It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 5:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37077
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
KDdidit wrote:
Most of the "news" immediately reported after these events is wrong anyway, no matter which "side" they support.


It's now a race to report. Accuracy be damned.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20573
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Baby McNown wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Right. See thanks for posting the NOT TERROR RELATED headline. Just step back and admit you are wrong.


My post at 11:30 AM was made after checking CNN and BBC's reporting on the matter. At the time (again, 11:30AM, some 6 hours ago), the motive was not yet determined, and the quote used by both outlets referenced an "open mind". Time, as it does, passed, and 1 hour ago (meaning 5 hours had come and gone since my post at 11:30 am) the BBC updated the article you linked. What this means is, that at the time I posted, both CNN and BBC had not reported on the official stance of London police regarding motive, and the facts reported had all the earmarks of the recent spate of vehicular attacks that have occurred specifically in that city.

At the time you made your post ABC of all the wounded horse newsrooms already had it from the PD as not being terror. This is where you step back from the keyboard for a bit. Being trounced by me doesn't look good on your resume.


1. The PD initially said "not terror" and then walked it back to "keeping an open mind". Only later was it definitively "not terror". It's likely that ABC was still reporting the initial pronouncement by London police before the "open mind" bit.

2. From now on I'll go to the local ABC affiliate for all the breaking news on an event in London.

3. You didn't trounce anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 64436
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
If baby mac doesn't get housed in a thread he considers that a trouncing.
It's weird but that's why we love him.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 54157
Location: Pearl Harbor, Waukesha, and other things that make no sense
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Looking forward to Terrorism Expert Cheryl Scott.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 20573
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Curious Hair wrote:
Looking forward to Terrorism Expert Cheryl Scott.


In an ironic twist she'll just tell people: "Be. Careful."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37077
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
You two don't bother reading actual news at all do you?


Right, because it's improper to surmise a terror link when a car rams into 11 people in a country that has had a rash of vehicular attacks of a particular variety in the last 6 months. :roll:



It's definitely unnecessary JLN.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 64436
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
You two don't bother reading actual news at all do you?


Right, because it's improper to surmise a terror link when a car rams into 11 people in a country that has had a rash of vehicular attacks of a particular variety in the last 6 months. :roll:



It's definitely unnecessary JLN.

Right. I just assume it was an Asian driver.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 37077
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
You two don't bother reading actual news at all do you?


Right, because it's improper to surmise a terror link when a car rams into 11 people in a country that has had a rash of vehicular attacks of a particular variety in the last 6 months. :roll:



It's definitely unnecessary JLN.

Right. I just assume it was an Asian driver.


I was glad when i found from Mrs Crest none of our daughter's are currently driving in Europe.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 8:20 pm 
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Right. See thanks for posting the NOT TERROR RELATED headline. Just step back and admit you are wrong.


My post at 11:30 AM was made after checking CNN and BBC's reporting on the matter. At the time (again, 11:30AM, some 6 hours ago), the motive was not yet determined, and the quote used by both outlets referenced an "open mind". Time, as it does, passed, and 1 hour ago (meaning 5 hours had come and gone since my post at 11:30 am) the BBC updated the article you linked. What this means is, that at the time I posted, both CNN and BBC had not reported on the official stance of London police regarding motive, and the facts reported had all the earmarks of the recent spate of vehicular attacks that have occurred specifically in that city.

At the time you made your post ABC of all the wounded horse newsrooms already had it from the PD as not being terror. This is where you step back from the keyboard for a bit. Being trounced by me doesn't look good on your resume.


1. The PD initially said "not terror" and then walked it back to "keeping an open mind". Only later was it definitively "not terror". It's likely that ABC was still reporting the initial pronouncement by London police before the "open mind" bit.

2. From now on I'll go to the local ABC affiliate for all the breaking news on an event in London.

3. You didn't trounce anyone.

Admit you were wrong and move on Juice. I know it hurts, but you must.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nope. Presuming that each of these incidents is an act of Islamic terrorism is even more dangerous and it only serves to feed the appetite of right wing nut jobs that get hard ons when such attacks occurs.

There is no upside in presuming that this was an act of terrorism. You're promoting an agenda as opposed to allowing the facts to play out.


Actively wishing away facts of the current climate of terrorist attacks in Europe, particularly with regards to London, puts people in danger. The objective reality is that the last, what, 3 out of 4 times since March the early-morning facts were "multiple people injured/killed by car running into them" the "facts played out" into a terrorist attack committed by a particular kind of terrorist. And the last 4 acts ALL were attacks of hate and terror.

Quote:
You did the same thing with the Charlottesville car incident and you wound up looking equally foolish. You were quick to try and defend the actions of a Nazi extremist and that is dangerous also.


Yeah....that's not what I did. If you could stop saying it, dingus, that'd be great.

Quote:
You repeatedly slant events so that they coincide with your own worldview.


:lol: :lol: :lol: The First Amendment is about religious tolerance.



Actually it is.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/amend_1.htm

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group