It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 31935
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
rogers park bryan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
More information is certainly resulting in better RPB posts!

Thank you....I think


I meant it sincerely. I like those stats you posted.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79854
rogers park bryan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
There was no way Schwarber was standing on the on deck circle feeling confident in having to face Scherzer but Dusty managed as if it were so.


Plus, I think he would have been swinging out of his shoes to make up for the blunder. Scherzer would have made him look foolish.

Eh...Schwarber is pretty good about working at bats. Who knows what he would have done though yesterday after that.


But Dusty ignoring numbers as usual. Almora KILLS LHP. KILLS.

Almora vs LHP: .342
Schwarber vs RHP: .221

To say nothing of the fact the RHP is one of the best hitters of this generation and the other guy had a fucking 5.88 ERA this year.

Oh and Sean DoLittle retired Rizzo in their only meeting and holds LHP to .146 avg
Oliver Perez has given up 2 HR's to Rizzo and gives up .227 to LHP


Damn, Dusty


Regarding Rizzo, let's not pretend he didn't hit a well placed pop up. Fake tough guy pretended like that level of contact isn't an out 99% of the time.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79854
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Every criticism/praise is framed by the outcome. For instance, if CJ gives up a homer to Harper in Monday's game, these boards (and the media) would be ripping Maddon relentlessly for making the same mistake in two games and losing the series for the Cubs. Instead, Maddon looks like a great leader of men by going right back to his set-up guy and giving him another chance because Edwards had a clean inning.


This is true, too. The reality is that the ends justify the means, and a lot of times it's a crapshoot (sorry Rick!)

Dusty's move yesterday was dumb before and after, though.



Except that his starter was on a 100 pitch count limit. If Scherzer gets hurts after throwing 110, then Dusty is ripped again for overtaxing his starter when he knew the guy was coming off an injury. If the reliever comes in and does his job, we aren't talking about that move. All framed by outcomes.

Maddon looks good because Rizzo's pop up fell between three fielders. Dusty looks like a moron, when frankly, his pitcher got Rizzo to hit a ball that is caught 90+ percent of the time.


Except that his starter hadn't reached 100 and was throwing a one hitter (dude!) and Schwarber had generally looked foolish against him all day.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15018
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Every criticism/praise is framed by the outcome. For instance, if CJ gives up a homer to Harper in Monday's game, these boards (and the media) would be ripping Maddon relentlessly for making the same mistake in two games and losing the series for the Cubs. Instead, Maddon looks like a great leader of men by going right back to his set-up guy and giving him another chance because Edwards had a clean inning.


This is true, too. The reality is that the ends justify the means, and a lot of times it's a crapshoot (sorry Rick!)

Dusty's move yesterday was dumb before and after, though.



Except that his starter was on a 100 pitch count limit. If Scherzer gets hurts after throwing 110, then Dusty is ripped again for overtaxing his starter when he knew the guy was coming off an injury. If the reliever comes in and does his job, we aren't talking about that move. All framed by outcomes.

Maddon looks good because Rizzo's pop up fell between three fielders. Dusty looks like a moron, when frankly, his pitcher got Rizzo to hit a ball that is caught 90+ percent of the time.


Except that his starter hadn't reached 100 and was throwing a one hitter (dude!) and Schwarber had generally looked foolish against him all day.

Kyle had a bomb that went foul in the first few innings. This had to be on Dusty's mind in a low scoring contest like yesterday.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 79854
City of Fools wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Every criticism/praise is framed by the outcome. For instance, if CJ gives up a homer to Harper in Monday's game, these boards (and the media) would be ripping Maddon relentlessly for making the same mistake in two games and losing the series for the Cubs. Instead, Maddon looks like a great leader of men by going right back to his set-up guy and giving him another chance because Edwards had a clean inning.


This is true, too. The reality is that the ends justify the means, and a lot of times it's a crapshoot (sorry Rick!)

Dusty's move yesterday was dumb before and after, though.



Except that his starter was on a 100 pitch count limit. If Scherzer gets hurts after throwing 110, then Dusty is ripped again for overtaxing his starter when he knew the guy was coming off an injury. If the reliever comes in and does his job, we aren't talking about that move. All framed by outcomes.

Maddon looks good because Rizzo's pop up fell between three fielders. Dusty looks like a moron, when frankly, his pitcher got Rizzo to hit a ball that is caught 90+ percent of the time.


Except that his starter hadn't reached 100 and was throwing a one hitter (dude!) and Schwarber had generally looked foolish against him all day.

Kyle had a bomb that went foul in the first few innings. This had to be on Dusty's mind in a low scoring contest like yesterday.


He was so far out in front of it that I think a pitcher would consider it his victory for fooling the batter more than the batter would feel it was great contact.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15018
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
good dolphin wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Every criticism/praise is framed by the outcome. For instance, if CJ gives up a homer to Harper in Monday's game, these boards (and the media) would be ripping Maddon relentlessly for making the same mistake in two games and losing the series for the Cubs. Instead, Maddon looks like a great leader of men by going right back to his set-up guy and giving him another chance because Edwards had a clean inning.


This is true, too. The reality is that the ends justify the means, and a lot of times it's a crapshoot (sorry Rick!)

Dusty's move yesterday was dumb before and after, though.



Except that his starter was on a 100 pitch count limit. If Scherzer gets hurts after throwing 110, then Dusty is ripped again for overtaxing his starter when he knew the guy was coming off an injury. If the reliever comes in and does his job, we aren't talking about that move. All framed by outcomes.

Maddon looks good because Rizzo's pop up fell between three fielders. Dusty looks like a moron, when frankly, his pitcher got Rizzo to hit a ball that is caught 90+ percent of the time.


Except that his starter hadn't reached 100 and was throwing a one hitter (dude!) and Schwarber had generally looked foolish against him all day.

Kyle had a bomb that went foul in the first few innings. This had to be on Dusty's mind in a low scoring contest like yesterday.


He was so far out in front of it that I think a pitcher would consider it his victory for fooling the batter more than the batter would feel it was great contact.

I didn't mention the batter's mindset. I'm talking about Dusty.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27570
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
good dolphin wrote:
denisdman wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Every criticism/praise is framed by the outcome. For instance, if CJ gives up a homer to Harper in Monday's game, these boards (and the media) would be ripping Maddon relentlessly for making the same mistake in two games and losing the series for the Cubs. Instead, Maddon looks like a great leader of men by going right back to his set-up guy and giving him another chance because Edwards had a clean inning.


This is true, too. The reality is that the ends justify the means, and a lot of times it's a crapshoot (sorry Rick!)

Dusty's move yesterday was dumb before and after, though.



Except that his starter was on a 100 pitch count limit. If Scherzer gets hurts after throwing 110, then Dusty is ripped again for overtaxing his starter when he knew the guy was coming off an injury. If the reliever comes in and does his job, we aren't talking about that move. All framed by outcomes.

Maddon looks good because Rizzo's pop up fell between three fielders. Dusty looks like a moron, when frankly, his pitcher got Rizzo to hit a ball that is caught 90+ percent of the time.


Except that his starter hadn't reached 100 and was throwing a one hitter (dude!) and Schwarber had generally looked foolish against him all day.



Dusty is a dummy, hes pitched to Rizzo three times in 3 games with first base open..all three times Rizzo assbanged him.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group