On a healthy Bulls team, Moore could easily take the role of a guy like Brooks or Snell and outperform them both.

im not sure what the argument was and i don't have the energy to go back and read a 4 page thread about E Twuan Moore, so you and long time guy can return to your regularly scheduled program

Well if you don't know then maybe don't comment?

that's not exactly a ringing endorsement

he's interchangeable with a million other mediocre backup point guards

Well if you don't know then maybe don't comment?

i did go back and read it
so it's basically you and IMU trolling long time guy
enjoy

EM will get paid somewhere

Disagree. He is fine as the third or fourth guard on a team. He can be a regular rotation guy on a good team.

The Bulls' problem is the fluctuating skill of the guys in the regular starting lineup not named Jimmy Butler. On a healthy Bulls team, Moore could easily take the role of a guy like Brooks or Snell and outperform them both.

So long time guy, can we officially end this discussion on whether Moore will be a solid contributor for the Bulls?

Was Thibs right to give him some time last year?

Since February 1st -

30.7 Minutes, 50% FG% on 11 attempts per game, 50% 3P% on 3 attempts per game, 3.2 REB, 3.0 APG, 0.8 STL, 0.5 BLK, and only 1.4 TOV and 2.6 PF.

He could start for most of the league.

[
No. If Moore is starting for you, your team is fucking trash. Bagels is correct here, as usual.

He has definitely leap frogged Snell and Brooks. Neither may be on the team next year but as it stands now he would be in the top 10 of the rotation even if the Bulls were fully healthy. You were right in this instance. Brooks has really regressed and Snell was a miss. On a good team he is no better than a 4th guard though. If I were to scour the rosters of the top ten teams in the NBA, i'd be hard pressed to place him in the top 3 as far as guard rotations go.

John Wall is taking Etwaun Moore's ass out. This is what we used to call on their playground a "takeout". Kyle Lowry last game and now Wall. Now we are about to see why he is a fringe guy.

John Wall is trash.

When E'Twaun Moore was on the court tonight, the Bulls beat the Wizards. Moore was a +4...the only positive on the team.

You can't argue with points.

Since Etwaun Moore began receiving starter's minutes. His +/- has been positive 8 times and negative 13 times. In your basketball world that should make him a bad basketball player shouldn't it? I am pretty sure that this will be casually ignored also. I don't know how tonight's game will be factored in because I didn't check for tonight's game. even with that it is still just nine.


"eye test" told me this. In that third quarter when Washington broke the game open his sorry ass was on the court and being dominated by John Wall. The +- isn't going to show that but he got his ass tattooed and the game was effectively over from that point on.

When E'Twaun Moore was on the court tonight, the Bulls beat the Wizards. Moore was a +4...the only positive on the team.

You can't argue with points.

"eye test" told me this. In that third quarter when Washington broke the game open his sorry ass was on the court and being dominated by John Wall. The +- isn't going to show that but he got his ass tattooed and the game was effectively over from that point on.

Actually...that is exactly what +/- shows. And it shows you're wrong.

John Wall played 39 minutes.

E'Twaun Moore played 20 minutes.

Based on both of them being on the positive side of +/- it doesn't take a genius to figure out that Wall must have done most of his damage in the other 19 minutes.

This isn't rocket science. This is second grade math.

Unless you want to make the argument that John Wall scoring points actually took away points from his team's score. I'm not sure I've ever heard of that happening before but anything is possible. I did miss some of the second half of the game.

Alright - I'm back to thinking you're a Nas mult.

No one is this dense.

Apparently you are. Instead of a mult you are probably a damn robot or something. Data input data output. Watch the games and you will be able to add more value. The game was blown open in the 3rd quarter. Etwaun Moore was guarding Wall at the time it occurred. He was thoroughly dominated during that stretch. The game was effectively over after that.

You never can provide any details from any games. It's always Stat crunching. It's one of the main reasons I stopped listening to the score. It's obvious that you rarely watch games.

James Harden isn't good because his plus minus isn't high enough. What the hell is that? Etwaun Moore shot 1 for 4 scored 2 points got his ass pimped on defense and yet he played winning ball because he has a +4 rating. Get a clue about sports.

The funniest thing about this entire exercise is that you think because a few guys on a message board fail to call you out on stupid shit like this that somehow it qualifies you as knowledgeable. This is known in logic as "argumentum ad ignoratio". Maybe you can have someone explain it to you.