It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


what exactly do you expect when you follow a woman around and stand over her?

Well for me personally , they usually just suspend my account .

:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ok fine. Was he justified in punching her with a closed fist because she pushed and slapped him?


1. She shoved and struck him about the neck and face. Those are both escalating crimes of battery.

2. I've answered this question like 10 times.
I'm sorry. I missed it. Can you say if he was justified or not in his actions just one more time? I don't mean to be a pain but most of the time when people say they answered this question already they really haven't or they would just do it again. I believe you though. I just can't find it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7200
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
if you watch that video and ask yourself the simple question "Did her actions merit his reaction?" and you say "yes, he was justified", I just can't understand how a well-adjusted person can think that. And if I am in the minority, then i think it explains a lot about where we are headed in our society as a whole. His punch was obviously not self-defense, it was a clear example of a man losing his temper and smashing her face in in anger.


No question about it


How do you arrive at this conclusion, given what was on video?


the magical powers of eyesight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27586
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
badrogue17 wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


what exactly do you expect when you follow a woman around and stand over her?

Well for me personally , they usually just suspend my account .






:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
if you watch that video and ask yourself the simple question "Did her actions merit his reaction?" and you say "yes, he was justified", I just can't understand how a well-adjusted person can think that. And if I am in the minority, then i think it explains a lot about where we are headed in our society as a whole. His punch was obviously not self-defense, it was a clear example of a man losing his temper and smashing her face in in anger.


No question about it


How do you arrive at this conclusion, given what was on video?


the magical powers of eyesight.


Well, what about the images of that video painted Mixon's actions as "obviously not self-defense"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7200
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
if you watch that video and ask yourself the simple question "Did her actions merit his reaction?" and you say "yes, he was justified", I just can't understand how a well-adjusted person can think that. And if I am in the minority, then i think it explains a lot about where we are headed in our society as a whole. His punch was obviously not self-defense, it was a clear example of a man losing his temper and smashing her face in in anger.


No question about it


How do you arrive at this conclusion, given what was on video?


the magical powers of eyesight.


Well, what about the images of that video painted Mixon's actions as "obviously not self-defense"?


he barely held his temper before he even threw the punch when he feinted like he was going to hit her. when she slapped him he lost it and he couldnt check himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
if you watch that video and ask yourself the simple question "Did her actions merit his reaction?" and you say "yes, he was justified", I just can't understand how a well-adjusted person can think that. And if I am in the minority, then i think it explains a lot about where we are headed in our society as a whole. His punch was obviously not self-defense, it was a clear example of a man losing his temper and smashing her face in in anger.


No question about it


How do you arrive at this conclusion, given what was on video?


the magical powers of eyesight.


Well, what about the images of that video painted Mixon's actions as "obviously not self-defense"?


he barely held his temper before he even threw the punch when he feinted like he was going to hit her. when she slapped him he lost it and he couldnt check himself.


And how do you differentiate between his "temper" and "trying to get the woman to stop battering him"? It seems as though whatever his ultimate response would have been, even if it was a slap or shove in return, you would say he lost his temper and "obviously wasn't trying to defend himself".

You're failing to substantiate your claim that this "obviously wasn't self-defense"? What would actual, affirmative self-defense (no retreating) have looked like?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ok fine. Was he justified in punching her with a closed fist because she pushed and slapped him?


1. She shoved and struck him about the neck and face. Those are both escalating crimes of battery.

2. I've answered this question like 10 times.
I'm sorry. I missed it. Can you say if he was justified or not in his actions just one more time? I don't mean to be a pain but most of the time when people say they answered this question already they really haven't or they would just do it again. I believe you though. I just can't find it.
JLN, did you miss this? I went back and looked and couldn't find you answering this one time let alone ten. It's probably my fault though.

Can you answer it just one more time?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
JLN looking to elicit some work from the FoP.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Can you answer it just one more time?


I think a strike by Mixon was a reasonable response in the situation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Can you answer it just one more time?


I think a strike by Mixon was a reasonable response in the situation.
Thank you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7200
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And how do you differentiate between his "temper" and "trying to get the woman to stop battering him"? It seems as though whatever his ultimate response would have been, even if it was a slap or shove in return, you would say he lost his temper and "obviously wasn't trying to defend himself".

You're failing to substantiate your claim that this "obviously wasn't self-defense"? What would actual, affirmative self-defense (no retreating) have looked like?


something other than a right cross to the face of a woman. but that's just me. i would prefer the "just let it go and walk away" approach myself. but hey, she struck him first! Golden Ticket, free shot! playground rules!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And how do you differentiate between his "temper" and "trying to get the woman to stop battering him"? It seems as though whatever his ultimate response would have been, even if it was a slap or shove in return, you would say he lost his temper and "obviously wasn't trying to defend himself".

You're failing to substantiate your claim that this "obviously wasn't self-defense"? What would actual, affirmative self-defense (no retreating) have looked like?


something other than a right cross to the face of a woman.


Would your opinion on the matter be different if the recipient were a man?

Quote:
but hey, she struck him first! Golden Ticket, free shot! playground rules!


And then again. She shoved him first, and then without a physical retort, struck him about the face and neck. It's the escalation without sufficient provocation that makes a strike to defend himself reasonable.

Finally, in your mind, what would she have had to do to warrant what we saw from Mixon on video? Is there any scenario in which his striking of her is acceptable to you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


It takes a lot of courage to Donkey Kong punch a woman who has a quarter of your strength.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nas wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


It takes a lot of courage to Donkey Kong punch a woman who has a quarter of your strength.


Don't assume her bench press gains, shitlord.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38078
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


It takes a lot of courage to Donkey Kong punch a woman who has a quarter of your strength.

Groovy.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
Nas wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Getting slapped in the face and shoved will usually do that to a person. Crazy.


It takes a lot of courage to Donkey Kong punch a woman who has a quarter of your strength.

Groovy.


I would expect nothing less from you. Merry Christmas!

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7200
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And how do you differentiate between his "temper" and "trying to get the woman to stop battering him"? It seems as though whatever his ultimate response would have been, even if it was a slap or shove in return, you would say he lost his temper and "obviously wasn't trying to defend himself".

You're failing to substantiate your claim that this "obviously wasn't self-defense"? What would actual, affirmative self-defense (no retreating) have looked like?


something other than a right cross to the face of a woman.


Would your opinion on the matter be different if the recipient were a man?

Quote:
but hey, she struck him first! Golden Ticket, free shot! playground rules!


And then again. She shoved him first, and then without a physical retort, struck him about the face and neck. It's the escalation without sufficient provocation that makes a strike to defend himself reasonable.

Finally, in your mind, what would she have had to do to warrant what we saw from Mixon on video? Is there any scenario in which his striking of her is acceptable to you?


in any situation if there is a way to exit without throwing a punch be it a man or woman, i take that path no matter if I am in the right or the wrong.

your second question is purely hypothetical. perhaps if she posed a grave physical threat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
We all abide by an unwritten social contract. That is indisputable. Every social animal abides by a social contract, even friends of JORR.

I am just weary of a social contract that requires one to make split-second decisions regarding the ethics of their action when they are the victim of battery. If someone is attacking you, it is hard for me to say "well, you have to weigh the threat they pose to you and react accordingly." It's a slippery slope. At what point does one go into fight or flight mode? At what point is it the defender's duty to worry about the safety of the aggressor? Clearly, we all believe women are meak, inferior beings with smaller brains, but does that preclude them from retaliation when they viciously attack a man?

From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?

Given the additional information about his instigation, I do truly think now that he is not a good person. But these statements that MANY make about this being black and white scare me. This is not black and white, and people have a right to defend themselves. I am uncomfortable with a social contract that says otherwise.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23917
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
you defenders are full of horseshit. he followed her and was attempting to intimidate her.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38078
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
We all abide by an unwritten social contract. That is indisputable. Every social animal abides by a social contract, even friends of JORR.

I am just weary of a social contract that requires one to make split-second decisions regarding the ethics of their action when they are the victim of battery. If someone is attacking you, it is hard for me to say "well, you have to weigh the threat they pose to you and react accordingly." It's a slippery slope. At what point does one go into fight or flight mode? At what point is it the defender's duty to worry about the safety of the aggressor? Clearly, we all believe women are meak, inferior beings with smaller brains, but does that preclude them from retaliation when they viciously attack a man?

From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?

Given the additional information about his instigation, I do truly think now that he is not a good person. But these statements that MANY make about this being black and white scare me. This is not black and white, and people have a right to defend themselves. I am uncomfortable with a social contract that says otherwise.

Just don't defend yourself too well, bubby.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 77043
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
leashyourkids wrote:
We all abide by an unwritten social contract. That is indisputable. Every social animal abides by a social contract, even friends of JORR.

I am just weary of a social contract that requires one to make split-second decisions regarding the ethics of their action when they are the victim of battery. If someone is attacking you, it is hard for me to say "well, you have to weigh the threat they pose to you and react accordingly." It's a slippery slope. At what point does one go into fight or flight mode? At what point is it the defender's duty to worry about the safety of the aggressor? Clearly, we all believe women are meak, inferior beings with smaller brains, but does that preclude them from retaliation when they viciously attack a man?

From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?

Given the additional information about his instigation, I do truly think now that he is not a good person. But these statements that MANY make about this being black and white scare me. This is not black and white, and people have a right to defend themselves. I am uncomfortable with a social contract that says otherwise.


Use commonsense. My reaction to you would be entirely different from my reaction to a 110 lb guy or MOST women. There is nothing manly about knocking out a person you know are a lot weaker than you. Especially if you don't have to. Pushing the woman away would have been more than enough if he needed to touch her. He lost control or he simply felt it was okay to knock a weak woman out. Congratulations to him. Hopefully he feels more manly. To me he looks like a pussy.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

"You can’t love your country only when you win." -President Biden

https://youtu.be/R6e4ruziZBI?si=1G4W1vbh0eGQuHfU


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?
At a minimum, he should not be escalating the situation. I don't care what he says that slap did not cause him severe damage and he knew it. If he had put his hands out to stiff arm and started to back away and she still kept coming we may be having a different confrontation. He didn't have to turn around and run but backing up and being defensive was probably the safest route for him anyways since she was doing so much damage.

Instead, he escalated the violence with a closed fist and no matter what anyone says that does matter. It was a split second decision but many crimes are split second decisions and that doesn't take away the fault. He was also actively involved as the aggressor at least 3 times(returning, getting in her face, using the only verified slur).

I know you aren't really talking to me because I can list plenty of times where I think it would be acceptable to hit a woman if you really were in danger. This just wasn't one of those times.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
We all abide by an unwritten social contract. That is indisputable. Every social animal abides by a social contract, even friends of JORR.

I am just weary of a social contract that requires one to make split-second decisions regarding the ethics of their action when they are the victim of battery. If someone is attacking you, it is hard for me to say "well, you have to weigh the threat they pose to you and react accordingly." It's a slippery slope. At what point does one go into fight or flight mode? At what point is it the defender's duty to worry about the safety of the aggressor? Clearly, we all believe women are meak, inferior beings with smaller brains, but does that preclude them from retaliation when they viciously attack a man?

From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?

Given the additional information about his instigation, I do truly think now that he is not a good person. But these statements that MANY make about this being black and white scare me. This is not black and white, and people have a right to defend themselves. I am uncomfortable with a social contract that says otherwise.


Use commonsense. My reaction to you would be entirely different from my reaction to a 110 lb guy or MOST women. There is nothing manly about knocking out a person you know are a lot weaker than you. Especially if you don't have to. Pushing the woman away would have been more than enough if he needed to touch her. He lost control or he simply felt it was okay to knock a weak woman out. Congratulations to him. Hopefully he feels more manly. To me he looks like a pussy.


Of course. I agree with all of that. I just think that legally it's tricky.

Also, as I said, now that it has become known that he instigated a lot of it, too, I feel even less sorry for him. What he did was wrong. Period. Mine is more of a general sentiment.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
From a personal perspective, I do agree that Mixon went overboard. From a legal perspective, I'm torn. What if the woman was an MMA fighter? What if she wielded a knife in her hand? Is he supposed to make these split-second decisions while someone is pummeling him? Is this guy not allowed to swing back at Rhonda Rousey?
At a minimum, he should not be escalating the situation. I don't care what he says that slap did not cause him severe damage and he knew it. If he had put his hands out to stiff arm and started to back away and she still kept coming we may be having a different confrontation. He didn't have to turn around and run but backing up and being defensive was probably the safest route for him anyways since she was doing so much damage.

Instead, he escalated the violence with a closed fist and no matter what anyone says that does matter. It was a split second decision but many crimes are split second decisions and that doesn't take away the fault. He was also actively involved as the aggressor at least 3 times(returning, getting in her face, using the only verified slur).

I know you aren't really talking to me because I can list plenty of times where I think it would be acceptable to hit a woman if you really were in danger. This just wasn't one of those times.


The bolded part wasn't known (at least I didn't know) until recently. It changes my perspective a bit.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
He apologized today and took full responsibility. Some posts in here look silly given that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20642
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He apologized today and took full responsibility. Some posts in here look silly given that.


Why is that?

Also, the Deadspin story on this was posted 8 minutes ago :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32235
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He apologized today and took full responsibility. Some posts in here look silly given that.

Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He apologized today and took full responsibility. Some posts in here look silly given that.


Why is that?

Also, the Deadspin story on this was posted 8 minutes ago :lol:

Huh?

I saw it on ESPN.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 88952
Location: To the left of my post
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He apologized today and took full responsibility. Some posts in here look silly given that.


Why is that?

Also, the Deadspin story on this was posted 8 minutes ago :lol:

Huh?

I saw it on ESPN.
To answer your question though he didn't think his behavior was justified. You do.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 328 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group