Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

America wrote:

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Cashman wrote:

America wrote:

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal.

FavreFan wrote:

Cashman wrote:

America wrote:

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal.

Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber.

FavreFan wrote:

Cashman wrote:

America wrote:

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal.

Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber.

leashyourkids wrote:

FavreFan wrote:

Cashman wrote:

America wrote:

None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal.

Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber.

Hendricks isn't a prospect, and the Cubs should consider giving up Schwarber.

Chris Sale could play a better LF than Schwarber.

Speculation on the Nationals making an offer. With an interesting note that the White Sox supposedly said they would not consider offers from the Cubs:

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-h ... -meetings/

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Asking for more from the Cubs is one thing but not considering an offer is stupid.

I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb.

312player wrote:

This isn't just about Sale but I don't understand why any team would trade with Theo. The track record of looking forward is pretty well known. Theo trades his trash away and then laughs at his team.

The Billy Beane trade should have been his last in baseball.

312player wrote:

Boilermaker Rick wrote:

312player wrote:

The Yankees cleaned up last year.

Yeah, I don't care about the Chapman trade at all. They won. It was worth it.

Author:	denisdman [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: More Sale chatter: http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/chri ... ves-112816 Is Sale ultimately going to be traded for the simple reason that Sale doesn't seem like he wants to be here?

Author:	America [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable.

Author:	Cashman [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 2:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Cashman wrote: America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable. Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal.

Author:	leashyourkids [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
FavreFan wrote: Cashman wrote: America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable. Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal. Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Trading Sale http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=103206	Page 4 of 20

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: Cashman wrote: America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable. Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal. Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber.

Author:	America [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
If the Astros are dead set against moving Correa or Boston is putting Betts/Bogaerts off limits I'm fine with that. But the talk of Dansby Swanson or Alex Bregman being off limits is too much for me to bear.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: Cashman wrote: America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable. Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal. Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber. Hendricks isn't a prospect, and the Cubs should consider giving up Schwarber.

Author:	WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
If they are not getting 4 top prospects then it's stupid to deal him. You have Sale, Quintana and Rodon locked up for cheap for the next 3 years. Add in Eaton and Abreu and that's a core. Stupid to deal him for anything less than best of the best prospects.

Author:	leashyourkids [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
FavreFan wrote: leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: Cashman wrote: America wrote: None of the players listed in that article strike me as guys who should be untouchable. When trading Sale, no one should be untouchable. Exactly. It's annoying to keep hearing that word. I would just fuckin hang up on any team that said that about one of their prospects in a potential Sale deal. Well, I wouldn't say no one. It's not like the Cubs should consider giving up Hendricks or Schwarber. Hendricks isn't a prospect, and the Cubs should consider giving up Schwarber. Let me know when Sale has a baseball encased in plexiglass.

Author:	Frank Coztansa [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Chris Sale could play a better LF than Schwarber.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Frank Coztansa wrote: Chris Sale could play a better LF than Schwarber. Schwarber improved. As long as he can swing the bat none of it matters.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Frank Coztansa wrote: Chris Sale could play a better LF than Schwarber. Give Schwarbs a break. Hard to play a decent LF when you're the size of Rhode Island.

Author:	Frank Coztansa [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Thats true. Its hard to believe Fowler didnt see or hear Schwarber lumbering towards him in Arizona.

Page 4 of 20	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Brick [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Speculation on the Nationals making an offer. With an interesting note that the White Sox supposedly said they would not consider offers from the Cubs: http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-h ... -meetings/ Good for the White Sox.

Author:	America [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Turner, Giolito, Robles and Fedde and I'd be OK.

Author:	FavreFan [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Any Nats offer would have to start with Harper or they can fuck off too.

Author:	America [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Harper leaves for the Yankees in two years and there's nothing anyone is going to do to stop him. I'd almost rather have Trea Turner for that reason alone.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Speculation on the Nationals making an offer. With an interesting note that the White Sox supposedly said they would not consider offers from the Cubs: http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-h ... -meetings/ Asking for more from the Cubs is one thing but not considering an offer is stupid.

Author:	Don Tiny [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Speculation on the Nationals making an offer. With an interesting note that the White Sox supposedly said they would not consider offers from the Cubs: http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-h ... -meetings/ Asking for more from the Cubs is one thing but not considering an offer is stupid. Inferiority complex from the White Sox front office ... nothing new to see here.

Author:	312player [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb.

Author:	Brick [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
312player wrote: I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb. This isn't just about Sale but I don't understand why any team would trade with Theo. The track record of looking foolish is pretty well known. Theo trades his trash away and then laughs at the team that did it. The Billy Beane trade should have been his last in baseball.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Boilermaker Rick wrote: 312player wrote: I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb. This isn't just about Sale but I don't understand why any team would trade with Theo. The track record of looking forward is pretty well known. Theo trades his trash away and then laughs at his team. The Billy Beane trade should have been his last in baseball. The Yankees cleaned up last year.

Author:	leashyourkids [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
"Trading Sale" sounds like a Lifetime movie.

Author:	312player [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Boilermaker Rick wrote: 312player wrote: I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb. This isn't just about Sale but I don't understand why any team would trade with Theo. The track record of looking forward is pretty well known. Theo trades his trash away and then laughs at his team. The Billy Beane trade should have been his last in baseball. Colorado fleeced him, so did the Yanks.

Author:	Brick [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Nas wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: 312player wrote: I always knew the Sox were scared to deal Sale or Quintana to the Cubs, dumb organization from the top down..stop being a pussy and hear what the Cubs offer is, IMO the Cubs and Dodgers have the best farm system in mlb. This isn't just about Sale but I don't understand why any team would trade with Theo. The track record of looking forward is pretty well known. Theo trades his trash away and then laughs at his team. The Billy Beane trade should have been his last in baseball. The Yankees cleaned up last year. Well, I'm sure if the Cubs called up and offered a laughable deal like that the Sox would take it.

Author:	Brick [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
So for evidence we have a one time "all in" type move by Theo and one trade from 2011. Yeah, I'm going to say it would be smart to never trade with Theo.

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Yeah, I don't care about the Chapman trade at all. They won. It was worth it.

Author:	312player [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Trading Sale
Hank Scorpio wrote: Yeah, I don't care about the Chapman trade at all. They won. It was worth it. Won Castro trade too. Cashman ain't scared to play poker with Theo, why is Herry~Kenny?