WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
America wrote:
Olney
Glasnow, Meadows and Bell?
Holy hell man, they are not getting those 3 for Q.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Quintana for prospects http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=104059 |
Page 2 of 28 |
| Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
America wrote: Olney Glasnow, Meadows and Bell? |
|
| Author: | America [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: America wrote: Olney Glasnow, Meadows and Bell? You mean OR Bell. That package is better than what the Sox got for Sale by a huge margin. That's 3 top 25 prospects, including two who could easily be top 10. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
I don't see the Bucs letting go of Bell. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
this is another of those "no way would we trade that guy or that guy or that guy" thing and then the Sox get all three. |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
I have mixed feelings about that trade. I don't want them to trade Q but damn it would be nice to get Austin Meadows. He's the 2nd best amateur player I've ever seen (Hunter Greene took over the top spot). Watching a dynamic player like that on a daily basis is enticing as hell and he's close to major league ready. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Hatchetman wrote: this is another of those "no way would we trade that guy or that guy or that guy" thing and then the Sox get all three. Grand slam if it happens |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: America wrote: Olney Glasnow, Meadows and Bell? Holy hell man, they are not getting those 3 for Q. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. |
|
| Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Big Chicagoan wrote: Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. I hope whoever gets him enjoys the hell out of that.
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. I hope whoever gets him enjoys the hell out of that.Somebody fucking with Mr. Edward Scissorhands I've been the man before you've been a man And I've been the man's equilibrium until it's worrisome Aiming for his gut like Caesarians |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Big Chicagoan wrote: Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. I don't think Hahn is hyping anything up, it is common knowledge that the guy is pretty good, his stuff isn't as good as Sale's but he makes less and is locked up longer...I have more faith in him staying healthy over the next 3-4 years over Sale. I guarantee you his win % goes up on any other team, the Sox offense was offensive. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
312player wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. I don't think Hahn is hyping anything up, it is common knowledge that the guy is pretty good, his stuff isn't as good as Sale's but he makes less and is locked up longer...I have more faith in him staying healthy over the next 3-4 years over Sale. I guarantee you his win % goes up on any other team, the Sox offense was offensive. Agreed. |
|
| Author: | Joe Orr Road Rod [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
312player wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Sox have their hype machine in overdrive on Q. I've seen several analysts saying that Q could bring more than Sale because of the extra year of control and minimal performance difference. Hahn doing work in the media to pump up the return. Showing some GM chops. You know Hahn is in charge because Kenny would be bad mouthing all of the players before he traded them if he had his way. I don't think Hahn is hyping anything up, it is common knowledge that the guy is pretty good, his stuff isn't as good as Sale's but he makes less and is locked up longer...I have more faith in him staying healthy over the next 3-4 years over Sale. I guarantee you his win % goes up on any other team, the Sox offense was offensive. Marginally maybe. But if you think he's suddenly going to start posting 15-6 seasons, I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I want him to go somewhere where his supporters can't complain about a lack of "run support". |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
I want the Sox to get the best return for him but he's probably better off in the AL. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
They mentioned the possibility on the news. No mention of players going back but they mentioned Yankees and someone else also in play. |
|
| Author: | America [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Meadows would be incredible but if they are offering Glasnow and Bell together that's pretty outstanding too. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/sean ... 1612210195 |
|
| Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
America wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: America wrote: Olney Glasnow, Meadows and Bell? You mean OR Bell. That package is better than what the Sox got for Sale by a huge margin. That's 3 top 25 prospects, including two who could easily be top 10. I would not say by a huge margin. I would at least ask for some combination of three of their top five. And I doubt you would have said they would have gotten the package from the Nationals ahead of time. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Stop yourself. You are not getting 3 of their top 5 prospects for Quintana. |
|
| Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
RFDC wrote: Stop yourself. You are not getting 3 of their top 5 prospects for Quintana. Did you think that Adam Eaton was worth three of the best prospects from the Nationals including two in the top 30? |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
RFDC wrote: Stop yourself. You are not getting 3 of their top 5 prospects for Quintana. Cub fan hate. It is all this is. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Yep. They're jealous! |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
| yeah that is it, Cub fan hate. This is why people think you are an idiot ruffcorn. Don't act so surprised next time someone makes a thread about your idiotic posts/thoughts. |
|
| Author: | Cashman [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: RFDC wrote: Stop yourself. You are not getting 3 of their top 5 prospects for Quintana. Did you think that Adam Eaton was worth three of the best prospects from the Nationals including two in the top 30? I am still scratching my head at this one, and saying WTF happened?!?!? I think they got paranoid, heard someone else was after him and offered a shit load for him. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Cub fans preemptively melting at our three newest additions |
|
| Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
RFDC wrote: :lol: yeah that is it, Cub fan hate. This is why people think you are an idiot ruffcorn. Don't act so surprised next time someone makes a thread about your idiotic posts/thoughts. Oddly obsessed and petty to the end. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
good dolphin wrote: Cub fans preemptively melting at our three newest additions They miss the good old days of celebrating prospects. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: RFDC wrote: :lol: yeah that is it, Cub fan hate. This is why people think you are an idiot ruffcorn. Don't act so surprised next time someone makes a thread about your idiotic posts/thoughts. Oddly obsessed and petty to the end. Do you have heart issues? |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: good dolphin wrote: Cub fans preemptively melting at our three newest additions They miss the good old days of celebrating prospects. imagine how great these prospects must be if they are in the Sox farm system and analysts still think they are great |
|
| Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Quintana for prospects |
good dolphin wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: good dolphin wrote: Cub fans preemptively melting at our three newest additions They miss the good old days of celebrating prospects. imagine how great these prospects must be if they are in the Sox farm system and analysts still think they are great With Chris Getz now in charge things are sure to turn around! |
|
| Page 2 of 28 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|