It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 11:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 418 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
I don't know why we have to choose a side.

Should we bomb North Korea to ashes? Yes.

Is this kid a fucking moron who was asking for it? Yes.


I don't find this offensive coming from you. In fact, I pretty much agree with the sentiment, though I'd say "asking for it" is a bit much. But I think it's fair to say the same thing about a woman who gets shitty at a frat party and gets raped. Saying she did something dumb doesn't absolve the rapist. However, such a thought is anathema to the social justice left which is why I find the take by many of them in this case to be so offensive.

It is not fair to say.


Why not?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68609
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Some of the takes are pretty astounding.

"He knew it was a bad idea to go there so I don't feel bad for him."

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Fraternities are not inherent dangerous places.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Kirkwood wrote:
Fraternities are not inherent dangerous places.



:lol: Which frat do you belong to?

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Some of the takes are pretty astounding.

"He knew it was a bad idea to go there so I don't feel bad for him."

Meanwhile lets go to the food and drink section of this board and survey all the fatties posting about the risks of international travel while killing themselves slowly with steady diets of italian beef and pizza.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
I don't know why we have to choose a side.

Should we bomb North Korea to ashes? Yes.

Is this kid a fucking moron who was asking for it? Yes.


I don't find this offensive coming from you. In fact, I pretty much agree with the sentiment, though I'd say "asking for it" is a bit much. But I think it's fair to say the same thing about a woman who gets shitty at a frat party and gets raped. Saying she did something dumb doesn't absolve the rapist. However, such a thought is anathema to the social justice left which is why I find the take by many of them in this case to be so offensive.


But you have no opinion other than to desire to actively parrot out the faux outrage from the compassionate conservatives?


What the fuck are you talking about?


Your primary goal here seems to line up with the usual conservative actors who see this as the most horrible story of the day. Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame. Then hit the trifecta with your fixation on the social justice left that has you criticizing them for inaccurately perceived hypocrisies.

You cited a hysterical writer's piece from Commentary, that pretty much parroted the latest cynical FoxNews theme of the last week and then snidely ask if "we" are going to victim blame with many around here using completely false analogies, which by your silence you seem to embrace.

Face it, this is a made for right wing outrage story. Just sad that a goofy kid who clearly thought he was above it all got mixed up in this mess that many are attempting to profit from.

And that the trumpets are all in line :P

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
Your primary goal here seems to line up with the usual conservative actors who see this as the most horrible story of the day. Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame. Then hit the trifecta with your fixation on the social justice left that has you criticizing them for inaccurately perceived hypocrisies.

You cited a hysterical writer's piece from Commentary, that pretty much parroted the latest cynical FoxNews theme of the last week and then snidely ask if "we" are going to victim blame with many around here using completely false analogies, which by your silence you seem to embrace.

Face it, this is a made for right wing outrage story. Just sad that a goofy kid who clearly thought he was above it all got mixed up in this mess that many are attempting to profit from.

And that the trumpets are all in line :P

As opposed to all those authentically genuine left wing outrage stories of the poor criminal who assaulted a police officer and got shot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 77048
Location: Chicago Heights
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.

_________________
His mind is not for rent to any God or government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Kirkwood wrote:
Fraternities are not inherent dangerous places.

This explains a lot.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Some of the takes are pretty astounding.

"He knew it was a bad idea to go there so I don't feel bad for him."


Imaginary posting running rampant in this thread. Everyone agrees that this is horrible, just that like it or not, the notion of going to North Korea is a stupidly risky idea and that you wish this kid and his parents used a bit of common sense before embarking on such a bizarre trip.

I presume his parents kicked in allow him to fund this dumb excursion. I cannot imagine that when the topic of N. Korea came any sane parent would've been anything less than strenuous in pointing out the danger and lunacy in engaging with the North Koreans in N. Korea.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
America wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Your primary goal here seems to line up with the usual conservative actors who see this as the most horrible story of the day. Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame. Then hit the trifecta with your fixation on the social justice left that has you criticizing them for inaccurately perceived hypocrisies.

You cited a hysterical writer's piece from Commentary, that pretty much parroted the latest cynical FoxNews theme of the last week and then snidely ask if "we" are going to victim blame with many around here using completely false analogies, which by your silence you seem to embrace.

Face it, this is a made for right wing outrage story. Just sad that a goofy kid who clearly thought he was above it all got mixed up in this mess that many are attempting to profit from.

And that the trumpets are all in line :P

As opposed to all those authentically genuine left wing outrage stories of the poor criminal who assaulted a police officer and got shot.



How many times do you want to keep playing this false analogy card? Did you read the dozen or so posts above that called that intellectual dishonesty for what it is?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.


Now respond to Ogie's directly on point post about his first hand thoughts on travelling around parts of the Middle East as a member of the tribe...

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.



It is horrible no doubt. You have to question the kid's rationale for going also. With any risky endeavor you have to ask what's the upside? What is the upside of visiting N. Korea?

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
How many times do you want to keep playing this false analogy card? Did you read the dozen or so posts above that called that intellectual dishonesty for what it is?

Except no one has really explained how the analogy is false. Its a choice to go to North Korea to same way its a choice to break the law and be confrontational with armed police.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

So should humans just blithely exist for the sole purpose of consuming oxygen and food?

Also, Mt. Everest is a mountain. A large one. We cannot appeal to Mt. Everest's humanity because, as a mountain, Mt. Everest is not human. OTOH North Koreans are human and as such are subject to a few behavioral expectations that Mt. Everest (again, a mountain) is exempted from. We can do something about the way North Korea treats people. We actually did once upon a time but a general lost his marbles and the whole thing had to be called off to avoid WW3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
How many times do you want to keep playing this false analogy card? Did you read the dozen or so posts above that called that intellectual dishonesty for what it is?

Except no one has really explained how the analogy is false. Its a choice to go to North Korea to same way its a choice to break the law and be confrontational with armed police.



I will explain how the analogy is false. The American Govt and the police aren't known to be oppressive. When a person becomes involved in a physical conflict with the police the citizen still has Civil Rights which must be adhered to. If a police officer violates those rights they are expected to be punished according to the rule of law. The police aren't above the law theoretically. Citizens are still supposed to have rights. N. Korea is different though. It is an acknowledged violator of human and Civil rights. People that visit are doing so "at their own risks".

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
America wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
How many times do you want to keep playing this false analogy card? Did you read the dozen or so posts above that called that intellectual dishonesty for what it is?

Except no one has really explained how the analogy is false. Its a choice to go to North Korea to same way its a choice to break the law and be confrontational with armed police.


North Korea was not his country.

He had no protections, nor should he have expected such from any state actor in North Korea.

There was no basis for his misguided belief that he should expect his privilege to exist in N. Korea

He didn't fund the state actors to protect and serve him in that country.

Freedoms as many believe them to exist here, quite simply don't there.

He, certainly in light of the State Dept.'s warnings should have expected poor treatment at every turn, and couldn't have expected any court or other actor to provide him with a potential avenue for justice in No. Korea.

Being confrontational with the police isn't supposed to automatically breaking the law in the United States.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

So should humans just blithely exist for the sole purpose of consuming oxygen and food?

Also, Mt. Everest is a mountain. A large one. We cannot appeal to Mt. Everest's humanity because, as a mountain, Mt. Everest is not human. OTOH North Koreans are human and as such are subject to a few behavioral expectations that Mt. Everest (again, a mountain) is exempted from. We can do something about the way North Korea treats people. We actually did once upon a time but a general lost his marbles and the whole thing had to be called off to avoid WW3.



It was called off because we didn't want to go to war with China and lose. When you climb Mt. Everest you know the risks. If you don't then you're an idiot. If you succumb because the risks got the better of you it isn't the same as a person that's accidentally killed. The sympathy won't be the same.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 89038
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.



It is horrible no doubt. You have to question the kid's rationale for going also. With any risky endeavor you have to ask what's the upside? What is the upside of visiting N. Korea?

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

You won't excuse this kid for going to North Korea but you will excuse Carmelo Anthony for staying in New York?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:
I will explain how the analogy is false. The American Govt and the police aren't known to be oppressive.

Wait, really?

Quote:
When a person becomes involved in a physical conflict with the police the citizen still has Civil Rights which must be adhered to. If a police officer violates those rights they are expected to be punished according to the rule of law. The police aren't above the law theoretically. Citizens are still supposed to have rights. N. Korea is different though. It is an acknowledged violator of human and Civil rights. People that visit are doing so "at their own risks".

There's international law regarding human rights as well, but North Korea proudly and blatantly ignores it. But because that's expected of North Korea that makes it OK? Why should American police be subject to rule of law but the North Korean government not? This is a country that has a three-generations rule when it comes to acts of "sedition" and treats their own much like they did Warmbier.

You are applying an ethical double standard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.



It is horrible no doubt. You have to question the kid's rationale for going also. With any risky endeavor you have to ask what's the upside? What is the upside of visiting N. Korea?

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

You won't excuse this kid for going to North Korea but you will excuse Carmelo Anthony for staying in New York?


Yes because Carmelo knew what he was getting into and the kid should have also. Kid shouldn't have died for visiting N. Korea but he also shouldn't have visited N. Korea

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Top that with your angle that anyone who doesn't agree with your position is all but inhumame.


Yeah, I'd say anyone who doesn't think this is a horrible story is pretty inhumane.



It is horrible no doubt. You have to question the kid's rationale for going also. With any risky endeavor you have to ask what's the upside? What is the upside of visiting N. Korea?

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

You won't excuse this kid for going to North Korea but you will excuse Carmelo Anthony for staying in New York?


In fairness he is/was a married man with an expensive wife who counts their money closely.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

So should humans just blithely exist for the sole purpose of consuming oxygen and food?

Also, Mt. Everest is a mountain. A large one. We cannot appeal to Mt. Everest's humanity because, as a mountain, Mt. Everest is not human. OTOH North Koreans are human and as such are subject to a few behavioral expectations that Mt. Everest (again, a mountain) is exempted from. We can do something about the way North Korea treats people. We actually did once upon a time but a general lost his marbles and the whole thing had to be called off to avoid WW3.



It was called off because we didn't want to go to war with China and lose. When you climb Mt. Everest you know the risks. If you don't then you're an idiot. If you succumb because the risks got the better of you it isn't the same as a person that's accidentally killed. The sympathy won't be the same.

The point is being a human being in North Korea does not have to be such a risk-fraught endeavor. The USA can exert pressure on North Korea to change their behavior whereas Mt. Everest cannot be negotiated with or compelled by force to change its bloodthirsty nature.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I will explain how the analogy is false. The American Govt and the police aren't known to be oppressive.

Wait, really?

Quote:
When a person becomes involved in a physical conflict with the police the citizen still has Civil Rights which must be adhered to. If a police officer violates those rights they are expected to be punished according to the rule of law. The police aren't above the law theoretically. Citizens are still supposed to have rights. N. Korea is different though. It is an acknowledged violator of human and Civil rights. People that visit are doing so "at their own risks".

There's international law regarding human rights as well, but North Korea proudly and blatantly ignores it. But because that's expected of North Korea that makes it OK? Why should American police be subject to rule of law but the North Korean government not? This is a country that has a three-generations rule when it comes to acts of "sedition" and treats their own much like they did Warmbier.

You are applying an ethical double standard.


I'm not saying that N. Korea should get away with anything. They aren't exempt from blame. Actually most of the blame lies with their Govt. We aren't going to war over their values and until we do its moot to argue over their validity.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:08 pm
Posts: 3725
Location: East of Eden
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Going to North Korea is like accepting a drink from Bill Cosby. If you do it you might end up with a cool story to tell, but it's far more likely that you're going to get fucked.


I follow a guy on Flickr who has been there several times. Comes back with hundreds of photos...of course, he stays with his group, but he's been fine.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
This registered sex offender I regularly converse with on the internet just said something really stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
North Korea was not his country.

He had no protections, nor should he have expected such from any state actor in North Korea.

There was no basis for his misguided belief that he should expect his privilege to exist in N. Korea

He didn't fund the state actors to protect and serve him in that country.

Freedoms as many believe them to exist here, quite simply don't there.

He, certainly in light of the State Dept.'s warnings should have expected poor treatment at every turn, and couldn't have expected any court or other actor to provide him with a potential avenue for justice in No. Korea.

Being confrontational with the police isn't supposed to automatically breaking the law in the United States.

Now you're just blathering on about white privilege which inevitably leads down the road to him being a "DUMBASS FRAT BOI" and you actually believing the North Korean story that he stole the poster.

Thousands of westerners have traveled to North Korea and enjoyed (? I dont know if its enjoyable, certainly memorable I guess) themselves safely and without incident. The risk is nowhere near that of climbing Mt. Everest or circumnavigating the world in a sailboat. Before this incident with Warmbier the most dangerous part of visiting North Korea was the ride on an old Soviet plane. Whether or not he actually tried stealing the post nobody really knows, but even if he did that crime does not carry with it the penalty of death-by-torture.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:

I look at people that attempt to climb Mt. Everest the same way actually. Does that make a person inhumane to simply question the sanity of it?

So should humans just blithely exist for the sole purpose of consuming oxygen and food?

Also, Mt. Everest is a mountain. A large one. We cannot appeal to Mt. Everest's humanity because, as a mountain, Mt. Everest is not human. OTOH North Koreans are human and as such are subject to a few behavioral expectations that Mt. Everest (again, a mountain) is exempted from. We can do something about the way North Korea treats people. We actually did once upon a time but a general lost his marbles and the whole thing had to be called off to avoid WW3.



It was called off because we didn't want to go to war with China and lose. When you climb Mt. Everest you know the risks. If you don't then you're an idiot. If you succumb because the risks got the better of you it isn't the same as a person that's accidentally killed. The sympathy won't be the same.

The point is being a human being in North Korea does not have to be such a risk-fraught endeavor. The USA can exert pressure on North Korea to change their behavior whereas Mt. Everest cannot be negotiated with or compelled by force to change its bloodthirsty nature.


The U.S has applied pressure over the years. Militarily and economically we've tried but to no avail. N. Korea will have to be changed from within. This kid also didn't die because he tried to change the behavior of N. Korea. He died trying to pull a prank allegedly.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I will explain how the analogy is false. The American Govt and the police aren't known to be oppressive.

Wait, really?

Quote:
When a person becomes involved in a physical conflict with the police the citizen still has Civil Rights which must be adhered to. If a police officer violates those rights they are expected to be punished according to the rule of law. The police aren't above the law theoretically. Citizens are still supposed to have rights. N. Korea is different though. It is an acknowledged violator of human and Civil rights. People that visit are doing so "at their own risks".

There's international law regarding human rights as well, but North Korea proudly and blatantly ignores it. But because that's expected of North Korea that makes it OK? Why should American police be subject to rule of law but the North Korean government not? This is a country that has a three-generations rule when it comes to acts of "sedition" and treats their own much like they did Warmbier.

You are applying an ethical double standard.


I'm not saying that N. Korea should get away with anything. They aren't exempt from blame. Actually most of the blame lies with their Govt. We aren't going to war over their values and until we do its moot to argue over their validity.

The United States is currently at war with the DPRK, fyi.

And really when you blame this kid for being tortured to death you are saying the Norks should get away with it. If you didn't think they should be allowed to murder people you would blame them for the murdering, not the kid for getting murdered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
America wrote:
Thousands of westerners have traveled to North Korea

All idiots


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Otto Warmbier
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
America wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I will explain how the analogy is false. The American Govt and the police aren't known to be oppressive.

Wait, really?

Quote:
When a person becomes involved in a physical conflict with the police the citizen still has Civil Rights which must be adhered to. If a police officer violates those rights they are expected to be punished according to the rule of law. The police aren't above the law theoretically. Citizens are still supposed to have rights. N. Korea is different though. It is an acknowledged violator of human and Civil rights. People that visit are doing so "at their own risks".

There's international law regarding human rights as well, but North Korea proudly and blatantly ignores it. But because that's expected of North Korea that makes it OK? Why should American police be subject to rule of law but the North Korean government not? This is a country that has a three-generations rule when it comes to acts of "sedition" and treats their own much like they did Warmbier.

You are applying an ethical double standard.


I'm not saying that N. Korea should get away with anything. They aren't exempt from blame. Actually most of the blame lies with their Govt. We aren't going to war over their values and until we do its moot to argue over their validity.

The United States is currently at war with the DPRK, fyi.

And really when you blame this kid for being tortured to death you are saying the Norks should get away with it. If you didn't think they should be allowed to murder people you would blame them for the murdering, not the kid for getting murdered.



We are at war with N. Korea currently?

So if they "shouldn't get away with it" then what do you propose that the U.S. Gov't should do?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 418 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group