When will this clown do the unthinkable and go a day without lying? And when will his supporters find public integrity?

God forbid a week without drama.

Stop making stuff up, Jorr. That is not happening and you know it.

January 18, 2018:

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton ... sig-784081

Not Jezebel. Not Babe. Not Baby McNown's semi-weekly newsletter. This is Newsweek.

Lawrence Lessig, the Roy L. Furman professor of law and leadership at Harvard Law School, penned an essay for Medium in October outlining a series of hypothetical scenarios that could take place should the ongoing probe find that the Trump campaign actually conspired with Russia to influence the results of the election.

Who is Lawrence Lessig?

Who is Lawrence Lessig?

You should get in your safe space. Let me know if I can bring by a set of safety pins for you.

A hypothetical scenario could be the Zombie Apocalypse. Be better than this, JOrr.

RPB wins again. Old Dumbfuck Bob incapable of a serious discussion resorts to ad hominem.

I read both Chicago papers everyday and consume a lot of other media. I'm pretty comfortable in saying that nobody who posts here is any more informed than I am.

In every presidential election there is a large segment of the population that is unhappy with the outcome, but I've never seen an attempt to make a person's vote the barometer for measuring his character until Trump was elected. Although there are countless reasons why people vote for a candidate and they really shouldn't be questioned, the pussy hat people, like their leader before them, have declared Trump voters "deplorable". That's a real problem for the country. A lot of people voted for Clinton for no other reason than that she has a vagina. I think that's pretty dumb, but I don't want to take their votes away and I don't think they're deplorable for doing such a thing.

Please e-mail one of the foremost weeklies in America and advise them to be better. Will you do that?

Please e-mail one of the foremost weeklies in America and advise them to be better. Will you do that?

January 18, 2018:

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton ... sig-784081

Not Jezebel. Not Babe. Not Baby McNown's semi-weekly newsletter. This is Newsweek.

Please stop retardedly interjecting with variants of "do better." That shit sucks.

January 18, 2018:

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton ... sig-784081

Not Jezebel. Not Babe. Not Baby McNown's semi-weekly newsletter. This is Newsweek.

RPB wins again. Old Dumbfuck Bob incapable of a serious discussion resorts to ad hominem.

I read both Chicago papers everyday and consume a lot of other media. I'm pretty comfortable in saying that nobody who posts here is any more informed than I am.

In every presidential election there is a large segment of the population that is unhappy with the outcome, but I've never seen an attempt to make a person's vote the barometer for measuring his character until Trump was elected. Although there are countless reasons why people vote for a candidate and they really shouldn't be questioned, the pussy hat people, like their leader before them, have declared Trump voters "deplorable". That's a real problem for the country. A lot of people voted for Clinton for no other reason than that she has a vagina. I think that's pretty dumb, but I don't want to take their votes away and I don't think they're deplorable for doing such a thing.

January 18, 2018:

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton ... sig-784081

Not Jezebel. Not Babe. Not Baby McNown's semi-weekly newsletter. This is Newsweek.

FWIW Newsweek is getting ripped pretty hard by the other left leaning media for this.

In every presidential election there is a large segment of the population that is unhappy with the outcome, but I've never seen an attempt to make a person's vote the barometer for measuring his character until Trump was elected. Although there are countless reasons why people vote for a candidate and they really shouldn't be questioned, the pussy hat people, like their leader before them, have declared Trump voters "deplorable". That's a real problem for the country. A lot of people voted for Clinton for no other reason than that she has a vagina. I think that's pretty dumb, but I don't want to take their votes away and I don't think they're deplorable for doing such a thing.

I'm glad I take up so much real estate in your head. I'll take an answer on the smoking question any time you're ready you fucking baby.

You've got to be kidding. This very thing was the essence of the Anti-Communist phony Craze starting in the 40's, the Southern Strategy starting in the 60's and Values Voters of the 80's. Those together with the ridiculous assertions that Democratic voters/leaders are soft headed, unpatriotic, limp wristed, soft on crime and are Bad! for the military and our "world standing" have been the core planks in every republican platform since 1952.

Even now your words belie your argument here and consistent Trump defense. You love the position that "a lot of people voted for Clinton for no other reason than that she has a vagina", because it seems to free your conscience to defend Trump while infantilizing a large portion of the plurality that voted for her. But yet you continually are aggrieved by the assertions that many never Trumpers see primarily him as a bigot, a liar, a fraud, incompetent and completely incapable of surrounding himself with zealots only interested in lining their pockets in any cynical way possible. And that MANY of his supporters are cut from the same cloth. Then disingenuously claim that you don't find a lot of her voters deplorable, just pretty dumb.

You've got to be kidding. This very thing was the essence of the Anti-Communist phony Craze starting in the 40's, the Southern Strategy starting in the 60's and Values Voters of the 80's. Those together with the ridiculous assertions that Democratic voters/leaders are soft headed, unpatriotic, limp wristed, soft on crime and are Bad! for the military and our "world standing" have been the core planks in every republican platform since 1952.

Even now your words belie your argument here and consistent Trump defense. You love the position that "a lot of people voted for Clinton for no other reason than that she has a vagina", because it seems to free your conscience to defend Trump while infantilizing a large portion of the plurality that voted for her. But yet you continually are aggrieved by the assertions that many never Trumpers see primarily him as a bigot, a liar, a fraud, incompetent and completely incapable of surrounding himself with zealots only interested in lining their pockets in any cynical way possible. And that MANY of his supporters are cut from the same cloth. Then disingenuously claim that you don't find a lot of her voters deplorable, just pretty dumb.

Is it really so hard to understand that defending the way our government is set up has nothing to do with defending Trump?

If we're going to declare those who didn't vote as we did horrible people we may as well end this experiment right now. Because the U.S. no longer exists.

Fantastic post.