Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT

Prospects don't mean shit.

Wake me up when they produce on the big club.

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Prospects don't mean shit.

Wake me up when they produce on the big club.

Wake me up when Quintana produces on the big club.

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Prospects don't mean shit.

Wake me up when they produce on the big club.

I agree. I'm just happy Quintana is a Cub.

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Prospects don't mean shit.

Wake me up when they produce on the big club.

I agree. I'm just happy Quintana is a Cub.

FavreFan wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Congrats Sox Fans, Hahn just butfucked Glory Boy Theo.

We'll see. Ya'll got an average pitcher. We got some dudes who may be good years from now.

No. Terrible deal. Reverse of the Sosa trade.

Hank Scorpio wrote:

FavreFan wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

Congrats Sox Fans, Hahn just butfucked Glory Boy Theo.

We'll see. Ya'll got an average pitcher. We got some dudes who may be good years from now.

No. Terrible deal. Reverse of the Sosa trade.

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1?

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1?

For what was given up I would have went after Archer, but I guess this Q guy is #2 on the list of starters you could have got.

HawaiiYou wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

Archer plays for a team that currently holds the second wild card position and is three games better than the Cubs.

good dolphin wrote:

HawaiiYou wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

Archer plays for a team that currently holds the second wild card position and is three games better than the Cubs.

HawaiiYou wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1?

No worries about Quintana being competitive like that

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1?

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

rogers park bryan wrote:

RFDC wrote:

Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career.
.

Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

I dont think it is odd at all when you consider the entire picture.

So letme get this straight? First, the SOX fans on this board railed on THEO & CO for prospects, and now that the SOX have prospects its all good?

And now that "RAWDEAL" RICKY is on the southside, he is going to lead all of these kids to GLORY? ONCE AGAIN, it needs to be pointed out who the owner is? FF, do you reall think JERRY is going to pay these guys when they are due for a big payday? NOPE!!

I AM GLAD THAT THE SOX MINORS LEAGUES IS GOING SO WELL! MAYBE CHARLOTTE WILL HAVE MORE ATTENDANCE THAN STATE OF IL COMISKULAR RATE PARK?? But, Hey, bacon on a stick!! :lol:

Author:	Joe Orr Road Rod [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:15 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Terry's Peeps wrote: Prospects don't mean shit. Wake me up when they produce on the big club. I agree. I'm just happy Quintana is a Cub.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:16 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Hank Scorpio wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Prospects don't mean shit. Wake me up when they produce on the big club. Wake me up when Quintana produces on the big club. Enjoy your long sleep.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:17 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Prospects don't mean shit. Wake me up when they produce on the big club. I agree. I'm just happy Quintana is a Cub. Yup.

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:19 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
I want to be wrong on this but I'm not.

Author:	Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:23 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Rick just trade raped Theo

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=107398	Page 3 of 5

Author:	FavreFan [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:25 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Prospects don't mean shit. Wake me up when they produce on the big club. I agree. I'm just happy Quintana is a Cub. I agree. I'm willing to take addition by subtraction for now with the hope of something more in the future.

Author:	RFDC [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. I think this could potentially be a good deal for both clubs. Eloy is going to be a good one. No doubt the Cubs needed pitching help that would be around for awhile. At least they did not give up any of their current major league guys and I dont think any of the other 3 guys are going to amount to much.

Author:	pittmike [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:30 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Sox have 6 of top 40 prospects now? 10 of 68?

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:33 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Hank Scorpio wrote: FavreFan wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Congrats Sox Fans, Hahn just butfucked Glory Boy Theo. We'll see. Ya'll got an average pitcher. We got some dudes who may be good years from now. No. Terrible deal. Reverse of the Sosa trade.

Author:	badrogue17 [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Big Chicagoan wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: FavreFan wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Congrats Sox Fans, Hahn just butfucked Glory Boy Theo. We'll see. Ya'll got an average pitcher. We got some dudes who may be good years from now. No. Terrible deal. Reverse of the Sosa trade. Friend of mine on Facebook said Sammy Sosa now looks like a character in the Rob Zombie version of Cabaret.

Author:	America [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:41 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
The Cubs paid what the Astros should have given up for Q back in December. Hahn got a bailout.

Author:	Big Brane [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:47 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
So letme get this straight? First, the SOX fans on this board railed on THEO & CO for prospects, and now that the SOX have prospects its all good? And now that "RAWDEAL" RICKY is on the southside, he is going to lead all of these kids to GLORY? ONCE AGAIN, it needs to be pointed out who the owner is? FF, do you reall think JERRY is going to pay these guys when they are due for a big payday? NOPE!! I AM GLAD THAT THE SOX MINORS LEAGUES IS GOING SO WELL! MAYBE CHARLOTTE WILL HAVE MORE ATTENDANCE THAN STATE OF IL COMISKULAR RATE PARK?? But, Hey, bacon on a stick!!

Author:	formerlyknownas [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 11:57 am ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Kap gets sloppy seconds on Rick Hahn (Leader of the Year)

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year

Page 3 of 5	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	America [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
It's about the money. Quintana is nothing to the Cubs, he in no way affects extension talks with Bryant and Rizzo. From a pure pitching perspective I would much much much rather have Verlander.

Author:	HawaiiYou [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? For what was given up I would have went after Archer, but I guess this Q guy is #2 on the list of starters you could have got.

Author:	FavreFan [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? No worries about Quintana being competitive like that

Author:	good dolphin [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? For what was given up I would have went after Archer, but I guess this Q guy is #2 on the list of starters you could have got. Archer plays for a team that currently holds the second wild card position and is three games better than the Cubs.

Author:	Apologist [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
If they throw in Kate Upton, the trade is a steal

Author:	FavreFan [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
good dolphin wrote: HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? For what was given up I would have went after Archer, but I guess this Q guy is #2 on the list of starters you could have got. Archer plays for a team that currently holds the second wild card position and is three games better than the Cubs.

Author:	leashyourkids [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
I just looked at Quintana's stats. Wow, this dude is good. Just hasn't gotten any run support. Great trade.

Author:	HawaiiYou [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
FavreFan wrote: good dolphin wrote: HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? For what was given up I would have went after Archer, but I guess this Q guy is #2 on the list of starters you could have got. Archer plays for a team that currently holds the second wild card position and is three games better than the Cubs. like i said i dont know anything about the AL

Author:	badrogue17 [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
FavreFan wrote: HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? No worries about Quintana being competitive like that

Author:	HawaiiYou [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Yesterday Eloy Jimenez was the next Aaron Judge and Quintana was a pitcher who never reached his potential. Today Eloy Jimenez is a bum and Quintana is a today's version of a 1984 Rick Sutcliffe.

Author:	sjboyd0137 [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
HawaiiYou wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont know if Verlander would have worked. Would he demand being a #1? How would that affect the rest of the starters? Would Lester be pissed he's not #1? No one gives a flying fuck about number designations in a rotation. And after Lester's start on Sunday, he can shut the fuck up, too. Go shove a pineapple up your ass.

Author:	RFDC [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont think it is odd at all when you consider the entire picture.

Author:	312player [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
RFDC wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: RFDC wrote: Eh. Q was not the guy I wanted. But it is better than Verlander at this point in his career. . Your Verlander stance is odd. Hall of Famer 6 months removed from a Cy Young type year I dont think it is odd at all when you consider the entire picture. We'd keep Jimenez if it was Verlander.

Author:	Apologist [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Verlander shouldn't cost that much if the Cub pays his salary. Factor in that Ilitch is now dead

Author:	Don Tiny [ Thu Jul 13, 2017 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: QUINTANA TO THE CUBS HOLY SHIT
Big Brane wrote: So letme get this straight? First, the SOX fans on this board railed on THEO & CO for prospects, and now that the SOX have prospects its all good? And now that "RAWDEAL" RICKY is on the southside, he is going to lead all of these kids to GLORY? ONCE AGAIN, it needs to be pointed out who the owner is? FF, do you reall think JERRY is going to pay these guys when they are due for a big payday? NOPE!! I AM GLAD THAT THE SOX MINORS LEAGUES IS GOING SO WELL! MAYBE CHARLOTTE WILL HAVE MORE ATTENDANCE THAN STATE OF IL COMISKULAR RATE PARK?? But, Hey, bacon on a stick!! (I would've gone with 'do' instead of 'due', but that's being picky)