It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:02 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 446 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
3 games into his Cubs run and Im happy so far. Truth is I was just reading about the game yesterday on my phone as they don't have Comcast sports net in Jamaica.


viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102982

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38103
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
3 games into his Cubs run and Im happy so far. Truth is I was just reading about the game yesterday on my phone as they don't have Comcast sports net in Jamaica.

Humble brag.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If my SP could consistently give up one run per outing, I'd win probably 80% of those games. JLN might have the actual number.
He did have the numbers. Sale won 70% of those games, Q won 53%. But it's ALL run support!


Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
It's weird there are still so many debates about him. Most Sox fans are happy he's gone and most Cub fans are happy to have him. Win/win

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
It's weird there are still so many debates about him. Most Sox fans are happy he's gone and most Cub fans are happy to have him. Win/win


Im not sold on him. He hasnt looked great the last two outings.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's weird there are still so many debates about him. Most Sox fans are happy he's gone and most Cub fans are happy to have him. Win/win


Im not sold on him. He hasnt looked great the last two outings.

Welcome to the Quintana Experience

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's weird there are still so many debates about him. Most Sox fans are happy he's gone and most Cub fans are happy to have him. Win/win


Im not sold on him. He hasnt looked great the last two outings.

Welcome to the Quintana Experience


I would just pin it on the fact that hes not a great pitcher, not that he lacks some sort of #TWTW.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's weird there are still so many debates about him. Most Sox fans are happy he's gone and most Cub fans are happy to have him. Win/win


Im not sold on him. He hasnt looked great the last two outings.

Welcome to the Quintana Experience


I would just pin it on the fact that hes not a great pitcher, not that he lacks some sort of #TWTW.

I dunno. I think you gotta pick a side here. Outside of W/L he is a great pitcher. Some of us just value W/L more than others do

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 5:54 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If my SP could consistently give up one run per outing, I'd win probably 80% of those games. JLN might have the actual number.
He did have the numbers. Sale won 70% of those games, Q won 53%. But it's ALL run support!


Image

Thank you for your input.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

A useless stat has convinced you he's not a good pitcher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Keyser Soze wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

A useless stat has convinced you he's not a good pitcher.




He's a bum, his 9 years of service shows you all ya need to know.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keyser Soze wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

A useless stat has convinced you he's not a good pitcher.

.429 career win % and a 4.06 career ERA in the dreadful NL says he is not a good pitcher.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77051
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Keyser Soze wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

A useless stat has convinced you he's not a good pitcher.


:lol:

The compulsion to play amateur GM coupled with easy availability of stats on the Internet has caused an entire generation of fans to lose sight of the object of the game.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Ill have a stronger opinion on him after a half-year with the Cubs. Just watching him pitch is a more valuable way to evaluate than any stats.


Yup.

Stats can convince you that Jeff Samardzija is a good pitcher.

A useless stat has convinced you he's not a good pitcher.


:lol:

The compulsion to play amateur GM coupled with easy availability of stats on the Internet has caused an entire generation of fans to lose sight of the object of the game.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:28 pm
Posts: 381
pizza_Place: Palermos on 63rd
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.


Do you see Q as a staff ace?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77051
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
MartyD47 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.


Do you see Q as a staff ace?



Juice seems to be suggesting that over 150+ starts the White Sox were magically inferior offensively when Quintana took the mound as opposed to Sale, rather than considering whether other factors might be at play.

Which is really just a different way of making the McCarveresque statement that the team that scores more wins.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
MartyD47 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.



Do you see Q as a staff ace?



Juice seems to be suggesting that over 150+ starts the White Sox were magically inferior offensively when Quintana took the mound as opposed to Sale, rather than considering whether other factors might be at play.

Which is really just a different way of making the McCarveresque statement that the team that scores more wins.


Do you refute the 3.43 RS/Start figure for Sale and the 2.76 figure for Quintana? I'd like to see your evidence that such was not the case. Do you further dispute the actual distribution of each respective pitcher's run support broken down by individual game, in which Sale was nearly 10% more likely to get 3+ runs of support, and more than 12% more likely to get 4+ runs of support than Quintana? Do you have different data?

We're not talking about the "fraction of a run" bullshit you like to hide behind. Sale got more whole, real, runs than Quintana way more often than not. I would like to see you substantively refute this other than retreating to your "the game exists only within the confines of itself" obfuscating.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77051
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
MartyD47 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.



Do you see Q as a staff ace?



Juice seems to be suggesting that over 150+ starts the White Sox were magically inferior offensively when Quintana took the mound as opposed to Sale, rather than considering whether other factors might be at play.

Which is really just a different way of making the McCarveresque statement that the team that scores more wins.


Do you refute the 3.43 RS/Start figure for Sale and the 2.76 figure for Quintana? I'd like to see your evidence that such was not the case.


I understand the facts. Are you saying the Sox hated Quintana and scored less for him or are you open to the possibility that the same factors thst resulted in the Sox scoring less also affected the amount of runs allowed by Quintana?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77149
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Completely agree with JLN

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
MartyD47 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I'll ask this question again, because it seemingly got lost (or the baseball deadheads in this thread finally realized how silly they sound): If not for a difference in run support, what accounts for the disparate win conversion rates of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana when they both give up the same amount of runs in a start?

Here are the distributions of their actual run differentials (Runs Support - Runs Allowed) in every game either pitcher gave up 1 run or fewer:

Image
Image

Quintana was twice as likely as Sale to get a hard-luck ND when allowing 1 run or fewer (again, this is run differential, so "0" means the teams were tied when the pitcher left the game), on top of being more likely to get a loss when allowing 1 or fewer runs.

I fail to see how these facts place the onus of Quintana's record squarely on him as a pitcher, and not on the offense behind him in games where he pitched very similar to someone who is already a fringe HOF candidate.



Do you see Q as a staff ace?



Juice seems to be suggesting that over 150+ starts the White Sox were magically inferior offensively when Quintana took the mound as opposed to Sale, rather than considering whether other factors might be at play.

Which is really just a different way of making the McCarveresque statement that the team that scores more wins.


Do you refute the 3.43 RS/Start figure for Sale and the 2.76 figure for Quintana? I'd like to see your evidence that such was not the case.


I understand the facts. Are you saying the Sox hated Quintana and scored less for him or are you open to the possibility that the same factors thst resulted in the Sox scoring less also affected the amount of runs allowed by Quintana?


There IS a difference, that's all I'm interested in at this point, because I have also demonstrated that a difference in run support predicts a difference in W%. Why the team scored way less often when Quintana was on the mound is largely irrelevant. The fact is they did, and that lack of scoring leads to a bad showing in a bad statistic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77051
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Nas wrote:
Completely agree with JLN



You agree that Quintana is cursed but try to couch it as "science". At least you don't post graphs.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Image

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77051
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Ultimately, I don't care about the "why" either. Whether he's a flawed pitcher or a remarkably unlucky guy, I don't want him on my team.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ultimately, I don't care about the "why" either. Whether he's a flawed pitcher or a remarkably unlucky guy, I don't want him on my team.

Image

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20670
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Completely agree with JLN



You agree that Quintana is cursed but try to couch it as "science". At least you don't post graphs.


Is your counter-argument to the premise that "Jose Quintana received run support from his team not even commensurate with that of Chris Sale, even when the two pitched similar games" really so silly as "Well, that would have to be some kind of curse or something, so I'm going to ignore all those things that actually happened because of my personal incredulity"?

Ok, JORR, you're right, all those games didn't actually occur within the confines and contexts of themselves. What really happened to explain the differences in run support we saw?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:28 pm
Posts: 381
pizza_Place: Palermos on 63rd
When the Sox needed 6 innings out of Q he'd go 5, when they needed 7, he'd go 6. His line usually looked good, but I never thought he came close to impacting a game the way statheads say he does.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ultimately, I don't care about the "why" either. Whether he's a flawed pitcher or a remarkably unlucky guy, I don't want him on my team.

Right. It's that simple. This endless debate is nuts.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 446 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group