
But one part of your quote is factually incorrect at the time you made it.


No, it's not. And I qualified that. Baseball America I know for a fact didn't have him as a top 100 prospect. You do realize MLB is not the only publication that ranks farm systems? I know you are new at this baseball/prospect thing.. And I purposely qualified my statement, because yes, it's not black and white, there are many different ranking systems.

What happened here was that you were trying to get a burn on the Cubs, looked up the name Jeimer Candelario, saw MLB had him ranked 92, and then went on about some nonsense about the Cubs traded their top 100 prospect for a rental catcher.

I felt I needed to qualify that "top 100" prospect with the metadata that depending you ask/trust/follow, he really isn't anymore.


Keep spiking the football acting like you accomplished something though, it's been a tough year for the Subdivision.


If you meant Baseball America, you would have limited it by saying Baseball America. Instead, you generalized, were immediately proven incorrect and are now backtracking.

Bob, this isn't even fun for me any more. It's like punching a boxer while he lays on the mat.


Only if you are under the assumption that mlb.com is the be all to end all for all prospect rankings. Which was never specified. Keep fishing, maybe ask Sarley for some advice.


Your words opened it up to all publications.

Now double down again on this


In the exact same sentence I acknowledged that he might be hanging on the backed end of a top 100 list, but his stock is falling.

If you aren't going to be handy around the house, you should at least be "book smart".

This is brutal, GD. Brutal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:18 am
Posts: 67
pizza_Place: All of them
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why does the whole White Sox housing project jump in on Bob Frank fights?

Let these two settle it. Its a perfect matchup



The irresistible force meets the immovable object!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Gorilla Monsoon wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why does the whole White Sox housing project jump in on Bob Frank fights?

Let these two settle it. Its a perfect matchup



The irresistible force meets the immovable object!

:lol:

Its Koko B. Ware vs the Red Rooster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why does the whole White Sox housing project jump in on Bob Frank fights?

Let these two settle it. Its a perfect matchup


Caller Bob can handle it. He has proven quite feisty. I called his thoughts "Alt-Cub" in honor of the rising power of the Alt Right movement. "It's not misinformation if you believe it!"

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101528
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
He is feisty and passionate, I'll give him that. He's a fucking moron, but he is feisty.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Frank Coztansa wrote:
He is feisty and passionate, I'll give him that. He's a fucking moron, but he is feisty.



I reserve that language for our President. I think Bob is highly intelligent and just wants to rile up, using his terminology here, the Subdivision.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27570
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why does the whole White Sox housing project jump in on Bob Frank fights?

Let these two settle it. Its a perfect matchup



It is strange, maybe they lack the confidence in their man winning an argument.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 39746
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
denisdman wrote:
"It's not misinformation if you believe it!"

Isn't this very strategy used in the financial industry? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27570
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
IMU wrote:
Candelario is going to be a decent MLB player.




Nope

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Caller Bob wrote:
denisdman wrote:
"It's not misinformation if you believe it!"

Isn't this very strategy used in the financial industry? :lol:


Hey now Boob.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 295 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group