It is currently Tue Jun 04, 2024 6:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77483
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America.


I don't know what Pence's motivations are and I don't care. This is the same goof who wants to "reeducate" homosexuals.

But I will say that there are millions of Americans who have no problem with someone protesting discrimination and oppression and who might even join such protest but who also have an issue with the specific form this particular protest has taken.

Image
Image

And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.



I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37485
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?



Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1879 ... s-contract

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37485
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?



Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1879 ... s-contract


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miam ... story.html

https://sportsday.dallasnews.com/dallas ... lowed-play

These are monetary decisions being made by NFL owners.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Seacrest wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?



Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1879 ... s-contract

Because the 49ers GM said he was being cut if he didn't opt out. I have a hunch as to why MANY like to ignore that fact though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for any kind of demonstration often believe there's never a right time or place for them.


Yep.

Seacrest wrote:
Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.


Nope.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... opted-out/

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?



Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1879 ... s-contract

Because the 49ers GM said he was being cut if he didn't opt out. I have a hunch as to why MANY like to ignore that fact though.
Why wouldn't Kaep let them cut him then though?

Lynch was just trying to get himself out of the story.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37485
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for any kind of demonstration often believe there's never a right time or place for them.


Yep.

Seacrest wrote:
Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.


Nope.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... opted-out/


Kaepernick had restructured his deal before John Lynch even came.

A 2.5M cap hit is hardly cost prohibitive.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
If I can't trust football management, who can I trust?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37485
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?



Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/1879 ... s-contract

Because the 49ers GM said he was being cut if he didn't opt out. I have a hunch as to why MANY like to ignore that fact though.
Why wouldn't Kaep let them cut him then though?

Lynch was just trying to get himself out of the story.


Yes, that's exactly what Lynch was doing.

I will give Kaep major props for what he did with his contract BEFORE Lynch arrived.

He put his money where his mouth was.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?
This indicates that it is wrong to ever think that there is a "wrong place" to protest. Is it ok to think the Westboro idiots are wrong to protest at the time they do?

And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that the Westboro church idiots are not the equivalent of NFL kneelers (plus they're winning millions in court), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Seacrest wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for any kind of demonstration often believe there's never a right time or place for them.


Yep.

Seacrest wrote:
Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.


Nope.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... opted-out/


Kaepernick had restructured his deal before John Lynch even came.

A 2.5M cap hit is hardly cost prohibitive.

Lynch doesn't mention restructuring at all as a possibility. If he was merely trying to get the 49ers out of the story, they could have painted themselves in an even better light just by mentioning that, just like all these teams Kaepernick was supposedly pricing himself out of when in fact nothing close to a deal ever materialized with any of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Lynch doesn't mention restructuring at all as a possibility. If he was merely trying to get the 49ers out of the story, they could have painted themselves in an even better light just by mentioning that, just like all these teams Kaepernick was supposedly pricing himself out of when in fact nothing close to a deal ever materialized with any of them.
The problem is that if he says they wanted to keep him, then the question is "Why not sign him now?" and the answer of "Because we'd rather suck next year and get a higher draft pick so why would we sign a guy who opted out?" doesn't go over very well with fans.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
He is saying that Pence, the Vice President of the entire United States, thinks so little of discrimination and oppression that he walks out because he believes protesting discrimination and oppression is disrespectful to America.


I don't know what Pence's motivations are and I don't care. This is the same goof who wants to "reeducate" homosexuals.

But I will say that there are millions of Americans who have no problem with someone protesting discrimination and oppression and who might even join such protest but who also have an issue with the specific form this particular protest has taken.

Image
Image

And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for any kind of demonstration often believe there's never a right time or place for them.


Yup.
The silent majority as well as the Southern Strategy were littered with millions that believed such a thing. This way of thinking was prevalent during a time when moral justification for such protests should have been a no brainer. If they didn't believe in such protests during that period imagine now. Probably a lot of "how dare they" being pondered regarding such a thing.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77483
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?


Kaepernick took a stand- as confused as he may be about what exactly he stands for- and now others are standing against him. Nobody has to hire someone who is immediately going to anger his customers. And nobody has to like the way he is protesting. We all have rights.

I'm simply pointing out that for most Americans, a man suffering under Jim Crow being set upon by a German Shepherd is infinitely more sympathetic than a wealthy guy who is disrespecting the flag. And they are disrespecting it. I don't want to take their right to do so away. And I'm not concerned about it in any way. But that is what they are doing and many Americans don't like it. They have that right too.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?
This indicates that it is wrong to ever think that there is a "wrong place" to protest. Is it ok to think the Westboro idiots are wrong to protest at the time they do?

And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that the Westboro church idiots are not the equivalent of NFL kneelers (plus they're winning millions in court), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

No, that's not a logical implication of what I wrote at all.

One key difference in your tortured comparison of course is that few people are really sympathetic to Westboro's views in the first place, not just their tactics. Compare that to the NFL players, where MANY feign sympathy for what they're protesting about but do an awful lot of throatclearing about how it's just not the right place or time. Now if you want to suggest that the NFL players' views are in fact as abhorrent as Westboro's, feel free. That strikes me as a more honest argument than disingenuous complaints about tactics for a group you don't even have any substantive agreement with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?


I agree. Sports are first and foremost a business. If Kaepernick is comfortable with the consequences then fine. I think he should have known what lie before him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?


Kaepernick took a stand- as confused as he may be about what exactly he stands for- and now others are standing against him. Nobody has to hire someone who is immediately going to anger his customers. And nobody has to like the way he is protesting. We all have rights.

I'm simply pointing out that for most Americans, a man suffering under Jim Crow being set upon by a German Shepherd is infinitely more sympathetic than a wealthy guy who is disrespecting the flag. And they are disrespecting it. I don't want to take their right to do so away. And I'm not concerned about it in any way. But that is what they are doing and many Americans don't like it. They have that right too.

But the freedom riders evidently weren't sympathetic to most Americans, nor was King (nor were the wealthy athletes protesting in that time), despite the distinctions you're trying to draw. That's the whole point of the polls. Those tactics only became acceptable retrospectively as part of our happy narrative of US history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
well somehow the civil rights movement was able to achieve most of its objectives at the time. how did that happen if most people were opposed to the cause?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
well somehow the civil rights movement was able to achieve most of its objectives at the time. how did that happen if most people were opposed to the cause?


Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Bill.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?

No I'd say you can't pretend you're committed to winning above all else if you're not willing to sign him (which BTW, is exactly what teams say again and again when they sign guys with long criminal records without a moment's hesitation). As to the circus, no one who actually played with him or coached him in San Francisco complained that he was a distraction.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

I understand your last sentence is accurate, but if you want to compare a kneeling NFL star to a guy attempting to stand while Bull Connor sprays him with a firehose and sets a German Shepherd on him, I'm just going to walk away from the conversation.

You evidently didn't because I already acknowledged the exact way you'd try to dismiss it in that very sentence and you proceeded to do so anyway. Quite amusing whilst you yourself are crying about being misread by others.

Kaepernick is being blackballed out of the league. Last year, MANY of his detractors here were saying his protest was purely empty virtue signaling. Seems to be the opposite of empty virtue signaling if it had that kind of economic implications, no?


Kaepernick took a stand- as confused as he may be about what exactly he stands for- and now others are standing against him. Nobody has to hire someone who is immediately going to anger his customers. And nobody has to like the way he is protesting. We all have rights.

I'm simply pointing out that for most Americans, a man suffering under Jim Crow being set upon by a German Shepherd is infinitely more sympathetic than a wealthy guy who is disrespecting the flag. And they are disrespecting it. I don't want to take their right to do so away. And I'm not concerned about it in any way. But that is what they are doing and many Americans don't like it. They have that right too.

But the freedom riders evidently weren't sympathetic to most Americans, nor was King (nor were the wealthy athletes protesting in that time), despite the distinctions you're trying to draw. That's the whole point of the polls. Those tactics only became acceptable retrospectively as part of our happy narrative of US history.


Again yep.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37485
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that NFL players are not the equivalent of civil rights protesters (plus they're paid millions!), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't the right time or place for any kind of demonstration often believe there's never a right time or place for them.


Yep.

Seacrest wrote:
Kaepernick had a contract to play in the NFL this year. He alone is the reason he is not currently on an NFL roster. I'm not sure why this is something MANY don't know, or pretend isn't true.


Nope.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... opted-out/


Kaepernick had restructured his deal before John Lynch even came.

A 2.5M cap hit is hardly cost prohibitive.

Lynch doesn't mention restructuring at all as a possibility. If he was merely trying to get the 49ers out of the story, they could have painted themselves in an even better light just by mentioning that, just like all these teams Kaepernick was supposedly pricing himself out of when in fact nothing close to a deal ever materialized with any of them.


His opting out was done months before John Lynch was hired.

Kaepernick's contract was originally supposed to keep him with the Niners through 2020, but the team worked with the 29-year-old to revamp it before he reclaimed the starting job in October.

As part of the deal's reconfiguration, Kaepernick traded $14.5 million in injury guarantees during the 2017 season for the opportunity to opt out of the deal early. His decision saves the Niners his $14.5 million base salary in 2017 though he will still count nearly $2.5 million in dead money for the remainder of his signing bonus proration.

From the moment Kaepernick and the Niners struck that agreement, the expectation was that Kaepernick would explore his options

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38206
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?


I agree. Sports are first and foremost a business. If Kaepernick is comfortable with the consequences then fine. I think he should have known what lie before him.

Again, its everyone else BUT Kaep that seems to be concerned he's not on a roster. Ive yet to hear or read anything coming from his mouth saying" I deserve to be playing and this is bullshit that I'm not".

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15026
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?


I agree. Sports are first and foremost a business. If Kaepernick is comfortable with the consequences then fine. I think he should have known what lie before him.

I don't know how he could have. Pro athletes have a pretty high opinion of their value, as they should and have to. I'm sure he thought a team would pick him up.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This indicates that it is wrong to ever think that there is a "wrong place" to protest. Is it ok to think the Westboro idiots are wrong to protest at the time they do?

And before anyone swoops in to remind everyone that the Westboro church idiots are not the equivalent of NFL kneelers (plus they're winning millions in court), the point is that the people who most often insist that this just isn't right time or place for protests often believe there's never a right time or place for them.

No, that's not a logical implication of what I wrote at all.

One key difference in your tortured comparison of course is that few people are really sympathetic to Westboro's views in the first place, not just their tactics. Compare that to the NFL players, where MANY feign sympathy for what they're protesting about but do an awful lot of throatclearing about how it's just not the right place or time. Now if you want to suggest that the NFL players' views are in fact as abhorrent as Westboro's, feel free. That strikes me as a more honest argument than disingenuous complaints about tactics for a group you don't even have any substantive agreement with.

"Tortured comparison". :lol:

Both are protests. The Westboro one being more unpopular doesn't change the fact that it's ok for people to think some places should be free from protest or they won't like it.

Your last two sentences are laughable.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?

No I'd say you can't pretend you're committed to winning above all else if you're not willing to sign him (which BTW, is exactly what teams say again and again when they sign guys with long criminal records without a moment's hesitation). As to the circus, no one who actually played with him or coached him in San Francisco complained that he was a distraction.
So why would the 49ers have cut him? Was he bad at football?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89412
Location: To the left of my post
ZephMarshack wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
No team has an obligation to sign Kaepernick. When people say it is wrong of NFL teams not to sign him, they are essentially saying that a team with a need at quarterback has no right to consider the circus that would accompany him. And if they are saying that the team has to "put up" with the circus, aren't they essentially saying that the team must basically agree with the message?

No I'd say you can't pretend you're committed to winning above all else if you're not willing to sign him (which BTW, is exactly what teams say again and again when they sign guys with long criminal records without a moment's hesitation). As to the circus, no one who actually played with him or coached him in San Francisco complained that he was a distraction.
So why would the 49ers have cut him? Was he bad at football?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38206
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Kaepernick took a stand- as confused as he may be about what exactly he stands for- and now others are standing against him. Nobody has to hire someone who is immediately going to anger his customers. And nobody has to like the way he is protesting. We all have rights.

I'm simply pointing out that for most Americans, a man suffering under Jim Crow being set upon by a German Shepherd is infinitely more sympathetic than a wealthy guy who is disrespecting the flag. And they are disrespecting it. I don't want to take their right to do so away. And I'm not concerned about it in any way. But that is what they are doing and many Americans don't like it. They have that right too.

Its as simple as this.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group