It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 5:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Jaw Breaker wrote:
They do, but the question is whether this approach of tanking a half decade of seasons or more is worth it. For me, anything less than a WS appearance is a complete failure. As much as I hated most of Hendry's moves, they were "in the mix" several times and in other years they had enough talent but the players underperformed.

Yeah, that's not what I was saying. Im talking in general about building a team to win.

I agree with what you say there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You are talking about future seasons. I'm talking about the results. IMU seems to be talking about results too. He'd be disappointed with a World Series win if the Cubs weren't good for another few years.

I mean, of course you want your team to be good as much as possible. I just wouldn't celebrate consistency if it doesn't lead to at least one title.

If you're a Cub fan that will be disappointed after a World Series win, I cant help you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54268
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
There is a business case to be made for being consistently good, rather than the Kenny Williams "win or bust" philosophy.

Like the Bulls under John Paxson, interestingly enough.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Hatchetman wrote:
There is a business case to be made for being consistently good, rather than the Kenny Williams "win or bust" philosophy.


Right, but that may not be a great philosophy for a team that hasn't won in 108 years. I think if the Cubs need to dump highly valued prospects at any point to put them in a better position to win a World Series they have to do it. You don't really get that many chances unless you're the Yankees. The Nationals had their chance to win it and they made a decision based on their assumed "future dominance". Now they'll probably never have a better chance to win than they did the season they shut down Strasburg with arguably the best team in the game. But who knows? Maybe they'll win it this year and that will be forgotten.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
"Being consistently in the mix" is overrated.

So wait...since when did Boilermaker Rick become a fan of Theo's intentional losing?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
"Being consistently in the mix" is overrated.

So wait...since when did Boilermaker Rick become a fan of Theo's intentional losing?
No.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55821
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
"Being consistently in the mix" is overrated.

What makes the Cardinals and the Yankees what they are, and what makes the Sox and the Cubs what they are is the number of championships. It sucks that in recent decades both the Sox and Cubs haven't had championships or lots of playoff apperances.

You think the A's and Tigers will think the season was a success if they just are "in the mix"?


So you have done a 180 on all of this?

For a long time you have been saying that the Sox over the last 25 years have a good record of this and are in contention for the division often...

So you have changed your tune on all this?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
So you have done a 180 on all of this?

For a long time you have been saying that the Sox over the last 25 years have a good record of this and are in contention for the division often...

So you have changed your tune on all this?
No.

The discussion of regular season success was always secondary. It was often used because people were putting down the "only 1 title and then they sucked".

I'm not saying regular season success is meaningless.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:57 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
A 2005 White Sox situation, to me, would be a failure.
Winning a WORLD SERIES, something the Cubs haven't done since before World War I, would be a failure?

And you dared to quote something I said yesterday and call it dumb? This is, without question, in the team photo for stupidest thing ever said by anybody (mults included) in the history of this board.

Its so stupid, in fact, that its going to become my signature so people can see it for a long, long time.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55821
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So you have done a 180 on all of this?

For a long time you have been saying that the Sox over the last 25 years have a good record of this and are in contention for the division often...

So you have changed your tune on all this?
No.

The discussion of regular season success was always secondary. It was often used because people were putting down the "only 1 title and then they sucked".

I'm not saying regular season success is meaningless.

:lol: ah I see.

It is overrated when it fits your purpose.

But when it helps you in a Cubs/Sox pissing match then it isn't meaningless

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
:lol: ah I see.

It is overrated when it fits your purpose.

But when it helps you in a Cubs/Sox pissing match then it isn't meaningless
What does this have to do with the Cubs and Sox? The Cubs haven't been consistently good or won a title.

Are you honestly saying that I am wrong that winning a title is more important than making the playoffs a lot? Do you share the sentiment from IMU that the White Sox 2005 season was a "failure"?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Frank Coztansa wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
A 2005 White Sox situation, to me, would be a failure.
Winning a WORLD SERIES, something the Cubs haven't done since before World War I, would be a failure?

And you dared to quote something I said yesterday and call it dumb? This is, without question, in the team photo for stupidest thing ever said by anybody (mults included) in the history of this board.

Its so stupid, in fact, that its going to become my signature so people can see it for a long, long time.


Image

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 101893
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Excellent counterpoint.

_________________
ltg wrote:
[Fields will] be the starting QB on an NFL roster at the start of next season. Book It!
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 55821
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
:lol: ah I see.

It is overrated when it fits your purpose.

But when it helps you in a Cubs/Sox pissing match then it isn't meaningless
What does this have to do with the Cubs and Sox? The Cubs haven't been consistently good or won a title.

Are you honestly saying that I am wrong that winning a title is more important than making the playoffs a lot? Do you share the sentiment from IMU that the White Sox 2005 season was a "failure"?

I do not agree with that thought.

Just funny how the narrative changes to fit your purpose depending on the topic.

Being in the mix consistently is overrated. That is one to remember.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
Just funny how the narrative changes to fit your purpose depending on the topic.

Being in the mix consistently is overrated. That is one to remember.
The narrative didn't change! The Sox WON a title! :lol:

I've been consistent. I believe my statement was something like "I wouldn't trade the A's or Rays success for the White Sox success of the past 10 years".

But hey, if you want to hold against me the crazy concept that winning a title is the best thing you can do then go ahead.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26640
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I wish I had a job where I can suck at for 3-5 years and my excuse would be: "It's OK boss,because I'm not trying".

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Image

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
jimmypasta wrote:
I wish I had a job where I can suck at for 3-5 years and my excuse would be: "It's OK boss,because I'm not trying".

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
8675309 wrote:
Image


cheap version

I still have my Anthony Thomas and Brian Urlacher rookie year bobbleheads from Mc Donalds

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
After all the trading yesterday it's pretty clear Theo flawlessly read the market and extracted an absurb amount of value.

Dumping Shark and Hammel at their peak onto Beane led him to scamble to shore up the A's pitching as the regression monster showed up. Hammel has absolutely shat the bed and Shark's performance has done nothing to justify a top-10 prospect batting .300 in AA, 19-year old batting .303 in A and a 25-year old pitcher once considered a ROY.

Add picking up Bonnie for free in spring training and packaging him with the forgettable J. Russell in exchange for future Evan Gattis.

Not sure I've ever seen a run of magnificence like Theo has been on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Kirkwood wrote:
After all the trading yesterday it's pretty clear Theo flawlessly read the market and extracted an absurb amount of value.

Dumping Shark and Hammel at their peak onto Beane led him to scamble to shore up the A's pitching as the regression monster showed up. Hammel has absolutely shat the bed and Shark's performance has done nothing to justify a top-10 prospect batting .300 in AA, 19-year old batting .303 in A and a 25-year old pitcher once considered a ROY.

Add picking up Bonnie for free in spring training and packaging him with the forgettable J. Russell in exchange for future Evan Gattis.

Not sure I've ever seen a run of magnificence like Theo has been on.


Totally agree and I'd love to hear how that isn't the case.
I'm even more impressed with Theo & Co. if it's true that the Rays turned down a straight up deal of Addison Russell for David Price before letting the Cubs get him and then the Rays settling for pile of blah.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
8675309 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
After all the trading yesterday it's pretty clear Theo flawlessly read the market and extracted an absurb amount of value.

Dumping Shark and Hammel at their peak onto Beane led him to scamble to shore up the A's pitching as the regression monster showed up. Hammel has absolutely shat the bed and Shark's performance has done nothing to justify a top-10 prospect batting .300 in AA, 19-year old batting .303 in A and a 25-year old pitcher once considered a ROY.

Add picking up Bonnie for free in spring training and packaging him with the forgettable J. Russell in exchange for future Evan Gattis.

Not sure I've ever seen a run of magnificence like Theo has been on.


Totally agree and I'd love to hear how that isn't the case.
I'm even more impressed with Theo & Co. if it's true that the Rays turned down a straight up deal of Addison Russell for David Price before letting the Cubs get him and then the Rays settling for pile of blah.


You should wish and pray that Addison Russell is ever as good as Austin Jackson.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
8675309 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
After all the trading yesterday it's pretty clear Theo flawlessly read the market and extracted an absurb amount of value.

Dumping Shark and Hammel at their peak onto Beane led him to scamble to shore up the A's pitching as the regression monster showed up. Hammel has absolutely shat the bed and Shark's performance has done nothing to justify a top-10 prospect batting .300 in AA, 19-year old batting .303 in A and a 25-year old pitcher once considered a ROY.

Add picking up Bonnie for free in spring training and packaging him with the forgettable J. Russell in exchange for future Evan Gattis.

Not sure I've ever seen a run of magnificence like Theo has been on.


Totally agree and I'd love to hear how that isn't the case.
I'm even more impressed with Theo & Co. if it's true that the Rays turned down a straight up deal of Addison Russell for David Price before letting the Cubs get him and then the Rays settling for pile of blah.


You should wish and pray that Addison Russell is ever as good as Austin Jackson.


Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 11:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15019
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?


That wasn't your original "point". Which point are you now making, the first one (which was untenable) or the second one (which is a little hard to prove at this point)?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?


Either you are a Jedi and I fought it off or you just had a stroke.
Image

Think about your response to your fuck up of facts and try again.

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
City of Fools wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?


That wasn't your original "point". Which point are you now making, the first one (which was untenable) or the second one (which is a little hard to prove at this point)?


:lol: Are you telling me what my point was? Obviously, Tampa could have had Jackson. They didn't need the third team if they had wanted to go that route.

See RPB, this is why Cub fans get stereotyped as goofs.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81627
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?


That wasn't your original "point". Which point are you now making, the first one (which was untenable) or the second one (which is a little hard to prove at this point)?


:lol: Are you telling me what my point was? Obviously, Tampa could have had Jackson. They didn't need the third team if they had wanted to go that route.

See RPB, this is why Cub fans get stereotyped as goofs.

You were not real clear on your point at first.

Your point is: Prospects are just prospects and Russell would be lucky to be as good Austin Jackson right?

But the thing is prospects have value. Right now, Russell, McKinney and Straily is a better deal than getting Austin Jackson or Franklin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15019
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Rays did not get Austin Jackson in the deal.


I know, but he's acting like Russell was a bigger prize than anyone in this deal. Who knows if he's better than either Adames or Franklin?


That wasn't your original "point". Which point are you now making, the first one (which was untenable) or the second one (which is a little hard to prove at this point)?


:lol: Are you telling me what my point was? Obviously, Tampa could have had Jackson. They didn't need the third team if they had wanted to go that route.

See RPB, this is why Cub fans get stereotyped as goofs.

anyone reading your thoughts and my thoughts on this page can judge for themselves who the goof is, friend.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Theo's Record
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:42 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Hinsdale
pizza_Place: Lugi's of Hong Kong
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
8675309 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
After all the trading yesterday it's pretty clear Theo flawlessly read the market and extracted an absurb amount of value.

Dumping Shark and Hammel at their peak onto Beane led him to scamble to shore up the A's pitching as the regression monster showed up. Hammel has absolutely shat the bed and Shark's performance has done nothing to justify a top-10 prospect batting .300 in AA, 19-year old batting .303 in A and a 25-year old pitcher once considered a ROY.

Add picking up Bonnie for free in spring training and packaging him with the forgettable J. Russell in exchange for future Evan Gattis.

Not sure I've ever seen a run of magnificence like Theo has been on.


Totally agree and I'd love to hear how that isn't the case.
I'm even more impressed with Theo & Co. if it's true that the Rays turned down a straight up deal of Addison Russell for David Price before letting the Cubs get him and then the Rays settling for pile of blah.


You should wish and pray that Addison Russell is ever as good as Austin Jackson.


Image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpzR3bQQ7wc

_________________
Kenny Williams fell for the banana in the tailpipe


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group