It is currently Wed May 01, 2024 9:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Ohio St. Comparison
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:24 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Just to point this out. When compared to their 2002 National Championship team, they are easily similar.

1. Both teams began the season ranked outside the top 10 and moved into position by winning their games while those ahead fell around them.

2. Both are led by top notch, smothering, nation leading defenses.

3. Both have "game manager" type QB's.

4. Both offenses are led by young, powerful RB's, that were the #1 player in the nation out of high school.

5. Both had top WR's that were big, strong route runners with decent speed and great hands (Jenkins and Robiskie).

6. Both played great special teams.

7. Both will need to run the table to get to the big show.

8. Both teams have dominant O-lines.

9. And both teams were considered a year away from making a run at it, returning the bulk of their starters the following year.

***The stars are aligning...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:53 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: picking out a gravestone for Rooney
It is yet to be seen if their RB is a gun enthusiast, NFL dropout, crazy person yet though. That may be key.

_________________
Andy Rooney= biggest PUTZ of the dead


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
tmurf423 wrote:
It is yet to be seen if their RB is a gun enthusiast, NFL dropout, crazy person yet though. That may be key.


That would probably put OSU over the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ohio St. Comparison
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
BD wrote:
7. Both will need to run the table to get to the big show.


Which shouldn't be a problem this year in the down Big Ten...well and they duck Iowa ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Ohio St. Comparison
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:40 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
BD wrote:
7. Both will need to run the table to get to the big show.


Which shouldn't be a problem this year in the down Big Ten...well and they duck Iowa ;-)


They still have Penn St, Wisconsin, Illinois and Michigan - obviously some of these teams are not as good as projected, but I wouldn't call them cakewalks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89073
Location: To the left of my post
The team I saw against Purdue was better than the 2002 OSU team that came to Ross-Ade stadium. I would be shocked if OSU loses a game this year, and if South Florida wins out then OSU win the national title.

Another LSU loss and OSU is the favorite to win the title.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
.
And they have her...
.
.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
OSU will be healthy this week as they take on the Michigan State Spartans.

The Bucks have had James Laurinitis practicing all week after leaving last week's game with a hip pointer.

DT Todd Denlinger will play on Saturday, as well, after missing last week's game.

And the big one, FS Anderson Russell could be back in the lineup. The rumors of a high ankle sprain proved unfounded, as Tressel said Anderson rolled his ankle a little bit and he expects him to be on the field on Saturday.

The Bucks should be at about 100% (other than Lawrence Wilson, who is out for the year with a broken leg, and Curtis Terry, who is out for the season with a shoulder injury, but who has chosen to redshirt this year rather than miss half his season and return into a rotation at outside LB. Terry will replace Grant at OLB next year, after starting last year. Wilson, a starter last year and this year, will replace Gholston if he leaves next year, with Heyward and Rose getting more PT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:12 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Back to back shutting down of the top offense in the Big Ten. But pundits continue to say the Big Ten is down, so their top offenses are garbage. No big deal. Now they are saying that OSU can run through their schedule and they would still be unconvinced. Sounds like 2002.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
I hate this crap. I think this "Big 10 is down" talk is garbage. Just because we have more parity this year... and that somehow equates to us being down. You can blame Michigan losing to Appy State and Oregon for that. I suppose you can blame NU for losing to Duke, but no one expects anything from us. We need dOSU to win the NC if we are going to dispell the rumor of the B10's demise. I never thought I'd ever say this, but "GO BUCKS!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:25 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
My_name_1s_MUD wrote:
I hate this crap. I think this "Big 10 is down" talk is garbage. Just because we have more parity this year... and that somehow equates to us being down. You can blame Michigan losing to Appy State and Oregon for that. I suppose you can blame NU for losing to Duke, but no one expects anything from us. We need dOSU to win the NC if we are going to dispell the rumor of the B10's demise. I never thought I'd ever say this, but "GO BUCKS!"


Damn right! Welcome aboard!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89073
Location: To the left of my post
Purdue not competing against Michigan and OSU hurt the league too. If Purdue beats Penn State(they won't) they will be the third best team in the Big Ten. Even if they lose, they will be no less than 5th unless things go horribly wrong.

Saying the Big Ten is down is always popular to say. I wouldn't care if OSU was in the MAC, they are for real.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:29 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Purdue not competing against Michigan and OSU hurt the league too. If Purdue beats Penn State(they won't) they will be the third best team in the Big Ten. Even if they lose, they will be no less than 5th unless things go horribly wrong.

Saying the Big Ten is down is always popular to say. I wouldn't care if OSU was in the MAC, they are for real.


Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed - I hope they finish the season strong now that they have gotten through their rough patch of Ohio St/Michigan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
Quote:
Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed.


Exposed is the wrong word. Purdue is a good team. dOSU is just better. I'm not sure Michigan is better... Purdue just played poorly that game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:45 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
My_name_1s_MUD wrote:
Quote:
Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed.


Exposed is the wrong word. Purdue is a good team. dOSU is just better. I'm not sure Michigan is better... Purdue just played poorly that game.


They generally play poorly whenever they play any good team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89073
Location: To the left of my post
BD wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Purdue not competing against Michigan and OSU hurt the league too. If Purdue beats Penn State(they won't) they will be the third best team in the Big Ten. Even if they lose, they will be no less than 5th unless things go horribly wrong.

Saying the Big Ten is down is always popular to say. I wouldn't care if OSU was in the MAC, they are for real.


Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed - I hope they finish the season strong now that they have gotten through their rough patch of Ohio St/Michigan.


In a matter of a few posts you say that Ohio State shuts down some of the best offenses in the Big Ten and complain about how the media says the offenses aren't very good and then you go and basically say that Purdue's offense isn't very good. Which is it? Do you give Ohio State credit for causing Purdue to have a poor offensive game or are they exposed when playing a good team? You can't have it both ways.

Purdue did not show up to play in those two games, but your use of the word "exposed" is the exact same stuff the media says that you are complaining about. Purdue hasn't won at Ann Arbor in forty years. For some reason, they can't win up there. OSU deserves to be the number one team in the country.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89073
Location: To the left of my post
BD wrote:
My_name_1s_MUD wrote:
Quote:
Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed.


Exposed is the wrong word. Purdue is a good team. dOSU is just better. I'm not sure Michigan is better... Purdue just played poorly that game.


They generally play poorly whenever they play any good team.


If Purdue wins every game they will be favored in, they will finish 9-3 and 5-3 in the Big Ten which will most likely be good for fourth place in the Big Ten. So basically you are saying that the fourth team in the Big Ten isn't very good. I think that shows that the Big Ten is not that good.

The previous two years, we didn't beat anyone who was good, but that is because we weren't very good. I think it is a little early to say that this year's team plays poorly against any good team. You may be right but pretty much every other team in the Big Ten is going to lose to both OSU and Michigan unless they don't have them on the schedule. By the same logic, every team in the Big Ten plays poorly against any good team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:12 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12121
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
BD wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Purdue not competing against Michigan and OSU hurt the league too. If Purdue beats Penn State(they won't) they will be the third best team in the Big Ten. Even if they lose, they will be no less than 5th unless things go horribly wrong.

Saying the Big Ten is down is always popular to say. I wouldn't care if OSU was in the MAC, they are for real.


Purdue can beat average/below average teams, but when they play the good teams, their offense has gotten exposed - I hope they finish the season strong now that they have gotten through their rough patch of Ohio St/Michigan.


In a matter of a few posts you say that Ohio State shuts down some of the best offenses in the Big Ten and complain about how the media says the offenses aren't very good and then you go and basically say that Purdue's offense isn't very good. Which is it? Do you give Ohio State credit for causing Purdue to have a poor offensive game or are they exposed when playing a good team? You can't have it both ways.

Purdue did not show up to play in those two games, but your use of the word "exposed" is the exact same stuff the media says that you are complaining about. Purdue hasn't won at Ann Arbor in forty years. For some reason, they can't win up there. OSU deserves to be the number one team in the country.


Ohio St. deerves credit for shutting down Purdue, and they shouldn't be criticized for their schedule. Purdue does have a good offense - it usually works fine, but they haven't played well against the better defenses. Maybe that's expected, but it's also keeping them from taking a step up in the conference.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group