It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 9:42 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 617 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31473
pizza_Place: Milano's
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.

Nets 141 Sixers 118 are you still beating your drum for Brown?

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 31473
pizza_Place: Milano's
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.


is it possible for you to make an NBA post without mentioning Thibs or the Timberwolves ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
:lol: The only person currently on the roster from the day of Hoiberg's arrival is Jimmy Butler. I don't even believe that Portis had been drafted at that point.


Ouch babe. You forgot All-Star caliber Nikola Mirotic.

edit: Wow you guys post fast. I responded to an old post. Maybe it was already addressed.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.


is it possible for you to make an NBA post without mentioning Thibs or the Timberwolves ?


If there was an ounce of consistency or objectivity I could. .500 team playing .500 ball (actually will be 1 or 2 over) doesn't jive with him being the terrible coach that you and others portray him to be. He has made mistakes and he probably isn't championship level but the results don't coincide with the narrative. This roster isn't all that talented and Jimmy Butler has had his two best seasons as a pro playing for Hoiberg.

He doesn't get credit for anything which puts guys like me in a position to defend him all the time. I know why the Thibs talk is persona non grata and it has nothing to do with Hoiberg. His team stinks and he hasn't lived up to the hype. I am going to bang the drums as long as I believe that there isn't objectivity involved.


If anyone can show where this team was predicted to be anywhere but where they are then maybe I will leave it alone.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
long time guy : Thibs as JORR : Trump


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Veteran team? The Bulls began the season with 5 established players on the roster. The rest were unproven.


Yes, veteran team would be the correct description for a team with one three-time NBA champion, one one-time NBA champion, and several other players with multiple years of playoff experience.



long time guy wrote:
I'm not happy with some of the things Hoiberg has done but you're off base if you think that he has presided over a "shit show". When it is said and done they will finish where they were predicted to finish. If he'd done a terrible job there'd be no way that could have happened.


It is a terrible job. I'm sorry you're impressed with the illusion of mediocrity. In all fairness the Bulls should be five to seven games better given the atrociousness of the east. Good coaches mean a team exceeds expectations. And it is a shit show due to all the blowback Hoiberg has generated due to his failure to lead a locker room.

long time guy wrote:
The Bulls have performed better against better teams.


Meaningless when you're under 500 and generally a shit team.

long time guy wrote:
They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


Are you praising or criticizing Hoiberg here? Can't tell.

long time guy wrote:
2. As has been previously stated you have no problem touting Thibs's record while with the Bulls. Thibs record was attained against an Eastern Conf. that was shittier than it is today yet you conveniently have failed to ever mention it.
[/quote]

Once again you have no facts to back up anything here. The east had better records 1-8 in 2011 as compared to this year:
http://www.nba.com/standings/2010/team_ ... d_Cnf.html

Maybe I "conveniently fail to ever mention it" because it never happened. On the other hand can we take you to task for inconveniently mentioning things that never happened? Results in a lot of research I really don't want to do. Please speak factually.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18469
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.


is it possible for you to make an NBA post without mentioning Thibs or the Timberwolves ?


If there was an ounce of consistency or objectivity I could. .500 team playing .500 ball (actually will be 1 or 2 over) doesn't jive with him being the terrible coach that you and others portray him to be. He has made mistakes and he probably isn't championship level but the results don't coincide with the narrative. This roster isn't all that talented and Jimmy Butler has had his two best seasons as a pro playing for Hoiberg.

He doesn't get credit for anything which puts guys like me in a position to defend him all the time. I know why the Thibs talk is persona non grata and it has nothing to do with Hoiberg. His team stinks and he hasn't lived up to the hype. I am going to bang the drums as long as I believe that there isn't objectivity involved.


If anyone can show where this team was predicted to be anywhere but where they are then maybe I will leave it alone.

Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
As the only objective one here, let me sort this out.

Hoiberg has done a poor job in his only two years as head coach. It's evident that the players dont respect him and that he doesn't have a coherent gameplan game to game. There is nothing to suggest he has improved as a coach in his two years. He should be fired immediately but probably won't be because nobody who works under Reinsdorf is ever held accountable for anything.

Thibs has a track record of success that only a few coaches in the league currently can match. That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing. Given his track record, I'm obviously inclined to give Thibs more of a benefit of the doubt than Hoiberg, but he needs to make the playoffs next season or else we have to seriously start considering ltg is correct about him being mediocre and overrated. But I'm not ready to go there yet after his only bad season as a head coach.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54268
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Does anyone else suspect long time guy has some ~faaaaabulous~ reasons for hating Thibodeau the way he does?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Your argument also lacks validity for 2 reasons. 1. The Bulls have performed better against better teams. They aren't stockpiliing wins against crappy teams.


right, they lose to those crappy teams. which is due to effort, which is a reflection of the coach



So do your soon to be NBA title contending Wolves (lost to the lowly Kings over the Weekend). You however still beat the drums for Thibs.

Their letdowns against crappy teams is cause for concern. Hoiberg probably is only destined to be .500 coach but they have looked better the past 2 weeks.


I just find the level of disappoointment with the Bulls to be rather phony. Before the start of the season there were very few if any that were happy with the construction of the Roster. Hated the signing from Wade to Rondo to anyone. To here some tell it now the Bulls would be so much better off if they only had another (preferably Thibs) as their coach. Having Thibs as coach sure has been working wonders for the Wolves and their 50 loss season having ass hasn't it.

Nets 141 Sixers 118 are you still beating your drum for Brown?


Yep

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.


The Bulls lost wade traded everyone's favorite Taj for nothing and has an all star player that has rebelled since day one.

No one was talking this young stuff during the summer and Lavine isn't that much of a difference maker. They had a cappy record with him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.


The Bulls lost wade traded everyone's favorite Taj for nothing and has an all star player that has rebelled since day one.

No one was talking this young stuff during the summer and Lavine isn't that much of a difference maker. They had a cappy record with him.


huh?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.

Both the Bulls and Wolves will finish within a handful of games of what they were last year. That's stagnation.

I don't agree at all with your first season theory. Whether it's your first season or 10th, you should be evaluated based on what your team did that year comparable to expectations. Also, you and I didn't give Hoiberg any such benefit of the doubt last season, so it's disingenous to now give such a benefit to Thibs simply to try to win an argument.

Go back to before the season started and remember your expectations for both teams. I believe you will see that the Bulls are finishing right around where you thought they would, and the Wolves are worse than you thought they would be. Given that, I don't see how you can say the Bulls are more disappointing than the Wolves.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.



The Wolves two best players have been injury free the entire season. Last season you couldn't get enough of telling the message board world how Thibs could mount any obstacle presented. Now he cant coach around the loss of his 3rd possibly 4th best player? They weren't playing well with Lavine and there record is 2 or 3 games better than Sacramento's.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
Does anyone else suspect long time guy has some ~faaaaabulous~ reasons for hating Thibodeau the way he does?


Anymore than this board has for loving him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.

Both the Bulls and Wolves will finish within a handful of games of what they were last year. That's stagnation.

I don't agree at all with your first season theory. Whether it's your first season or 10th, you should be evaluated based on what your team did that year comparable to expectations. Also, you and I didn't give Hoiberg any such benefit of the doubt last season, so it's disingenous to now give such a benefit to Thibs simply to try to win an argument.

Go back to before the season started and remember your expectations for both teams. I believe you will see that the Bulls are finishing right around where you thought they would, and the Wolves are worse than you thought they would be. Given that, I don't see how you can say the Bulls are more disappointing than the Wolves.


Hoiberg inherited a playoff team that expected to compete against the Cavs just one year prior. He ran that team into the ground and broke a five year string of playoff appearances. His expectations were different than the ones set for This after he inherited a team that, for all its talent, didn't crack thirty wins last year. To judge the two similarly is to indulge in a false equivalency.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.

Both the Bulls and Wolves will finish within a handful of games of what they were last year. That's stagnation.

I don't agree at all with your first season theory. Whether it's your first season or 10th, you should be evaluated based on what your team did that year comparable to expectations. Also, you and I didn't give Hoiberg any such benefit of the doubt last season, so it's disingenous to now give such a benefit to Thibs simply to try to win an argument.

Go back to before the season started and remember your expectations for both teams. I believe you will see that the Bulls are finishing right around where you thought they would, and the Wolves are worse than you thought they would be. Given that, I don't see how you can say the Bulls are more disappointing than the Wolves.


Hoiberg inherited a playoff team that expected to compete against the Cavs just one year prior. He ran that team into the ground and broke a five year string of playoff appearances. His expectations were different than the ones set for This after he inherited a team that, for all its talent, didn't crack thirty wins last year. To judge the two similarly is to indulge in a false equivalency.

The Bulls werent expected to compete with the Cavs last year or the year before.

It's not a false equivalency at all. You expected the Wolves to be better than the Bulls this year! :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That said, this season has been an unmitigated disaster. The Timberwolves are every bit as disappointing as the Bulls this season, and might be even more disappointing.


There are several reasons why you cannot compare the two.

First of all, the Wolves have a younger roster than the Bulls, and their core players are significantly younger than the Bulls' core players on average. Second of all, this is Hoiberg's second year with the team - Thibs is in his first year. Third of all, just to speak factually, the west is markedly better than the east this year, making Thibs' job much tougher. The east, speaking factually, is significantly worse than the west, making Hoiberg's job much easier.

Of course you can compare the two. They are both NBA teams.

None of what you posted excuses the job Thibs has done this year. A young, very talented team that stagnates is worse than a veteran laden team that stagnates. Let's remember that a lot of people had Minnesota as a much better team than the Bulls before the season started. Now that it's clear that the Wolves aren't any better the Bulls, it's ok to trot out excuses like you just did? Nah.

If Hoiberg has had a disastrous season than Thibs has as well. Any argument otherwise is just equivocating.


What do you mean by the Wolves "stagnating"? They are going to finish with a better record than they did last year, and that's after losing Levine for the season. I'm not excusing Thibs but am saying there are different degrees of doing a bad job. Thibs' job this year is bad but of a lesser degree than Hoiberg's primarily because it's his first year and typically you're granted a bit of leeway in your first year with a young team. Not so if he was taking over the Spurs, for example. Hoiberg might finish with a worse record than last year despite a free agent spending spree that netted your beloved Raon Rondo and Dwayne Wade, not to mention him being in his second year on the job, where improvement should be expected.

Both the Bulls and Wolves will finish within a handful of games of what they were last year. That's stagnation.

I don't agree at all with your first season theory. Whether it's your first season or 10th, you should be evaluated based on what your team did that year comparable to expectations. Also, you and I didn't give Hoiberg any such benefit of the doubt last season, so it's disingenous to now give such a benefit to Thibs simply to try to win an argument.

Go back to before the season started and remember your expectations for both teams. I believe you will see that the Bulls are finishing right around where you thought they would, and the Wolves are worse than you thought they would be. Given that, I don't see how you can say the Bulls are more disappointing than the Wolves.


Hoiberg inherited a playoff team that expected to compete against the Cavs just one year prior. He ran that team into the ground and broke a five year string of playoff appearances. His expectations were different than the ones set for This after he inherited a team that, for all its talent, didn't crack thirty wins last year. To judge the two similarly is to indulge in a false equivalency.


It really is quite interesting how you casually toss Lavine'injury in but fail to account for the 200 games lost to Hoi berg last season.

The Wolves will be 1 or 2 games better than last season. Something tells me they expected more from a coach who they are paying 10 mil a year for.

Since we are into excuse making it should be noted that Sam Mitchell took over last season's team in training camp and essentially had a collection of unproven players yet managed to win 29 games.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
The Bulls werent expected to compete with the Cavs last year or the year before.

It's not a false equivalency at all. You expected the Wolves to be better than the Bulls this year! :lol:


I want to say there was an expectation with rose back and Miami losing James that the east was wide open. When love got injured the expectation that the bulls would rise increased significantly. Losing that year to the Cavs was thibs biggest disappointment in Chicago. So yeah they were expected to compete, failed, came back with the same roster and supposedly an innovative coach then promptly sucked and missed the playoffs. Much different than inheriting a directionless team with no playoff experience in a cut throat conference.

My expectations for the wolves were admittedly hyperbolic but yeah I thought thibs could do better. I still believe he will. If over his tenure thibs doesn't turn the wolves around then I'll admit he's not as good as I thought he was. That being said, regardless, him and Freddie Shinebox do not belong in the same breath with one another.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan you're no longer in the Army anymore. No need to attack Muslims.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The Bulls werent expected to compete with the Cavs last year or the year before.

It's not a false equivalency at all. You expected the Wolves to be better than the Bulls this year! :lol:


I want to say there was an expectation with rose back and Miami losing James that the east was wide open. When love got injured the expectation that the bulls would rise increased significantly. Losing that year to the Cavs was thibs biggest disappointment in Chicago. So yeah they were expected to compete, failed, came back with the same roster and supposedly an innovative coach then promptly sucked and missed the playoffs. Much different than inheriting a directionless team with no playoff experience in a cut throat conference.

My expectations for the wolves were admittedly hyperbolic but yeah I thought thibs could do better. I still believe he will. If over his tenure thibs doesn't turn the wolves around then I'll admit he's not as good as I thought he was. That being said, regardless, him and Freddie Shinebox do not belong in the same breath with one another.

I disagree with the first part. Nobody had them beating the Cavs that year. Nobody. I guess we can debate the meaning of compete, but I doubt either of us cares enough to do that. Agree to disagree.

The West isn't a a cut throat conference. Half the conference isn't good and they'll send a below .500 team to the playoffs. It's not the same conference it's been for much of the past 15 years.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The Bulls werent expected to compete with the Cavs last year or the year before.

It's not a false equivalency at all. You expected the Wolves to be better than the Bulls this year! :lol:


I want to say there was an expectation with rose back and Miami losing James that the east was wide open. When love got injured the expectation that the bulls would rise increased significantly. Losing that year to the Cavs was thibs biggest disappointment in Chicago. So yeah they were expected to compete, failed, came back with the same roster and supposedly an innovative coach then promptly sucked and missed the playoffs. Much different than inheriting a directionless team with no playoff experience in a cut throat conference.

My expectations for the wolves were admittedly hyperbolic but yeah I thought thibs could do better. I still believe he will. If over his tenure thibs doesn't turn the wolves around then I'll admit he's not as good as I thought he was. That being said, regardless, him and Freddie Shinebox do not belong in the same breath with one another.

I disagree with the first part. Nobody had them beating the Cavs that year. Nobody. I guess we can debate the meaning of compete, but I doubt either of us cares enough to do that. Agree to disagree.

The West isn't a a cut throat conference. Half the conference isn't good and they'll send a below .500 team to the playoffs. It's not the same conference it's been for much of the past 15 years.


The part about competing is really a minor point when compared to the larger point about the different teams hoiberg and thibs inherited, and how past performance and roster determine expectations. Hoiberg inarguably took the Bulls backwards while Thibs has marginally pushed the wolves forward, though not as much as I would have expected. That is why I said initially that the two teams cannot be so easily compared. They had/have different expectation.

The west when compared to the east is cut throat. You mention one team in the west being under 500 and entering the playoffs, but that's misleading so it's curious as to why you'd state that. Like I said before up to four east playoff teams may enter the postseason under 500 while the top team in the east wouldn't crack the top four in the west. That's cut throat

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The Bulls werent expected to compete with the Cavs last year or the year before.

It's not a false equivalency at all. You expected the Wolves to be better than the Bulls this year! :lol:


I want to say there was an expectation with rose back and Miami losing James that the east was wide open. When love got injured the expectation that the bulls would rise increased significantly. Losing that year to the Cavs was thibs biggest disappointment in Chicago. So yeah they were expected to compete, failed, came back with the same roster and supposedly an innovative coach then promptly sucked and missed the playoffs. Much different than inheriting a directionless team with no playoff experience in a cut throat conference.

My expectations for the wolves were admittedly hyperbolic but yeah I thought thibs could do better. I still believe he will. If over his tenure thibs doesn't turn the wolves around then I'll admit he's not as good as I thought he was. That being said, regardless, him and Freddie Shinebox do not belong in the same breath with one another.

I disagree with the first part. Nobody had them beating the Cavs that year. Nobody. I guess we can debate the meaning of compete, but I doubt either of us cares enough to do that. Agree to disagree.

The West isn't a a cut throat conference. Half the conference isn't good and they'll send a below .500 team to the playoffs. It's not the same conference it's been for much of the past 15 years.


The part about competing is really a minor point when compared to the larger point about the different teams hoiberg and thibs inherited, and how past performance and roster determine expectations. Hoiberg inarguably took the Bulls backwards while Thibs has marginally pushed the wolves forward, though not as much as I would have expected. That is why I said initially that the two teams cannot be so easily compared. They had/have different expectation.

The west when compared to the east is cut throat. You mention one team in the west being under 500 and entering the playoffs, but that's misleading so it's curious as to why you'd state that. Like I said before up to four east playoff teams may enter the postseason under 500 while the top team in the east wouldn't crack the top four in the west. That's cut throat

It's not misleading. Half the conference is below .500. This isn't the same conference that was having 10 48+ win teams from a few years ago. That's cutthroat. The West outside of the top three teams isn't really impressive.

And you're assessment of the two teams expectations continues to be wrong I believe. They both were expected to be a 5-8 seed by most analysts in their respective conferences. Most would probably say the Wolves have more talent on their roster. I believe you would say that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72289
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I'm not defending Hoiberg. I've been consistent in my dislike for him. But us pro-Thibs guys inarguably did not have a good year for our cause.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fixing The Bull
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77149
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
I'm not defending Hoiberg. I've been consistent in my dislike for him. But us pro-Thibs guys inarguably did not have a good year for our cause.


You didn't. I nailed it. Same with Hoiberg too.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 617 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group