Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - Knicks have interest in D Rose

They can actually free up enough space this off-season to sign Barnes to a max deal.

I know they can, but it would be the worst free agent acquisition in Bulls history.

Jbi11s wrote:

I know they can, but it would be the worst free agent acquisition in Bulls history.

Ben Wallace

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

They won this trade.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

Which Lopez did we get?

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Which Lopez did we get?

Jennifer.

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better

Krazy Ivan wrote:

Terry's Peeps wrote:

Which Lopez did we get?

Jennifer.

Good, she should be able to box out on the defensive end.

FavreFan wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better

Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is?

Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:

Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is?

The son of the terrible Grant brother.

A team of Dwight Howard, Derrick Rose, and Carmelo Anthony may be the greatest collection of playoff losers in history.

FavreFan wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better

Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Author:	conns7901 [ Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
BD wrote: They can actually free up enough space this off-season to sign Barnes to a max deal.

Author:	Nas [ Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:24 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Jbi11s wrote: I know they can, but it would be the worst free agent acquisition in Bulls history. Ben Wallace

Author:	Jbi11s [ Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Nas wrote: Jbi11s wrote: I know they can, but it would be the worst free agent acquisition in Bulls history. Ben Wallace At least Wallace had a career accomplishment or two before signing.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
He gone!

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Bye Asshole

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Knicks have interest in D Rose http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=100943	Page 2 of 3

Author:	Matches Malone [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
It was time to move on.

Author:	Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Which Lopez did we get?

Author:	redskingreg [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
I know it seemed imminent, but it's still bittersweet. Always will think of what could have been, if not for Philly game 1.

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. They won this trade.

Author:	Brick [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
A team of Dwight Howard, Derrick Rose, and Carmelo Anthony may be the greatest collection of playoff losers in history.

Author:	redskingreg [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:50 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:51 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. Nobody is going to trade anything of value for Rose.

Author:	FavreFan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better

Author:	815 [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
This is officially Jimmy's team now. I see almost no chance of them trading him as well. Jimmy Butler this season: • Playing w/ Rose: 19.5 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 4.4 APG • Without Rose: 27.7 PPG, 7.2 RPG, 7.0 APG

Page 2 of 3	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Krazy Ivan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Terry's Peeps wrote: Which Lopez did we get? Jennifer.

Author:	Harvard Dan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Krazy Ivan wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Which Lopez did we get? Jennifer. Good, she should be able to box out on the defensive end.

Author:	billypootons [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. isnt rose's $24M expiring contract very desirable... ? and he could potentially not be totally useless this season? lopez has 3 years left at $12M or so a year right? not horrific but not a steal for a 10-8 guy?

Author:	Krazy Ivan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Harvard Dan wrote: Krazy Ivan wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Which Lopez did we get? Jennifer. Good, she should be able to box out on the defensive end. Hey Now

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: FavreFan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers. Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further.

Author:	redskingreg [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
40th best PG last year. But hey, lets give up young talent for him!!!

Author:	Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is?

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote: Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is? The son of the terrible Grant brother.

Author:	billypootons [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote: Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is? he had a good 2015 ncaa tourney

Author:	Krazy Ivan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Douchebag wrote: Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote: Can someone explain to me in seven words or less who the hell Jerian Grant is? The son of the terrible Grant brother. Does he have a significantly better twin, too?

Author:	KDdidit [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Boilermaker Rick wrote: A team of Dwight Howard, Derrick Rose, and Carmelo Anthony may be the greatest collection of playoff losers in history. They're a lock for the 2011 Finals!

Author:	FavreFan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:01 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: FavreFan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers. Rose has ZERO value right now. This was a classic dumping of a player. That's it. There was never a possibility of getting useful assets back for Derrick Rose.