Chicago Fanatics Message Board
http://chicagofanatics.com/

Kate Steinle verdict
http://chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=109778
Page 3 of 5

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

312player wrote:
You'd have to see the confession to know if this guy confessed or was being fed scenario after scenario by a detective and agreed to a few.. He's obviously of low intelligence,nutrition and common sense. Maybe the jury saw the " confession" and didn't buy it.

He got back here 5 different times after being deported and has several aliases. I'm pretty sure his intelligence is higher than most posting here. :lol:

Author:  312player [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
You'd have to see the confession to know if this guy confessed or was being fed scenario after scenario by a detective and agreed to a few.. He's obviously of low intelligence,nutrition and common sense. Maybe the jury saw the " confession" and didn't buy it.

He got back here 5 different times after being deported and has several aliases. I'm pretty sure his intelligence is higher than most posting here. :lol:




That's the funny part man, a guy with an IQ of room temp can get in this country a dozen times past our border control. He's pretty much a functioning genius..im not exaggerating.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
You'd have to see the confession to know if this guy confessed or was being fed scenario after scenario by a detective and agreed to a few.. He's obviously of low intelligence,nutrition and common sense. Maybe the jury saw the " confession" and didn't buy it.

He got back here 5 different times after being deported and has several aliases. I'm pretty sure his intelligence is higher than most posting here. :lol:




That's the funny part man, a guy with an IQ of room temp can get in this country a dozen times past our border control. He's pretty much a functioning genius..im not exaggerating.

:lol:

Never heard him speak but I'll take your word for it. Doesn't exactly seem like Mensa material.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

rogers park bryan wrote:
Why would he say he shot at a seal if it was accidental?

Assuming police are telling the truth about that, hard to believe it was any kind of accidental firing.

Well maybe there's something we don't know.


Nah bro. Fucker is guilty as sin.

Author:  America [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

the absurdity of municipalities refusing to enforce federal law, especially when that federal law literally pertains to the basis for the idea of countries as a concept, is what this story will mean to the average American. I'm pretty pro mexican immigration into the USA, I've made that clear I think, but the sanctuary city shit needs to end. Its is not up to a handful of cities to have their own immigration policy separate from the rest of the country. This isn't like the weed laws, it really undermines American sovereignty over itself.

Author:  312player [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

https://48hills.org/2017/10/17/zarate-t ... al-health/

Author:  shirtless driver [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Wasn't one of the basic concepts behind "sanctuary cities" was so that undocumented people could 'say' something if they 'saw' something without fear of reprisals? Something to that effect, or am I thinking of something else?

In not completely unrelated news, this just happened up in my neck of the woods last week.
http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/t ... b77dc.html

This sack of shit was out on an I-Bond for his SECOND domestic. He likes beating up the various mothers of his various sons.
Never should've been out on the streets, let alone a felon in possession of a firearm at a bar that he was forbidden to enter, and 'blackout drunk' on booze he was forbidden to consume.....
Now 2 brothers are dead because little MMA wanna-be Nate Kivi felt disrespected.
Good thing he likes rolling around in cages getting humped and choked out by dudes, I hear there's plenty of that in prison.

http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/h ... ed996.html

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

We should have a contest to see who can be the angriest about this. RPB's $9.50 Binny's card to the winner.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

From the article:

The interview took place late at night, and at times Zarate fell asleep. He was rambling and not always coherent. Some of the things he said to the officers were clearly wrong.

Author:  HawaiiYou [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

shit like this puts independents like me back in the trump camp temporarily until the emotion wanes.

shit decision. SF is the same as those towns in Mississippi that still practicing Jim crow.

this is why everyone hates SF. and i don't blame them.

big winner : TRUMP

Wall is going to be real now.

DACA is dead now.

Borderline deportations are out the window now. You're 1% illegal, sayonara.

Author:  HawaiiYou [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

shirtless driver wrote:
Wasn't one of the basic concepts behind "sanctuary cities" was so that undocumented people could 'say' something if they 'saw' something without fear of reprisals? Something to that effect, or am I thinking of something else?

In not completely unrelated news, this just happened up in my neck of the woods last week.
http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/t ... b77dc.html

This sack of shit was out on an I-Bond for his SECOND domestic. He likes beating up the various mothers of his various sons.
Never should've been out on the streets, let alone a felon in possession of a firearm at a bar that he was forbidden to enter, and 'blackout drunk' on booze he was forbidden to consume.....
Now 2 brothers are dead because little MMA wanna-be Nate Kivi felt disrespected.
Good thing he likes rolling around in cages getting humped and choked out by dudes, I hear there's plenty of that in prison.

http://www.kenoshanews.com/news/local/h ... ed996.html


Listen. I lived in the bay area for many years. My kids live there now. I visit them a lot and stay over for weeks and months like I'm doing now. These bullshit sanctuary cities were a noble idea. But now it's out of control. It's more for these ultra liberal fucks to feel good about themselves and think they're living in a some fantasy utopia.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

SpiralStairs wrote:
From the article:

The interview took place late at night, and at times Zarate fell asleep. He was rambling and not always coherent. Some of the things he said to the officers were clearly wrong.

Alright.

Let's throw the confession out.

Let's also pretend he accidentally discharged the weapon(this is bullshit beyond reasonable doubt, IMO, but I'll play along)

It appears they proved he had the gun in his possession and it seems pretty clear the gun discharged while in his possession. Are there other charges beyond possession the prosecutors could have charged him with? There has to be an escalation of charges for simply having possession of a gun vs "accidentally" discharging and killing someone with that same gun, right?

Author:  HawaiiYou [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

I m more mad and angry at the dumbfucks on this jury and at our system.

I guess this is how African Americans feel on a daily basis when they get screwed over by the Justice System.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

HawaiiYou wrote:

I guess this is how African Americans feel on a daily basis when they get screwed over by the Justice System.

:lol: :lol:

I still don't know if this is a mult but if it is, it's a brilliant one.

Author:  312player [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

FavreFan wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
From the article:

The interview took place late at night, and at times Zarate fell asleep. He was rambling and not always coherent. Some of the things he said to the officers were clearly wrong.

Alright.

Let's throw the confession out.

Let's also pretend he accidentally discharged the weapon(this is bullshit beyond reasonable doubt, IMO, but I'll play along)

It appears they proved he had the gun in his possession and it seems pretty clear the gun discharged while in his possession. Are there other charges beyond possession the prosecutors could have charged him with? There has to be an escalation of charges for simply having possession of a gun vs "accidentally" discharging and killing someone with that same gun, right?




You didn't read the article: " sig sauer, hair trigger, no safety"

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

FavreFan wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
From the article:

The interview took place late at night, and at times Zarate fell asleep. He was rambling and not always coherent. Some of the things he said to the officers were clearly wrong.

Alright.

Let's throw the confession out.

Let's also pretend he accidentally discharged the weapon(this is bullshit beyond reasonable doubt, IMO, but I'll play along)

It appears they proved he had the gun in his possession and it seems pretty clear the gun discharged while in his possession. Are there other charges beyond possession the prosecutors could have charged him with? There has to be an escalation of charges for simply having possession of a gun vs "accidentally" discharging and killing someone with that same gun, right?


Don't know enough about the California penal code to say. However, state's attorneys are generally not looking to leave out charges if applicable.

As to your comment about a charge being "escalated", that's what the involuntary manslaughter charge was there for. The state apparently didn't meet its burden on that to garner a conviction.

The family is free to sue him in civil court for being responsible for her death and he will most likely be found liable. They are going to have no chance of collecting any money from him though.

Edit: the video interview with the police was presented to the jury, or at the very least, was not barred from being presented as evidence at trial.

Author:  HawaiiYou [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

FavreFan wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:

I guess this is how African Americans feel on a daily basis when they get screwed over by the Justice System.

:lol: :lol:

I still don't know if this is a mult but if it is, it's a brilliant one.


I wonder what your avatar has to say about this , infowars.com

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
From the article:

The interview took place late at night, and at times Zarate fell asleep. He was rambling and not always coherent. Some of the things he said to the officers were clearly wrong.

Alright.

Let's throw the confession out.

Let's also pretend he accidentally discharged the weapon(this is bullshit beyond reasonable doubt, IMO, but I'll play along)

It appears they proved he had the gun in his possession and it seems pretty clear the gun discharged while in his possession. Are there other charges beyond possession the prosecutors could have charged him with? There has to be an escalation of charges for simply having possession of a gun vs "accidentally" discharging and killing someone with that same gun, right?




You didn't read the article: " sig sauer, hair trigger, no safety"

I don't know. Not an expert but I've handled a handgun multiple times before. Even hair trigger guns are pretty hard to discharge accidentally if you aren't a toddler. I guess if he really is mentally ill then that would be a valid explanation.

But still, that doesn't address the bottom part of my post that was quoted.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

HawaiiYou wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:

I guess this is how African Americans feel on a daily basis when they get screwed over by the Justice System.

:lol: :lol:

I still don't know if this is a mult but if it is, it's a brilliant one.


I wonder what your avatar has to say about this , infowars.com

He blames Democratic Gay Rape and I tend to agree.

Author:  DannyB [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

MANY saw this coming. The stupid prosecutor picked the wrong case to politicize. And grossly overcharge.

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=106343&p=2773104&hilit=accident#p2773104

Author:  ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 2:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

HawaiiYou wrote:
shit like this puts independents like me back in the trump camp temporarily until the emotion wanes.

shit decision. SF is the same as those towns in Mississippi that still practicing Jim crow.

this is why everyone hates SF. and i don't blame them.

big winner : TRUMP

Wall is going to be real now.

DACA is dead now.

Borderline deportations are out the window now. You're 1% illegal, sayonara.


One can only hope.

Build that wall!

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

DannyB wrote:
MANY saw this coming. The stupid prosecutor picked the wrong case to politicize. And grossly overcharge.

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=106343&p=2773104&hilit=accident#p2773104



None of us sat on that jury. I'm not going to criticize the people who did and who actually heard the evidence.

But I will say it's one hell of a coincidence that a guy who has a long criminal record and who had repeatedly been deported just happened to be in the wrong place and found a stolen gun on the ground, picked it up and had it inadvertently go off in his hand and kill a woman. If you're that unlucky you should probably be locked up just on general principle.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

So I assume that all the people that believe in sanctuary cities think this guy should just be allowed to live in San Francisco now?

Author:  badrogue17 [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
DannyB wrote:
MANY saw this coming. The stupid prosecutor picked the wrong case to politicize. And grossly overcharge.

http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... t#p2773104



None of us sat on that jury. I'm not going to criticize the people who did and who actually heard the evidence.

But I will say it's one hell of a coincidence that a guy who has a long criminal record and who had repeatedly been deported just happened to be in the wrong place and found a stolen gun on the ground, picked it up and had it inadvertently go off in his hand and kill a woman. If you're that unlucky you should probably be locked up just on general principle.

Yeah but the other end of that argument is preposterous . This guy has been deported 5 times, you’d think he would want to keep as low a profile as possible so he’s going to pick up a gun and murder some random citizen ? That makes no sense either .

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

badrogue17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
DannyB wrote:
MANY saw this coming. The stupid prosecutor picked the wrong case to politicize. And grossly overcharge.

http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... t#p2773104



None of us sat on that jury. I'm not going to criticize the people who did and who actually heard the evidence.

But I will say it's one hell of a coincidence that a guy who has a long criminal record and who had repeatedly been deported just happened to be in the wrong place and found a stolen gun on the ground, picked it up and had it inadvertently go off in his hand and kill a woman. If you're that unlucky you should probably be locked up just on general principle.

Yeah but the other end of that argument is preposterous . This guy has been deported 5 times, you’d think he would want to keep as low a profile as possible so he’s going to pick up a gun and murder some random citizen ? That makes no sense either .


To get there we have to assume the guy is a rational human being. There are people out there who just don't give a fuck.

In any case, if the guy wasn't in the U.S. he wouldn't have been able to "find" the gun and have it "accidentally" go off in his hand.

Also, why are the usual critics of the NRA so quiet on this one?

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

I heard on the radio that the gun was stolen from an unlocked federal agent's vehicle or was that fake news?

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Hank Scorpio wrote:
I heard on the radio that the gun was stolen from an unlocked federal agent's vehicle or was that fake news?


The car wasn't unlocked, but the gun was loaded and in a backpack in the car.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Also, why are the usual critics of the NRA so quiet on this one?

What should the NRA be criticized for?

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But I will say it's one hell of a coincidence that a guy who has a long criminal record and who had repeatedly been deported just happened to be in the wrong place and found a stolen gun on the ground, picked it up and had it inadvertently go off in his hand and kill a woman. If you're that unlucky you should probably be locked up just on general principle.
Even Jose Quintana is not that unlucky.

Author:  Joe Orr Road Rod [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Kate Steinle verdict

Kirkwood wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Also, why are the usual critics of the NRA so quiet on this one?

What should the NRA be criticized for?


GUNS!

Page 3 of 5 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/