Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - Knicks have interest in D Rose

Big Chicagoan wrote:

FavreFan wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

redskingreg wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks.

You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose?

Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises.

And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus.

You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better

Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further.

Douchebag wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers.

Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further.

Good point. Wouldn't want to end up like you.

The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.

Matches Malone wrote:

The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.

They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

Nas wrote:

Matches Malone wrote:

The Knicks just want that expiring contract.

If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.

They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

I know LTG has a problem with the return, but if you were intent on moving him what else was out there? You had to make a move.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Douchebag wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: FavreFan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: redskingreg wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Bulls didn't get shit for him. Would rather have had future picks. You have to align $$$$$$$$ in NBA trades, ya dingus. What team, in their right mind, is going to give up anything significant for a high dollar question mark like Rose? Bad teams. Kings, Lakers, ect. Poorly run franchises. And picks have $$$$ value, ya dingus. You're not gonna get get valuable picks for Rose without eating an albatross contract in the process. This was a fine trade. They weren't going to do better Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers. Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further. Good point. Wouldn't want to end up like you.

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Big Chicagoan wrote: Douchebag wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Not an albatross contract this season. Salary cap way up. 1 year left. Former MVP. Still can put up good numbers. Just step away from this thread before you embarrass yourself further. Good point. Wouldn't want to end up like you. Are you seriously suggesting that a team in the lottery is going to give up a pick to trade for Rose? How would that help their team now, or even in the future?

Author:	Matches Malone [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
The Knicks just want that expiring contract. If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term.

Author:	Nas [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Matches Malone wrote: The Knicks just want that expiring contract. If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term. They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams.

Author:	Matches Malone [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Nas wrote: Matches Malone wrote: The Knicks just want that expiring contract. If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term. They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams. I know LTG has a problem with the return, but if you were intent on moving him what else was out there? You had to make a move.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Knicks have interest in D Rose http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=100943	Page 3 of 3

Author:	Nas [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
Matches Malone wrote: Nas wrote: Matches Malone wrote: The Knicks just want that expiring contract. If you're going to continue to try and run a triangle based offense in NY then there's no way Rose is there long term. They hope he has a great year before free agency. It's a great deal for both teams. I know LTG has a problem with the return, but if you were intent on moving him what else was out there? You had to make a move. Not much more. You would have had to wait to see who failed in free agency.

Author:	Jbi11s [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
This season was a loss before the trade. Now you are taking one step more towards a rebuild. IMO that's what they need to do. You have to build through the draft, because for w/e reason no elite free agent wants to play here.

Author:	good dolphin [ Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Knicks have interest in D Rose
always assume you won the trade if the opposite side is the Knicks

Page 3 of 3	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/