It is currently Thu May 23, 2024 10:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2049 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 69  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
his damage to our city's riverscape by renegning on a verbal agreement after having received all kinds of considerations from the city to have his tower built.


What are you referring to? I hope not the word "TRUMP". You can stand downtown and see corporate names and logos on all kinds of buildings and no one says "boo". If someone had put a sign the same size up that said HILLARY FOR KWEEN! We wouldn't even be discussing it.


You have any new signage examples on the river?



Was signage a problem when the building before him had one ?


entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17588
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Not to mention the ignoring of epa regulations regarding river water usage.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54389
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I believe JORR said years ago, before the Trump campaign even began, that if the building said MAGGIE DALEY on it in big gold letters, everyone would think it was really cool.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Curious Hair wrote:
I believe JORR said years ago, before the Trump campaign even began, that if the building said MAGGIE DALEY on it in big gold letters, everyone would think it was really cool.


I believe that I was outspoken in my dislike for the naming of Maggie Daley Park and the wing of the hospital

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
GoldenJet wrote:
Not to mention the ignoring of epa regulations regarding river water usage.


That's why I asked what he was referring to. I've heard the building is heating up the river far beyond what's considered normal.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I believe JORR said years ago, before the Trump campaign even began, that if the building said MAGGIE DALEY on it in big gold letters, everyone would think it was really cool.


I believe that I was outspoken in my dislike for the naming of Maggie Daley Park and the wing of the hospital


The objections to the TRUMP sign predate the #RESISTANCE movement and Trump's political career. They mostly relate to Chicago's provincialism and hatred for anything New York. The Trump sign is nothing but tasteful from an objective standpoint. And when you think about what the building replaced, any complaints are laughable.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54389
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The objections to the TRUMP sign predate the #RESISTANCE movement and Trump's political career. They mostly relate to Chicago's provincialism and hatred for anything New York.


I'm much more miffed about Macy's replacing Field's than the Trump sign, as far as anti-New-York provincialism goes.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20848
pizza_Place: Giordano's
good dolphin wrote:
entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.
Exactly what kind of obligation was Trump under to not place signage in places he wasn't prohibited from placing it? You seem to acknowledge that Trump wasn't actually, legally, prohibited from placing the signage where it currently is, so do you mean to argue that Trump had some moral obligation to abide by the city's attempts to prohibit "visual clutter" despite the city not prohibiting it?

EDIT: LOL, the TRUMP signage is no more lower to street level than the old Chicago Sun-Times signage.

Image
Image

But yeah, Trump is totally wrong for placing signage at that height in that footprint.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I believe JORR said years ago, before the Trump campaign even began, that if the building said MAGGIE DALEY on it in big gold letters, everyone would think it was really cool.


I believe that I was outspoken in my dislike for the naming of Maggie Daley Park and the wing of the hospital


The objections to the TRUMP sign predate the #RESISTANCE movement and Trump's political career. They mostly relate to Chicago's provincialism and hatred for anything New York. The Trump sign is nothing but tasteful from an objective standpoint. And when you think about what the building replaced, any complaints are laughable.


Are you trolling me?

The 100+ story building was approved without objection but your assertion that complaints about the sign are provincialism?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 2:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Come on, man. What do you think it is? The Sun-Times building was a hideous barge with ugly big yellow lettering. Nobody ever complained. It was "ours". Trump is an outlander. There's a new bar on the river I just saw the other day maybe at La Salle with a big ass sign. I haven't heard a peep about it. As pointed out earlier, if that building said DALEY, same font, same size nobody would say shit expect for how classy it is.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Come on, man. What do you think it is? The Sun-Times building was a hideous barge with ugly big yellow lettering. Nobody ever complained. It was "ours". Trump is an outlander. There's a new bar on the river I just saw the other day maybe at La Salle with a big ass sign. I haven't heard a peep about it. As pointed out earlier, if that building said DALEY, same font, same size nobody would say shit expect for how classy it is.


and I say you are wrong.

The architect of the building says you are wrong as well.

It seems kind of preposterous to argue that the second tallest building in the city received approval even though it was built by an outsider but that people objected to the sign only because of the name appearing on it.

You are arguing with 2018 glasses on. Trump had a hit TV show and sold out seminars in this city back in the days this was built. He had that reality winner and Chicago guy Rancic as his local face of the project. They named an honorary street after the guy.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
:lol: We're not talking about approval issues. Obviously the sign was approved too. The reason there are public complaints about it aren't due to aesthetics, but rather simply due to what the name is and its association with New York. Your argument is tough to make when there are so many uglier things along the river.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37413
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
his damage to our city's riverscape by renegning on a verbal agreement after having received all kinds of considerations from the city to have his tower built.


What are you referring to? I hope not the word "TRUMP". You can stand downtown and see corporate names and logos on all kinds of buildings and no one says "boo". If someone had put a sign the same size up that said HILLARY FOR KWEEN! We wouldn't even be discussing it.


You have any new signage examples on the river?



Was signage a problem when the building before him had one ?


entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.



You are taking the "democratic overlords" status to a new level with that comment.

Why didn't someone else build on that site?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
his damage to our city's riverscape by renegning on a verbal agreement after having received all kinds of considerations from the city to have his tower built.


What are you referring to? I hope not the word "TRUMP". You can stand downtown and see corporate names and logos on all kinds of buildings and no one says "boo". If someone had put a sign the same size up that said HILLARY FOR KWEEN! We wouldn't even be discussing it.


You have any new signage examples on the river?



Was signage a problem when the building before him had one ?


entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.



You are taking the "democratic overlords" status to a new level with that comment.

Why didn't someone else build on that site?


Because they wouldn't pay Eddie Burke's asking price?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
his damage to our city's riverscape by renegning on a verbal agreement after having received all kinds of considerations from the city to have his tower built.


What are you referring to? I hope not the word "TRUMP". You can stand downtown and see corporate names and logos on all kinds of buildings and no one says "boo". If someone had put a sign the same size up that said HILLARY FOR KWEEN! We wouldn't even be discussing it.


You have any new signage examples on the river?



Was signage a problem when the building before him had one ?


entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.



You are taking the "democratic overlords" status to a new level with that comment.

Why didn't someone else build on that site?


are you of the belief the property would have remained vacant or Sun Times property but for Trump

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 8:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37413
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
his damage to our city's riverscape by renegning on a verbal agreement after having received all kinds of considerations from the city to have his tower built.


What are you referring to? I hope not the word "TRUMP". You can stand downtown and see corporate names and logos on all kinds of buildings and no one says "boo". If someone had put a sign the same size up that said HILLARY FOR KWEEN! We wouldn't even be discussing it.


You have any new signage examples on the river?



Was signage a problem when the building before him had one ?


entirely different situation. The river was a cesspool and to be avoided back in those days. The riverscape is now a jewel that they city was attempting to keep clean of visual clutter. Something was overlooked in the discussion of Trump tower in terms of defining the location of signage. Instead of recognizing all the city had done in terms of assistance in bringing his project to fruition and not establishing an enormous gaudy sign based on a mistake, Trump chose the other route. You don't see that kind of new signage anywhere else on the river.



You are taking the "democratic overlords" status to a new level with that comment.

Why didn't someone else build on that site?


good dolphin wrote:
are you of the belief the property would have remained vacant or Sun Times property but for Trump


I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 39856
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Who cares? Were any of you dopes investors or something? Are there laws sent down from God to Moses regarding no Trump signs but Wrigley lights are fine? Or millennium beans and tall grasses cool but no Star Wars?

Anyone arguing this shit sounds dumb. Always and forever someone wants to shape the look of the future. Trumps building he gets his name on it if he wants. No matter how much I dislike it.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37413
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures


I'm amused by the fact that you somehow think that the government is some benevolent charity that Trump owes some sort of fealty to because of all they did for him.

And if the sign wasn't illegal, then yes, advertising your brand is part of the reward.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54389
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
For obvious reasons, one of my favorite tweets ever:


_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 7:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures



The Lincoln Yards project along the river that Rahm is trying to jam through right now is about one million times more egregious than the Trump sign and everyone objecting is going to get steamrolled and then patted on the head. There will be no hue and cry the way there was over a relatively tasteful sign that simply spelled out the wrong name.

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures


I'm amused by the fact that you somehow think that the government is some benevolent charity that Trump owes some sort of fealty to because of all they did for him..


Isn't that how it works? You do something for someone and they owe you.

That building does not get built without government favors. I don't mean anything illegal. If Trump had to build only to what was allowed at the time of contracting he wouldn't have closed on the site.

He came in with the intent to be a one time developer in this city and that is what he will be.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Last edited by good dolphin on Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:23 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 80383
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures



The Lincoln Yards project along the river that Rahm is trying to jam through right now is about one million times more egregious than the Trump sign and everyone objecting is going to get steamrolled and then patted on the head. There will be no hue and cry the way there was over a relatively tasteful sign that simply spelled out the wrong name.


In one sentence you say there is hue and cry and in the second you say there is none.

I'll say it again, the Trump name was welcomed in this city at the time. They named an honorary street after him.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77312
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
No, in one sentence I point out that the usual activists are complaining about an ill-conceived development that is going to swallow millions of TIF dollars and in the other I point out how the public at large is saying, "Jobs, jobs, jobs! Da Mare is takin' a buncha dirty industreel sites an' puttin' up bee-oo-tiful buildins' dat won' have dat shitty Trump name on dem. Da parks will have nice names like Finkl an' Labkon!"

_________________
Communists are just people who are terrible at capitalism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 10:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37413
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Seacrest wrote:

I'm of the belief that with risk, goes reward.

So again, who else was going to build on that site?


Any number of developers. That wasn’t exactly a risky site. The risk was more in a shifting market, which is the risk of every proposal.

I haven’t even looked into whether it was profitable. He certainly screwed a lot of his initial purchasers though

Do you think the sign had any effect on reward? The listing packets were photoshopping the sign out of the pictures


I'm amused by the fact that you somehow think that the government is some benevolent charity that Trump owes some sort of fealty to because of all they did for him..


Isn't that how it works? You do something for someone and they owe you.

That building does not get built without government favors. I don't mean anything illegal. If Trump had to build only to what was allowed at the time of contracting he wouldn't have closed on the site.

He came in with the intent to be a one time developer in this city and that is what he will be.


No, that's not how this works. And it certainly isn't working in Chicago. Billions in unfunded pension obligations and a crumbling infrastructure with no money to pay for it.

The city is getting far more from that site then they had to give.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
NBA is the most discussed sports league on Twitter.

Why the NBA - not the NFL or MLB - is America's favorite pastime
MARTIN ROGERS | USA TODAY | 6:10 pm EDT October 15, 2018
USA TODAY
According to a Twitter study earlier this year, the NBA was the most discussed sports league in 2018, LeBron James was the most talked about athlete and the Cleveland Cavaliers held the distinction of being the most Tweeted-about team. Expect only one of those things to change when the next set of figures rolls in.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
NBA is the most discussed sports league on Twitter.

Why the NBA - not the NFL or MLB - is America's favorite pastime
MARTIN ROGERS | USA TODAY | 6:10 pm EDT October 15, 2018
USA TODAY
According to a Twitter study earlier this year, the NBA was the most discussed sports league in 2018, LeBron James was the most talked about athlete and the Cleveland Cavaliers held the distinction of being the most Tweeted-about team. Expect only one of those things to change when the next set of figures rolls in.



The headline is dumb. Football by far is the most popular sport, even if the NBA reigns on Twitter.

Check out this graph here: https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallu ... avevjg.png

What's interesting about the poll is baseball's obvious decline between the '60s-'70s which coincided with football's rise. Not sure what was going on back then but maybe HawaiiYou can chime in here since he seems to be broadcasting live from that era anyway. There seemed to be a slight spike in baseball interest in the mid '90s though I'm not sure if that's mid or late '90s based on how I'm reading the graph. A late '90s spike would clearly reflect the Sosa McGuire thing. The NBA saw a huge spike in the '80s but I'm not sure if that's too early to attribute that to Jordan since he wasn't "Air Jordan" at that time but merely an exciting player on the way to becoming "the best ever." I attribute the spike in the '90s to the Bulls/Jordan. Here's the full article:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/224864/foo ... watch.aspx

Quote:
Football Still Americans' Favorite Sport to Watch
BY JIM NORMAN
Football Still Americans' Favorite Sport to Watch
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
37% say football is their favorite sport to watch, by far the most for any sport
Baseball is at its lowest point ever, with only 9% saying it is their favorite
Football has slipped in popularity from its peak of 43% in 2006 and 2007
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- American football, under attack from critics in recent years, has lost some of its popularity but is still the champion of U.S. spectator sports -- picked by 37% of U.S. adults as their favorite sport to watch. The next-most-popular sports are basketball, favored by 11%, and baseball, favored by 9%.

Americans' Favorite Spectator Sports, 1937-2017
The 9% of Americans who mention baseball as their favorite sport to watch is the lowest percentage for the sport since Gallup first asked the question in 1937. Americans named baseball as the most popular sport in 1948 and 1960, but football claimed the top spot in 1972 and has been the public's favorite ever since.

Soccer now nearly matches baseball's popularity. Seven percent say it is their favorite sport to watch, the highest that sport has registered to date. Only once before have at least 7% of Americans named a sport other than football, basketball or baseball as their favorite -- and that was auto racing in 1997. (Auto racing is now down to 2% of mentions.)

Though football retains its top spot, its popularity has slipped since peaking at 43% in 2006 and 2007. In 2008, it dipped slightly to 41% and dropped again to 39% in 2013 -- the last time the question was asked before the December 2017 poll and its 37% reading.

Among the possible reasons for the drop in recent years:

In 2014, a video of National Football League star running back Ray Rice punching his wife and dragging her unconscious body from an elevator shocked the nation. It pushed the already-simmering issue of NFL players' domestic assaults into national prominence, sparking protests and calls for NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to resign.
Numerous studies dating back to the 1990s had documented the physical and mental toll concussions were taking on football players at all levels. One of the studies inspired the movie Concussion, released nationwide in 2015.
Protests by NFL players during the pregame playing of the U.S. national anthem in 2016 and 2017 drew strong criticism from President Donald Trump and conservative pundits.
With the national-anthem controversy in full swing this past October, a Gallup poll indicated the NFL was taking a hit. Fifty-seven percent of Americans said they were fans of professional football, down 10 percentage points from the previous time the question was asked, in December 2012. Support for most other sports, including college football, had not changed meaningfully during the same five-year span.

Gallup News Alerts
Gallup News Alerts
Get the latest data-driven news delivered straight to your inbox.

Football Leads Among All Groups, but Some Like It Less Than Others

Women were less likely than men to pick football as their favorite sport even before the issue of players' assaults on women exploded in 2014, and that still holds true. Conservatives, in spite of the national-anthem protests the last two years, are only slightly less likely than moderates to favor football, and are more likely to do so than liberals. Parents of children under 18, who might be expected to be most affected by the publicity surrounding concussion risks football players face, are about as likely as others to pick football as their favorite.

Meanwhile, those who determine the future of spectator sports -- 18- to 34-year-olds -- are the age group least likely to favor football. But even among them, football tops all other sports by a comfortable margin. Soccer and baseball show meaningful differences by age, with soccer appealing more to adults younger than 55 and baseball more to adults aged 55 and older.

Football Tops All Subgroups, but Age, Ideology Affect Second Choices
What is your favorite sport to watch?
Football Basketball Baseball Soccer
%
%
%
%
All adults 37 11 9 7
Gender
Men 42 9 10 6
Women 32 13 8 8
Age
18 to 34 years old 30 11 6 11
35 to 54 years old 40 12 7 10
55 years old and older 39 11 14 1
Political ideology
Conservative 38 10 12 5
Moderate 41 11 6 6
Liberal 28 16 11 13
Children under 18
Children under 18 40 13 7 12
No children under 18 36 11 10 5
GALLUP, DEC. 4-11, 2017
Implications

For the past half-century, football has been America's game, unrivaled by any other spectator sport. Even the challenges it currently faces have had only a small effect on Americans' likelihood to consider it their favorite spectator sport. Though Gallup's October polling showed a decline in the percentage of Americans saying they are fans of professional football, the drop-off did not occur among college football fans, and it may not have included the hardcore NFL fans who consider it their favorite sport.

But the fact that the sport has weathered the attacks on it so far is no guarantee that it will do so over the long run. Football's relatively low popularity among younger Americans, combined with ever-growing evidence of the physical and mental damage the sport does even at the high school level, could jeopardize its standing in the decades ahead.

And for all spectator sports in the U.S., there is one other sobering statistic to consider. The number of Americans who say they do not have a favorite sport has grown from 8% in 2000 to 15% now -- an increase larger than for any sport during that time.

SURVEY METHODS
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 4-11, 2017, with a random sample of 1,049 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20848
pizza_Place: Giordano's
3 more pages.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
3 more pages.



Still would be about 2000% less than the silly ass DiCaro thread you constantly post in you damn idiot. Never miss a chance to show the world just how much of a condescending, hypocritical idiot that you happen to be clown.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Best of Twitter
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2018 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
NBA is the most discussed sports league on Twitter.

Why the NBA - not the NFL or MLB - is America's favorite pastime
MARTIN ROGERS | USA TODAY | 6:10 pm EDT October 15, 2018
USA TODAY
According to a Twitter study earlier this year, the NBA was the most discussed sports league in 2018, LeBron James was the most talked about athlete and the Cleveland Cavaliers held the distinction of being the most Tweeted-about team. Expect only one of those things to change when the next set of figures rolls in.



The headline is dumb. Football by far is the most popular sport, even if the NBA reigns on Twitter.

Check out this graph here: https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallu ... avevjg.png

What's interesting about the poll is baseball's obvious decline between the '60s-'70s which coincided with football's rise. Not sure what was going on back then but maybe HawaiiYou can chime in here since he seems to be broadcasting live from that era anyway. There seemed to be a slight spike in baseball interest in the mid '90s though I'm not sure if that's mid or late '90s based on how I'm reading the graph. A late '90s spike would clearly reflect the Sosa McGuire thing. The NBA saw a huge spike in the '80s but I'm not sure if that's too early to attribute that to Jordan since he wasn't "Air Jordan" at that time but merely an exciting player on the way to becoming "the best ever." I attribute the spike in the '90s to the Bulls/Jordan. Here's the full article:

https://news.gallup.com/poll/224864/foo ... watch.aspx

Quote:
Football Still Americans' Favorite Sport to Watch
BY JIM NORMAN
Football Still Americans' Favorite Sport to Watch
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
37% say football is their favorite sport to watch, by far the most for any sport
Baseball is at its lowest point ever, with only 9% saying it is their favorite
Football has slipped in popularity from its peak of 43% in 2006 and 2007
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- American football, under attack from critics in recent years, has lost some of its popularity but is still the champion of U.S. spectator sports -- picked by 37% of U.S. adults as their favorite sport to watch. The next-most-popular sports are basketball, favored by 11%, and baseball, favored by 9%.

Americans' Favorite Spectator Sports, 1937-2017
The 9% of Americans who mention baseball as their favorite sport to watch is the lowest percentage for the sport since Gallup first asked the question in 1937. Americans named baseball as the most popular sport in 1948 and 1960, but football claimed the top spot in 1972 and has been the public's favorite ever since.

Soccer now nearly matches baseball's popularity. Seven percent say it is their favorite sport to watch, the highest that sport has registered to date. Only once before have at least 7% of Americans named a sport other than football, basketball or baseball as their favorite -- and that was auto racing in 1997. (Auto racing is now down to 2% of mentions.)

Though football retains its top spot, its popularity has slipped since peaking at 43% in 2006 and 2007. In 2008, it dipped slightly to 41% and dropped again to 39% in 2013 -- the last time the question was asked before the December 2017 poll and its 37% reading.

Among the possible reasons for the drop in recent years:

In 2014, a video of National Football League star running back Ray Rice punching his wife and dragging her unconscious body from an elevator shocked the nation. It pushed the already-simmering issue of NFL players' domestic assaults into national prominence, sparking protests and calls for NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to resign.
Numerous studies dating back to the 1990s had documented the physical and mental toll concussions were taking on football players at all levels. One of the studies inspired the movie Concussion, released nationwide in 2015.
Protests by NFL players during the pregame playing of the U.S. national anthem in 2016 and 2017 drew strong criticism from President Donald Trump and conservative pundits.
With the national-anthem controversy in full swing this past October, a Gallup poll indicated the NFL was taking a hit. Fifty-seven percent of Americans said they were fans of professional football, down 10 percentage points from the previous time the question was asked, in December 2012. Support for most other sports, including college football, had not changed meaningfully during the same five-year span.

Gallup News Alerts
Gallup News Alerts
Get the latest data-driven news delivered straight to your inbox.

Football Leads Among All Groups, but Some Like It Less Than Others

Women were less likely than men to pick football as their favorite sport even before the issue of players' assaults on women exploded in 2014, and that still holds true. Conservatives, in spite of the national-anthem protests the last two years, are only slightly less likely than moderates to favor football, and are more likely to do so than liberals. Parents of children under 18, who might be expected to be most affected by the publicity surrounding concussion risks football players face, are about as likely as others to pick football as their favorite.

Meanwhile, those who determine the future of spectator sports -- 18- to 34-year-olds -- are the age group least likely to favor football. But even among them, football tops all other sports by a comfortable margin. Soccer and baseball show meaningful differences by age, with soccer appealing more to adults younger than 55 and baseball more to adults aged 55 and older.

Football Tops All Subgroups, but Age, Ideology Affect Second Choices
What is your favorite sport to watch?
Football Basketball Baseball Soccer
%
%
%
%
All adults 37 11 9 7
Gender
Men 42 9 10 6
Women 32 13 8 8
Age
18 to 34 years old 30 11 6 11
35 to 54 years old 40 12 7 10
55 years old and older 39 11 14 1
Political ideology
Conservative 38 10 12 5
Moderate 41 11 6 6
Liberal 28 16 11 13
Children under 18
Children under 18 40 13 7 12
No children under 18 36 11 10 5
GALLUP, DEC. 4-11, 2017
Implications

For the past half-century, football has been America's game, unrivaled by any other spectator sport. Even the challenges it currently faces have had only a small effect on Americans' likelihood to consider it their favorite spectator sport. Though Gallup's October polling showed a decline in the percentage of Americans saying they are fans of professional football, the drop-off did not occur among college football fans, and it may not have included the hardcore NFL fans who consider it their favorite sport.

But the fact that the sport has weathered the attacks on it so far is no guarantee that it will do so over the long run. Football's relatively low popularity among younger Americans, combined with ever-growing evidence of the physical and mental damage the sport does even at the high school level, could jeopardize its standing in the decades ahead.

And for all spectator sports in the U.S., there is one other sobering statistic to consider. The number of Americans who say they do not have a favorite sport has grown from 8% in 2000 to 15% now -- an increase larger than for any sport during that time.

SURVEY METHODS
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 4-11, 2017, with a random sample of 1,049 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.



So in a twitter thread you think you are being relevant by making a point totally unrelated to you know twitter. Its stupid and you could have kept it honestly. You are disputing a point which no one actually made.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2049 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 69  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group