It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:00 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BULLS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Big Chicagoan
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Douchebag wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
redskingreg wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.


You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?


Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better


Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further.


Good point. Wouldn't want to end up like you.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 42967
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further.


Good point. Wouldn't want to end up like you.

Are you seriously suggesting that a team in the lottery is going to give up a pick to trade for Rose? How would that help their team now, or even in the future?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Matches Malone
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Matches Malone wrote:
The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.


They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU
Top
 Profile  
 
Matches Malone
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Nas wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.


They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

I know LTG has a problem with the return, but if you were intent on moving him what else was out there? You had to make a move.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Matches Malone wrote:
Nas wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.


They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

I know LTG has a problem with the return, but if you were intent on moving him what else was out there? You had to make a move.


Not much more. You would have had to wait to see who failed in free agency.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU
Top
 Profile  
 
Jbi11s
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
This season was a loss before the trade. Now you are taking one step more towards a rebuild. IMO that's what they need to do. You have to build through the draft, because for w/e reason no elite free agent wants to play here.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80062
always assume you won the trade if the opposite side is the Knicks

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 3
  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BULLS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group