Calling someone a Nazi and calling someone a Nazi sympathizer is not the same thing.

And seacrest might want to look up the definition of slander before throwing that term out.

This is a sad path for the board to go down. I thought we moved past this.

Have a blessed day

I really did not grasp just how many neo-Nazi sympathizers this board seems to have. Very sad!

That's dumb and reductive.

Bills, generally appreciate your work. How many Asian people do you know in real life?

One of my closest friends is Laotian.

White nationalists aren't as bad as ISIS and their operatives. There is no arguing this, and to say so is not implicit support of either group. Thinking so is just stupid.

This is where you are again wrong. If you were to poll blacks and i'd assume Jewish people in this country and ask them which of the two groups are they most threatened by your answer would be white nationalists. To be frank it's not even close

Are you saying there are more supremacist inspired attacks than Islam fueled terror attacks? Just looking at the news the last year I wouldn't think that true or close. Do you mean US only? I would like to see the stats.

Let's be clear about this though. I know there are stats out there that indicate right wing-inspired attacks are more numerous than attacks inspired by different ideologies, but groups like ISIS are beyond depraved. They indiscriminately target innocent civilians no matter the setting. Let's just not make this into a who is better/who is worse thing.

Is reading this worth my time?

IMU posted something Nazi related. Seacrest didn't like it and edited/deleted it. Then we all argued.

So in summary, no.

Calling someone a Nazi and calling someone a Nazi sympathizer is not the same thing.

Do you think you can say anything you want to anyone and when you royally piss someone off you can just say "uh sorry" and it's going to be like it never happened?
I was more than willing to drop it and live in peace around you. I was polite to you. I sure as fuck didn't like you any.
Being polite and living in peace is indeed the responsible thing to do.
And I didn't talk behind your back.

Then I saw the way you treated a friend of mine. Similar to how you treated me. How you treated his family... Similar to how you treated mine. Shit man you're still doing it today with your Sig line.

I've been watching over the years. You're certainly not a good man. I used to attribute it to your age but you're not a kid any more. You're just a mean little man who wants to hurt people.
Yeah I happily busted you out for the shit you talked tbat I caught. Maybe if you weren't so self absorbed you'd have thought about who was within earshot when you talk like you do.

This is being conveniently ignored.

That's what I thought. US only.

And you're still a bitch poster. GTFO Eric.

Please don't delete or edit this post on my account, but this is clearly evidence of selective moderation, no?

Please don't delete or edit this post on my account, but this is clearly evidence of selective moderation, no?

It's a pretty fine line.

Anyway, there's an interesting conversation to be had here if it could be done dispassionately and without rancor which I doubt. Should people be able to hold bad beliefs and express those beliefs in a nonviolent manner without being attacked?

What we're really talking about is thought policing. We could use religion as an example. All the Abrahamic religions are supremacist by their very nature. Christians and Jews don't believe their supremacy will be manifested until they get to the next world. I don't believe that world exists so I have little problem with such supremacist thought. Muslims on the other hand, believe that their supremacy will be enshrined here on earth. That's an issue. I don't care of you think I'm an infidel. Just don't try to subjugate me or cut my head off. I'm certainly not going to attack you simply because you believe I'm a heathen.

Is reading this worth my time?

I'm not following the first name use.

I'm not following the first name use.

Anyone can think or believe what they want but history doesn't really support what you continue to suggest. I'm not familiar with Muslim history in Europe. As far as the U.S. goes their actions are reactions to U.S. policy. There is a direct correlation. Religion is convenient spin by people that continue to promote the fallacy that the U.S. is infallible.

I will definitely kill that if IMU wants me to. I would consider it more inappropriate in certain cases, but IMU has never tried to be anonymous. And some guys actually use their real first names. A couple have used their last.

I don't see where he called you a Nazi or a Nazi sympathizer. Let me know if he does.