Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

Sneakers O'Toole wrote:

This is so confusing. IMU said JLN is pro-nazi. I saw the post before it was edited, and JLN saw the post as he quoted it, so I'm sure he'd confirm it. So with that said, "pro-nazi" is the same as calling someone a nazi, but calling someone a nazi sympathizer is not?

Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer?

What about a Nazi synthesizer?

long time guy wrote:

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

long time guy wrote:

It was Pro Nazi. As I said JLN could clear this up but he loves to misrepresent things. This is right in his wheelhouse.

Exactly what have I misrepresented in this thread? Go fuck yourself dude, seriously.

Again comprehension. Seacrest has misstated what the quote was. You can clear it up. He said that Imu referred to you as a Nazi. He didn't. All you have to do is state what was said. I'm sure you know. It's not for others to clear up when you can do it.

You are contributing to the misunderstanding by remaining silent. You were extremely vocal during the whole Doxxing thing yet you are silent now. Step up to the plate and stop being so damn hypocritical.

Yes, all my posts in this thread on the topic are the silent variety.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

Perhaps, but it's not my board [but I'm on that board]. I would say that categorizing anyone as a Nazi in any capacity could be injurious to their real life persona in the modern political climate. With that in mind, were it my board, such claims—especially those without proper merit or passed off casually—would get a closer look from me, yeah.

[1]I'm just going by what you said earlier in that you didn't ask for it to be edited or deleted. It didn't seem like you meant "not yet, but I was about to".

[2]I know it's easy for me to say since I rarely post, but this board is a better read with little to no moderation and as had been mentioned before, it seems impossible to moderate in this way without it coming off as arbitrary. This was ignored the first time I referenced it (unless I missed a response), but just today BD was accused of being pro forced sterilization of all black people. That would seem injurious to BD's real life persona, if that's the criteria we're using.

[3]And just to clear this up, and if you don't draw any distinction, that's fine, but IMU said you were pro-Nazi, correct?

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

Sneakers O'Toole wrote:

Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer?

What about a Nazi synthesizer?

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

Sneakers O'Toole wrote:

Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer?

What about a Nazi synthesizer?

BeerFan, who I dont mind at all, has an ongoing series featuring Frank and Trig Palin in all his posts.

rogers park bryan wrote:

BeerFan, who I dont mind at all, has an ongoing series featuring Frank and Trig Palin in all his posts.

Yes they both are implying that the other molests children. Is that better or worse than being a Nazi?

Anyone want to give me the cliff notes on the Apologist/IMU feud?

BeerFan, who I dont mind at all, has an ongoing series featuring Frank and Trig Palin in all his posts.

:lol:

OK SeaFan. Have at it!

Hank Scorpio wrote:

:lol:

OK SeaFan. Have at it!

It was mentioned to Jimmy earlier today before you or RPB posted. Frank was asked last week to about about behavior modification. You see how that works?

I'll let you get back to your hangover. And it's BigCrest to you pal.

Seacrest wrote:

Hank Scorpio wrote:

:lol:

OK SeaFan. Have at it!

BigCrest does sound a lot better. Carnitas and some sunshine fixed me right up.

Author:	Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Don Tiny wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Sneakers O'Toole wrote: This is so confusing. IMU said JLN is pro-nazi. I saw the post before it was edited, and JLN saw the post as he quoted it, so I'm sure he'd confirm it. So with that said, "pro-nazi" is the same as calling someone a nazi, but calling someone a nazi sympathizer is not? Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer? What about a Nazi synthesizer? Well that'd just be radical.

Author:	long time guy [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: long time guy wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: long time guy wrote: It was Pro Nazi. As I said JLN could clear this up but he loves to misrepresent things. This is right in his wheelhouse. Exactly what have I misrepresented in this thread? Go fuck yourself dude, seriously. Again comprehension. Seacrest has misstated what the quote was. You can clear it up. He said that Imu referred to you as a Nazi. He didn't. All you have to do is state what was said. I'm sure you know. It's not for others to clear up when you can do it. You are contributing to the misunderstanding by remaining silent. You were extremely vocal during the whole Doxxing thing yet you are silent now. Step up to the plate and stop being so damn hypocritical. Yes, all my posts in this thread on the topic are the silent variety. Was it Nazi or Pro-Nazi?

Author:	Don Tiny [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
I guess in the end I don't much care who says what they think was written. If it wasn't deleted, there'd be zero discussion. It's all rumor and innuendo now. Worthless.

Author:	Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Sneakers O'Toole wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Perhaps, but it's not my board [but I'm on that board]. I would say that categorizing anyone as a Nazi in any capacity could be injurious to their real life persona in the modern political climate. With that in mind, were it my board, such claims—especially those without proper merit or passed off casually—would get a closer look from me, yeah. [1]I'm just going by what you said earlier in that you didn't ask for it to be edited or deleted. It didn't seem like you meant "not yet, but I was about to". [2]I know it's easy for me to say since I rarely post, but this board is a better read with little to no moderation and as had been mentioned before, it seems impossible to moderate in this way without it coming off as arbitrary. This was ignored the first time I referenced it (unless I missed a response), but just today BD was accused of being pro forced sterilization of all black people. That would seem injurious to BD's real life persona, if that's the criteria we're using. [3]And just to clear this up, and if you don't draw any distinction, that's fine, but IMU said you were pro-Nazi, correct? 1. Yeah I wasn't going to huff and puff over it, because it's not my board to moderate, and I had already used up a lot of capital on the whole doxxing fiasco, so making a stink over this as well could make me more of a problem child than I already am. I disagreed with it vehemently, and think it's a pretty shitty thing to go throwing around at people for not singing as loud as the rest of the choir (or posting to twitter enough about how great PK Subban is, etc.). 2. I would say my real life persona is now a lot closer to my board persona than MANY here, and that would be taken into consideration in the hypothetical world where I am King of the Board. 3. That's what the post said when I quoted it, though I can't speak to what it read in any earlier versions. And no, I don't see much of a distinction. "Nazi" is the operative term, here.

Author:	badrogue17 [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Don Tiny wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Sneakers O'Toole wrote: This is so confusing. IMU said JLN is pro-nazi. I saw the post before it was edited, and JLN saw the post as he quoted it, so I'm sure he'd confirm it. So with that said, "pro-nazi" is the same as calling someone a nazi, but calling someone a nazi sympathizer is not? Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer? What about a Nazi synthesizer? Because.....obligatory

Chicago Fanatics Message Board http://chicagofanatics.com/

Editing Posts http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=108001	Page 15 of 15

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
The "pro nazis" win!

Author:	pittmike [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Don Tiny wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Sneakers O'Toole wrote: This is so confusing. IMU said JLN is pro-nazi. I saw the post before it was edited, and JLN saw the post as he quoted it, so I'm sure he'd confirm it. So with that said, "pro-nazi" is the same as calling someone a nazi, but calling someone a nazi sympathizer is not? Which is worse, being a Nazi sympathizer, or a Nazi empathizer? What about a Nazi synthesizer? Borg? Edit I meant Korg.

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:27 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
rogers park bryan wrote: BeerFan, who I dont mind at all, has an ongoing series featuring Frank and Trig Palin in all his posts. Yes they both are implying that the other molests children. Is that better or worse than being a Nazi?

Author:	Frank Coztansa [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
I am not implying. JimmyBeerFan lives in the far east so that he has access to underage prostitutes. He posted pictures way back when.

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
OK SeaFan. Have at it!

Author:	Curious Hair [ Sun Aug 20, 2017 4:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
rogers park bryan wrote: BeerFan, who I dont mind at all, has an ongoing series featuring Frank and Trig Palin in all his posts. Yeah, if we have this new no-dragging rule, then it needs to be used here. And I don't even get along with Frank!

Author:	Furious Styles [ Sun Aug 20, 2017 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Frank took Trig Palin's last name?

Author:	Seacrest [ Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Hank Scorpio wrote: :lol: OK SeaFan. Have at it! It was mentioned to Jimmy earlier today before you or RPB posted. Frank was asked last week to about about behavior modification. You see how that works? I'll let you get back to your hangover. And it's BigCrest to you pal.

Author:	Hank Scorpio [ Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Seacrest wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: :lol: OK SeaFan. Have at it! It was mentioned to Jimmy earlier today before you or RPB posted. Frank was asked last week to about about behavior modification. You see how that works? I'll let you get back to your hangover. And it's BigCrest to you pal. BigCrest does sound a lot better. Carnitas and some sunshine fixed me right up.

Page 15 of 15	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Seacrest [ Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Editing Posts
Hank Scorpio wrote: Seacrest wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: :lol: OK SeaFan. Have at it! It was mentioned to Jimmy earlier today before you or RPB posted. Frank was asked last week to about about behavior modification. You see how that works? I'll let you get back to your hangover. And it's BigCrest to you pal. BigCrest does sound a lot better. Carnitas and some sunshine fixed me right up. Glad to hear it.