It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 7:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Scotty Pods Priced Out?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Scott Podsednik, thanks for the memories? On the same day that the White Sox & Royals completed a trade in which third baseman Mark Teahen and cash will be coming to the South Side for second baseman Chris Getz & third/first baseman Joshua Fields and also announced the end of the Jermaine Dye era by not picking up his option, might "Scotty Pods" be far behind?

It appears that way, according to White Sox General Manager Kenny Williams and Sun-Times/SCORE Insider Joe Cowley. There are rumblings that Podsednik might have priced himself out of the market to come back to the South side next year. According to Cowley's latest blog entry at 670thescore.com, talks have broken down between Podsednik, his agent and Williams, who claims that "Money is tight." There are reports that Scotty Pods may have asked for $7.5 million a season for 2 years, and may be considered outrageous by many. It also doesn't necessarily mean that Anaheim's Chone Figgins, considered one of the few free agent prizes in a weak class this offseason, is within the Sox price range. Cowley reports that Sox prospect Jordan Danks could be in line as the third outfielder and potential new leadoff hitter at U.S. Cellular Field next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
This is probably Pods last contract, I don't blame him for trying to get all he can. I'll just be surprised if he does.

That's a pretty tall order asking Danks to leadoff ....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
Pods will be back knocking at the door of the Sox because no other team in baseball is going to give him 7.5 Mil over 2 years. He was unclaimed on waivers before the Sox picked him up if I recall?

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
SHARK wrote:
Scott Podsednik, thanks for the memories? On the same day that the White Sox & Royals completed a trade in which third baseman Mark Teahen and cash will be coming to the South Side for second baseman Chris Getz & third/first baseman Joshua Fields and also announced the end of the Jermaine Dye era by not picking up his option, might "Scotty Pods" be far behind?

It appears that way, according to White Sox General Manager Kenny Williams and Sun-Times/SCORE Insider Joe Cowley. There are rumblings that Podsednik might have priced himself out of the market to come back to the South side next year. According to Cowley's latest blog entry at 670thescore.com, talks have broken down between Podsednik, his agent and Williams, who claims that "Money is tight." There are reports that Scotty Pods may have asked for $7.5 million a season for 2 years, and may be considered outrageous by many. It also doesn't necessarily mean that Anaheim's Chone Figgins, considered one of the few free agent prizes in a weak class this offseason, is within the Sox price range. Cowley reports that Sox prospect Jordan Danks could be in line as the third outfielder and potential new leadoff hitter at U.S. Cellular Field next year.


If 'money is tight', then why did they trade for Mark Teahan?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
BD wrote:

If 'money is tight', then why did they trade for Mark Teahan?


They got $2MM back from the Royals to offset.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
mel junior wrote:
BD wrote:

If 'money is tight', then why did they trade for Mark Teahan?


They got $2MM back from the Royals to offset.


OK, that makes more sense. How much money do they add to their payroll with this trade? I thought I had read that Teahan was making somewhere between $4 and $5 million. Was that incorrect?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80165
Abreu signed for 9 million per year and Pods wants 7.5. I guess he figures it is early in free agency and he might as well ask for the max. He can always play the market and come back to the Sox with the highest bid.

I have a feeling Figgins will get no more than 8. Lots of people will want him, just not that much.

If Abreu signed for 9 then Dye should be worth about 5-6. I'd take another chance on him at that amount.

but geeze, 7.5 for Pods...I wouldn't give him that much over 2 years let alone 1.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:08 pm
Posts: 3848
pizza_Place: I'm a Gelsosomo's guy.
good dolphin wrote:
Abreu signed for 9 million per year and Pods wants 7.5. I guess he figures it is early in free agency and he might as well ask for the max. He can always play the market and come back to the Sox with the highest bid.

I have a feeling Figgins will get no more than 8. Lots of people will want him, just not that much.

If Abreu signed for 9 then Dye should be worth about 5-6. I'd take another chance on him at that amount.

but geeze, 7.5 for Pods...I wouldn't give him that much over 2 years let alone 1.


I thought it WAS over 2 years? Hell I wouldn't pay him that for 2 years, especially not for one. He was out of baseball before he had about a 5 month rejuvenation with the Sox. 7.5 Million is a helluva price to pay for a hunch he will have a similar season production wise.

_________________
Does your cat make too much noise? Try KITTEN MITTENS!


Charlie: Oh shit. Look at that door dude. See that door right there? That door marked 'Pirate'? You think a pirate lives in there?
Dennis: I see a door marked 'Private.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 am
Posts: 6682
Location: sw burbs
pizza_Place: home run inn
mel junior wrote:
BD wrote:

If 'money is tight', then why did they trade for Mark Teahan?


They got $2MM back from the Royals to offset.



3:42pm: Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star heard the Royals sent $1MM to the White Sox with Teahen :wink: :wink: :eye:

_________________
“Be Who You Are and Say What You Feel Because Those Who Mind Don't Matter and Those Who Matter Don't Mind.” ~ Dr. Suess


Nice Guys Finish Last

Thank you,and have a nice day !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12555
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
good dolphin wrote:
I have a feeling Figgins will get no more than 8. Lots of people will want him, just not that much.


Plus as a 32 year old speedster, he's going to want some years on that contract, I'd imagine... that's kind of risky if you end up with a groin pull this year and then two or three more years of an average speed guy with less defensive range still making 8 mill a year.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:53 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
newper wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I have a feeling Figgins will get no more than 8. Lots of people will want him, just not that much.


Plus as a 32 year old speedster, he's going to want some years on that contract, I'd imagine... that's kind of risky if you end up with a groin pull this year and then two or three more years of an average speed guy with less defensive range still making 8 mill a year.


His age is what concerns me. If he gets a 4 or 5 year deal, how good will he be for the last 2 or 3 years of a contract like that?

I do think he'll get more than $8 million, but I thought Bernstein, who said he thinks he'll get 5 years at $15 million per, is a bit on the high side. I think it'll be a 4 year deal at $11 or $12; remember, all it takes is one crazy team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 pm
Posts: 4051
Location: logan squiz
pizza_Place: art of pizza
$8~10 sounds about right for Figgins. I hope he doesn't end up with the Sox.

Pods could be a sign & trade for some lucky team. Rongey said on WSW that Kenny's just haggling, and he's probably right. I don't really want to see him back here, but I think you'd be doing worse by putting Danks in the leadoff role this year. Let Pods do what he does and hopefully you can sign him cheap enough that you don't mind eating the contract if his discipline disappears.

Another TIDBIT from WSW: Rumors of a package (Jenks & Jordan Danks?) that could bring Carl Crawford to the Sox. I like the sound of that compared to signing Figgins of the free agent market.

_________________
Douchebag wrote:
This thread is probably going to make Tim Raines want to do cocaine again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Trading Jenks would create a huge hole in the bullpen (and not just because of his size). Are they going to sign another closer or promote Thornton? If Thornton is the new closer who gets Mauer, Morneau and Kubel out in the 7th or 8th inning? I LOVE the idea of acquiring Crawford but trading Jenks would create more holes in an already questionable bullpen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:32 am
Posts: 6682
Location: sw burbs
pizza_Place: home run inn
Figgins Too Expensive For White Sox; Podsednik Talks Heat Up
By Howard Megdal [November 9 at 9:00pm CST]

Chris De Luca of the Chicago Sun-Times is reporting that White Sox GM Kenny Williams flatly denied that Chicago would have enough money to spend on free agent leadoff hitter Chone Figgins.

''We don't have that kind of money," Williams said. "Sometimes the minor [free-agent deals] are the major ones, in my mind. How many Novembers have you heard that line?"

De Luca does report, however, that "talks between the Sox and incumbent leadoff hitter Scott Podsednik have heated up in recent days." Podsednik obviously wouldn't command the kind of money Figgins will be seeking

_________________
“Be Who You Are and Say What You Feel Because Those Who Mind Don't Matter and Those Who Matter Don't Mind.” ~ Dr. Suess


Nice Guys Finish Last

Thank you,and have a nice day !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
While talks have supposedly re-ignited with Scott Podsednik, ESPN Radio 1000's Bruce Levine says that the White Sox DH role could be filled by Jim Thome one more time, the Rangers' Hank Blalock or MVP Hideki Matsui of the New World Champion Yankees. Something tells me that Matsui might be out of the White Sox price range, but that guy can hit!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group