It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 195 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He pitches half his games at US Cellular field. No, the conditions don't make for unusually low scoring games. The White Sox offense has been PUTRID for the duration of Quintana's career.



So? U.S. Cellular Field isn't really the offensive paradise it's made out to be.

Yes, it is. We've both been to a lot of games there. You more than I. You know this. The ball flies everywhere...and the dimensions are small. The infield speed is above average. You don't need to look at Park Factors to know this. But if you want: http://www.parkfactors.com/chw

The park is not particularly small and the ball doesn't "fly all over". Sure, it did when you had a lineup with Thomas, Lee, Ordonez, and Valentin. And there are a lot of issues with the various "park factors".


There are a lot of issues with the various "park factors" and U.S. Cellular is not particularly small.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Quintana has a 2.35 FIP, and a Run Average of 2.7. I don't think it's fair to dock him "greatness points" because he doesn't pass some completely arbitrary benchmark of "super-greatness" when his team doesn't score runs.



Why are you so willing to completely ignore game context?

Do you consider Javy Vazquez better than Mark Buehrle? If not, why not?


No one is ignoring anything except for you.


You're ignoring the fact that he is the second best starting pitcher in most games he starts.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Vazquez isn't a good comparison. The Sox offense didn't suck back then and Vazquez was boom or bust. Quintana is as consistent as they come.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He pitches half his games at US Cellular field. No, the conditions don't make for unusually low scoring games. The White Sox offense has been PUTRID for the duration of Quintana's career.



So? U.S. Cellular Field isn't really the offensive paradise it's made out to be.

Yes, it is. We've both been to a lot of games there. You more than I. You know this. The ball flies everywhere...and the dimensions are small. The infield speed is above average. You don't need to look at Park Factors to know this. But if you want: http://www.parkfactors.com/chw

The park is not particularly small and the ball doesn't "fly all over". Sure, it did when you had a lineup with Thomas, Lee, Ordonez, and Valentin. And there are a lot of issues with the various "park factors".


There are a lot of issues with the various "park factors" and U.S. Cellular is not particularly small.


Stand out on the 100 level concourse, just above the stairs going into the seating bowl. Do you feel that wind behind you? Now go to the upper deck. Also kinda windy, no? That helps fly balls. You can visually watch the balls carry if you're sitting down the first or third baselines. It is easily seen.

The park is very small with those factors considered.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
JORR never argues that Chris Sale isn't a top 5 pitcher. He ignores the fact that Chris Sale hast only won 14 games once. It's highly likely that he would have won 20 games several times if he didn't pitch for the Sox.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:50 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Vazquez isn't a good comparison. The Sox offense didn't suck back then and Vazquez was boom or bust. Quintana is as consistent as they come.



You're really dancing around the numbers.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Vazquez isn't a good comparison. The Sox offense didn't suck back then and Vazquez was boom or bust. Quintana is as consistent as they come.



You're really dancing around the numbers.


I'm not. It's crystal clear. Vazquez was wildly inconsistent but his best stuff was arguably better than Buehrle's. Quintana is just about as consistent as they come and his best stuff is right up there with any pitcher in baseball.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.

How can you judge two pitchers against each other in the same game? They aren't facing the same team. Your logic is severely flawed.

If Quintana pitches against the White Sox offense and Alfredo Simon pitches against the White Sox offense and Quintana loses? Then you're on to something.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Vazquez isn't a good comparison. The Sox offense didn't suck back then and Vazquez was boom or bust. Quintana is as consistent as they come.



You're really dancing around the numbers.


I'm not. It's crystal clear. Vazquez was wildly inconsistent but his best stuff was arguably better than Buehrle's. Quintana is just about as consistent as they come and his best stuff is right up there with any pitcher in baseball.


I agree. He consistently blows the lead in the sixth or seventh inning.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.


Before this year we all considered Sale to be a top 5 pitcher and he spent the previous 3 seasons being the best in only about 50% of his starts. Why didn't we hold this against him? Because he plays for the Sox.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Vazquez isn't a good comparison. The Sox offense didn't suck back then and Vazquez was boom or bust. Quintana is as consistent as they come.



You're really dancing around the numbers.


I'm not. It's crystal clear. Vazquez was wildly inconsistent but his best stuff was arguably better than Buehrle's. Quintana is just about as consistent as they come and his best stuff is right up there with any pitcher in baseball.


I agree. He consistently blows the lead in the sixth or seventh inning.


He doesn't usually have the lead. We're talking about a 0-0 game or at best a 1-1 game.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.

How can you judge two pitchers against each other in the same game? They aren't facing the same team.


The difference between most offenses within the minuscule space of a single game is negligible. The way those offenses will perform on that day is largely determined by the pitchers. We only see the difference in big league offenses over many games and many at-bats vs. a wide variety of different pitchers, situations, and plate umpires.

The plate umpire's effect on the game is seriously underrated. Do you really believe that a plate umpire has less effect on the game than the capability of one team to score an average of a fraction run more than the opposition over the course of a season? Do you think it is coincidence that Eric Cooper had the plate in both of Buehrle's no-hitters?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Actually, Vasquez was better than Buehrle by almost 2 WAR over their respective careers. Are you asking which pitcher would I take? Vasquez, as he was better at doing the things over which a pitcher has direct control. He only had 4 seasons of 4+ FIP, whereas Buehrle spent 10 of 14 seasons as a full-time starter over the 4 FIP mark, and Buehrle, for some reason benefited greatly from routinely friendly HR/FB rates.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The difference between most offenses within the minuscule space of a single game is negligible. The way those offenses will perform on that day is largely determined by the pitchers. We only see the difference in big league offenses over many games and many at-bats vs. a wide variety of different pitchers, situations, and plate umpires.

The plate umpire's effect on the game is seriously underrated. Do you really believe that a plate umpire has less effect on the game than the capability of one team to score an average of a fraction run more than the opposition over the course of a season? Do you think it is coincidence that Eric Cooper had the plate in both of Buehrle's no-hitters?


So, your argument that Jose Quintana isn't great hinges on the idea that, across multiple games, he isn't "better" than the pitcher he opposes, because...the White Sox can't hit, which is because...the other pitcher is better...which is because...Quintana isn't better at pitching than the Sox' offense is at scoring...which is because the opposing pitcher is better....you're tying bootstraps to other bootstraps, all being pulled up by another bootstrap.

But still, you want to talk about Jose Quintana not "beating" an opposing pitcher across many games, but don't want to hear about the other things Quintana does, again across many games, that he does better than the vast majority of MLB starters? So we're talking about Quintana's W-L record, essentially. Which...ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.

How can you judge two pitchers against each other in the same game? They aren't facing the same team.


The difference between most offenses within the minuscule space of a single game is negligible. The way those offenses will perform on that day is largely determined by the pitchers. We only see the difference in big league offenses over many games and many at-bats vs. a wide variety of different pitchers, situations, and plate umpires.

The plate umpire's effect on the game is seriously underrated. Do you really believe that a plate umpire has less effect on the game than the capability of one team to score an average of a fraction run more than the opposition over the course of a season? Do you think it is coincidence that Eric Cooper had the plate in both of Buehrle's no-hitters?

So why aren't there just 15 "stock batting lineups" in the league? One based out of every ballpark. Baseball rosters would solely be rotations and bullpens. And the hitters play both the tops and bottoms of innings.

Let's get rid of that minuscule space. Sounds like you'd love that. Now we just have pitchers competing against pitchers with all other things being equal.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Actually, Vasquez was better than Buehrle by almost 2 WAR over their respective careers. Are you asking which pitcher would I take? Vasquez, as he was better at doing the things over which a pitcher has direct control. He only had 4 seasons of 4+ FIP, whereas Buehrle spent 10 of 14 seasons as a full-time starter over the 4 FIP mark, and Buehrle, for some reason benefited greatly from routinely friendly HR/FB rates.



This is where Fangraphs has taken people. To arguing that fucking Javy Vazquez was better than Mark Buehrle. There's no point in going on. We just aren't going to agree.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
If you're going to argue that "great pitchers do it", then I'll need to be shown when the likes of Clayton Kershaw turn their greatness to 11 when they see their team isn't going to score, and how it is determined that such things are actively accomplished.


Nobody "turns their greatness up". It just is. You can't be great if you're the second best starting pitcher in most games you start. Period.

How can you judge two pitchers against each other in the same game? They aren't facing the same team.


The difference between most offenses within the minuscule space of a single game is negligible. The way those offenses will perform on that day is largely determined by the pitchers. We only see the difference in big league offenses over many games and many at-bats vs. a wide variety of different pitchers, situations, and plate umpires.

The plate umpire's effect on the game is seriously underrated. Do you really believe that a plate umpire has less effect on the game than the capability of one team to score an average of a fraction run more than the opposition over the course of a season? Do you think it is coincidence that Eric Cooper had the plate in both of Buehrle's no-hitters?

So why aren't there just 15 "stock batting lineups" in the league? One based out of every ballpark. Baseball rosters would solely be rotations and bullpens. And the hitters play both the tops and bottoms of innings.

Let's get rid of that minuscule space. Sounds like you'd love that. Now we just have pitchers competing against pitchers with all other things being equal.


Time and repetition. Time and repetition.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Actually, Vasquez was better than Buehrle by almost 2 WAR over their respective careers. Are you asking which pitcher would I take? Vasquez, as he was better at doing the things over which a pitcher has direct control. He only had 4 seasons of 4+ FIP, whereas Buehrle spent 10 of 14 seasons as a full-time starter over the 4 FIP mark, and Buehrle, for some reason benefited greatly from routinely friendly HR/FB rates.



This is where Fangraphs has taken people. To arguing that fucking Javy Vazquez was better than Mark Buehrle. There's no point in going on. We just aren't going to agree.


I wouldn't argue that. I would say Vazquez at his best was probably better than Buehrle. Buehrle was fairly consistent though and Vazquez was all over the place.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nobody want to take on the Buehrle/Vazquez question in spite of their supposed hard held beliefs in SABRmetric research regarding the things a pitcher can "control". Probably because arguing that Vazquez was better than Buerhle is even more ridiculous than calling Quintana "great".


Actually, Vasquez was better than Buehrle by almost 2 WAR over their respective careers. Are you asking which pitcher would I take? Vasquez, as he was better at doing the things over which a pitcher has direct control. He only had 4 seasons of 4+ FIP, whereas Buehrle spent 10 of 14 seasons as a full-time starter over the 4 FIP mark, and Buehrle, for some reason benefited greatly from routinely friendly HR/FB rates.



This is where Fangraphs has taken people. To arguing that fucking Javy Vazquez was better than Mark Buehrle. There's no point in going on. We just aren't going to agree.


That's like the 4th time you've mentioned "Fangraphs" today, for the love of God there are at least 3 other reputable statistical databases that can serve as your Evil Numbers Boogymen.

And yes, Vasquez was better than Buehrle, because he struck out batters at a much higher rate, walked batters at only a marginally-worse rate, and was able to induce pop-ups that made up a large bulk of his fly-ball rate, meaning he could sustain league-average-or-worse luck in the HR/FB department and still not be a detriment to his team. Buehrle, on the other hand, was in a much more precarious position, in that he had to have the sustained "luck" (the ability of a pitcher to influence HR/FB rate is still dubious) of fly balls not turning into home runs, which is where he derived much of his value. If you give Buehrle league-average luck over his career, he becomes much, much worse.

You want to incorporate things a pitcher cannot control (defense, offensive "help", and so on) into their overall value, whereas I think it is better to valuate a pitcher with more weight placed on the things that pitcher can control directly. When you do the former, Buehrle is the better pitcher, when you do the latter, Vasquez is the clear favorite. I'd rather build a team based on how good players are at the things they can control and influence, and I think over the long run my team would be better than yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And yes, Vasquez was better than Buehrle, because he struck out batters at a much higher rate, walked batters at only a marginally-worse rate, and was able to induce pop-ups that made up a large bulk of his fly-ball rate, meaning he could sustain league-average-or-worse luck in the HR/FB department and still not be a detriment to his team. Buehrle, on the other hand, was in a much more precarious position, in that he had to have the sustained "luck" (the ability of a pitcher to influence HR/FB rate is still dubious) of fly balls not turning into home runs, which is where he derived much of his value. If you give Buehrle league-average luck over his career, he becomes much, much worse.
We can use this post when someone tries to say that no one just uses SABRmetrics as the definitive answer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Luck is not sustainable over 3000+ innings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

That's like the 4th time you've mentioned "Fangraphs" today, for the love of God there are at least 3 other reputable statistical databases that can serve as your Evil Numbers Boogymen.


Well then, substitute whichever one you're getting your idiotic ideas from.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

That's like the 4th time you've mentioned "Fangraphs" today, for the love of God there are at least 3 other reputable statistical databases that can serve as your Evil Numbers Boogymen.


Well then, substitute whichever one you're getting your idiotic ideas from.


Have you made your case the Buehrle is better than Vasquez? Because I haven't seen it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

That's like the 4th time you've mentioned "Fangraphs" today, for the love of God there are at least 3 other reputable statistical databases that can serve as your Evil Numbers Boogymen.


Well then, substitute whichever one you're getting your idiotic ideas from.


Have you made your case the Buehrle is better than Vasquez? Because I haven't seen it.

Dude...Buehrle was the #1 starter on a World Series team. He's probably the greatest pitcher in White Sox history, he won the White Sox an obscene amount of games. I'm not talking about pitcher wins, I'm talking about team wins. Buehrle is responsible for a lot a lot a lot of them. Definition of a horse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 76968
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

That's like the 4th time you've mentioned "Fangraphs" today, for the love of God there are at least 3 other reputable statistical databases that can serve as your Evil Numbers Boogymen.


Well then, substitute whichever one you're getting your idiotic ideas from.


Have you made your case the Buehrle is better than Vasquez? Because I haven't seen it.


I have no interest in making such an argument. If you think Vazquez was better than Buehrle feel free to go around saying it.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
America wrote:
Dude...Buehrle was the #1 starter on a World Series team. He's probably the greatest pitcher in White Sox history, he won the White Sox an obscene amount of games. I'm not talking about pitcher wins, I'm talking about team wins. Buehrle is responsible for a lot a lot a lot of them. Definition of a horse.


How is any of what you said quantifiable and comparable across other teams and pitchers? I just asked for an argument for Buerhle being better than Vasquez, and what I got in response is "team wins" (what the hell are those?), "a horse" and "#1 starter on a World Series team". He was also the #1 starter on a lot of really bad White Sox teams, why aren't you counting those seasons?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And yes, Vasquez was better than Buehrle, because he struck out batters at a much higher rate, walked batters at only a marginally-worse rate, and was able to induce pop-ups that made up a large bulk of his fly-ball rate, meaning he could sustain league-average-or-worse luck in the HR/FB department and still not be a detriment to his team. Buehrle, on the other hand, was in a much more precarious position, in that he had to have the sustained "luck" (the ability of a pitcher to influence HR/FB rate is still dubious) of fly balls not turning into home runs, which is where he derived much of his value. If you give Buehrle league-average luck over his career, he becomes much, much worse.
We can use this post when someone tries to say that no one just uses SABRmetrics as the definitive answer.


Better include this last bit, numb nuts:

Quote:
You want to incorporate things a pitcher cannot control (defense, offensive "help", and so on) into their overall value, whereas I think it is better to valuate a pitcher with more weight placed on the things that pitcher can control directly. When you do the former, Buehrle is the better pitcher, when you do the latter, Vasquez is the clear favorite. I'd rather build a team based on how good players are at the things they can control and influence, and I think over the long run my team would be better than yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rick Hahn
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88937
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
America wrote:
Dude...Buehrle was the #1 starter on a World Series team. He's probably the greatest pitcher in White Sox history, he won the White Sox an obscene amount of games. I'm not talking about pitcher wins, I'm talking about team wins. Buehrle is responsible for a lot a lot a lot of them. Definition of a horse.


How is any of what you said quantifiable and comparable across other teams and pitchers? I just asked for an argument for Buerhle being better than Vasquez, and what I got in response is "team wins" (what the hell are those?), "a horse" and "#1 starter on a World Series team". He was also the #1 starter on a lot of really bad White Sox teams, why aren't you counting those seasons?
Your argument was "he was lucky" so you didn't make a strong case either.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 195 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group